Palin goes on offense in Troopergate, releases affidavit
posted at 10:42 pm on September 2, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Everyone knew it was coming but I thought they’d wait longer to do it. Presumably they decided to take advantage of the raging river of information and push it out now rather than wait until things quiet down, when the media can focus all of its attention on it. Here’s the PDF. The recitation of facts is only around 10 pages; pay special attention to the short section on the Bailey phone call, which is where she’s most likely to have problems. This is, ostensibly, a legal document written for ethics investigators, but the true aim of course is to put the public on notice about her former brother-in-law’s “eccentricities” so that if she’s found guilty of crossing an ethical line she can claim she acted the way any good daughter or sister would when family’s threatened. The defense, in other words, will be that she’s morally right even if she’s ethically wrong.
Not the actions of a woman ready to pull an Eagleton, needless to say.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Yeah! That’s my girl! I can’t wait for tomorrow night’s speech. If it’s like Fred’s tonight, I’m going to be giddy.
Spirit of 1776 on September 2, 2008 at 10:44 PM
I am really glad they are getting ahead of this. This seems to me to be the only real possible speed bump, so for them to get out front and set the story – that’s good news.
Spirit of 1776 on September 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM
GIVE ‘EM HELL, SARAH!!!!
YOU are a GREAT AMERICAN and a HERO!!!!
grtflmark on September 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM
We need more offense!!!
ninjapirate on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 PM
and the ‘cuda smiles, and BARES HER TEETH …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 PM
Push em BACK! Push em BACK! Waaaay BACK!
xyzzy on September 2, 2008 at 10:47 PM
go sarah! i, for one, will sleep very well knowing that this kind of lady is “a 72-year-old heartbeat away”.
homesickamerican on September 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM
After the trooper-in-law threatened her father and tased her nephew, the governor had to wonder when he was going to come after her. That’s my reading of the situation and would explain the First Dude’s involvement.
Terrie on September 2, 2008 at 10:49 PM
I will say it now; Sarah is as tough as any man in Washington. She will be just fine.
carbon_footprint on September 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM
If John McCain is just another partisian Republican, then I’m a Michael Moore Democrat….. Lieberman
Rovin on September 2, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Fred nailed that speech. And with “Troopergate” I’m not sure what they’re going to use to attack Palin. All I needed to hear is what the guy did and I suddenly didn’t care what kind of pressure she put on anyone to fire him. I have to think that it’ll be similar with most voters. I mean the guy tasered his step-son, drank while on the job, and threatened to kill his wife’s father and they want us to be outraged over her trying to get this guy fired?
I frankly would be less likely to vote for her if she DIDN’T try to get him fired.
Kronos on September 2, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Just wait until tomorrow and when she debates Biden (as in she’ll still be the VP nominee wobbly-ones).
Haunchie on September 2, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Wait, did we read the same document? She has expressly denied any wrongdoing and expressly denied firing anyone over Wooten. What she said is that Bailey did not act with her approval or authority — a statement Bailey himself supports. By the way, contrary to your title, Allah, that document is not Palin’s affidavit.
I maintain: the BIGGEST thing Palin needs to do right now is to be 100% honest about everything, even if it makes her look a little bad. In political investigations, the coverup — or even innocuous actions that look like a coverup (see Scooter Libby) — is worse than the crime. They are looking for Palin to trip up and fail to mention something, or cover something up, or change a story, or SOMETHING. She needs to treat lightly here, and I’m glad she’s hired counsel. I hope she’s got a great white collar legal team working for her on this.
Outlander on September 2, 2008 at 10:53 PM
Fire up teh Cuda
stlpatriot on September 2, 2008 at 10:54 PM
If Sarah didn’t have issues with the guy’s behavior….
anyway on offense baby.
sven10077 on September 2, 2008 at 10:54 PM
I give props to HotAir, I was informed on Palin here, but I did my own homework. Integrity jumped out at me about Palin. I’ll take integrity over experience every time. You can count on someone who chooses to do the right thing over someone who is “politically” experienced.
I liked her 10 minutes into my research and like her more with every new thing I learn about her. Doing the politically expediant is easy… doing something else is doing something else entirely.
Hog Wild on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Put Ann Coulter in charge! I want the GOP to play aggressive offense. The Dems play dirty so hit ‘m and hit ‘em hard.
DerKrieger on September 2, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Like i said before, no one, and i mean no one (sane that is. leaving out 90% of Kos commentators) will blame her for (supposedly) pressuring for the firing of a guy who TASED his own stepson and threatened to kill his father-in-law (Palin’s father).
madne0 on September 2, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Offtopic, I just heard that her entire family including the boyfriend will be joining her onstage tomorrow after she’s done speaking. Um, I’m not so sure that’s a good idea. I think it’s better for her to meet them offstage or something(with the media around). Putting her family up there might bring up thoughts of her not being able to be devoted to her job. The bristol situation will add a little elmer gantryish factor to it too.
ninjapirate on September 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Comeback? She’s there! I like her!
DfDeportation on September 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Sarah Palin is what America needs. Now is the time for Sarah Palin to come to the aid of the country.
Travis1 on September 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
I just love how the Lib media were on edge on the VP
announcement,and like an F-22 Raptor,claws extended,
pull the rug right underneath Obama and Hilrod!
As the First Women VP,outstanding mission!
And Hope is going to meet SarahCuda,waffle destoyer
extradanere!!!!
canopfor on September 2, 2008 at 11:00 PM
That’s true. I’m still offended when all of Mitt’s extended family came on the stage after his “faith” speech. I asked myself, is this man ready to lead? Can he be devoted to his job?
Spirit of 1776 on September 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM
General G Patton.
Someone needs to make a video,with Sarah Palin on the stage
as Patton,then flood the video websites!!
canopfor on September 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM
After reading both her personal statement, her affidavit, and her requesting that she be investigated if is almost impossible if not improbable that she did anything wrong at all.
azcop on September 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM
Better argument than the Clinton’s ever had…………
………. Go Sarah, GOOOOOOOOOO!
Seven Percent Solution on September 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM
Amen, Patriot. Time for Sarah’cuda to start shredding Democrat flesh. Let the bloodletting begin.
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:06 PM
Drudge has it that the NYT is running three (3) front page stories on Palins daughter. That institution should be torched. Pitchforks & torches as Beck would say.
wepeople on September 2, 2008 at 11:06 PM
OT, but did everyone notice how totally freaking nuts the crowd went everytime the name Sarah Palin was mentioned? Tomorrow will be historic.
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:07 PM
The Palin family has good reason to be very afraid of the nutjob and he’s still on the job?! Cripes. The whole community needs to be on high alert. Why isn’t he in jail?
kellyjane on September 2, 2008 at 11:07 PM
…..and I’m still lovin’ on the Palinator…….Sarah baby…….
FiveWays on September 2, 2008 at 11:08 PM
The McCain campaign has to be very, very aggressive. Liberal commenters are adding notes to every story that’s written stating false information that Sarah Palin is a secessionist. The “Big Lie” theory of warfare seems to be their purpose. They want to smear Gov. Palin so that lies will sail around for people that aren’t well-informed to believe. It’s like all the crazy rumors that floated around about Obama being a non-citizen or a secretly hostile Muslim. These left-wing loons literally don’t care that it’s all lies.
Jill1066 on September 2, 2008 at 11:08 PM
I think I am in love!
She is an amazing breath of fresh air!
HoosierCon on September 2, 2008 at 11:08 PM
azcop on September 2, 2008 at 11:05 PMShe will come out of this intact and even stronger. Wooten will have to change his name and move to another state.
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:09 PM
Sorry, Azcop
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:09 PM
“I just heard that her entire family including the boyfriend will be joining her onstage tomorrow after she’s done speaking”
GOOD — the crowd will go NUTS; i 1/2 expect them to start chanting bristol and levi’s names …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:10 PM
Never fret, Jill. The storm is nearing its peak. Tomorrow night her speech will electrify an entire nation.
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:11 PM
A successful Woman protecting an abused wife…
Yeah that’s an “argument”
Doogiesd on September 2, 2008 at 11:12 PM
You mean she doesn’t admit to snorting coke in it? How about attending a racist church, that in there? Commie racist mentor at least? Real-estate transaction with a felon? Ok, how about launching here career in the home of a terrorist? No? Ah shoot!
TheBigOldDog on September 2, 2008 at 11:12 PM
For our party’s sake I hope she is telling the truth, because as the famous saying goes, “It’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up”. I would support her whole-heartedly in this matter for firing the guy who wouldn’t fire the jerk of a brother-in-law, but since she claims she didn’t fire him for that reason, the fact that her brother-in-law is a jerk won’t matter if it turns out she was lying.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on September 2, 2008 at 11:13 PM
No that isn’t good. They will be chastised for encouraging this. Teenage pregnancy isn’t the ideal here and they don’t deserve a standing ovation. They don’t deserve to be castigated either.
ninjapirate on September 2, 2008 at 11:13 PM
“if it turns out she was lying”
um, EVERY PIECE OF EVIDENCE points to her telling the truth.
fer cryin’ out loud, allah’s on her side as of tonite, can we stop with the hand-wringing?!
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:14 PM
“They don’t deserve to be castigated either”
but since they HAVE, a rnc that’s even more pissed than usual at the lll networks’ lies is going to take the opportunity to give a giant middle finger to said liars, and i guarantee the bulk of the nation will cheer along with them …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:16 PM
If that happens, I’m gonna feel weird, but I expect her to rock the joint.
Spirit of 1776 on September 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM
TROOPERGATE: Barracuda vs. Barry’s cooties.
PS: If this is troopergate, what was the Edwards’ fiasco?
TRAMPERGATE?
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on September 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM
FYI, don’t go to the VPILF site. Judging from what I”ve seen on it lately it’s actually an anti-Palin site disguised as a pro-Palin site. Just my opinion, though.
DethMetalCookieMonst on September 2, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Speaking of going on the offense, I love this:
Buy Danish on September 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Re: ninjapirate 10:59pm
If the boyfriend was instead Bristol’s *husband*, I’d have no problem with them all being onstage, but since he is *not* married to the pregnant daughter, having him up there is shoving the whole thing down our throats. I’d say Palin is trusting a little too much on Evangelical support if she does that.
Aslans Girl on September 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM
I believe the support will be a direct response to the non-stop attack the MSM, Democrats, and Left have attacked Sarah Palin and HER FAMILY since her nomination….
Trust me, the American people are sick of it, and with the New Media, we have a voice that will not be silenced.
The next slogan for this convention will be……. BACKLASH!!!!
Seven Percent Solution on September 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Mmm. The more I think about this, the less “ethically wrong” she would have been even if she did try to apply pressure. The ex is a dangerous man regardless of who he used to be married to, and, at a minimum, should have been fired. It would have been wrong not to ask why the guy wasn’t gone. That Monagan didn’t get rid of him IS, in a fair world, a stain on Monagan’s reputation, not Palin’s.
What Governor Palin is doing is smart — really, the only thing to do, since the MSM seems adamant not to report the details of the ex brother-in-law, or any mitigating specifics for that matter, just the accusation. From what Ace of Spades said about it, the special investigator (Branchwater?) is no friend to the Palins. I saw him on Youtube on a very biased news report calling for everyone in Alaska to call his office if they had information. What a circus the man is trying to create! I also “question the timing,” as his report is supposed to come out a few days before the election — exactly too late to counter it.
Aardvark on September 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM
” Edwards’ fiasco?”
i think it was so pathetic it didn’t get a name, tho perhaps “babygate” was floated …
/note the lll media deliberately picked troopergate to deflect form the ORIGINAL troopergate — y’know, where it was documented that billy jeff utilized state troopers to bring in the booty calls, etc. …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:21 PM
To be fair, it’s sort of hard to play offense when the democrats have hardly any gameplan. It’s like they are playing Coleco, and we’re playing with Madden.
SouthernGent on September 2, 2008 at 11:21 PM
Don’t you find it rather odd that the same people that view water boarding as torture and have condemned the Bush Administration for its use on 3 occasions, seem to have no problem with a law enforcement officer using a taser on a 10 year old boy? I guess we just need to tase the crap out of enemy combatants in the future.
Jim M. on September 2, 2008 at 11:21 PM
“DethMetalCookieMonst on September 2, 2008 at 11:19 PM”
well duh! since the term is perjorative no matter how much you want to dress it up …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:22 PM
The left has shot their wad in the first couple of days. Tomorrow night, it’s her turn to hit back.
Dudley Smith on September 2, 2008 at 11:22 PM
“having him up there is shoving the whole thing down our throats”
only to uptight worrywart handwringers like yerself …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:23 PM
“Jim M. on September 2, 2008 at 11:21 PM”
shh! they think they’re getting away with the hypocrisy!
:-)
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Actually I could be wrong with my last comment, but it’s really hard to tell from one post on there to another.
DethMetalCookieMonst on September 2, 2008 at 11:25 PM
I’m wondering whether she’s bringing them up so those blue-collar voters in PA and OH will see the pride she has in her family, and also that her family probably looks a like theirs. I bet the boyfriend wears a hockey jersey. Also, I’m guessing that that’s the way she’s always done, and she probably figures if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
smellthecoffee on September 2, 2008 at 11:25 PM
I actually think Ninjapirate is right. I think it’s a bad idea to have him up there with them. Perhaps if the baby was already born it would be one thing but the fact is that the baby hasn’t been born.
DethMetalCookieMonst on September 2, 2008 at 11:26 PM
great link buy danish!
annnd, for those still trying to push the “babydaddy is being forced into the whole thing” meme — “The young parents-to-be haven’t faced any pressure to wed, says the boy’s mother, Sherry Johnston, reporting that the two teens planned to marry before it was known she was pregnant.
“This is just a bonus,” Johnston said.”
let’s hear it for teens that have their heads screwed on straighter than 80% of their “elders!”
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Nah, I’m not a worry-wart, I’m a prude and I think I may be sick if this rumor of the unmarried boyfriend being up there tomorrow night is true.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on September 2, 2008 at 11:27 PM
Having her family up there clearly sticks the media in the eye and says, “We’re still her bitches!”
SouthernGent on September 2, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Aslans Girl on September 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Bristol and Levi have decided to bring a child into the world, they ARE parents. A wedding ceremony at this point is a formality.
oldleprechaun on September 2, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Ethically wrong but morally right? Is that some crazy new age religion? Maybe its late but that does not compute. Relativism at its best. Take a stand – being an alpha dog these days is hard.
Fuquay Steve on September 2, 2008 at 11:29 PM
well, then, have the barf bag handy …
Buckaroo on September 2, 2008 at 11:29 PM
Washington Post:
News Media Demanding DNA Testing of Palin Family
Wa-Po artical link The media are jackals
The Chewbacca Defense on September 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM
In addition to quotes from Monegan, given to ADN, these few quotes seem like case closed to me:
Prediction: Blog rumors of a sex tape by week’s end, that will be picked up by at least MSNBC.
RightWinged on September 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM
You’re absolutely right that teenage pregnancy isn’t something to be cheered, hence, encouraged. But this particular teen-aged couple and their families have had to endure the harshest, most hypocritical, the most vicious journalistic intrusiveness ever. Maybe they deserve a little cheering for that.
jackmac on September 2, 2008 at 11:33 PM
Like you and AllahPundit, I tend to be a worry-wort.
The thing is, I’ve heard you can remove worry-warting with Duct Tape. It’s an old folk remedy. But I’ve never tried it myself. Like, should I rap it around my head, or what? (I’m not very mechanically inclined.)
Anybody got any advice?
Loxodonta on September 2, 2008 at 11:33 PM
Comeback? Hardly.try rope-a-dope.
BohicaTwentyTwo on September 2, 2008 at 11:34 PM
I hate idiots that wave at the camera!
SouthernGent on September 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Never fret, Jill. The storm is nearing its peak. Tomorrow night her speech will electrify an entire nation.
ManlyRash on September 2, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Let’s hope so on both counts because I’m gawdawful tired of having all my favorite sites responding to the drivel.
Bishop on September 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Hell, they’ll probably start the rumor.
Spirit of 1776 on September 2, 2008 at 11:37 PM
I guess lefties just happen to love rogue cops. I had no idea….
RBMN on September 2, 2008 at 11:37 PM
………… More Cow Bell!!!
Seven Percent Solution on September 2, 2008 at 11:38 PM
I want Sarah Palin to say something along the lines, “I have stood down entrenched politicians, and I am not afraid of the media. BRING.IT.ON.” Walk off the stage.
SouthernGent on September 2, 2008 at 11:38 PM
Quite a constrast to an opportunistic woman protecting her husband’s “legacy” by smearing the young employee he took advantage of, isn’t it?
Oh, and please give us a list of Hillary’s foreign policy achievements, Donks. Since she was your runner-up pick, the achievements of your main man must be at least twice as great. What is two times zero, again?
drunyan8315 on September 2, 2008 at 11:39 PM
The more I learn, the more I lover her.
TheSitRep on September 2, 2008 at 11:39 PM
My wife and I don’t often buy Us Magazine. We will never buy another one after this.
Mr_Magoo on September 2, 2008 at 11:40 PM
I have no problem with family on stage, let everyone see that she isn’t ashamed of her daughter.
Real parents stand by their kids, political expediency can suck an egg.
Bishop on September 2, 2008 at 11:40 PM
No… that’s not how it will be taken and debated. No cheering and no castigating for teenage pregnancy.
BTW, my mother was 17yo when he was pregnant with my oldest brother, had a shotgun wedding, and they’ve been together 35 years.
ninjapirate on September 2, 2008 at 11:42 PM
If this is the “new politics” this country deserves what it asks for.
I for one will continue to fight against the tide of evil suffocating the good people of the US of A.
Mr_Magoo on September 2, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Accepting the concequences of your actions, wether good or bad, should bee cheered.
BohicaTwentyTwo on September 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
You know, every person that has ever had sex outside of marriage, and yes, that does include quite a few evangelicals, could but for the grace of God be in her exact position. Just like everyone that has gone out for a few drinks or had a couple glasses of wine at dinner could get a DWI. I certainly don’t approve of out-of-wedlock teenage pregnancy or drunk driving but sheesh let’s not get so church lady on everyone.
mrsmwp on September 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Heh.
I like Newt’s suggestion:
She should say:
“Barak, I’ve been the governor of a state, what have you done?”
Barak, I stood down members of my own party over issues in the best interests of my citizens. What have you done?
Barak, I’ve managed a staff of thousands and was responsible for billions in state revenues. How’s your campaign goin?
BacaDog on September 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Drudge has it that the NYT is running three (3) front page stories on Palins daughter. That institution should be torched. Pitchforks & torches as Beck would say.
wepeople on September 2, 2008 at 11:06 PM
They are so far in the tank, they need to produce their shows in a submarine. How dare they attack a mother of five and her teenage daughers…
DfDeportation on September 2, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Did you make the similar comment the TWO TIMES Barak Obama’s kids were on stage last week? Did you query whether he would be able to do his job?
HawaiiLwyr on September 2, 2008 at 11:46 PM
I certainly hope so. When she says things like “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull?”
.. “Lipstick.” I feel better.
But I also know democrats. And I know how they have 60 days to plan her destruction. And her career, her reputation and her family are all at stake, and targets. All it takes is for one person to come forward like Anita Hill and with the help of the press and the democrats who want Obama towin, Mccain to lose, and Palin to be taken down, they will try. And she seems to be a good woman. And this is a good family. And I don’t want to despise the democrats any more that I do right now.
wise_man on September 2, 2008 at 11:46 PM
It is a family moment. The two of the are engaged. I don’t see a problem with them being on stage together, IF THE FAMILY WANTS IT. And apparently they do.
(Actually, it might help this young couple to sustain their future wedding. Because if that boy ever does her wrong, his face will have been plastered all across America’s living rooms.)
Loxodonta on September 2, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Now if only we can get rid of the Nat’l Enquirer and their crap, we’ll be in good shape.
Sakaki on September 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM
OMG, if she did that, McCain would be lucky if the country didn’t demand that the ticket be reversed, with her as Pres!
I wonder if any politician, and especially McCain, can really appreciate the depth to which the media is despised and loathed by real Americans, after their dastardly behavior over the last 8 years? Turn the Sarahcuda loose!
drunyan8315 on September 2, 2008 at 11:50 PM
I don’t think they have any idea. I wasn’t surprised when he said he was surprised by the amount of enthusiasm.
SouthernGent on September 2, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Moose hunter, hell, she’s after jackass…!
d1carter on September 2, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Comeback from where? The media is so hysterical, that I think it is catching. This lady is quite capable of taking care of herself. I am sure that if she thought there was anything to all this, she would not be where she is right now. It only puts her under more scrutiny and pressure.
Terrye on September 2, 2008 at 11:54 PM
.
What if there is a wedding in the morning? Would that make everything OK for you?
News2Use on September 2, 2008 at 11:55 PM
The interesting thing here is that (and I have no absolute proof, but my belief after watching as much as I can) Sarah Palin had no presidential ambition. That cant be said for Obama, and Biden and McCain. I think that the people who try too hard for this or anything else, might not be the best person for the job. Example, Huckabee tries too hard. Hillary tries too hard. Everything they do, every step they take is all for the single purpose of being elected the president.
And it took McCain to win the primary and then pick Palin. How wonderful would it be that if McCain and Palin win, Palin gets a lot of experience and then we can at some time get to vote for her when she’s ready. I can think of few people who deserve to be the president. For the right reasons. If McCain didn’t pick her, I don’t think she would be so egotistic to seek it out on her own. But the few days of learning about her, and seeing the democrats attack her and her family, it’s nice to have optimism for the future.
wise_man on September 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Thanks for that link. Unbelievable!
“We are being bombarded by e-mails and phone calls from journalists asking when she will be dropping out of the race,” Schmidt said.
TheBigOldDog on September 2, 2008 at 11:57 PM
There are SMART people running this campaign, and they’re quick and tough.
Campaigns ( smart tough campaigns ) win elections
Period; no question mark……
Ask Bush I, or Reagan 1980, or Bush II 2004, or Nixon 1968
Nixon had to wrestle die-hard Democrats as well as Wallace in the South in 1968, and toughed it out while outsmarting HHH and Wallace
Reagan 1980 won New York and New Joysey, and 42 other states, even with a Republican renegade taking five percent of the national vote
The McCain campaign in the past month has been nearly flawless: as fast and persistent as the Obamites, and smarter
Janos Hunyadi on September 2, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »