WaPo: Battleground anxiety plagues Denver
posted at 9:55 am on August 26, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Outwardly, Democrats talk about the strength of their ticket, especially since the addition of Joe Biden. Quietly, though, a strain of worry has crept into conversations in Denver, especially among delegates from battleground states. They wonder whether Barack Obama may run out of gas long before the November election date in the crucial states he needs to win the Presidency:
The anxiety comes in several forms, but particularly common is the pained look, followed by the quick glance away and the lengthy pause, in the face of a simple question: How is Barack Obama doing?
“Ahhh . . .,” said Barry Bogarde, political director for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees in Pennsylvania, a battleground state that the senator from Illinois needs to win. “Better,” he finally said. “He’s doing better.”
Asked how things are going for Democrats in New Hampshire, another swing state that the party carried in 2004, the state party chairman, Ray Buckley, did not even mention Obama’s race against Sen. John McCain. He talked instead about efforts to win a Senate race and hold two congressional seats.
Jim Beasley, the commissioner of Ohio’s Department of Transportation, did not have high hopes for Obama in his area of southern Ohio. “Ahhh, well. Rural Ohio will be difficult,” he said. “Rural areas are difficult for him.”
While fundraising remains strong for Barack Obama, with back-to-back $50 million months, enthusiasm for his candidacy has declined considerably. Every national poll has Obama losing significant ground since finishing the primaries ahead of Hillary Clinton. Even among the most favorable sampling type — adults, not registered voters or likely voters — the race is a dead heat coming into the conventions, the first time in decades the Democrat has not had a wide lead at this point.
Unfortunately, the Democrats continue with some self-deception about the nature of their challenge. The Post reports that the so-called Bradley Effect, in which black politicians overpoll because of latent racism in the electorate, has gotten sotto voce discussion in Denver. Others more openly worry about running a black candidate for the ticket, somehow forgetting that millions of Democrats voted against Obama in the primaries.
They cannot bring themselves to admit the real weakness in their ticket. Barack Obama has no executive experience, no military experience, no private-sector leadership experience, and three undistinguished years in the US Senate. His attempt to run as a reformer got derailed the moment Obama became the first candidate since Watergate to refuse the public-financing system, along with its spending limits, and it got exposed as a joke when he added Joe Biden, a DC insider for 35 years, as his running mate. Without his crusade of reform and change, Obama has no qualifications for the job he seeks, and his reaction to the Russo-Georgia war shows how unprepared he is to take charge.
Small wonder, then, that battleground-state delegates would rather talk about state and local races than Obama’s chances in November. They’re preparing themselves for the disaster to come, emotionally and politically.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
There’s good reason for concern. Hastily constructed facades are typically more fragile than the real thing.
RBMN on August 26, 2008 at 9:58 AM
What is best in life? To crush Democrats. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their women…
Can’t wait for Election Day, 2008.
It’s a fine day in America when a man can go to the polls and vote against the Democrat Party.
Obama’s concession speech will undoubtedly be the best in history. Of course.
NoDonkey on August 26, 2008 at 9:58 AM
I think that. although common sense is anything but, the American people still have enough sense of self-preservation to see through the empty suit and his b-busting wife.
bbz123 on August 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM
If they mean gass as gasoline then yes, if they mean gas as in hot air then no.
TooTall on August 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Pfft. BFD. Liberals are perennially in a state of angst and rage.
Fletch54 on August 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Racism FTW?
Ugh. It’s sad and disappointing that republicans count on these types of votes.
lorien1973 on August 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM
and who will be the happiest woman in america should b.Hussein lose??
Hillary!!! oh yeah she’ll endorse obama with a smile, as she is twisting the knife in his back!!
hell hath no fury…
right4life on August 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM
From your lips to God’s ears.
ctmom on August 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM
huh? the racists are the liberal democrats.
right4life on August 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Ok, I have to go with maybe he should check his tire pressure. It was the obvious comment but could not resist…
But seriously Ed. I’m sure Senator Obama will be fine. Don’t forget the Libs still have the “failed policies of the Bush administration” to focus on. Or didn’t you listen to Michelle last night?
Mr_Magoo on August 26, 2008 at 10:06 AM
The media will white wash this event and Hussein will get the usual post-convention bounce. This negative talk is just to pump up the troops. Do not fall for it. McCain will win in November, but Hussein will have his moment in the sun in September.
saved on August 26, 2008 at 10:06 AM
I don’t know that the GOP is counting on these votes as part of its strategy. That’s overstating the case a bit. Personally, I think the number of people who will be voting against Obama for that reason is smaller than the pundits make it out to be.
Slublog on August 26, 2008 at 10:06 AM
I think this is all an attempt to keep this story alive. It seemed pretty clear to me last night that, while there may be a small contingent of PUMAs still in Hillary’s corner, the vast majority of Dems are uniting.
However, I think that there is definitely some concern in Democratic circles because polling is dead-even between Obama and McCain. Common sense tells me that Obama should be destroying McCain in the polls — what with all of the anti-Republican sentiment in our country right now.
http://thepajamapundit.com/
thePajamaPundit on August 26, 2008 at 10:06 AM
What, an inexperienced, gaffe-prone, scandal-burdened ultra-leftist with 27 flip-flops (so far), & his gaffe-prone running mate who’s on record bashing his leader & praising his opponent? What weakness?
jgapinoy on August 26, 2008 at 10:07 AM
But, how will we hold our heads up in the world community when 55% of our voters have revealed themselves to be racist by their vote against Barry?
horatio on August 26, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Excuse me? What is it you’re trying to say here?
Rod on August 26, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Where they come from is irrelevant – although I do get the humor in that the democrat party is full of racists. It’s part of the strategy, isn’t it? To get these votes? Isn’t that just a little sad?
I agree. Maybe it’s talked about so often to put some taint on the Republican party. But even Republicans seem to count on it (Bradley Effect).
lorien1973 on August 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM
given the democrats want them more than the republicans, and they voted in democrat primaries..I’m not sure what your point is.
right4life on August 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM
So is ‘run out of gas’ a euphemism for ‘P.O. or scare voters away from the party’?
Vashta.Nerada on August 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Recall the pic from the Olympics looking down on a quaint facade shielding the shanty-quality stores behind it? Barack Obama Boulevard.
Patrick S on August 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM
I don’t think anyone in the DNC wants to admit it, but B.O. actually ran out of gas a long while back.
pilamaye on August 26, 2008 at 10:12 AM
`
You DO understand that the entire democratic primary was based on voting purely for either a black man or a woman, right? The party of identity politics has shown itself.
Vashta.Nerada on August 26, 2008 at 10:12 AM
And yet after Election Day, Democrats will denounce their fellow Americans as racist xenophobes, in keeping with their stereotype of their fellow countrymen. It’s not that most citizens exhibit common sense and patriotism when choosing their President, particularly in this age of radical Islamic terror and Russian aggression — noooo, it’s just that they are a bunch of “unenlightented” yahoos who have the “audacity” to believe in American exceptionalism and a palpable aversion to voting for any candidate who happens to be black!
Dariaanne on August 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM
BTW, where was the media clamor for Alan Keyes, Michael Steele, Ken Blackwell or Lynn Swann? Oh right….they were black conservatives, so they don’t count!
Dariaanne on August 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM
What is really going to be sad is watching the old media en masse shouting that if we don’t vote for Obama, we are merely racists. I imagine the chorus will begin soon, and increase in volume all the way to November.
Vashta.Nerada on August 26, 2008 at 10:16 AM
My guess is you’ll see a certain amount of unity, at least on the surface, by the end of the week, combined with the spin that every single speaker in Denver hit a home run. The problem will be holding that together, given the egos involved (i.e. — you can’t send the Clintons out there to be second bananas for Obama, because it has to be all about them, yet at the same time if you’re Barack’s people and don’t give them at least the same position or slightly higher as a public face for the fall campaign as Joe Biden, all the stories about Bill and Hillary being snubbed are going to start leaking out again).
jon1979 on August 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Obambi’s acceptance of the nomination this week and the official beginning of his run for office is star crossed. Electional astrology says waning moon is not the right time to begin anything, unless it’s destroying weeds or cutting down timber.After the new moon on Sept 30 is the best time to begin an endeavor.
The gods are with the GOP. Let’s be sure to finish the job by getting out to vote.
rishika on August 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM
By labeling Biden as “Scranton Joe” the Obama campaign strategists have exposed their worry over potentially losing a Blue-State lock. The Dems have carried PA for as long as I can remember. Biden’s clever nickname says they fear a major loss is on the horizon.
In November Pennsylvanians won’t turn to their religion and their guns, they’ll turn to the GOP lever in the voting booth.
And if Biden is Scranton Joe, then I’m Tokyo Rose.
fogw on August 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Yeah, too many people bitterly clinging to their guns, religion, and antipathy.
Kafir on August 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Two nations liberated from tyranny and NO ATTACK on our soil in over seven years…..now that’s “failure” I can live with.
Perhaps Obama can get Andrew Sullivan to write that concession speech???……..
Rovin on August 26, 2008 at 10:25 AM
.
I agree – I see McCain taking Pennsylvania, and if he holds Virginia as well, I enjoy an early champagne on election day.
Vashta.Nerada on August 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM
And what do you think they will “learn” from their trouncing? What will the MSM say was the main reason for the loss? What will they say in Europe?
Rod on August 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Whitey.
fogw on August 26, 2008 at 10:30 AM
“And yet after Election Day, Democrats will denounce their fellow Americans as racist xenophobes, in keeping with their stereotype of their fellow countrymen.”
The implosion of the Democrat Party after Barack Obama blows the election will be wondrous to behold.
1. The far-left, Democrat base who turned out in droves for Obama, will be enraged. Their ire will turn against Clinton and any other Democrat who will be seen as traitors for not supporting their terrible candidate. Many of these people will leave the Democratic Party or give up on politics altogether.
2. Never again will the Democrats make the mistake of nominating a far-left candidate. America will not have to worry about another Barack Obama a step away from the White House.
3. Yes, the two-headed insane clown posse will be Speaker of the House/Majority Leader of the Senate, but these are two extremely weak people, who are both completely corrupt and ultimately incompetent. The headless Senate and Congress will get no single piece of the Democrat agenda accomplished.
That’s why it’s so important to elect a President McCain this fall. It may ultimately lead to the collapse of the Democrat Party, whereas a win by Obama would only strengthen the parties ability to fund raise and to restrict the activities of the opposition through legislation (e.g. the Fairness Doctrine, the banning of free elections when it comes to union votes, etc.).
NoDonkey on August 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM
For his sake, I hope it’s the day he has a real epiphany, and realizes that his personal redemption will not come from politics and Alinsky style power manipulation. I would like to see him go back into academia, where he can make some genuine contributions. Leave behind the stagecraft, and put your mind to use, Mr. Obama!
RushBaby on August 26, 2008 at 10:33 AM
WHat I don’t get is the people that should be accused of racism won’t be. It is the Democrats!
When you break down the numbers, Democrats make up 42% of the electorate or 72 million voters. Barry should get ALL of these votes.
Republicans are about 33% of the electorate. Barry can’t expect to get their 55 million votes b/c of the differences in ideologies.
Independents/third party – make up what? 25% He can probably get half of this group who are probably left-leaning, which would be maybe 20 million votes.
About 122 million votes were cast in 2004, so he should get roughly 60% of the vote if you add the Democrats and Indies together, right?
So when he loses by a landslide, how can they blame right-leaning indies and Republicans, whose votes he was not going to get anyway?
It is the Democrats and left-leaners who defected from the party of the left that should be blamed, but won’t be.
JAM on August 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM
“The war is lost.” –Harry Reid
Mr_Magoo on August 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM
The Bradley affect has nothing to do with “latent racism”. It has to do with the fact that people are afraid to openly express their opposition to any minority. They are afraid of being labeled a racist.
So instead they tell the pollster what they believe they are supposed to say, then vote their conscience when the curtain is pulled.
MarkTheGreat on August 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM
I think the main thing that conservatives need to come to grips with is the fact that America really likes John McCain. This isn’t about Obama’s weakness as much as it is about McCain’s strength. He wasn’t my candidate, but I’m damn glad he is the Republican nominee now. Obama would be demolishing any of the others right now.
You can tell this is true because of the desperate way the Obama campaign is flailing, trying to tie McCain to Bush in any way, no matter how implausible. But Bush isn’t running and he isn’t even showing up right now.
McCain was on Jay Leno’s show last night and got a veritable hero’s welcome; that audience is always a focus group of middle America and they LOVE the guy. America is very, very comfortable with the idea of John McCain as president for the next 4 years. They have already moved beyond Bush, and there is nothing any Democrat can do about that.
rockmom on August 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Slab some butter on Obama, he’s toast!
moxie_neanderthal on August 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM
For every person who is voting against Obama because of his race, there are 2 or 3 voting for him because of it.
MarkTheGreat on August 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM
“I would like to see him go back into academia, where he can make some genuine contributions.”
I wonder why all these whiz-kid lawyers we have as politicians always want to tinker with health care.
Do they think what passes for our justice system is perfect? We are by far the most litigious civilization in the history of earth. We have far, far more lawyers per capita than any nation on earth. The price of litigation adds a significant percentage to the price of goods.
It will take a lawyer to halt what the legal profession as been reduced to – an organized racket designed to line the pockets of a privileged guild, bloodsucking from productive people.
NoDonkey on August 26, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Honestly, Barack Obama is a very talented and appealing politician. He should go back to being a Senator from Illinois and actually leading from there. America could use an example of a black elected official who isn’t trying to be Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson all the time, or hiding money in his freezer, or talking about nationalizing the oil companies. Obama could become a very important figure in America. He just really shouldn’t be President right now.
rockmom on August 26, 2008 at 10:41 AM
In the story, “Little Black Sambo”, the tiger ran around the tree so fast that it turned to butter.
Therefore your statement is racist. Get thee to the woodshed.
MarkTheGreat on August 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM
I agree with your assessment of the problem, but I’m not sure a lawyer will be the solution. We need to take the jackpot out of the justice. Windfalls are what too many lawyers are all about, but we beat up oil companies who provide a product we need.
For starters, I’d humbly suggest we take all punitive damages and turn them over to the jurisdiction in which the case is decided, like a fine. The lawyers don’t get one penny. Then find a way to curb venue shopping and we’re moving in the right direction.
trubble on August 26, 2008 at 10:45 AM
He just declares that his opponents are racist. How is that better?
He just passes earmarks to the company that employs his wife, which then gives his wife a huge raise. How is that better?
He just talks about taxing away all of their profits. How is that better?
MarkTheGreat on August 26, 2008 at 10:47 AM
since I can remember paying attention to politics, (92, Clinton Gore) that has been said about EVERY democratic ticket.. ‘Oh, it’s a dream team’..
DaveC on August 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Agree completely. If you are injured, that’s what compensatory damages are for.
Additionally, compensatory damages are decided at a lower civil standard, preponderence of the evidence. That is, if your evidence is better than the other guys, then you win.
Punishment needs to be decided at the higher criminal standard. Beyond a reasonable doubt.
Beyond that, we need to go to some type of loser pays system.
I like the variant where if the defendant makes a good faith offer before trial, and it is turned down, then when the plaintiff wins, the plaintiff is responsible for trial costs. (Good faith could be defined as an offer that turns out to be within, say, 10% of the jury award.) In this case, it was the plaintiff that forced an unneccessary trial, by refusing the good faith offer.
MarkTheGreat on August 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Obama might not appreciate how he was working at cross-purposes against the Democrat party’s attempt to trick the “values voters.”
The partial birth Obama phase of the campaign wasn’t popular with anyone except die-hard marxists and hedonists, i.e., the democrat party base.
jeff_from_mpls on August 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM
“We need to take the jackpot out of the justice.”
But only a lawyer can do that. Because the legal profession will do what they do best, obfuscate the issue. Tell us again how lucky we are for being up to our armpits in lawyers.
We need a lawyer to tell us the roles that lawyers play that are beneficial to the American people and separate them from the areas where lawyers manipulate the legal system in order to benefit themselves at the expense of everyone else in our country.
In short, we need a lawyer to decipher the thicket of obfuscation lawyers use to hide their nefarious activities.
NoDonkey on August 26, 2008 at 10:57 AM
+1..
the MSM will proclaim it the greatest speech ever
and be completely forgotten within a week.. like his others.
DaveC on August 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Not a single Republican has voted against Barack Obama yet. All the racism directed at the False God has come from his own party.
Elizabetty on August 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM
On the first day His convention highlights included a terrorist, a racist, a murderer and a spouse with an entitlement mentality that would not allow her to love her country until her country paid her back. I can picture waves of bitter rednecks in upstate PA flocking to Barack America. Outstanding way to run a convention.
grdred944 on August 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Disaster is right. A disaster for the country if BO wins.
ronsfi on August 26, 2008 at 11:16 AM
Barack and Michelle Obama: Lawyers
Bill and Hillary Clinton: Lawyers
Joe Biden: Lawyer
John Edwards: Lawyer
John Kerry: Lawyer
Harry Reid: Lawyer
Gore: If memory serves went to law school but didn’t finish.
It’s a party of lawyers, lacking leadership with an understanding of how the real world works economically or practically.
BadgerHawk on August 26, 2008 at 11:16 AM
San Francisco translation:
“Bitter, clingey, religious, racists in flyover country”…
RocketmanBob on August 26, 2008 at 11:22 AM
“It’s a party of lawyers, lacking leadership with an understanding of how the real world works economically or practically.”
Exactly and remember, lawyers and legislators in this country pretty much do the same thing – they are both professional critics, at some level.
They’re the ones who tell citizens, you’ve done wrong and here’s how to remedy it.
That’s one thing when you are a lawyer, that’s what you do.
But to legislate, to critique, to essentially tell fellow citizens, how you’re running your company is wrong, or how you’re running your state is wrong . . .
Shouldn’t you have to have some sort of “in the trenches experience”? Seems to me the Democrats are full of generals who never had to serve in the infantry and who never commanded a platoon, much less a division.
That’s precisely why Democrats are so inherently useless. They have no convictions on how things get done in this country, because they have no experience.
They do what their special interests tell them to do and they are selected for Democrat Party leadership precisely because they have no personal convictions to trip them up.
Successful Democrats “throw under the bus” everyone and everything that gets in their way. That’s how they thrive. Whether it’s so-called “Catholics” and their faith or Obama and his close friends, the only ethics Democrats adhere to is the ethic of having no ethics.
NoDonkey on August 26, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I’m sure it will all turn around when Barack marches down the aisle in that 75,000 seat stadium with his troops all chanting his name on Thursday- heh!
This little “Triumph of the Will” recreation won’t have a negative effect on people at all, will it Barry?
jjshaka on August 26, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Liberals – it’s in their nature to shout their agenda into every open microphone. They can’t help themselves. It’s in their DNA. Look at the liberal Hollywood crowd. Most American’s cringe when these people have an open mic. The only ones cheering them, are those just like them. Everyone else is repulsed. But, it’s also in their nature to have extreme arrogance which only hurts them because they truly have no self-control and HAVE to run their mouths.
Liberals are their own worst enemy.
Conservative_SAHM on August 26, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Reese Hopkins is an African-American talk show host on Boston’s WRKO. He’s a moderate conservative. He’s in Denver for the convention, broadcasting live. About an hour ago he said Obama is doomed. According to him, all the talk, even by those running the convention, is “disdainful” toward the Obama campaign. According to him, the talk among themselves is all about his ego and being the most famous person ever to run for the White House. He says the environment is “safe” and so the talk is unguarded. He says the response to Michelle’s speech today is, “whatever.”
TheBigOldDog on August 26, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Count on it? How do they count on it versus be aware of it? Or acknowledge its existence?
Are they encouraging it? Do they look at the polls and think “Yesss! The Bradley Effect! Goooo racists! We’re counting on you!”
misterpeasea on August 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM
As election time draws closer, I feel better and better. People are realizing what Obama is all about and they don’t want any.
Andy in Colorado on August 26, 2008 at 12:06 PM
if only.
jimmer on August 26, 2008 at 12:09 PM
OMG I think my gov. has lost his ever loving mind,I live in WV by the way,he thinks that come Nov. the state will go democrat when most of the people here have said there is no way they are voting for he who cant be named because this state was soo Hilary heck in the county I live in the head of the Democratic party are writing her in so they don’t have to vote for him but still get to vote Democrat for the love of god I have to move back to Ohio where most people are normal.
tee866 on August 26, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Obama demands to be seen as a blank slate of Hope and Change, so everything but his bullet-point resume has been either destroyed or buried. So, all we have to go on are his associations.
In his case it’s hardcore Marxists, political fixers, race-baiting preachers and rich white terrorists.
I take that back, since we now know that his housing project created a hardcore slum and the Annenberg project failed even by its own standards.
emerson7 on August 26, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Number of seconds of experience of Obama + Biden:
* executive position in government = 0
* leadership position in military = 0
* any position in military = 0
* leadership position in private sector = 0
* law firm partnerships achieved = 0
* number of real jobs Biden’s held = 0
Chuck Schick on August 26, 2008 at 12:25 PM
rebecca on August 26, 2008 at 2:17 PM
I am amazed at the free pass that both we and the media are giving to the Dems who want to eliminate / truncate / obfuscate the roll-call vote!
Doesn’t anybody realize that if this should succeed, it will have a huge negative effect on our political system, which is already under assault from the rabid anarchist left, and the criminalization of (R) politics spearheaded by the “grownup” left.
If Obama is nominated through a contrived process, it will open the floodgates of cynicism. It won’t hurt Obama that much because he will be under the media cone of silence, and his party will be busy “falling in line”. But it will hurt the tradition of transparency in American politics that has grown up in the last 40 years. It will be yet another lost value we will have the Dems to thank for.
What was that thing the Dems were always shouting in 2004? “Count Every Voice?” “Count Every Volunteer?” Can’t remember, but it was “Count Every V-O-something“, I’m sure of it.
drunyan8315 on August 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM
I think they have reason to worry. Obama is getting to be old news.
Terrye on August 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM
Comment pages: