Running against Bush == Running away from John McCain

Is it true, and/or is it helpful (or could it backfire, as the term “running away” has a double meaning)?

Biden: We’ll go after the Bush administration
I’ve been getting a lot of e-mail about this clip of Joe Biden speaking at a campaign event yesterday in which he promised to go after the Bush administration

for “violations of the……

NYT: “The surge, clearly, has worked”
posted at 10:50 am on August 22, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/22/nyt-the-surge-clearly-has-worked/

The result, now visible in the streets, is a calm unlike any the country has seen since the American invasion toppled Saddam Hussein in April 2003. The signs — Iraqi families flooding into parks at sundown, merchants throwing open long-shuttered shops — are stunning to anyone who witnessed the country’s implosion in 2005 and 2006.

You feeling this yet dumba$$,or are we going to have to get
Saracuda to b!tch slap this into your ignorant head like she
did Obama last night.

How The Surge Worked
By Peter Mansoor
Sunday, August 10, 2008; B07
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/08/AR2008080802918_pf.html

The increase in U.S. forces, moreover, was dwarfed by the concurrent expansion of Iraqi forces by more than 140,000 troops. Over time, Iraqi units grew more capable and increasingly took the lead in providing security, backed by coalition advisers, ground forces, intelligence and air power. Operations this spring in Basra, Baghdad, Mosul and elsewhere — though not always smooth — have demonstrated the growing effectiveness of the Iraqi army. Without the change in strategy and additional forces provided by the surge, the effort to improve the capabilities of Iraqi forces would have died stillborn, swallowed by the sectarian violence that was ripping Iraq apart by the end of 2006.

Has stuck-on-stupid Biden been right about anything.

Please Mr. “lets suck up to the Iranian’s and give them 200 million dollars after 9/11″ tell us more.

Please Mr. “lets split Iraq up along sectarian lines”,please
share more of your infinite wisdom.

Please Mr. “5 deferments/chickenhawk”,show us more of your
international expertise.

Whow,wait a second,I think I may have found something Biden
was right on:

But we can’t seem to talk about what comes next without talking about Iraq. It’s obvious we must end the reign of Saddam Hussein. It would be unrealistic, if not downright foolish, to believe we can claim victory in the war on terrorism if Saddam is still in power.
– Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in Remarks On Saddam Hussein At The Center For Strategic And International Studies Forum, Washington, D.C., February 4, 2002
And of course Mr. Biden voted for the War in Iraq.

Typical,hypercritical,lying a$$ liberal.

Biden: Iraq surge success a ‘fantasy’
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/11/biden_iraq_surge_success_a_fan.html

Amid reports that the U.S. military surge has helped to stabilize insurgent attacks in Baghdad and a recent Pew Research Center poll that found 48 percent of Americans now believe the U.S. military effort in Iraq is going well, up from 30 percent in February, Biden said, “This whole notion that the surge is working is fantasy.
“The surge was to provide breathing room. Breathing room for what purpose?” he asked the officials assembled from Iowa’s 99 counties. “To work out a coalition government to end this civil war.”
Biden said there is “let me emphasize, no political progress among the major factions” in trying to govern Iraq. Biden has long supported a decentralized federal government system for Iraq.

Here is the reality that democrats like Biden can’t handle:

Remember Those Iraqi Benchmarks? Well, Guess What…
June 17, 2008 – by Abe Greenwald
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/remember-those-iraqi-benchmarks-well-guess-what/

Then something happened. The gains of the troop surge allowed the Iraqi government and citizenry to implement the security measures and legislative acts called for by the U.S. The benchmark line of argument quietly died. Here, then, is the brief life and glorious death of the great benchmark trope.

I am still looking forward to seeing them post Obamas transcripts from Columbia. Where is that story? Did he fail or place so poorly that if it wasn’t for affirmative action he never would have been accepted? or was it something more…

What about those Annenburg Files?

I can see the Clintons now, voting for McCain thinking she can make a comeback in 2012.

Unless, unless… you’re still running for the Senate in 2008?

Show your cards, Joe.

Did you opt for the backup plan?

You know, like when they spent all of the 90′s and after 9/11 saying Saddam was an immanent threat
and needed to be taken out because of his WMD’s/ties to terrorism.

When they voted for war.

What they really meant was,we wanted another UN resloution
and big dumb Bush tricked us into voting for war.

Do Biden’s words here leave you with the impression that he thought the surge would bring down the violence:

Biden Declares Troop Surge a Failure
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/04/biden_slams_bus.html

“The surge is not succeeding, and the president refuses to see that,” Biden declared to reporters on a conference call.

“It’s like squeezing a water balloon, you squeeze it in one place, it bulges somewhere else,” said Biden, who has advocated a decentralized federal system in Iraq.

Biden is a lying ignorant fool.

Why aren’t the Republicans tabulating the cost of DEMOCRAT investigations that have turned up NOTHING?

The only thing worthless lawyers like Obama/Biden know how to do it to litigate.

Lawyers produce nothing of value beyond conflict. The Democrat Congress is chalk full of lawyers and they’ve produced nothing.

One of the bumper stickers on my Avalanche is :
How’s that impeachment going DUMB…(Picture of a donkey/democrat).
Really pisses liberals off because it smashes their central theme of Bush lying about the war and being a war criminal.
If all of this was true,they have the power,Impeach.
PUT UP OR SHUT UP!!
They don’t so they won’t.

What really gets me mad about this clip is this blatant lying about how they always said that the surge would bring down violence but that it would not create political progress.
The surge has worked,there has been major political progress (15 of the 18 benchmarks met).Shia,Sunni,and Kurds are working together in a freely elected government.

Here’s Biden pre-surge:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/08/23/politics/fromtheroad/entry4376910.shtml

“The surge isn’t going to work either tactically or strategically,” Biden told the Boston Globe last summer. “Tactically it isn’t going to work because … our guys go in and secure a neighborhood, but because we don’t have enough troops, we have to turn it over to the Iraqis, and they can’t hold it or won’t hold it.”

Biden called Petraeus “dead flat wrong” on the surge and said an Iraqi government made up of Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds is “not going to happen.”

Now I know liberals live in their starbucks/Berkeley bubble
but I hope he brings this idiotic line of bullsh!t he is trying to serve up here to the debates,because Palin will B!tch slap his a$$ with the truth of where he and his leader
Obama really stood when the country needed them most.

Which President’s administration suffered this sort of scrutiny without some prior, clear indication of criminal activity? Which suffered it even with some indication of criminal activity? Where, exactly, does Biden evince a proper role of Congress to carefully scrutinize millions of documents looking, hoping for some indication that a crime has been committed?

This is not legitimate review, no matter how carefully Biden attempts to wrap it in non-committal language. This is a witch hunt. It’s obsessive. It’s deranged. And, even if it’s not strictly unconstitutional, every signer of our Constitution would regard it as gross dereliction of duty on the part of Congress.

I’ve written of this matter as a possible cause of civil war. If our chosen leaders are to be prosecuted by their opposition for what amounts to policy differences, what’s the point of remaining cooperative members of the body politic?

The “going after the previous officeholder” meme is addressed therein.

Interesting book.

Mew

Hmm soubds alot like the Terroists to me.
I guess you can now call Democrats Terroists.

Or just plain idiots.