U.S. News and World Report: Romney’s out; Update: Rove tried to talk Lieberman out of joining the ticket
posted at 9:39 pm on August 27, 2008 by Allahpundit
Any reason to place more stock in this rumor than every other rumor over the past three weeks? Just the timing: Drudge is red-fonting the claim that McCain’s settled on a nominee as I write this, which jibes with Byron York’s sources telling him this afternoon that the inner circle held their final meeting today about the pick. Like York, I’m nervous that the name’s going to leak tomorrow and it’s going to be both swallowed up by Pericles’s oration at the Parthenon and also perceived as an ungracious attempt to step on his spotlight. But McCain’s stuck. He said the nominee would be revealed on the 29th, so they have to start moving on it now to get the logistics in order.
Still in the running, according to U.S. News: Hutchison (groan), Meg Whitman (groan), and … Joementum (groooooan), although NBC speculates that the timing of the rollout means Lieberman’s not the pick since it would force him to campaign on the Jewish sabbath. Exit question: If it’s true that Mitt’s out, what finished him off? Was Huck right about there being too many antagonistic soundbites floating around out there or is it a case of there simply being too much money on the ticket in light of the attack on McCain’s houses? If the latter, bear this fun fact in mind: Whitman, the former CEO of eBay, is worth a cool $1.4 bil.
Update: Here’s Politico’s report claiming that the nominee will be told tomorrow. Note well: There seems to be no Saturday event on the schedule. Joementum?
The GOP nominee-in-waiting will move to immediately change the campaign conversation from Barack Obama’s football stadium acceptance speech Thursday to the new Republican ticket, to be revealed at a noontime Friday rally in a Dayton, Ohio, basketball arena. McCain and his running mate will then travel by bus to Pennsylvania, where they’ll hold an outdoor event at a minor league baseball stadium in Washington County, just southwest of Pittsburgh. On Sunday, the duo will head to suburban St. Louis for another event to be held at a minor league baseball stadium, this one in O’Fallon, Mo.
Update: Bob Novak claims Lieberman tried to talk McCain out of putting him on the ticket, now Politico claims he did no such thing — but was asked to by none other than Karl Rove. I’ve got a baaad feeling about this.
Republican strategist Karl Rove called Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) late last week and urged him to contact Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to withdraw his name from vice presidential consideration, according to three sources familiar with the conversation.
Lieberman dismissed the request, these sources agreed.
Lieberman “laughed at the suggestion and certainly did not call [McCain] on it,” said one source familiar with the details…
“Rove is pushing Romney so aggressively some folks are beginning to wonder what’s going on,” grumbled one veteran Republican strategist.
I’m assuming three sources aren’t coordinating to feed Politico a lie, which means Novak’s piece is probably wrong and was circulated to try to torpedo Lieberman’s chances by making it look like even he’s against the idea. Is Maverick actually going to drop Joementum on us on Friday?
Update: Say, who are the guys with earpieces following Romney around?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »
Well – another Veepthread nears 400 posts. I wonder how many thousands of HotAir posts have been devoted to the two Veeps. Got to be at least 10,000. My guess would be 20,000 in the last month. Whatever the number, thousands have consisted of curses laid down on McCain over people who will not be picked and who never were in much danger of being picked. Thousands others have been predictions that the same people would be great. Most were based on unverified rumors, of course, up to the last moment. We already saw it on the Dem side: Hardly anyone had it right ahead of time.
I don’t want to see Maverick’s presidential jet get shot down by a bad pick, and I have my own ideas about what would be destructive. If he makes a pick I find questionable, I’ll hear him out. I’ll probably vote for him and find reasons to vote for him as long as he doesn’t pick me or Bill Ayers.
In the meantime I strongly doubt that any of these news stories can be trusted. If Romney’s hinted that he’s out, that would be the strongest evidence yet that he’s in, but it’s not really evidence of anything.
I tend to believe that McCain’s real inner circle is a tight-lipped group. Anyone who’s talking is very likely by definition not part of the real inner circle.
CK MacLeod on August 28, 2008 at 12:30 AM
McCain simply MUST put Taffy on the ticket!
Female.
A real attack dog.
Will help us take South Dakota!
Loxodonta on August 28, 2008 at 12:30 AM
I’d like to see Joe Lieberman as the pick.
There. I said it.
Lieberman won’t affect social policy much as VP. He’s a true reach-across-the-aisle (well, halfway across anyway). He’s paid a huge price for doing and saying the right things on national security and quite frankly no one deserves this more than Joe Lieberman.
TallDave on August 28, 2008 at 12:31 AM
Uhh…that would be what we in Tennessee call a “PRO.”
powerpro on August 28, 2008 at 12:32 AM
And Boom! goes the dynamite. Well played John. I am still having a hard time warming up to you, but well played.
hot-heir on August 28, 2008 at 12:32 AM
All three of them are pro-choice. God help this country if McCain chooses any of them. As for me, I’m from California anyway so my vote doesn’t matter.
The Principal Chair on August 28, 2008 at 12:33 AM
So what’s your favorite flavor of Kool-Aide?
You’re just firing for effect right?
Mojave Mark on August 28, 2008 at 12:33 AM
Hmmmm… there is something to this. Starting in Ohio and having him absent from the announced list for MO.
Damn it, John. If you are going to pick someone with limited experience, go with Palin and pick up the female support. Pawlenty is going run over like the deer in headlights that he is.
Damiano on August 28, 2008 at 12:34 AM
You advocate the destruction of the Republican party then. This party will become one of bluedog Democrats. We’ve already given up too much lately.
hot-heir on August 28, 2008 at 12:34 AM
The most inner circle is not talking specifics, because, until tonight, McCain had to make his decision. But, the campaign had to do something to reassure the fundraisers and big donors, who were beginning to freak out.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 12:34 AM
There are some new commenters since the open reg and I have already chosen my favorites, but some of them are living the dream..
Palin would be eaten alive by Joe Biden, I can’t stand joe biden but a few of these names are outclassed by him totally in the political domain, both on the stump, at the debate and during the campaign. Biden was a huge choice for Obama, worrying.. imho the only two with muscle that can goe toe to toe with Joebiden would be Romney or JoeL.
Romney is just as fake & full of crap as biden, it’s a good matchup and lieberman despite the groans is unmatched by the entire field. This guy pawlenty is such a snoozer if McCain picks him he’s going to lose I think.
saus on August 28, 2008 at 12:35 AM
No way. He can’t pick a terrierist.
sloopy on August 28, 2008 at 12:36 AM
Anything else you can share? I’ve been fascinated by your comments so far today.
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM
i’ve been fascinated too…
what are the odds of Palin?
1 in 3?
1 in 10?
battleoflepanto1571 on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Now, now – everyone’s votes matter. If McCain somehow pulls this out, then every additional vote he gets nationwide will help make the Dems STFU.
Also wanted to add: He’s a military guy and he’s got a lot of military guys around him. IF he determines that operational security and tactical surprise are of high value, some extraordinary misdirection up to and possibly even including outright deception would not be out of the question.
CK MacLeod on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Is that an endorsement? :)
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Why are you people still talking about Mitt?
He was NEVER an option. It would be suicide for Mccain.
NOBODY likes Romney. He could spend a billion dollars and it would make ZERO difference.
The VP is Huckabee. It has been been decided LONG AGO.
Are you aware that millions of Huckabee voters voted for Mccain because they didn’t think Huck could beat both Romney and Mccain?
Why did they vote Mccain?
To stop Mitt Romney!
I hope you finally understand that Romney will never be VP and I hope you realize how far out of the mainstream (and/or brainwashed by the RINO media) you are to even think that he could.
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Please, God, let this be true!
sloopy on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
The fact that a pro-choice candidate is even being considered for VP by some Republicans is very troubling.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 12:39 AM
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Ohhhh, that explains where he gets the idea that Huckabee is extremely popular, he’s deluded himself to the point where he thinks McCain voters were secretly Huckabee voters. Now I get it.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:42 AM
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 12:39 AM
I actually agree with you on something.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:42 AM
But! But! But! Terrierists are people too!
Loxodonta on August 28, 2008 at 12:42 AM
As do I.
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Maybe. Or maybe not.
Tom Blogical on August 28, 2008 at 12:43 AM
I do. And I won’t vote for McCain if Huckabigot is his VP pick.
davenp35 on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Worrying about going toe-to-toe with Joe is secondary. The Veep debate is a one-shot deal and not very important. Against a Palin (or a Pawlenty or some other presumably younger and less experienced debater), he’d be as likely to overplay his bombastic self as to “eat her alive.” As long as the VP candidate doesn’t perform so horribly as to throw the P’s judgment into question, other factors are much more important that a direct and personal VP-to-VP comparison.
CK MacLeod on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Is Maverick actually going to drop Joementum on us on Friday?
If so I will vote third party.
mgtanner on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
This thread has gone to the dogs.
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
davenp35 on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
That was one of the Saint’s surveys of one, that he’s always citing.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:45 AM
Hey, that Charlie Crist is starting to sound better and better. Where’s JetBoy?
:-) Hopefully Lieberman laughed at Rove because he knew he wasn’t gonna be the guy anyway and he thought it was funny that Rove fell for the gambit.
hopefully
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 12:45 AM
what are the odds of Palin wants to hop on this shipwreck?
Nil, the same odds as Jindal. Growing stars in the party want nothing to do with this. Romney wanted in because he just spent a ton of his own money trying to brainwash people that he is a conservative and since Huck and McCain were the only others standing at the end he succeeded but didn’t want to wait and see his investment diminish.
If its down to Pawlenty and Lieberman he might as well just pick Lieberman, Pawlenty would be a horrible pick.
LevStrauss on August 28, 2008 at 12:46 AM
+3. Awright! Can we get a “No Ridge, Hutchinson and Liebs” here?????!1?
fiatboomer on August 28, 2008 at 12:47 AM
Sure, Lieberman would go toe-to-toe with Biden.
Yeah, they’d be toe-to-toe because they’d be less debating and more making out on live television.
He wouldn’t make a difference in policy? Well, I guess not, unless something happened to McCain in office (the entire point of the Vice President), and then we’d have a liberal President and likely a Democratic Congress. Great idea.
Seriously, if McCain takes Lieberman, he’s out of his damn mind. It’s hard enough for conservatives to warm up to him, and when they finally begin to do so, he flushes all their concerns down the toilet and expects them to go along with it.
But he’s not out of his mind, right? He won’t do that. Surely he won’t.
Oathkeeper216 on August 28, 2008 at 12:47 AM
I still say the Jindal vs Biden debate could be fabulous viewing.
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 12:48 AM
fiatboomer on August 28, 2008 at 12:47 AM
Second!
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:48 AM
All I can say is what I’ve been told, and report what I saw, within limits. Keep in mind, McCain can change his mind about things so fast that it’s infuriating. BUT:
In the group I was with, when the topic of Lieberman being VP was raised, serious people guffawed. And that’s the best word I can come up with. It seemed like an inside joke that the meme was still out there. I walked away from the conversations relieved. Although my tension has ratcheted up again today being reminded what a Maverick the man is. I don’t think he’s self-destructive, and his new campaign team has been doing a bang-up job.
Insiders wanted Romney to replay the Reagan-Bush dynamic to unite the party. Palin was still in the mix, although I got the impression people were surprised by that–not that they didn’t want her. All the arguments about investigations, relative youth, etc. would usually have wiped her out completely for some, but the grassroots of the party won’t give her up. It was sort of a “There’s just something about Palin” thing going on.
Others were discussed (Pawlenty, Cantor, etc.). He really likes Fiorina.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 12:50 AM
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 12:48 AM
I don’t think Jindal is the best pick right now but I could definitely support that ticket. Same with Palin although I really wish she had more experience.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:50 AM
Hutchison wouldn’t be a disaster….nice Texas lady would make Biden look terrible if he was himself (ie nasty).
I heard Sweet Home Alabama on the radio today. Bob Riley!
/snowball, meet hell. But Bob Riley would be a great pick.
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 12:50 AM
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Shhhhhhh!
I’m hunting wabbits!
Loxodonta on August 28, 2008 at 12:51 AM
Ohio. Perhaps someone born elsewhere so as to have the “dual” appeal like Biden supposedly has for Obama . . . like Pennsylvania. Has to be good with numbers. How about John Kasich?
Trochilus on August 28, 2008 at 12:51 AM
I find it ridiculous that all these people who were voting against Obama and pulling the lever for McCain are going to whine and cry over a VP pick and are going to sit out over something so superfluous. A VP pick is window dressing, a candidate’s policy and history is what should cause people not to vote for a candidate, a VP pick is a stupid thing to jump ship for. “Waaaaaaa I won’t vote for McCain unless he gives me a useless crumb.” You people are pitiful. Keep in mind that I decided to sit this election out a while ago, think McCain is abhorrent, and have no interest in whipping up votes for him, I just hate seeing stupid reasons for voting for or not voting for a candidate.
LevStrauss on August 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Sigh.. Not all Mccain voters.
But DEFINITELY from south carolina on to super tuesday.
Many people thought that the vote would get so split that Romney might end up winning…so many social conservatives, scared out of their minds that Romney might win, voted for Mccain instead of Huck….just to stop Romney!
Polls very clearly showed this fact. The day before South Carolina primary, Huckabee was up in FLORIDA and CALIFORNIA and other super tuesday states.
After Mccain’s pit bull,Fred, stayed in WAY past his expiration date and helped win S.C. for Mccain(by a VERY NARROW margin)….Huck’s position in the polls dropped drastically and Social Conservatives (scared out of their minds that Romney might win) fled to Mccain just to stop Romney!
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Pawlenty is quite sharp. I don’t understand all the people cutting him down.
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Someone from Scranton, PA with executive experience, to counter Biden. I’d go with Michael Scott from the Office.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:53 AM
Many thanks, Texette!
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:53 AM
What the … ? Wow. My prayers are getting answered sooner than I anticipated. There’s hope for you two yet.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 12:53 AM
Sigh.
“Hey, Kettle, it’s Pot. Just calling to let you know you’re black. Hit me up later.”
Oathkeeper216 on August 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM
I’m sick to death of all the speculation. My least favorite is Huckabee but I’d still vote McCain. I would absolutely SHUDDER with that family of his on the stage, but I’d vote McCain. Damn, I hope those two “boys” of his were “vetted”. Shooting dogs – nice
Marcus on August 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM
No offense but you really come across as a kook with these made up facts. Huckabee was “UP” to a tie for second place in CA, on one poll. He quickly fell back to Earth but he was never winning CA.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Marcus on August 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM
They didn’t shoot any dogs to my knowledge, it was just a good ol’ fashion dog lynching. (UGH)
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 12:56 AM
Nobody. This year we all lose. And if McCain picks Joe Lieberman, who would represent the future of the GOP, then we will be losing for a long time afterwards.
WisCon on August 28, 2008 at 12:56 AM
Tom Ridge. Too bad he’s pro-choice. That’s a disqualifier.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM
Hope…and change?
sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM
No actually he was leading on some polls.
I notice you didn’t cite any polls either, but clearly you know what I was talking about. And besides, you seriously don’t believe that a S.C. win would have put him over the edge in all those states?
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM
Let me explain something about Minnesota. Minnesotans do politics at a very high level of skill. Success in political life here is like playing baseball in the Dominican Republic. You can only laugh at Dominican pitchers until you’re up to bat. Then you don’t laugh anymore. I could try to explain why Pawlenty beating first Roger Moe, and then Mike Hatch, for the governorship is a significant achievement, but the names won’t mean anything to you. Suffice it to say, that’s quite an achievement in a blue state.
RBMN on August 28, 2008 at 12:59 AM
OK, dog lynching – nice
Something out of “Deliverance” vs. the Cosby Kids. Uh-huh, St. Olaf.
Marcus on August 28, 2008 at 12:59 AM
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM
No, I seriously don’t believe it would have. McCain won CA with a ton of dishonest robo-calls having illegal-immigration hardliner former Governor Pete Wilson claiming McCain was the only one against illegal immigration. I guess he went senile.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:00 AM
I hope that’s true! He’ll do just fine. And all the build up of Joe Biden as some kind of superman…I really don’t get it.
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 1:01 AM
RBMN on August 28, 2008 at 12:59 AM
At first I thought you said basketball and I was baffled…
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:02 AM
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM
Yes I know what you were talking about because I was following the race very closely and I live in CA. Huck came in tied for second on one poll and it was a shocker. No repeat performance though. McCain basically had the nomination locked up after winning Florida. Our only chance was Mitt and Huck’s backdoor dealing in WV finished that for good.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:04 AM
Yes, sir, hope and change. I’m praying you receive both. There is peace to men and nations who honor God’s truth.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:08 AM
Look, I like Joe, and I can see the benefits of having him in the VP spot, really.
But all I can think of is “Tippecanoe and Tyler too”. The Whigs put Tyler on as a VP candidate thinking Harrison was young, and there was no danger of Tyler becoming president. Well, just remember how well that worked out.
The VP is not something you give to someone who opposes you on all your major issues.
I’m not saying I’ll bolt if Lieberman is the VP candidate. Obama has pretty much backed me into McCain’s corner already, but I don’t think it’s a good idea.
Romney is clearest, strongest VP candidate, failing that- Pawlentry would make a safe choice.
Sackett on August 28, 2008 at 1:08 AM
And you too.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:10 AM
Is it change we can believe in??
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:12 AM
Maybe everybody should just stay home and boycott this years general election. Start over again. Because this doesn’t look very good.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:13 AM
CK you sort of overlooked the whole campaign aspect which historically hasn’t even started yet? I wasnt talking about a single debate, that’s why I said the stump, the debate and the campaign.. Neither Palin nor Pawlenty bring much to either of those 3 things to matchup against Obama & Biden who are both excellent on the stump & the campaign, and in Biden’s case the debate too. Biden did a very good job tonight, he’s got a real man of the people thing going on, combined with the messiah Obama that contrast is dangerous.
This isn’t about who this guy wants or that guy wants, or the future of the party, it’s politics imho – it’s about winning, this election.
saus on August 28, 2008 at 1:15 AM
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:13 AM
I’ll decide that after he actually announces. Even if he picks someone horrible I won’t stay home, I’ll skip the president and vote down the ticket, and on the propositions. We get some doozies in this state…
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:15 AM
March 24, 2006
Connie on August 28, 2008 at 1:15 AM
What I’m saying is that you were out of touch with what social conservatives (i.e. Huck’s base) were thinking during the primaries. I know that I have talked to many, many Christians who said that they broke for Mccain after South Carolina(even though they dislike him) because they thought at that point, the only way to stop Mitt was to go for Mccain!
A complete 180 degree difference with how you viewed the situtation.
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 1:16 AM
Saus,
I have to respectfully disagree. Biden was lousy tonight. I was embarassed for him. Even David Gergen said it was the worst speech of the convention (and there have been some bad ones). And then, Obama stepped all over his moment and his family scene. For the first time in my adult life, I felt sorry for Joe Biden.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 1:19 AM
News Flash: Whomever McCain picks, the idiot MSM will say he or she was the worst pick possible.
Speedwagon82 on August 28, 2008 at 1:19 AM
You make me wish I’d bothered to watch. ;)
Connie on August 28, 2008 at 1:22 AM
Connie,
You didn’t miss much.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 1:24 AM
God just doesn’t want Huckabee to win the Presidency or be the VP. Do you reject the will of God? God apparently thinks that Huckabee would be better suited being a “Sharpton” to the bookburners. That way he can leave his position much easier than elected office so he can be on call for the rapture, which according to Rev. Hagee should be in a month or two.
LevStrauss on August 28, 2008 at 1:24 AM
If McCain were to chose a kangaroo as his VP I’d still vote for him over Obama.
Cardiganfox on August 28, 2008 at 1:24 AM
SaintOlaf on August 28, 2008 at 1:16 AM
Yes but you tend to make things up. You said “NOBODY” likes Romney and clearly many do. I do. Lots of people on here do. Lots of people I know do. Not to mention lots of Mormons do. (I’m not Mormon, if you were curious.) Romney got more total votes than Huckabee. Look it up (just not on the hucksarmy or huckPAC or huck’s official site.) Try government websites, or news websites.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:25 AM
Cardiganfox on August 28, 2008 at 1:24 AM
Does the kangaroo have executive experience?
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:26 AM
texette I didn’t think his speech was very good either, I thought he’s got a real man of the people thing going on, a compelling story and he will connect with voters that Obama needs, that and hitting on McCain – That’s his job and he did it well imho. Keep in mind he spoke after Bill Clinton, one of the absolute best in politics evah.
saus on August 28, 2008 at 1:27 AM
Pawlenty is a fine pick.
Sakaki on August 28, 2008 at 1:27 AM
Biden’s a great campaigner? He never got many votes in presidential primaries.
C’mon guys…stop falling for the MSM silliness.
funky chicken on August 28, 2008 at 1:30 AM
Well, incognito .. when people keep voting the same people back into office time and time and time again, and they expect different results. Normally that’s referred to as being insane. I’m sure you agree.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:30 AM
Chuck Todd was saying something about a recent change in speech writers, think Obama’s people came in, and I think that really contributed to it because the words in the speech were not well suited for Biden, but I don’t think it was a well written speech at all. The “is that change, it’s more of the same” repeat was really an awkward line to repeat, to many damn words to be an effective chorus, whoever thought of that should be fired. Also everything else was just out of place. Biden’s delivery sucked but I didn’t like the choice of words and the way they flowed more than I didn’t like his delivery by a mile.
LevStrauss on August 28, 2008 at 1:30 AM
I think Biden has had an easy ride, with no consequences for being a Doofus, and a backstabbing Doofus at that.
Do you know who I MOST would like to see get the VP nod?
Clarence Thomas, just to see Biden try to cope with the most important black man in America–the one he tried to destroy.
Come to think of it, Clarence put a book out last year. Isn’t that what candidates usually do?
texette on August 28, 2008 at 1:32 AM
The funny thing is, Mitt’s chances for VP would be much better if he had never run for President. Mitt supporters, there is just too much footage of them disagreeing with each other. If they had youtube and a long primary season in 1980, I doubt Reagan would have picked Bush.
Speedwagon82 on August 28, 2008 at 1:33 AM
People can vote how they want, but I see America falling fast and faster with each month. It’s amazing how much we’ve eroded our society. I don’t see how God can bless America anymore. Can any of you?
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:33 AM
If anyone can do it, God can.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 1:34 AM
There are so many Hot Air commenters now. It’s cool, but the conversation is so jumbled. Indented comments anyone? Like the DISQUS format? Might aggregate relevant comments to their respective place.
Anyways. I’ve said it so many times before. I’m with Ann Coulter on this one: the only way I’d vote for McCain is if Mitt is on the ticket.
iamse7en on August 28, 2008 at 1:34 AM
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:26 AM
Nah, but give him a break hes on the Australian coat of arms. Do you know how much foreign policy experience that brings to the ticket? (hint) Alot.
Cardiganfox on August 28, 2008 at 1:35 AM
I do..Reagan would have picked whomever gave him the best chance at victory not whomever let him drop his pants and moon the party left-wing.
That’s why Ron is an icon and Juan is MAVERICK!*
sven10077 on August 28, 2008 at 1:35 AM
Just wanted to point out I wasn’t inferring you were insane. Just making a general statement.
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:36 AM
Speedwagon82 on August 28, 2008 at 1:33 AM
I think it will make McCain look good if he can pick someone who has criticized him. After all, what footage will they use? Mitt saying McCain is too close to the Democrats on immigration? Mitt saying McCain opposed the Bush tax cuts? Democrats using these arguments? Right.
Besides, if they want to use the footage, they’ll use the footage. McCain used the footage of Hillary in spite of her not being chosen. He could even use that as a contrast, that he could pick the most qualified running mate in spite of some prior hostility, something Obama wasn’t professional enough to do.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:39 AM
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:36 AM
I get you. I’m not the one voting for the kooks. The problem here is so many voters don’t even speak English, much less research the issues. Slap a “For the Kids” slogan on any Proposition and watch it sail to passing.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:40 AM
America need only ask, I think. But are we asking?
fiatboomer on August 28, 2008 at 1:41 AM
These politicians, most anyway, they’ve been in government for decades and changed nothing. You think this time will be any different? Please take a look around your desk. In front of you. Now to the sides. Did you forget to put the lid back on the glue bottle?
apacalyps on August 28, 2008 at 1:43 AM
Well, goodnight everybody.
thecountofincognito on August 28, 2008 at 1:44 AM
Apacalyps, you are being entirely normal and sane tonight. My apologies for believing you didn’t have it in you.
My only question is why you have acted in the past as you have? Being like this you have people agreeing with you, speaking normally, treating you like a human bean.
I’m shocked and a little bit delighted.
trailboss on August 28, 2008 at 1:45 AM
Good night to everyone, also.
Apacalyps,
I’ll include your concerns in my prayers tonight.
texette on August 28, 2008 at 1:46 AM
What would Mitt on the ticket do to change anything? The one or two times if any that there is a tie in the Senate would be the only difference and he would probably have to follow McCain’s orders anyway. McCain is top dog, his advisers run the show, his policy would be what will be. Why do you insist on basing your vote useless acts of pandering that change nothing except give Mitt a pay cut? Do you have a new hunting rifle with an excellent scope or something? Makes no sense.
LevStrauss on August 28, 2008 at 1:58 AM
Rob Portman gave an interveiw in Cincinnatti a few days ago and said he was out of the running
William Amos on August 28, 2008 at 1:59 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »