<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ed Morrissey Show: Amanda Carpenter, John Randall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:29:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dljessup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1339556</link>
		<dc:creator>dljessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1339556</guid>
		<description>Ed:

Just a little bee in my bonnet.  You have taken to labeling your issues with the epithet &quot;open source production values&quot;.  I&#039;m an IT professional, and the crappiest software packages I have to work with are commercial offerings.  Many open source software packages are more stable and easier to use than their commercial competitors.  Given my experience, I find your equation of &quot;open source&quot; = &quot;buggy&quot; to be mildly annoying.  What experience have you had that has given you such a skewed view of open source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed:</p>
<p>Just a little bee in my bonnet.  You have taken to labeling your issues with the epithet &#8220;open source production values&#8221;.  I&#8217;m an IT professional, and the crappiest software packages I have to work with are commercial offerings.  Many open source software packages are more stable and easier to use than their commercial competitors.  Given my experience, I find your equation of &#8220;open source&#8221; = &#8220;buggy&#8221; to be mildly annoying.  What experience have you had that has given you such a skewed view of open source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Coqui</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1338053</link>
		<dc:creator>El Coqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1338053</guid>
		<description>John How? I can only see Amanda.Sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John How? I can only see Amanda.Sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slug</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336677</link>
		<dc:creator>slug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336677</guid>
		<description>Amanda, if you ain&#039;t spoken for, I&#039;d like ta come-a-callin&#039; on you sometime iffin that&#039;s okay with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda, if you ain&#8217;t spoken for, I&#8217;d like ta come-a-callin&#8217; on you sometime iffin that&#8217;s okay with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosferightu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336450</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosferightu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336450</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pcoop on August 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I actually had that question on the SAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pcoop on August 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I actually had that question on the SAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pcoop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336390</link>
		<dc:creator>Pcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336390</guid>
		<description>Amanda Carpenter is to dreamy goddesses as Nancy Pelosi is to blood-sucking harpies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda Carpenter is to dreamy goddesses as Nancy Pelosi is to blood-sucking harpies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiltedscotsman5</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336267</link>
		<dc:creator>kiltedscotsman5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336267</guid>
		<description>I echo that *sigh*... not only is she a sharp cookie, Amanda is just dreamy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo that *sigh*&#8230; not only is she a sharp cookie, Amanda is just dreamy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336264</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy in Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336264</guid>
		<description>Ed, do you pick Amanda Carpenter&#039;s picture over John Randall because she&#039;s much prettier than he is?

If so, I couldn&#039;t agree more.  Keep up the good work! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, do you pick Amanda Carpenter&#8217;s picture over John Randall because she&#8217;s much prettier than he is?</p>
<p>If so, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  Keep up the good work! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronsfi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336202</link>
		<dc:creator>ronsfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336202</guid>
		<description>Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorien1973</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1336150</link>
		<dc:creator>lorien1973</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1336150</guid>
		<description>Ed just has her on the show so he can post that picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed just has her on the show so he can post that picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBMN</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1335864</link>
		<dc:creator>RBMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1335864</guid>
		<description>From: &quot;The Professors&quot;
By Jamie Glazov, FrontPage Magazine, February 21, 2006
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=EF3AB960-FF17-4212-A0E0-B5E67A35215B

Frontpage Interview Excerpt:

&lt;blockquote&gt;David Horowitz: ....The task of the academic revolutionaries is to seize the power at its source.

FrontPage: I found this a haunting read. Many of the cases here literally sent chills up my spine. One entry that particularly disturbed me was the one on Professor Bill Ayers (pp.29-32), where you remind us that this 60s radical was the leader of the terrorist “Weatherman” cult. One detail that has always been on my mind throughout the years in studying this character and his group was that his girlfriend, Diana Oughton, died in a Manhattan townhouse when the bomb they were making accidentally blew up. You would think that the death of his girlfriend would have perhaps led to some second thoughts on Ayers’ behalf. But apparently not. And throughout the Left’s history in general, there is this same disturbing theme: never looking back and never reflecting on the evil consequences inspired by leftist ideas. Could you give us a few words of wisdom here on this phenomenon -- which Paul Johnson has referred to as “the heartlessness of ideas.”?

David Horowitz: Even when I was a leftist, Bill Ayers struck me as a superficial human being, and essentially thoughtless. You’re right, however, that the left is endemically thoughtless in this regard. It is incapable of confronting its failures and crimes – of being minimally accountable – because its agendas are not pragmatic to begin with. Leftists don’t really care about the balance sheet of what they have done. What they care about is the future – their fantasy of a world redeemed. Their calculus is analogous to that of the suicide bomber. When you get to the garden of Allah what you’ve left behind is trivia that doesn’t matter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From: &#8220;The Professors&#8221;<br />
By Jamie Glazov, FrontPage Magazine, February 21, 2006<br />
<a href="http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=EF3AB960-FF17-4212-A0E0-B5E67A35215B" rel="nofollow">http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=EF3AB960-FF17-4212-A0E0-B5E67A35215B</a></p>
<p>Frontpage Interview Excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>David Horowitz: &#8230;.The task of the academic revolutionaries is to seize the power at its source.</p>
<p>FrontPage: I found this a haunting read. Many of the cases here literally sent chills up my spine. One entry that particularly disturbed me was the one on Professor Bill Ayers (pp.29-32), where you remind us that this 60s radical was the leader of the terrorist “Weatherman” cult. One detail that has always been on my mind throughout the years in studying this character and his group was that his girlfriend, Diana Oughton, died in a Manhattan townhouse when the bomb they were making accidentally blew up. You would think that the death of his girlfriend would have perhaps led to some second thoughts on Ayers’ behalf. But apparently not. And throughout the Left’s history in general, there is this same disturbing theme: never looking back and never reflecting on the evil consequences inspired by leftist ideas. Could you give us a few words of wisdom here on this phenomenon &#8212; which Paul Johnson has referred to as “the heartlessness of ideas.”?</p>
<p>David Horowitz: Even when I was a leftist, Bill Ayers struck me as a superficial human being, and essentially thoughtless. You’re right, however, that the left is endemically thoughtless in this regard. It is incapable of confronting its failures and crimes – of being minimally accountable – because its agendas are not pragmatic to begin with. Leftists don’t really care about the balance sheet of what they have done. What they care about is the future – their fantasy of a world redeemed. Their calculus is analogous to that of the suicide bomber. When you get to the garden of Allah what you’ve left behind is trivia that doesn’t matter.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanStark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/26/the-ed-morrissey-show-john-randall/comment-page-1/#comment-1335828</link>
		<dc:creator>DanStark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=24110#comment-1335828</guid>
		<description>Amanda Carpenter?  Your ratings just increased tenfold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda Carpenter?  Your ratings just increased tenfold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
