Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Will Palin get helped by the opposition attacks?

posted at 10:15 am on September 2, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Sarah Palin has had a wild ride since becoming John McCain’s running mate.  Having governed in Alaska, the Palins haven’t experienced the national spotlight, and the opposition attacks must seem daunting — and in some cases, insane.  But rather than making Americans uncomfortable with Sarah Palin, Charles Mahtesian at Politico believes it might allow Americans to identify more closely with Palin than any of the other candidates:

Fishing permit violations. A blue-collar husband who racked up a DUI citation as a 22-year-old. An unmarried teenage daughter who is pregnant and a nasty child custody battle involving a family member.

All of this, to one degree or another, has surfaced in recent days as a result of efforts to discredit or undermine Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. But these revelations may have the opposite effect: In one sense, they could reinforce how remarkably unremarkable she is.

So far — and it is hard to tell what the future may hold for Palin’s unexpected national candidacy — the travails of the Palin family probably seem awfully familiar to many average Americans. It is this averageness that makes her such a politically promising running mate for John McCain — and such a dangerous opponent for Democrats. Many voters will find it easy to identify with her family’s struggles — a significant advantage in an election where the voting calculus is so unusually and intensely personal.

Color me skeptical on this point.  Last night, The Nation’s John Nichols and I discussed this on BBC Radio, and we both agreed that most of these issues will fade, whether or not one gets repulsed or inspired by them now.  None of them really have anything to do with Palin’s ability to govern, and she’s already established that in Alaska with a highly popular first two years as chief executive of the state.

People relate to Palin with or without these non-issues.  Who can’t relate to a “hockey mom” who went to a state university and worked her way up from the bottom of the political structure, while balancing family needs?  Most people know at least a few women just like her; most people have at least one Sarah Palin in their family.  In contrast, not too many have a POW war hero or a Harvard Law School graduate in their circle of acquaintance.

As Mahtesian says, that’s what makes attacks on Palin so dangerous for the Obama campaign.  Attack a Senator, and people shrug.  Attack a hockey mom, and people recoil from the familiarity of it.

So what should the Obama campaign do?  They may do best to just ignore her.  People don’t usually vote for running mates anyway.  George H. W. Bush won election even after Dan Quayle cratered in his debate with Lloyd Bentson and turned into a big liability on the campaign trail.  Quayle turned into a better VP than most would admit, but during the campaign he did nothing at all to help Bush 41, and he won anyway.  Regardless of who the running-mate is, voters eventually focus on the top of the tickets when making their choice.  Attacks on Palin will gain them nothing, and could cost them significant goodwill among the middle-class voters they need to woo.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Keep going after Gov. Palin. It will forge our affection and respect for her that much more.

carbon_footprint on September 2, 2008 at 10:16 AM

I don’t know, but it doesn’t make the attacks any less egregious.

silverfox on September 2, 2008 at 10:16 AM

I wonder if the tremendous giving to McCain’s campaign has tapered off since the controversies appeared?

eea on September 2, 2008 at 10:17 AM

I’m skeptical it will help but I agree the issues will fade away.

And then McCain will cream Obama in the debate and the country will be saved!

lodge on September 2, 2008 at 10:18 AM

The GOP needs to go on the offensive. That is what the convention is for.

Let Sarah shine. And let Obama be a bully.

It was nice to see that the McCain Campaign jumped on the media for spreading rumors for the democrats.

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:18 AM

werd..

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:18 AM

And we saw what the Obama’s people are gonna do. Governor Vilsak was on CNN claiming “Sarah Palin is a right wing extremist pick for the base.”

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Palin will get hurt, or helped, far more by what she does Wednesday evening in her convention speech than by any of the attacks or attack backlash. My hunch is that most American voters are still waiting to meet her, and tomorrow night’s the night when they’ll make up their minds about her.

JudetheFossil on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Obama has felt the pain of the attacks on her. You can bet their internal polling has shown it is a loser.
The best is eventually they are going to have to either take ownership of dkos or turn their back on them.
The shrill dkos will force a showdown between them and the Dem leadership.
As long as they do not attack dkos directly, the case can be made that they are not sincere on their stance that Palin’s family is off the table.

right2bright on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

You bet your sweet bippy. Since when did teenage pregnancy trump attending a church where America was damned and having a relationship with an unrepentent terrorist and convicted felon and, and, and………..?

el hombre on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Stand tall, IRON LADY, Sarah !!

stenwin77 on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Not only will the insane, made-up, and vicious attacks help her and the McCain campaign, I think the main reason they (the psycho nut-roots) are scrambling, nasty, and latching onto ANYthing that might hint of ANY sort of scandal is because they are suddenly scared that Barry O’Hopenchange just might LOSE.

JamesLee on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Attacks on Palin will make them seem as petty as they really are.

Woman’s Right to Choose Great, as long as the choice is to KILL the baby not marry the father and raise it.

Family Values Great as long as the value is to not have a nuclear family unit.

Not a single word from the press on the Rezko relationship lately? How about Palin’s SON, going to Iraq as infantry vs. Biden’s son going as what…. a JAG officer? Who is the elitist group NOW?

originalpechanga on September 2, 2008 at 10:21 AM

I wonder if the tremendous giving to McCain’s campaign has tapered off

Since he’s taking public funds, it would have, by necessity, tapered off regardless, right?

tree hugging sister on September 2, 2008 at 10:21 AM

The more I see Gov Palin and her family attacked, the more I like her. I said this in another thread, that I have way more in common with her than the other three combined.

I also admire her husband – especially his restraint. I have a feeling my own husband would be facing charges if anyone attacked our family the way the left is attacking the Palins.

Anna on September 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM

Palin’s life story suggests she is tough enough to withstand the MSM attack machine. She needs to come out and say, “You’ve got a problem with me? Fine, but leave my family alone.” That would be a call to arms for a nation of protective parents.

Terrie on September 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM

Keep it up. Every single low blow that the terrified left throws just galvanizes Palin even more. Eventually this will start hurting Obama, and it will take a goddamn miracle for him to get those points back.

MadisonConservative on September 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM

It’s only been a couple of days since the announcement. The attacks have been continuous and scurrilous. So far everything they’ve uncovered has made her even more popular with the base. I’ve been doing this for a while and I’ve never seen a voter base so psyched up. It’s true voters don’t usually vote for the second slot but in this case the second slot may significantly increase voter turn out and that’s good for McCain.

Oldnuke on September 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM

She will be helped because the attacks on her will be viewed as attacks on middle America.

Religious_Zealot on September 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM

ABSOLUTELY!!!

coffee260 on September 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM

BTW Fred is up tonight look for some fire back at the dems

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM

I think the attacks won’t really help Sarah Palin but will reflect negatively on the Obama campaign. Regardless of whether or not he had any part in them any attack on McCain or Palin will be attributed to Obama.

So no, it won’t directly help her but it will help them get elected I think.

Kronos on September 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM

I can’t remember being as mad about anything in politics as I have been about the way the left is treating Palin. I realize it’s because they’re scared of what she means for the election, but it’s still disgusting.

I’m registered as an independant and had never contributed to a candidate in my life. Both of those changed over the weekend.

Good job nutroots.

BadgerHawk on September 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Maybe, but it’s a huge distraction this campaign did not need. Will voters be comfortable putting an unknown, un-vetted, short-experienced, potentially distracted mother of kids with issues into the Oval Office?

Mostly, this reinforces the idea that McCain shoots from the hip far too often on big decisions. George W. B. has been doing the same thing, and the country hates him for it.

I distrust McCain for that very reason.

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM

“Most people know at least a few women just like her; most people have at least one Sarah Palin in their family.”

Ed, you’re a Minnesotan. As a former Minnesotan, I can relate to this statement. Just in my own family, here are people who can relate personally to Sarah Palin in some ways:
–my wife (45 y.o. former Minnesotan);
–my sister (43 y.o. Minnesota suburban baseball mom)
–my other sister (41 y.o. evangelical Christian suburban basebal/hockey mom)
–my 20-something niece (who lives in Minnesota, who has a young child and recently got married
–my evangelical Christian brother-in-law and his wife, who live in Colorado

The list can go on and on.

John2698 on September 2, 2008 at 10:25 AM

will be interesting to see the number of people that watch her speech this week

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:26 AM

The attacks from the left are sexist, cruel, untruthful and reflect the slimy nature of the left. Yes, this will help honorable people see what the Democrats really are.

rplat on September 2, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Next to Palin Biden is going to come across as a blowhard who’s spent too much time inside the Beltway and is out of touch with the real concerns of the average American.

rbj on September 2, 2008 at 10:26 AM

no. The attacks are killing Mccain with people who are voting for him based on the experience issue.

SaintOlaf on September 2, 2008 at 10:27 AM

BTW Fred is up tonight look for some fire back at the dems

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Just saw Fred on Fox blasting the New York Times. Seems he’s firmly behind the pick.

Oldnuke on September 2, 2008 at 10:27 AM

All the dirt they have managed to dig up on Palin (DUI, teen pregnancy, custody battle) is pretty run of the mill, while the dirt on Obama (commie-poet mentor, terrorist colleage, anti-American spiritual guide, etc.) is much more out of the mainstream.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

It’s all up to her is what it boils down to.

Just picture the convention. She gives a good speech and has them cheering and clapping, and then she says…

“Now I did just want to touch on my daughter Bristol. I’d ask you all and the media and the opposition to leave her alone as she goes through a difficult period in her life, but I will just say, and I have to say, that she made a choice and choices have consequences, and her life will be different forevermore from having made that choice. Batter? Worse? Who can say?

But I do know that when I hold the precious life that will be my grandchild in my arms for the very first time, I won’t even for a minute consider that she, or I, or anyone else, has been punished with a baby.”

Typhoon on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

In a Fox interview this morning we learned that Susan Estrich is outraged by these attacks and believes these “sexist” attacks will benefit Palin with female voters.

Liz Trotta on the other hand claims that most conservatives don’t think mothers should work when they have a family to raise. Megyn Kendall was shocked and took offense at this characterization of conservative ideology. There is an email blitz in progress…

Buy Danish on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

according to Todd, attacks on her kids “fire her up”

thats it nutroots, fire up teh Cuda, lmao

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

you know the left attacked us for “Swift boating” Kerry now it seems the want to swiftpregnancy” Palin. This is really desperation hour

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM

People are very offended by the ugly smears on Palin and her family. The attacks also highlight the nonsense about how “wrong” it is to bring up Obama’s shady friends. YOu can attack a 17 year old child but not Rezko, Wright and Ayers.

I have only heard negative comments about the media on this whole thing, most frequently the belief that the Obamedia is desperate.

Nasty attacks on a child is the best they can do?

clnurnberg on September 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM

I’m just pissed off now. The amount of irresponsibility, the lack of discipline, and the overall BS coming out of the MSM over Sarah Palin and her family is enough to make me sick. They REFUSED to cover the Edwards story, they REFUSE to cover Ayers and Rezko, and they REFUSE to treat Sarah Palin with the amount of respect she deserves. I hope this fires some people up as much as it’s firing me up, because this is ridiculous.

nickj116 on September 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

you forgot… he was smoking crack back when Cuda was giving birth…

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM

If I was the GOP I would take that angle of attack. That they left has embarked on a campaign to smear a mother of 5 just to gain political power.

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM

All the dirt they have managed to dig up on Palin (DUI, teen pregnancy, custody battle) is pretty run of the mill, while the dirt on Obama (commie-poet mentor, terrorist colleage, anti-American spiritual guide, etc.) is much more out of the mainstream.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

What “custody battle” are you referring to?

stenwin77 on September 2, 2008 at 10:32 AM

John Nichols and I discussed this on BBC Radio, and we both agreed that most of these issues will fade.

Ed, you must be thinking of Teddy, Barney, Condit, Jefferson, McKinney, Silky et al.

Republican mistakes deemed scandalous by Democrats don’t fade, they are illuminated like the Statue of Liberty on the Fourth of July by their complicit cohorts in the MSM.

fogw on September 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM

Color me confused. First you say this,

Color me skeptical on this point.

Then you say this,

Attacks on Palin will gain them nothing, and could cost them significant goodwill among the middle-class voters they need to woo.

MarkTheGreat on September 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM

Yes.

ExTex on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

If I was the GOP I would take that angle of attack. That they left has embarked on a campaign to smear a mother of 5 just to gain political power.

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM

bingo, and really Palin could come out and really take it to them and get away with harsh rhetoric if she wanted too

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

The more I look at this vp pick I can’t help but think that it was better than previously thought. Who’da thunk it that a VP pick would create such interest. Can you compare the media attention to any previous running mate? I don’t think so. Palin seems to be stealing McCain’s own thunder and that’s very good.

shick on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

What I find most interesting is that most commenters here are highly supportive, even adoptive of ‘Cuda’ Palin, when they know really relatively little about her.

What happens for the average voter, knowing only the MSM memes. Confuses people, makes some more likely to support her, if not the ticket; makes some less likely to support her, and the ticket. I see it as a net negative so far.

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

What “custody battle” are you referring to?

stenwin77 on September 2, 2008 at 10:32 AM

I believe he’s refering to the divorce battle around which the “Trooper Gate” nonsense is revolving.

TooTall on September 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM

We need Palin on the stump talking about Energy Indpedence and Drilling, she is so perfect on these points and clearly shows she’s in command of the issues. i.e. not an empty skirt.

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Palin: “Thanks for the warning. By the way, do you know what they say the difference is between a hockey mom and a Pit Bull?”

McCain aide: “No, Governor.”

Palin: “A hockey mom wears lipstick.”

If this is any indication.. we gonna have some fun

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Lets not forget one thing as well. Yesterday, at a regular campaign stop in St. Louis, McCain and Palin pulled a crowd roughly half the size of the scripted, choreographed, hyped, star-studded, and ticketed speech-of-a-lifetime by the Big Zero, er, O.

That’s a good sign in my opinion.

JamesLee on September 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM

We’ve already seen a number of well known leftists criticizing the Obama campaign for their attacks on Palin.

Dismay can, and often does lead to a lack of enthusiasm.

A lack of enthusiasm can and often does lead to vote suppression on election day.

MarkTheGreat on September 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM

What remains is, the people who know her best–Alaskans–love her the most of all.

RBMN on September 2, 2008 at 10:37 AM

But we know the left is gonna demonize anyone who runs. It doesnt matter if it was palin or mitt or pawlenty. This attack machine was poised ready to go.

William Amos on September 2, 2008 at 10:37 AM

What “custody battle” are you referring to?

stenwin77 on September 2, 2008 at 10:32 AM

It’s mentioned in the article above. Part of the brother-in-law/troopergate situation, I gather.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM

Another thought to add. Unlike the majority of politicians she seems unmotivated by the power of the office she might wield. That is very rare and an enormous plus.

shick on September 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM

women next to me at work is talking about Palin right now, all negative but I think she was a hillary supporter.

has all the b.s. completely mixed up. saying Palin may not have given birth to her child, then speaking about her daughter and saying she shouldn’t have announced that. i’m like wtf? but this is a reality, average people get half the b.s. the media feeds them

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM

In a world filled with fear of a nuclear Iran, messy energy markets, illegal immigration, high taxes and te ever-looming recession….the media focuses on the pregnancies of Gov Palin and her teenage child?

I don’t see how the media and the Obama campaign (Obama the result of a teen pregnancy, his birth occurring less that 7 month after the wedding)can be helped by this.

clnurnberg on September 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Fishing permit violations? Darn, I mayhave to re-think my stance.

I find that the best part about all of this, is that Palin is what nearly all candidates pretend to be.

It doesn’t really matter which party, but candidates always run on bringing change to Washington, as someone outside the beltway, not afraid to take on their own party when corruption arises, has a strong commitment to the party’s basic and most important values, as someone who is down to earth and in touch with the people, and so on.

Here is one candidate who doesn’t have to make all of that up. Plain is someone who doesn’t need handlers and focus-groups to tell her what to wear, how to act, and what to say.

It is really hilarious to watch the hysteria on the left. I suppose there are many who have reservations on the right as well, but I find that a lot of opinion is clouded by sublime sexism.

reaganaut on September 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Already posted this on another thread:

Sarah Palin is the best possible choice. She consolidates the base and will excite all the party activists to go work for her.

We don’t like it when our women folk are treated badly by lower lifeforms.

Go Sarah! oh yeah- and John.

It seemed apropos of this thread as well.

ExTex on September 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Despite what BO said yesterday, ie to “lay off”, I doubt the nutroots will stop. It isn’t their style to use good judgment. They are not politically savvy.

Continuing to beat up on Palin and her daughter will probably prove to be very damaging to the Dems. And, let’s not forget that the Obamamessiah’s mother was an unwed, pregnant teen for a few months, too. Makes one wonder if they think she should have had an abortion.

Cody1991 on September 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM

The questions raised will only offend those who are already offend by her.

Independents will wonder why the media is even bringing this up.

Sir Andrew on September 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM

Sarah Palin should be qualified for VP by the very act of running for the office.

Now where did I hear that?

Bishop on September 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM

BO knew the TImes was coming out with these attacks today, what he did yesterday was pre-emptive cover.

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:44 AM

What I find most interesting is that most commenters here are highly supportive, even adoptive of ‘Cuda’ Palin, when they know really relatively little about her.
trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

And most people don’t know Obama, or Biden…the fact is many of us have been supporting Palin for months.
Just because you don’t know much about her, or that the MSM had missed the obvious signs so didn’t do any research, is a sign that the MSM and others aren’t quite as smart as they think they are.
I sensed more of an embarrassment from the media ( a many psoters), they were caught without being prepared.

right2bright on September 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM

If McCain destroys Bambi in the debates like he should, it just won’t matter. Bambi is going to be like a deer in the headlights.

And speaking of headlights, when I think of a Palin-Biden debate, I think of the Nixon-Kennedy debate. At worst, Palin will lose on the radio and win on TV.

misterpeasea on September 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM

The one charge against her that really worries me at this point is the alleged “flip-flop” on the “bridge to nowhere” funding. Has anyone come across a more detailed examination of that bit of business that might prove excupatory for Sarah’cuda?

ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 AM

She’ll stand up there and simply say “I just want to say one thing to our opponents and their allies who attack me and my family: We’re tougher in Alaska!” and there’ll be 20 minutes of cheering and that’ll be that.

TexasJew on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 AM

And speaking of headlights, when I think of a Palin-Biden debate, I think of the Nixon-Kennedy debate. At worst, Palin will lose on the radio and win on TV. – misterpeasea on September 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM

I hadn’t thought about it that way. Good point.

ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 AM

Obama is already whining “I have more experience than her” based on running a campiagn!

He looks pretty silly comparing the decisions about lighting, Che flags, anti-semitic blogs for Obama, and teleprompters with running an actual state.

And he continues to run against the VP candidate, “beating up on the girl”, so to speak. McCain will look very presidential.

Where is Biden in all this?

clnurnberg on September 2, 2008 at 10:47 AM

BO knew the TImes was coming out with these attacks today, what he did yesterday was pre-emptive cover.

jp on September 2, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Agreed, “tsk, tsk, what a shame, leave Palin alone”, meanwhile his little surrogates along with the dkos kids are let loose.
The smart crime boss never commits the crime…

right2bright on September 2, 2008 at 10:47 AM

Sarah Palin should be qualified for VP by the very act of running for the office.

Now where did I hear that?

Bishop on September 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM

sniff – that was beautiful.

ExTex on September 2, 2008 at 10:47 AM

On the plus side, she’s going through a baptism by fire. If she emerges from this relatively unscathed it bodes well and gives testiment to her fortitude. She strikes me as a no-nonsense frontier woman type, governing with a baby on one hip and a gun on the other. I am still cautiously enthusiastic.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM

I’m not at all worried that people will start believing what they read and see.

The MSM has VERY little credibility, ESPECIALLY with the people who would identify with Sarah.

You can tell a lot about a person by the character of their enemies.

If the MSM is against Sarah, then that’s better than any endorsement she could receive from any Republican or conservative leader.

Religious_Zealot on September 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM

Obama has felt the pain of the attacks on her. You can bet their internal polling has shown it is a loser.
The best is eventually they are going to have to either take ownership of dkos or turn their back on them.

The shrill dkos will force a showdown between them and the Dem leadership.

As long as they do not attack dkos directly, the case can be made that they are not sincere on their stance that Palin’s family is off the table.

right2bright on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

Interesting point. I hope you’re right.

fossten on September 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM

You bet your sweet bippy. Since when did teenage pregnancy trump attending a church where America was damned and having a relationship with an unrepentent terrorist and convicted felon and, and, and………..?

el hombre on September 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

I hate to be skeptical, but my answer is: in a campaign that more resembles an Jerry Springer episode than a political contest.

So long as the MSM continue to give Obama a pass on everything they are trashing Palin for, Obama will win. Meanwhile the Democrats are feeding the frenzy, with total disregard to ethics or sense.

I think it was a mistake for the McCain camp to not put her in a press conference this AM, if only to do the updates for the RNC schedule. She can come out and look strong and in charge of the convention, then simply tell reporters that there is no more to say about her daughter when they ignore asking relevant questions in favor of feeding the gossip beast.

By keeping her locked away and only sending out a written statement, she looks like she’s weak and hiding. The sooner she comes out and looks in charge and taking care of business the better.

Damiano on September 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM

A former sportscaster who named her daughter Bristol? Seems like she’s had her eye on a higher office for a while.

I think the line of attack on Palin is experience. Obama looks like Biden next to her. I mean, do we want a woman who 20 years ago seemingly had aspirations to be a Sportscenter anchor and who’s political experience includes being mayor of a town of 10,000 and a half term as Governor of Alaska next in line to the presidency behind a 72-year-old man with a history of cancer?

This could be a disastrous pick for McCain.

Tom_Shipley on September 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM

Quayle turned into a better VP than most would admit, but during the campaign he did nothing at all to help Bush 41, and he won anyway.

Isn’t that because Dukakis was a horrible candidate, above anything else? The VPs might very well make the difference in this election.

Seixon on September 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM

thats it nutroots, fire up teh Cuda, lmao – stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM

Teh Cuda. Heh. I like that. A lot

ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM

I think McCain’s campaign would do well to begin linking the lefty blogs to Obama and the Dems.
The vile is bad enough now that they can force the Dems to either embrace, or turn their back. They can’t turn their back on them, so they will have to take ownership.
But the Republican campaign has to begin forcing the issue as a talking point.

right2bright on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

From Michele Catalano:

Isn’t it the Democrats who are supposed to be all about privacy in matters of the womb?

Very. Well. Said.

ExTex on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

The one charge against her that really worries me at this point is the alleged “flip-flop” on the “bridge to nowhere” funding. Has anyone come across a more detailed examination of that bit of business that might prove excupatory for Sarah’cuda?

ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 AM

So Sarah changed her mind based on the response of her constituency?

And this is somehow worse than Obama voting against medical aid for babies that survived abortion attempts??!!

Religious_Zealot on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Drop the gloves! Drop the gloves!

Leopold Stotch on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM

i assume you were referring to me, since i used “cuda”.. Let it be known, i’m a fredhead, and only supported Mac before this pick because of how much i’m against BO..

Now, i’m fired up because we have a pro gun, pro life conservative, who’s getting slammed like noone i’ve ever seen… shes possibly a fresh new face for the party, something we desperately need…

her likability will be at least +10 by the weekend if they keep it up…

Fire up teh Cuda

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

She strikes me as a no-nonsense frontier woman type, governing with a baby on one hip and a gun on the other. I am still cautiously enthusiastic.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM

Runs well in Alaska, the mountain west perhaps. Not so good in Michigan and Florida, methinks.

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:52 AM

Hey Allah, could you post a list of liberal trolls who you tolerate here just to make it easier for us to remember and ignore them?
FWIW.

silverfox on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Anyone catch that Bill Kristol comment in the Weekly Standard? About the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull?

coldwarrior on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM

We need a good comparison of Biden to Palin. Plagiarism vs troopergate. Hmmmm…. lying to inflate yourself in the eyes of others or (allegedly) having someone fired to protect your family.

thedudesblog on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Any guesses on when we’ll see the first Palin press availability?

Big S on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM

To borrow from the Messiah:

“She’s the one we have been waiting for.”

digitalintrigue on September 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM

Despite what BO said yesterday, ie to “lay off”, I doubt the nutroots will stop. It isn’t their style to use good judgment. They are not politically savvy.

Cody1991 on September 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM

But the ONE has spoken!

shick on September 2, 2008 at 10:55 AM

I don’t see how a focus on pregnancies can “run well” anywhere!

No one smeared AL Gore over his son’s illegal drug use and speeding, but the Palin girls choices (and NO illegal behavior is involved) are seen as reflections on the mother’s ability to lead?

clnurnberg on September 2, 2008 at 10:55 AM

ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM

hopefully it holds.. and i hope shes meaner than a junkyard dog.. i would love nothing more than to see her completely go off this week..

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:55 AM

On Drudge’s headlines now:

NY TIMES FEATURES 3 PAGE ONE STORIES ON PALIN’S TEEN DAUGHTER IN TUESDAY EDITIONS…

Philadelphia Columnist Warns: ‘If McCain wins, look for full-fledged race war’…

Baltimore Columnist: ‘Palin pick insulting on so many levels’…

Washington Columnist: ‘McCain’s cynical choice’…

The MEDIA is this country is dispicable!

ExTex on September 2, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Runs well in Alaska, the mountain west perhaps. Not so good in Michigan and Florida, methinks.

What about the South? They like a fiesty woman.

Disturb the Universe on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM

Perceptions of Palin have changed little with all the media attention, according to Rasmussen. She has been slightly harmed amongst women, though.

Good: “After a long weekend of Democratic criticism of John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate, over half of voters (52%) still have at least a somewhat favorable opinion of the Alaska governor. Thirty-one percent (31%) view her very favorably. ”

Bad: “But Democrats and unaffiliated voters are clearly more skeptical of Palin’s candidacy now than they were in the earlier survey. “

lodge on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM

When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Sarah Palin.

CurtZHP on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM

her likability will be at least +10 by the weekend if they keep it up…

Fire up teh Cuda

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM

Yes, credit where due, for ‘Cuda. However, will anything like that meme stick with enough semi-interested voters to make a positive difference, whereas confusion reigns only two months to voting day?

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM

coldwarrior on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Fire up teh Cuda…

stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM

Not so good in Michigan and Florida, methinks.

trailboss on September 2, 2008 at 10:52 AM

There is more to Michigan than the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint corridor. No nonsense gun-toting frontier types can be found from Ted Nugent’s Jackson County to the top of the UP.

coldwarrior on September 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4


You must be logged in to post a comment.