Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


McCain VP rollout on Friday

posted at 10:15 am on August 27, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Expect the news of John McCain’s running mate selection on Friday morning, and not by text message, e-mail, or semaphore.  Politico reports that McCain will introduce his VP nominee in the battleground states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Missouri starting at noon ET on the day after Barack Obama speaks from the Temple of O at Invesco Field.  The rallies will demonstrate Republican unity as a refreshing change from the Democratic drama in Denver:

John McCain is planning to rollout his vice-presidential nominee in three battleground states this weekend, with large-scale rallies planned for Ohio, Pennsylvania and Missouri, according to aides and advisers.

The GOP nominee-in-waiting will move to immediately change the campaign conversation from Barack Obama’s football stadium acceptance speech Thursday to the new Republican ticket, to be revealed at a noontime Friday rally in a Dayton, Ohio, basketball arena. McCain and his running mate will then travel by bus to Pennsylvania, where they’ll hold an outdoor event at a minor league baseball stadium in Washington County, just southwest of Pittsburgh. On Sunday, the duo will head to suburban St. Louis for another event to be held at a minor league baseball stadium, this one in O’Fallon, Mo.

The Missouri rally is being billed to local Republicans as something of a unity rally, since it will feature McCain, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee — the GOP presidential finalists who effectively divided the vote three ways in the Show Me State’s Super Tuesday primary. A McCain aide warned not to read too much into McCain’s planned guests, however.

Having Huckabee and Romney on the same stage would certainly raise more than a few eyebrows.  Huckabee has continued his criticism of Romney all the way to this week, after suggesting that Romney should have defied the Massachusetts Supreme Court on gay marriage.  McCain has apparently demanded that the swords be sheathed, but Huckabee’s slap will give these rallies a little more curiosity than they might otherwise have had.

According to Jonathan Martin, we can expect a “safe” pick.  The football analogy from his sources is that a handoff up the middle is better when you’re ahead, and that more bad things than good can happen when you put the ball in the air.  That seems to eliminate the Joe Lieberman pick, which should cheer the base, but may also mean that Sarah Palin is off the table, too.  Having scheduled both Huckabee and Romney for these rallies would hint that McCain didn’t choose either of them — which strongly hints at Pawlenty, although Martin’s sources also said not to read too much into the guest list for the events.

McCain has made the right choice on tactical timing.  Some wondered whether McCain would try to steal Obama’s thunder in Denver by announcing his running-mate pick today or tomorrow.  That would have been a mistake, for two reasons.  First, it seems more likely that the festivities in Denver would have stepped on McCain’s announcement rather than the other way around.  Second, with Obama constructing a Greek temple from which to orate at Invesco Field, McCain probably wants as many people focused on this demonstration of Obama’s ego as possible.

A Friday morning pick will step on media coverage of Obama’s speech and give McCain good weekend momentum rolling into the Republican convention.  It will also demonstrate a great deal more competency when compared to the botched Biden announcement of last week by Team Obama.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

petunia on August 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM

Petunia-
I understand your reaction (I think).
Palin first hit my radar when she decided to sue the feds over the polar bear’s protected status. It made me wonder who the heck she was! I got really interested after reading about her and hearing that she might be on the short list. I know she isn’t a household name, but neither is Pawlenty. I think that’s often the case with running mates.
For me, her “identity” is that of a rising politician from an important western state (important because of who it borders and its resources, not its population size). And, yes, I think her personal qualities complement McCain (non-beltway, young, woman) and *might* appeal to some swing voters.
Cheers.

Y-not on August 27, 2008 at 6:18 PM

Y-not on August 27, 2008 at 6:18 PM:
Not only that, but she also quit a position with the state ethics board when the previous gov tried to apply some undue influence

ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 6:25 PM

I am old enough to remember Dan Quayle well. He too was also a rising politician from an important state. Elevating him to VP ruined him.

I have often wondered how much better things would have been if we had just let him mature more before thrusting him onto the National Stage like that.

Be patient. The Palins and the Jindals of the world will get their chances. Let them age and mature before we pluck them off the tree.

Marking Time on August 27, 2008 at 6:28 PM

I am old enough to remember Dan Quayle well. He too was also a rising politician from an important state. Elevating him to VP ruined him.

Marking Time on August 27, 2008 at 6:28 PM

Boloney. 41 agreeing with the Dems to raise taxes ruined him!

ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 6:34 PM

if your BASE doesn’t want a guy, regardless of the reason

That is the difference between principled leadership and a leaf blowing in the wind.

petunia on August 27, 2008 at 6:37 PM

Boloney. 41 agreeing with the Dems to raise taxes ruined him!

ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 6:34 PM

Poppycock. He was damaged the moment Lloyd Bentsen told him “you’re no Jack Kennedy” in their VP debate, and his painfully awkward response didn’t bury the old coot.

sulla on August 27, 2008 at 6:40 PM

I am old enough to remember Dan Quayle well. He too was also a rising politician from an important state. Elevating him to VP ruined him.
Marking Time on August 27, 2008 at 6:28 PM

I was around then, too, and have lived in Indiana (although not back then). Was it really as key a state then as Alaska is now? I don’t really remember Indiana representing/embodying a pivotal issue. I thought Quayle was more about his family connections.

In any event, I bet you’re right… I suspect that Palin won’t get the nod. I just saw a headline about the RNC taking ANWR drilling off of the platform. Too bad. I really think people have clicked with the energy issue in a very visceral way… I wrote to several congressmen (and Nancy) for the first time since the Clarence Thomas hearings. Unfortunately, most people do not understand economics and business development, and the media reinforces doom and gloom about the economy, but they do understand their gas tanks.

Hey, there’s another crazy Huckabee thread starting on HotAir! ;-) Maybe I’ll see you there!

Y-not on August 27, 2008 at 6:40 PM

Libertarians have no place in Republican politics. Go back to Bob Barr, assnut.

Sakaki on August 27, 2008 at 6:17 PM

LOL! Attack me, and not my points. Typical. God forbid anyone challenge your most precious insight and analysis.

I did also mention that I’m a registered Independent. And those are the folks you want to win over, right? Well, keep it up, Sparky, because your alleged political savvy is not helping your case at all.

Did I say I was part of the “Libertarian Party”? No. I said that politically and philosophically, I am a conservative libertarian (small ‘l’ for those of you keeping score at home).

Yeah, libertarians don’t vote for Republicans at all or envolve themselves in Republican politics do they?

How about Neal Boortz or Larry Elder?

eanax on August 27, 2008 at 6:43 PM

In my opinion, Mormonism is false. That’s all I’ll say about it, cause I’m not into debating theology.

hot-heir on August 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM

And that is certainly your right. And that is not the question.

The problem is Romney didn’t do anything to incur the rath of these people. It is totally and completely bigotry! And so if they get to push Romney out–that means religous bigotry is the overiding power behind the Republican Party. The party of bigotry.

And it is bigotry against me, my children, my ancestors who came here on the Mayflower and with the Puritains, who built this country! They signed the Mayflower compact. They were among the Sons of Liberty. They fought for my freedom of religon against the British. Then were driven out of the country to Utah. They sacrificed everything to be able to worship according to their conscience.

And 2008–it is still religous bigots who pull the strings of the President of the United States.

There is no place for us to run if these people continue to turn more people against us.

The most qualified is defeated in favor of a no name, not done much. All in the name of religon!

This is wrong. And it is better to turn the power to the party that is by mobs and murders than to help in the further bigotry against me and my people. I can not be a party to that.

Okay I’m a bit emotional and I’m running late. But that article that said McCain gave in to the bigots was just more than I can take today.

I’m late to some voluteer work at a underprivileged daycare. I have to go.

petunia on August 27, 2008 at 6:53 PM

Petunia -
Hang in there. It is hard when someone you respect is attacked for reasons that seemingly have less to do with his qualifications than about who he is as a person.
And, it is really a drag when people go on a tear attacking/ridiculing/misrepresenting your religion.
I was pretty irritated on another post when someone claimed all major religions (including mine) classify the LDS as a cult. This election is the first time I’d ever heard that there were so many misguided folks, claiming to represent all Christians (the last time I checked, my religion has a leader and it isn’t a guy from Arkansas!), denigrating what I have always found to be a really admirable group of people. I don’t see how any of this helps us elect a good president.
Have a good night.

Y-not on August 27, 2008 at 7:15 PM

…or envolve involve themselves in Republican politics do they?

eanax on August 27, 2008 at 6:43 PM

There. That’s better…

eanax on August 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM

In my opinion, Mormonism is false. That’s all I’ll say about it, cause I’m not into debating theology.

hot-heir on August 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM
And that is certainly your right. And that is not the question.

The problem is Romney didn’t do anything to incur the rath of these people. It is totally and completely bigotry! And so if they get to push Romney out–that means religous bigotry is the overiding power behind the Republican Party. The party of bigotry.

And it is bigotry against me, my children, my ancestors who came here on the Mayflower and with the Puritains, who built this country! They signed the Mayflower compact. They were among the Sons of Liberty. They fought for my freedom of religon against the British. Then were driven out of the country to Utah. They sacrificed everything to be able to worship according to their conscience.

And 2008–it is still religous bigots who pull the strings of the President of the United States.

There is no place for us to run if these people continue to turn more people against us.

The most qualified is defeated in favor of a no name, not done much. All in the name of religon!

This is wrong. And it is better to turn the power to the party that is by mobs and murders than to help in the further bigotry against me and my people. I can not be a party to that.

Okay I’m a bit emotional and I’m running late. But that article that said McCain gave in to the bigots was just more than I can take today.

I’m late to some voluteer work at a underprivileged daycare. I have to go.

petunia on August 27, 2008 at 6:53 PM

Petunia…do you really think that John McCain would cave to evangelicals based on Romney’s Mormonism alone? The same John McCain that called evangelicals agents of intolerance?

Again, I think Mormons are misguided, and Mormons think I’m misguided, but that has nothing to do with politics. It’s a no win situation for us to divide ourselves right now. While Mitt may be imperfect politically, he is still the best man for the VP slot. I’m reminded of when we first went to war with the Taliban. We were intelligent enough to figure out that we had to ally ourselves with the Northern Alliance, regardless of their political agenda. At the end of the day, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. The vast majority of evangelicals are smart enough to figure this out, and I certainly think John McCain is too.

hot-heir on August 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM

Now you’re picking on small towns, sounds like something the dems would do

ConservativePartyNow on August 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM

I had nothing bad to say about the town. I live in a small town. Twice the size of that town and still not on most maps. I wouldn’t consider our mayor to be a great candidate for VP either. Also, according to wikipedia, during her time as mayor the population was 5,000, not 8,000.

Nothing wrong with a town like that, but you can hardly compare it to running the U.S., or even a major city. There are less people in her entire state than in most big cities. Does it mean something is wrong with Alaska? Hardly, its probably more beautiful due to the lower population.

However, its also a lot less like running the country than running a state with millions of people would be. We need somebody prepared to lead the most powerful nation on Earth. Could she handle the job? Maybe. The problem is we have no idea yet.

thecountofincognito on August 27, 2008 at 7:31 PM

I think its kind of lame trying to steal the other party’s thunder. Remember when John Kerry spoke after Bush 4 years ago? It was pretty desperate.

Speedwagon82 on August 27, 2008 at 7:35 PM

SARAH PALIN IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR ABUSE OF POWER.

Alaskan in Alaska on August 27, 2008 at 10:14 PM

Syrin (alias ‘Alaskan in Alaska’), put a lid on it. I looked into that investigation and it is so backfiring. Palin rightly demoted Monegan because he was a schill for the trooper union and was deadwood. Despite that, trooper Wooten is nuts, and Hollis French, the Obama man in AK is the leader of the investigation.

Such bitterness. What do your 6 kids think of this while eating spaghetti-o’s while you blog?

Sapwolf on August 28, 2008 at 12:08 AM

Well, Sapwolf, the bipartisan Alaska Legislative Council disagrees with you, 12-0. The investigation has just started! Sarah Palin is currently being investigated for abuse of power.

If you’re going to pipe up on Alaskan issues, you need to stay informed. http://www.AndrewHalcro.com is an excellent place to start.

There are stories abound about the on going Branchflower investigation regarding Troopergate that seem to come right out of a Law & Order episode.

Branchflower showing up in offices, flanked by techies, ordering hands off of keyboards and searching hard drives of state employees computers for emails…or possibly missing emails.

Open Government: The gospel according to Colberg

Alaskan in Alaska on August 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM

I don’t think this is good timing for Palin. Even if she would be able to rise above the charges that she used her position to try and punish a former in-law, having her ethics questioned at this point in time is something the GOP doesn’t need. Steven’s ethics are a disaster……who wants a twofer from Alaska? FWIW I wish the “powers that be” in the GOP would take that old fool Stevens aside and convince him it’s time to retire!! I know, I know he just won the GOP primary; that makes me question the sanity of Alaskan Republican voters.

If I had my druthers McCain would pick Haley Barbour as his VP although there hasn’t been any indication Barbour would want it. I like Romney well enough, but I just don’t think he’d be good for the long haul. It’s hard to ignore the money he spent on the primary and couldn’t even come close to the nomination. Even if Romney were picked by McCain I don’t think anyone should assume he’d be the natural successor to McCain. Those same evangelicals who wouldn’t vote for him in the primary won’t vote for him 4 years down the road…..leaving the GOP in much the same position as it is now.

Religion shouldn’t matter!! I thought we got beyond religion when JFK was elected. Although some predicted it, the Pope didn’t try to influence American politics!! I know I’ve mentioned this before, but I think it bears repeating i.e. the majority of evangelicals regard Mormonism as a cult. I lived in the deep south for over 30 years; I still don’t know if it’s something in the water or if it’s hard coded into their DNA, but Mormonism is a no go in much of the south. Heck, I’m Presbyterian and my Baptist neighbors were always trying to save me ;-)

I’m back in a conservative’s no-mans-land, NE Pa. I’ve already had it with the “Biden is really a local boy” meme in the news. Blech, how I wish I was back in Georgia!

McCain wasn’t my first choice, or even second or third, but I will do my duty and vote for him……however, if he suffers a brain fart and picks Goober Huckabee, then all bets are off.

poodlemom on August 28, 2008 at 1:33 AM

McCain can pick Snoopy for all I care.
Obama must lose.

Ronnie on August 28, 2008 at 2:03 AM

“…The rallies will demonstrate Republican unity as a refreshing change from the Democratic drama in Denver:

The announcement will be made before a raucous crowd of two hundred and seventy three enthusiastic Republican stalwarts and local politicians.

Following Saint Mc’s choice; there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth on wingnut blog sites all over the internets…those are the tubes that connect people with computers together.

J_Gocht on August 28, 2008 at 8:41 AM

J_Gocht on August 28, 2008 at 8:41 AM

You write for Reuters, dontcha? :)

sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:40 PM

sulla on August 28, 2008 at 12:40 PM

I’ve lost the mask, somewhere behind the sofa in the news room…! :)

J_Gocht on August 28, 2008 at 12:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4


You must be logged in to post a comment.