McCain VP rollout on Friday
posted at 10:15 am on August 27, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Expect the news of John McCain’s running mate selection on Friday morning, and not by text message, e-mail, or semaphore. Politico reports that McCain will introduce his VP nominee in the battleground states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Missouri starting at noon ET on the day after Barack Obama speaks from the Temple of O at Invesco Field. The rallies will demonstrate Republican unity as a refreshing change from the Democratic drama in Denver:
John McCain is planning to rollout his vice-presidential nominee in three battleground states this weekend, with large-scale rallies planned for Ohio, Pennsylvania and Missouri, according to aides and advisers.
The GOP nominee-in-waiting will move to immediately change the campaign conversation from Barack Obama’s football stadium acceptance speech Thursday to the new Republican ticket, to be revealed at a noontime Friday rally in a Dayton, Ohio, basketball arena. McCain and his running mate will then travel by bus to Pennsylvania, where they’ll hold an outdoor event at a minor league baseball stadium in Washington County, just southwest of Pittsburgh. On Sunday, the duo will head to suburban St. Louis for another event to be held at a minor league baseball stadium, this one in O’Fallon, Mo.
The Missouri rally is being billed to local Republicans as something of a unity rally, since it will feature McCain, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee — the GOP presidential finalists who effectively divided the vote three ways in the Show Me State’s Super Tuesday primary. A McCain aide warned not to read too much into McCain’s planned guests, however.
Having Huckabee and Romney on the same stage would certainly raise more than a few eyebrows. Huckabee has continued his criticism of Romney all the way to this week, after suggesting that Romney should have defied the Massachusetts Supreme Court on gay marriage. McCain has apparently demanded that the swords be sheathed, but Huckabee’s slap will give these rallies a little more curiosity than they might otherwise have had.
According to Jonathan Martin, we can expect a “safe” pick. The football analogy from his sources is that a handoff up the middle is better when you’re ahead, and that more bad things than good can happen when you put the ball in the air. That seems to eliminate the Joe Lieberman pick, which should cheer the base, but may also mean that Sarah Palin is off the table, too. Having scheduled both Huckabee and Romney for these rallies would hint that McCain didn’t choose either of them — which strongly hints at Pawlenty, although Martin’s sources also said not to read too much into the guest list for the events.
McCain has made the right choice on tactical timing. Some wondered whether McCain would try to steal Obama’s thunder in Denver by announcing his running-mate pick today or tomorrow. That would have been a mistake, for two reasons. First, it seems more likely that the festivities in Denver would have stepped on McCain’s announcement rather than the other way around. Second, with Obama constructing a Greek temple from which to orate at Invesco Field, McCain probably wants as many people focused on this demonstration of Obama’s ego as possible.
A Friday morning pick will step on media coverage of Obama’s speech and give McCain good weekend momentum rolling into the Republican convention. It will also demonstrate a great deal more competency when compared to the botched Biden announcement of last week by Team Obama.
You must be logged in to post a comment.


















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Why I like Mitt.
Disturb the Universe on August 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Please be Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina
gash on August 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM
The reality of the situation says no to both…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Not going to be happening…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM
I don’t disagree, but the Dims have never needed a smoking gun, when it comes to Republican “corruption.”
mwdiver on August 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM
So who do you think. We need an attack dog, and I don’t think Pawlenty fits the bill, especially since he is also pro-choice. And Mitt has way too much baggage. Maybe Kasich?
ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM
We can still hope!! Whitman would be wonderful.
talking_mouse on August 27, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Well, I don’t want to get in a prolonged argument with you, especially over a topic that has been argued to death, but it was Mitt’s money, and he wanted to win. They may have hated him for it; they also didn’t like the fact that he was handsome and wealthy, with the wealth coming in large part from his own business initiative — not from marrying a rich woman or writing books about himself. At least Fred and Rudy didn’t whine about it.
I gotta stop before my blood pressure goes up. Let’s find another topic.
BigD on August 27, 2008 at 11:41 AM
I say it will be Romney. I’d rather it be Palin, but so be it.
The 2 problems with Romney are the houses thing and the anti-McCain quotes. The first is a dead end for Dems, as we’ve seen this week. The second is more serious – and since McCain is pulling anti-Obama quotes from Hillary, they will play that card – but manageable.
Pawlenty is too nice to debate Biden and leave with his head intact.
The only knock against Palin is what somebody said – when you have the lead, play conservative. Save the long pass (Palin) for if you’re behind.
Plus nominating Palin on Friday would look like pandering to women. Say what you will about Maverick, he doesn’t pander well.
playblu on August 27, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Romney wouldn’t be a bad pick, because he could help in Michigan, Nevada, and Colorado, and wouldn’t lose the South for McCain–more Evangelicals are more likely than less likely to vote for McCain with Romney, and McCain is way ahead in all Southern states except VA.
Palin would be a daring pick, trying to win over women who voted for Hillary, and she dovetails well with McCain’s anti-corruption theme, is strongly pro-life and pro-drilling, and deflects attention away from McCain’s age. She is relatively unknown outside of Alaska, and might have an experience problem.
Huckabee would be a big mistake–he raised taxes in Arkansas, let lots of prisoners go (one of which committed a rape in Missouri), and the Clintons would have lots of dirt on him. He doesn’t bring much to the ticket, since Evangelicals are going with McCain anyway after his Saddleback remarks.
Kay Bailey Hutchison is great where she is–a Senator from Texas who gets re-elected over and over, but she speaks slowly, looks old, and would not win a debate against Biden. She’s not likely to win over any Hillary supporters or swing-state Independents.
There have been suggestions about Kasich, which would fit in with rallies in PA (where Kasich grew up) and OH (where Kasich was a Congressman). Swing-state appeal, good speaker, strong on economic issues (Ways&Means Chairman), young-looking, experienced, no baggage–he could be a good pick.
Please, Senator McCain–no to Huckabee and Hutchison–the other three would be fine!
Steve Z on August 27, 2008 at 11:45 AM
The way I see it, McCain has three choices. Go with the credentialed choice. Go with the safe choice. Go with the gimmick.
If he goes with the credentials, there is no one who can touch Romney in the resume department unless it is Giuliani.
If he goes with the safe choice, there is Pawlenty and a handful of others.
If he goes with the gimmick, there is Palin, Jindal, Powell, Leiberman, Huckabee, or someone totally unexpected.
I am betting on either credentials or safe.
There is one advantage that Romney has that no-one else has. The biggest knock against McCain has been that he is a mean, ill-tempered, unforgiving creep. Whom did McCain have the greatest animosity towards during the primaries? Romney. Now if McCain can show that he can put the past behind him, let bygones be bygones, he will remove the biggest problem he has. And what better way to do that than to pick Romney as his running mate?
Picking one of his friends — Lieberman, Ridge, Huckabee, et al. — does nothing to retire that meme.
Marking Time on August 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM
He is however a Maverick and goes against the flow. Sarah would fit right into that
ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Too much baggage, and Obama picked Biden? LOL!
Biden has a TON of baggage. Romney could stand toe-to-toe with Biden and make him look really bad. Biden’s been in Washington longer than McCain has. Romney’s actually accomplished some things in his life OUTSIDE of politics.
I don’t think Biden wants to compare his IQ or his academic record to Romney’s either…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM
She’d be out of her league, sorry…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 11:48 AM
playblu on August 27, 2008 at 11:42 AM
While I agree that if you are ahead you play it safe, but McCain doesnt have an insurmountable lead. This is a good time to be bold. I imagine though we will play it safe and go with Romney.
Defensor Fortis
mo_gunslinger on August 27, 2008 at 11:48 AM
If you have no idea what you’re talking about, do some research. You couldn’t be more wrong.
RBMN on August 27, 2008 at 11:50 AM
McCain is behind. Not only is he going up against Obama and the dems, but also the MSM
ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM
CHeap talk wheres the Links? Back it up Bunky or hush up.
-Wasteland Man.
WastelandMan on August 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM
My dream scenario would be McCain picking Romney as VP while having Huckabee on hand to witness while being told to stop the hate and unite behind McCain/Romney ‘08. Any chance of that or should I just dream on?
justahassell on August 27, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Invesco replaced Mile High Stadium in 1991.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INVESCO_Field_at_Mile_High
Neocon Peg on August 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM
RBMN:
You seem like a person in the know:
What ever happened to John Engler? He would be a great pick!
joepub on August 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM
I like John Kasich a lot, but I don’t see him in the VP slot. He would be a great cabinet member in a McCain Administration…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM
The debate ove McCain’s VP choice is fine…
But the following issue reminds me of why I’m sooo pissed at the GOP and will not donate until the idiocy goes down…
GOP platform may have global warming plank
texasrich on August 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Links to back up what? That post that you quoted was about how much hatred there was on this board for Huckabee. OK, I link you to . . . the page that you are reading (go back and read the comments above that post for ‘proof’. Bunky? Really?
I guess I should cower and say, ‘you win?’
ThackerAgency on August 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Do you mean the Late John Engler? I think only Obama has the power to bring him back.
RBMN on August 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Why Huckabee is not ready for prime time.
HERE
…Besides pardons, and immigration, and waffling on taxes etc. etc. etc. see how easy it is to actually link to why someone sucks?
-Wasteland Man.
WastelandMan on August 27, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Just going on what I have heard. There was an interview with him and they asked if he agreed with Ridge’s pro-choice stance and he kind of hmmed and hahed about it
ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Sorry, I was thinking of someone else. He’s still alive. See, you gotta look this stuff up. I broke my own rule.
RBMN on August 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM
The ‘Stache!
infidel on August 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM
wow, now yer really projecting. I just suggested you link to some of your claims. (see above) see even though I agree with Sulla most of the time I would ask him to give evidence of the things he claimed too. (no I dont think its Libel cripes yer wound up about a loser primary candidate.)
-Wasteland Man.
WastelandMan on August 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM
RBMN
No problem…he is a little overweight and vanished from the scene, so I can see you thinking that..,
But…he would be a good pick: Popular Catholic Michigan Governor, 3 terms. Popular. Rust belt!
joepub on August 27, 2008 at 12:10 PM
On Palin’s first day in office as Governor of Alaska she eclipsed the combined executive experience of the Democratic ticket by 100%.
Can’t you just imagine the collective gasp of the assembled Democrats watching televised coverage of a Palin VP rollout?
Apoplexy!
turfmann on August 27, 2008 at 12:12 PM
I say pick Mitt, they are going to use his primary quotes anyway, after all, Obama didn’t pick Hillary but McCain used her in an ad. Its a moot point. McCain can spin it that he can handle criticism and still choose the most qualified person, unlike his opponent.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Too bad Mitt is seen as a liability, being a Mormon, rich, and handsome. I thought those were good qualities in a man, especially when he’s articulate, kind, firm, intelligent, good father & husband… blah, blah, blah.
I can’t believe the anti-Mormon sentiment that’s out there.
I truly believe that that alone is what turns most people off of him. Here in the upper Northern Plains states I find so much prejudice about Mormons. It’s not right there on the surface, but it’s there.
How disgusting that picking a person for public office involves being against these things.
I guess if you just pander to the stupid & promise them lots of cream off the govt. tit, you’ll get votes.
Badger40 on August 27, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Haha you wish.
Th.. that’s Joe Lieberman’s music?!
e-pirate on August 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Registered by Dreamhost. Could be true, could be wishful thinking, could be a cybersquatter.
Sekhmet on August 27, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Any chance Palin had evaporated when Stevens won the primary. Imagine her running against “Reform” when her own state’s Senator, from her own party, is both campaigning and on trial. I like her, and if Stevens had resigned she’d have a shot.
I pray it’s not Lindsy Graham. He or Huckabee will cause me to stay home. Romney, Pawlenty, Jindal are all decent men and would be positive choices.
dead bowie on August 27, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Since there seem to be screams to let it drop, I will.
But it’s not libel when it’s well sourced in public accounts.
Links available on request.
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 12:44 PM
He can’t possibly consider Grahamnesty a safe pick…please oh please no. Don’t remind people why they have to hold their nose to vote for you.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM
A-B-H
Anybody But Huckabee – we’ve heard enough from Arkansas demagogues for quite a while.
Oh, and no more Senators!
Correct answer: Sara Palin! She works in every way.
drunyan8315 on August 27, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Pawlenty is definitely pro-life, but unfortunately he is a manmade global warming believer, and in the tank for ethanol. Both of which lose me.
BTW: My initials are also RB and I am from MN. :-)
Dasher on August 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Maybe they’ll believe two of us. –RBMNAnokaCo
RBMN on August 27, 2008 at 1:00 PM
At this point, I think Cantor and Ridge are the best options. I’m not wild about Ridge, but Cantor could be fun. Just think of all the coded and un-coded anti-semitism we’d get to enjoy from the nutroots. Lucky for us, they cannot seem to help themselves.
Infidoll on August 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM
Yea, Tim is pro-life (I’m in St. Paul and will wander downtown on monday) Also he’s probably the sharpest wit in the field. Vice-Presidential debates, he’ll slice Biden up so sharply Joe will look like a candle in an Errol Flynn movie.
billhedrick on August 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM
ack. Tim=Pawlenty
billhedrick on August 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM
Excellent point. It’d be another knock-out.
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 1:04 PM
Maybe so, but the vast majority of folks don’t know who Pawlenty is and he looks unseasoned next to someone like Biden.
If McCain were to become ill and needed to step down for whatever reason, who would you want stepping up to the plate — Pawlenty or Romney?
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM
If McCain values his votes, He will not pick either the Clown Prince of Massachusetts/Michigan (Romney), or the Fire-Breathing Dragon of Arkansas (Huckabee). Both of them would cause me to rethink being a Republican.
While I myself want Palin, and think she’d be the best choice, I have to agree that Pawlenty is the safe choice and also the most devoted to McCain. Devotion, very much so, plays a key role in things.
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM
I thought John Kerry was the Clown Prince of Massachusetts. I mean, the guy is always ready with some demeaning jokes about the troops and whatnot.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 1:13 PM
Nah. Kerry is the “Rich Fool who molests young women”.
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 1:14 PM
Too bad, St Olaf….
Huck just said on Rush he has not been asked to pack a bag for Dayton.
Sekhmet on August 27, 2008 at 1:15 PM
@ texasrich on August 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM
fixed
It makes sense to pay lip-service to AGW, which is a dying religious movement. It’s going to take few years to die properly after which the same crowd (wrong since ~ 1970) will probably switch back to the impending ice age.
–gh
gh on August 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM
I hear Huck never has to pack a bag. Somehow he is always provided for. The press is always looking for an explanation, but they’ll never figure it out until they realize that its not a human one.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Of course it’s not going to be Huckleberry…
eanax on August 27, 2008 at 1:19 PM
heh…Nice, but it ain’t gonna happen.
McCain/Crist ‘08
For better or worse…guess I’ll know if I’ve been right all this time by Friday.
JetBoy on August 27, 2008 at 1:27 PM
It’s Huck.
SaintOlaf on August 27, 2008 at 1:28 PM
If this is true, then the Lord has answered MY prayers! The High Reverend Huckster would be an unqualified disaster.
Marybeth on August 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM
McCain can either win this election or lose it with his pick on Friday. Maybe, just once, this guy can forget about being a “maverick” and do the right thing. If he picks another liberal, its over for him.
cjs1943 on August 27, 2008 at 1:31 PM
McCain would be out of his mind to pick Huckabee *or* Romney, because he needs the support of both evangelicals and fi-cons. The majority of posters here sound like Daily Kos denizens adulating Dennis Kucinich when you talk about Romney. You’ve got huge blind spots that can’t let you see how incredibly weak that Romney is (Hello?! Anyone remember the £106 million Romney poured into his campaign to end up getting nowhere?). If Romney couldn’t beat John McCain or Huckabee, what makes you think he could draw votes from the Joe Sixpacks who don’t hang around posting worthless comments on political websites all day (I include myself here :).
Palin or Pawlenty!
zmrzlina on August 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM
Whatever our wants and desires for a veep, I’m just glad to be a Republican in 2008. I remember our time in the desert, during the Clinton years, when it looked as if our country was going to be twisted into something we couldn’t recognize.
But we’re still here, and may God Bless the United States of America.
Doug on August 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM
zmrzlina on August 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM
You’re right, they both got way more votes than Romney.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM
SHHHH!!!!! Be careful, or you will be called a “BIGOT” by the Romney-or-nothing-ers
It’s incredible the amount of buffoonery here…. Mitt had $100 million and couldn’t win 4 counties in california. FOUR COUNTIES in a state that supposedly mitt is going to “shake up” because of Cali’s substantial mormon pop.
Mitt is a dud as VP, and was a dud as Pres nominee. $100 million…. and how many non-caucus states did he win where a family member wasn’t governor? 0?
Incredible.
I posted a few weeks back (don’t much post at all) that in addition, the Huck-a-haters (some southern baptists) have a SERIOUS problem with mormonism… i don’t like that bias, but it DOES exist, so why the heck would the maverick say “get over it, here’s a mormon vp as a social experiment for the south.”
there are a million reasons to pick anyone else… i’ve never been sold on romney as vp, particularly because he had the biggest failure in modern political history ($100 million… and he had less delegates and votes than HUCKABEE????
PASS. Give me Palin, Kasich, or heck even the EBay lady over Romney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
battleoflepanto1571 on August 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM
It’s a good point.
I think Mitt would be a fine VP, but I’m not convinced he’d be a great VP nominee this year. I’d prefer to see him as a cabinet secretary, using his turnaround expertise to streamline a department or two.
Then again, an efficient government department could be even scarier than a bloated, impotent one.
Beating O’Biden is Job One.
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM
Ugh. Double Ugh.
RB, Texas
RushBaby on August 27, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Romney’s stock just soared in my estimation. Thanks!
RushBaby on August 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM
I just aspire to RBTX. Maybe someday.
RBMN on August 27, 2008 at 1:50 PM
The primary issue with my lack of support for Romney is the fact that everyone who has built him up with certain statements about how he’ll win Michigan and other claims really do not know about the nuances of the political landscape.
I’ve worked on 3 major campaigns in the last 10 years, and have had a chance to take a look at the field and see the voting patterns and what would constitute a great pick. In 2008, it’s a unique situation:
The opposing side has disunity. We have 20% of Hillary-supporting females who are not interested in Obama. We have Obama who is on the defensive instead of the offensive. He’s pulled ads from some major battleground states. This means that we need to bring out the big guns to win voters.
Romney is reviled by a lot of people, and not just Huckabee conservatives in the south. The only reason he’s being built up is because that’s what the establishment Republicans, the ones who gave us Mark Foley and the 2006 disaster, want. Huckabee, in the same way, is reviled by everyone else.
Pawlenty will help McCain get over 270 EVs. But not many more than that. Palin could get him 300+ EVs, but a lot of people (especially Mitt-Bots) don’t want her picked because it would seem like pandering to the women’s vote…which, frankly, wouldn’t be that bad of an issue.
Cantor or Jindal would also be good, but there’s too much of a long shot or they already said they don’t want it.
So…there ya go.
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 1:50 PM
I like Mitt but I think choosing him would give the Dems the “silver spoon” spin they’re already trying to pin on McCain more credence. I think a more sensible choice would be Palin. She brings strength on economy issues where McCain could use some boosting.
Conservative_SAHM on August 27, 2008 at 1:51 PM
I don’t know if you are going to be appeasing disgruntled Hillary supporters with a woman who is the polar opposite of Hillary…
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM
They’ll vote for someone without a schlong, regardless of party affiliation. I know this. I grew up with 4 sisters. It’s the nature of the beast.
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 1:58 PM
I like Palin as a choice, but I was also very interested in Fred! prior to him even announcing his run. And we all know how that turned out. Seems like it will probably be Romney or Pawlenty.
4k78 on August 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM
Great insights. Thanks.
My only concern with Palin is that, as young as she is, she could be a long term asset to the party, and I’d hate to see her get thrown into the national foray too early.
I made the point elsewhere; I liked Dan Quayle a lot as an Indiana senator, but being picked as Bush’s VP ruined his career in the long term.
In Palin’s favor, as a governor she has skills and charm that Quayle lacks. I think she could be a great, great pick this year. Maybe a perky Thatcher over time. I just don’t want to see her served until she’s fully cooked so we don’t have her to rely on ten, twenty years down the road.
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 2:00 PM
FTFM.
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 2:02 PM
You CANNIBAL! *chuckle*
Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Hillary supporters feel like the strong woman at the office who made her way to the top by working hard and devoting her life to the “company”. Only to have the boss overlook her for promotion, that was rightfully her’s because of her commitment, and give it to the “new, young, fun guy”. The guy who has only been there for a year but is the life of the party. The bosses buddy. The boss has no ethics or class.
Hillary supporters are chomping at the bit to vote against the new guy and pulling the lever for the only ticket that has a female on it, would be supreme for them.
:)
Conservative_SAHM on August 27, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Yeah but isn’t Palin “the new guy” on our side?
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 2:12 PM
Republicans should have a toga party in MN during the convention.
lorien1973 on August 27, 2008 at 2:13 PM
McCain’s post-Biden pick sloganeering strongly suggests they are going with Romney and that John picked him prior to the Biden pick. I’ll eat my cat if it’s not Romney.
Yes, I said cat.
philnewkirk on August 27, 2008 at 2:15 PM
That is the one that got me too!!!! So straight forward! On the threat and Iran…
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:15 PM
I wouldn’t put it past McCain to mock Obama’s grand entrance.
“Unlike my opponent Publius Gasius…”
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 2:15 PM
Well the silver spoon is a bit off set by his religon. If anyone thinks that isn’t a handicap to sucess outside of Utah should just read the posts that will start happening about 1…2…3 now!
Anyway. I think Michelle O’s speech the other night competely undermines their change message and could be used against them.
If this country is so against the working poor then how do we explain the success of Michelle’s family and Barack’s family? Don’t they prove a much more level feild than is being portrayed? They have talent, they rise in a society built on MERIT. Sounds like America is on course to me.
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:21 PM
I guess it’s Cantor…the rollout has started.
eaglesdontflock on August 27, 2008 at 2:21 PM
Disgruntled Hillary voters are NOT going to vote for any woman on any ticket. If you like Hillary then Palin is probably not your cup of tea or witches brew or whatever Hillary’s fans drink. The only way that McCain could cash in on the disgruntled feminist vote is to nominate somebody like Susan Collins and that would be problematic because the RINO and RINOETTE would lose far more of the conservative base than they would get from the left.
highhopes on August 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Talked to some people last night. General themes are as follows. McCain got the message about Lieberman, got the message that he needs the conservatives. Huckabee is out–has the highest negatives, and the people who are enthusiastic about him largely are in states that won’t go to Obama anyway. Safe pick is Mitt, in the Reagan-Bush tradition of unifying the two biggest groups in the party. Most effective overall pick is Palin, although, like with Lieberman, he personally favors someone like Fiorina(?sp), moving some people to suggest a compromise with Hutchison (a close comrade, but pro-choice and boring). BUT, the general feeling is that, with the exception of maybe Lieberman or Huckabee, any reasonably decent choice will propell to the white house. There was more, but that’s the gist.
texette on August 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM
So we go with a near total unknown, Eric Cantor, and really tee off the Mitt supports like the Dems did Hillary.
Makes sense to me.
eaglesdontflock on August 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM
I maintain that the Romney/Huckabee fiasco has brought into stark relief who it is that gave us people like Foley but even more the out of control spending!
I think the very slim minority of Republicans opposing Romney on religous grounds are the ones we need to stop listening too. They increase spending because they only pretend to care about spending as an issue.
It is the equalivent of the shallowness of Obama on our side and we need to see it for what it is. And overcome it either with education of these people or just ignore them. They really are in the wrong party. That thought is not original with me. (shout out to Rush. Who I don’t like much, but he is right on this one.)
This has been an eye opener as to who realy believes in conservative principles and who wants to promote their narrow group into power for power’s sake. And then proceed to support new spending programs and the weakening of border laws.
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:35 PM
Hutchison is the only one of the women brought forward who has the experience to be the pick for this year. And Politico has an article that says she hasn’t even been vetted.
I have a very politically connected friend who used to be cheif of staff for conservative congressman… who didn’t even put Romney in the mix. Naturally I was unhappy but… It is what is is. McCain’s courage may fail him.
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:40 PM
YOu know what? I just re-read your post. Is Hutchison really pro-choice? Why didn’t I know that? That makes her not on my list now. That’s a shame. As a woman who has born five children I don’t understand pro-choice. I know it pits me against my gender. But I have been pregnant. That’s a BABY in there!
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:44 PM
HUCKABEE OR BUST!
SaintOlaf on August 27, 2008 at 2:45 PM
“any reasonably decent choice” sounds good to me.
NO WAY
NO HOW
NOBAMA
sulla on August 27, 2008 at 2:47 PM
FIFY.
thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 2:47 PM
Looks like Bust then, he just told Rush he was a no-go about an hour ago.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM
“reasonably decent choice” If reason is the standard then it is Mitt for sure. But really how likely is that?
petunia on August 27, 2008 at 2:50 PM
Fixed. Huckabee’s faux Christianity is an embarassment to evangelicals.
highhopes on August 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM
Look at the recent Gallup and Rassmussen VP Polls.
HUCKABEE WINS.
What you folks don’t understand, is that you AREN’T Joe Lunchbucket. Joe Lunchbuckets LOVE Huckabee, and they will be the pivotal voter block in this election.
marklmail on August 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM
Hutchison WOULD be a gimmick. She’s a Senator, like everyone else who is running. She’s pro-choice. She’s weak on immigration. She’s a lousy speaker. The main thing she has going for her is that she’s a woman.
The get out the vote people, the ones in the campaign most in touch with the grassroots, are pushing Mitt and Palin.
texette on August 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM
St. Olaf, I do understand your arguments about polls, but internal polling shows a big problem. Most of the numbers for Huckabee come from places McCain’s already going to win, and the numbers hurt him the most in places he’s trying to turn red.
texette on August 27, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Well, this should knock Crist out of the game, if he was ever in it (Yippee!)
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking-news/story/660701.html
Marybeth on August 27, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Sorry… anyone but Romney would be a mistake.
Think about the match-ups:
Obama is a young, unknown/ wildcard; the Dems had to pick Biden to add name recognition/ experience to the ticket. It’s a “bottom-heavy” ticket, credentials-wise.
On the GOP side, Palin and Pawlenty are regional candidates who are, like Obama, in the unknown/wildcard category. Picking either of them creates a “top-heavy” ticket, credential-wise, around a President who’ll be 72 on Inaguration Day. Given McCain’s age, the #2 pick suddenly matters.
Romney is nationally-known, regarded as a strong administrator (private and public sector) and yet, is not seen as part of the Beltway problem. He comes off as a recognition/ experience candidate, without the baggage of Biden. And lest we forget, he launched the only statewide public/private health insurance program in America.
He’s rich… so what? So’s Obama, Kennedy, Kerry, Edwards, and the Clintons. (Though Mitt EARNED his money… he didn’t marry, sue, bootleg, or kiss-and-tell his way into it.)
People feel secure, knowing the someone of Romney’s stature and demeanor is waiting-in-the-wings. I don’t think Palin or Pawlenty exude that kind of Presidential chops.
VastRightWingConspirator on August 27, 2008 at 2:57 PM
He’ll pick someone good. He knows he can win this now, and the gravity of the situation will help him make a responsible choice. Like W did.
Halley on August 27, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »