New McCain ad: “Passed Over”

posted at 8:30 am on August 24, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

John McCain’s campaign has decided to start some trouble between the Democrats just as they’ve gathered for their convention in Denver. Their new ad, “Passed Over”, asks why the woman who received 18 million votes for the nomination never even made it to the short list for the VP nomination. Team McCain’s answer? The ego of Barack Obama couldn’t handle it:

ANNCR: She won millions of votes. But isn’t on his ticket. Why? For speaking the truth.

On his plans:

HILLARY CLINTON: “You never hear the specifics.”

ANNCR: On the Rezko scandal:

HILLARY CLINTON: “We still don’t have a lot of answers about Senator Obama.”

ANNCR: On his attacks:

HILLARY CLINTON: “Senator Obama’s campaign has become increasingly negative.”

ANNCR: The truth hurt. And Obama didn’t like it.

When I first heard that the McCain campaign was going to make Hillary’s freeze-out an issue for an ad, I was a little skeptical that it would be effective. It might undercut the Democrats making the same argument in Denver, which could end up stifling dissent and hardening their resolve to show unity with or without Hillary on the ticket. An ad like this could make dissenters look explicitly like McCain stooges.

However, the McCain team found the right formula in this spot. Instead of just focusing on the injustice Hillary received, the ad makes it about Obama and his inability to deal with her criticisms. This calls into question Obama’s leadership and his ability to separate the personal from the job — as well as refloat all of the specific issues Hillary mentions in these clips.

Will this be effective in attracting former Hillary supporters in the Democratic Party? Perhaps. If that’s really McCain’s aim, how much more likely will he be to select Sarah Palin as his own running mate — a move that would give them a real reason to jump ship? Palin may not have a lot of experience, but she has a year and a half more of executive experience than either Obama or Joe Biden … and on a McCain/Palin ticket, the mentor would be in the top half.

Update: Cuffy Meigs has a rundown of women with executive experience who could make interesting outide-of-the-box choices for McCain’s running mate.  Palin gets top billing, but Cuffy thinks Meg Whitman (eBay’s transformative CEO) and Carly Fiorina could get a boost.  Picking a candidate with serious executive credentials in the private sector would help boost McCain on economic questions, too.  When attacking Obama on the economy, a great line could be: “Who will you trust more — two Senators with no private-sector experience, or a proven CEO?”  That could favor Whitman …. or Mitt Romney.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Based on this add by McCain camp, it appears he is picking a woman. Fiorina is out due to her being a typical Silicon Valley liberal. Whitman I’m not sure about. That pretty much leaves Sarah Palin and Hutchison.

If Mac is not a maverick, he’ll pick Hutchison and win.

However, the more interesting pick that would still get him the win is Palin.

Imagine her talking abortion with phony-Catholic, pro-abortion Biden while she has a baby named Trig who is only months old with downs syndrome. A baby that according to the ONE is not even human yet.

Priceless. :)

McCain / Palin ’08
or
McCain / Hutchison ’08

Sapwolf on August 25, 2008 at 8:13 PM

Why not offer Hillary the Republican VP spot? She has more experience than any of the other candidates for the office and it would be a fatal blow to Obama. Also she is a centrist not much unlike McCain. At the very least she could be offered a cabinet post so she could establish her health care plan (for which McCain would share credit, thus disarming a democratic weapon) and a cabinet post would be less dangerous if McCain should decide to kick the bucket while in office.

JC Silverberg on August 26, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3