Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 40, “The Believers”
posted at 7:50 am on August 24, 2008 by Robert Spencer
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
“Everything has an essence,” said Ibn Abbas, “and the essence of the Qur’an is the family of Ha Mim” – that is, suras 40 through 46, all of which begin with the Arabic letters ha and mim. (As always, the Muslim commentators say that “only Allah knows” the meaning of these apparently random letters that begin many of the chapters of the Qur’an.) Of the Ha Mim suras Ibn Mas‘ud added: “When I reach the family of Ha Mim, it is like reaching a beautiful garden, so I take my time.” These are all Meccan suras, and they share the general characteristics of the chapters of that period: furious denunciations of the unbelievers, but none of the exhortations to warfare against them that mark the Medinan suras, and fewer specific denunciations of the Jews and Christians than appear in the chronologically later chapters.
The first of these, Sura 40, is known as “The Believers,” from v. 28, and alternately as “The Forgiver,” from v. 3. Early Islamic authorities generally asserted that it was revealed to Muhammad right after sura 39, and it shares many of the themes of that sura. Verses 1-22 retail many of these: the Qur’an is from Allah (v. 2); there is no other god (v. 3); only unbelievers dispute his signs (v. 4), such as the people of Noah, whom Allah punished (v. 5) – they and other unbelievers are “Companions of the Fire” (v. 6).
The angels pray for the believers around the throne of Allah (vv. 7-9) and will address the unbelievers in hell, telling them that Allah hates them even more than they hate themselves (v. 10). Qatadah explained the mainstream view: “Allah’s hatred for the people of misguidance — when Faith is presented to them in this world, and they turn away from it and refuse to accept it — is greater than their hatred for themselves when they see the punishment of Allah with their own eyes on the Day of Resurrection.” Yet here again the decision as to who is guided to the truth and who remains an unbeliever is entirely up to Allah: no one can guide to the truth those whom Allah leaves to stray (v. 33) – which means, explains Ibn Kathir, that “whomever Allah sends astray will have no other guide except Him.”
The Tafsir al-Jalalayn explains the unbelievers’ question, “Our Lord, You have caused us to die twice, two deaths, and You have given us life twice” (v. 11): “For they were lifeless drops of semen, then they were given life, then made to die, then brought back to life for the Resurrection.” To their question, “Is there then any way to go out” of hell, the two Jalals say that “the answer given to them will be: No!” For they rejected the idea that only Allah was to be worshipped, and associated partners with him (v. 12). Muhammad should then call on Allah even though the unbelievers hate his doing so (v. 14), and should warn the unbelievers of the impending Day of Judgment (vv. 15-18). The unbelievers should travel the earth and see what became of those who refused to worship Allah alone in previous ages – for Allah is strict in punishment (vv. 21-22, 82-3).
Then verses 23-55 tell the story of Moses and Pharaoh with emphasis on Pharaoh’s intention to kill Moses (v. 26). A believer from among Pharaoh’s people asks him: “Will ye slay a man because he says, ‘My Lord is Allah’?” (v. 28). According to Maududi, this sura came to Muhammad when the unbelievers were plotting to kill him, so the parallels are obvious: as we have seen more than once, the Qur’an tells the story of an earlier prophet solely in order to make a point about the reception of Muhammad’s message by his contemporaries. And likewise this unnamed believer and contemporary of Moses warns his people that they are risking suffering the fate of those who rejected the earlier prophets (vv. 31, 34).
Pharaoh in his pride wanted to build a tower “to mount up to the god of Moses” (vv. 36-7), but ultimately his people were cast into the Fire (vv. 45-6). In hell the unbelievers will argue with each other over whose fault it was that they ended up there (vv. 47-48). Here again the unbelievers will ask to be released from hell, but will be refused (vv. 49-50). Allah promises to make his messengers victorious (v. 51); As-Suddi explains: “Allah never sends a Messenger to a people and they kill him or some of the believers who call them to the truth, then that generation passes away, but He then sends them someone who will support their call and will seek vengeance for their blood from those who did that to them in this world. So the Prophets and believers may be killed in this world, but their call will prevail in this world.” And indeed, Ibn Kathir adds, “Allah granted victory to His Prophet Muhammad and his Companions over those who had opposed him, disbelieved in him and shown hostility towards him. He caused His Word and His religion to prevail over all other religions…This religion will continue to prevail until the Hour begins.”
Allah tells Muhammad to be patient, for his promises will prove true (vv. 55, 77) – yet again indicating his tremendous solicitude for his prophet. We have seen the centrality of Muhammad in Islam is what led to Muslims being called “Muhammadans” in the West. Muslims universally reject this term as offensive, insisting that they do not worship Muhammad, but the Qur’anic reader, both Muslim and non-Muslim, seeing Allah’s constant concern for his prophet, faces two choices: he can view the repeated Qur’anic statements of Allah’s immense concern for his prophet as an attempt by Muhammad to bolster his stature and privileges as a prophet among his followers, or he can accept the proposition that Muhammad was essentially the most important and divinely beloved human being who ever lived. There doesn’t seem to be any other choice offered.
Verses 56-85 continue excoriating the unbelievers, who are motivated by nothing but pride (v. 56) – an oft-repeated Qur’anic trope that has led many Muslims through the ages and today to assume that non-Muslims know the truth of Islam but reject it out of selfish self-interest. The believers and unbelievers are not equal (v. 58) – those who reject Allah’s signs are deluded (vv. 62-3). The design of the natural world bears witness to Allah’s care for mankind, and his power (vv. 61, 64, 67). Those who reject Allah will soon know the truth (v. 70). Those whom people worship besides Allah will fail them (v. 74). Those who profess faith in Allah after they glimpse his punishments will still be punished (v. 85).
Next week: Sura 41, “Explained in Detail”: “The Unbelievers say: ‘Listen not to this Qur’an, but talk at random in the midst of its reading, that you may gain the upper hand!’”
(Here you can find links to all the earlier “Blogging the Qur’an” segments. Here is a good Arabic Qur’an, with English translations available; here are two popular Muslim translations, those of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, along with a third by M. H. Shakir. Here is another popular translation, that of Muhammad Asad. And here is an omnibus of ten Qur’an translations.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
If anyone has any questions or comments on this post, I’ll be checking in today to deal with them here, and per Michelle Malkin’s request, next week this series will continue at Jihad Watch.
Robert Spencer on August 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM
Wow. Will you still do the occasional “Jihad Watch” video here at Hot Air? I hate to see you leaving the Hot Air site but will follow your work at your site. Thanks Robert.
Zorro on August 24, 2008 at 8:41 AM
Zorro
No — again, per Michelle Malkin’s request. I may do an occasional video at Jihad Watch and post it at YouTube — or I may not.
Robert Spencer on August 24, 2008 at 8:52 AM
*looks at pic*
sorry you were saying?
sven10077 on August 24, 2008 at 8:52 AM
Well, you have a lot of fans here at Hot Air, we will follow your work no matter where it’s posted.
I’ve just registered as a commenter at Jihad Watch and will “see” you there.
Zorro on August 24, 2008 at 9:01 AM
HA is making a mistake. I’m willing to bet this series opened more eyes and influenced more people than 90% of all the Posts at HA. I can’t help but be very pessimistic about our future when our own allies are unwilling to make even small investments in education.
TheBigOldDog on August 24, 2008 at 9:08 AM
Really? Don’t tell me HA has gone dhimmi on us.
TheBigOldDog on August 24, 2008 at 9:12 AM
Being replaced by a “Blogging the Thoughts of Putin” series?
kc8ukw on August 24, 2008 at 9:35 AM
If Muhammed isn’t the anti-christ…I don’t know what is.
bridgetown on August 24, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Wow. To be blunt, I’m greatly disappointed. Of course, will follow you and the continuation at JW, but disappointing to say the least. Sure appreciate what you’ve done, Mr. Spencer – it’s a courageous path you’ve taken.
————
Muhammad must have been a good mood.
Spirit of 1776 on August 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Bad move.
Maxx on August 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Hmmmm…
Connie on August 24, 2008 at 9:58 AM
I’m kind of glad. It gets me to browse Jihad Watch, which I forget about, and there are some great posts over there.
Maybe that’s what Michelle has in mind?
bridgetown on August 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Mr. Spencer,
In verse 21:
Is this a reference to the Romans, whose Western Empire had fallen by Mohammad’s lifetime? Did anyone in Mohammad’s time call him on the fact that he had not “traveled the earth” outside of Arabia?
dentalque on August 24, 2008 at 10:03 AM
I’ll follow you to Jihad Watch, Mr. Spencer. I’m learning stuff.
But I am sad. Between this and the fact that no more videos are produced on this site, I miss the old school Hot Air site. I still hang out here, but it’s just not as much fun.
I guess the people who complained about the Koran Blogging got their way, huh?
mjk on August 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I think that a lot myself. But life is change, so I don’t want to complain. And despite the changes, I hang around ’cause I enjoy AP so much.
Spirit of 1776 on August 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I concur. Blogging the Quran is the only reason I visit HotAir. My attitude towards, not only Islam, but my own religious beliefs have been challenged, enlightened and informed by this excellent series.
The Jihad Watch videos that I have watched are outstanding as well.
Big mistake, Michelle. With the initial premise of independently produced video long gone, there is just no reason to visit this site anymore.
HeIsSailing on August 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM
It’s a sad day at HotAir for sure…
I will certainly head to JW to keep reading this series.
JetBoy on August 24, 2008 at 11:08 AM
There are many excellent reasons to visit Jihad Watch.
Questions for the candidates
Connie on August 24, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Leaving Hot Air? That’s very disappointing. Blogging the Qur’an was one of my two reasons to come to this site regularly. I hope this doesn’t mean the Powers That Be see less of a threat from jihadist Islam, and thus less of a need to understand its sources.
Like I said: I’m very disappointed — in Hot Air.
Regardless, thank you for taking the time to produce this each week, Robert. Even though I may only rarely comment, it’s been very educational and enlightening. I’ve had Jihad Watch on a feed for a while now, so I’ll gladly follow the series there, too.
irishspy on August 24, 2008 at 11:19 AM
I have been reading these assiduously and with great appreciation. Thank you for the scholarship, Dr. Spencer.
RushBaby on August 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Maybe HOTAiR had death threats. That would be very late in the series, so close to the end.
There is ambiguity in every business/house.
Entelechy on August 24, 2008 at 12:21 PM
I often wonder if Muslim men have over whelming control problems as a group. Are they afraid of women or afraid of thmeselves? This shallow but persistent thought crosses my mind every time I read Spencer’s useful and enlightening synopsis. I shall continue to read it at Jihad too since I do not want , EVER, to have to read the thing myself but still like to know.
jeanie on August 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM
I, like the others, am disappointed. I hope MM reads all of our comments.
I, too, will follow the series at JW, I already check in several times a week. Thank you, Robert, for your diligence and hard work!
bikermailman on August 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM
I guess this is part of the right wing shift to protecting Islam by censoring any negativity in order to curry favor with the restive folk in places like Iraq and Dearborn. If your going to buy them you should not whisper darkly about them.
Considering that neither presidential candidate knows their elbows from their nether regions when it comes to Islam, I suppose there is no reason to consider America has any chance against Islam so they may as well censor Islam at HotAir so as not to appear racist to independents or Hillary waifs who might vote for McCain and whatever advisers Saudi Arabia provides him.
Apparently, stories about balloon and bunting fund raising and transitory meaningless election trivia is the rule of the day.
BL@KBIRD on August 24, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Don’t think so. Might be internal politics, a.k.a. ambiguity to the outside.
Entelechy on August 24, 2008 at 12:39 PM
MDE, I agree. Unfortunately we will probably never know :( Robert is too class to say.
Spirit of 1776 on August 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I’m shocked that Michelle Malkin would make such a decision. I find it hard to believe it’s a business decision since Sundays here at Hot Air are so slow as to be this side of dead.
What’s really sorta comical about this is that I wouldn’t even know about Hot Air is it weren’t for Jihad Watch. I followed a link from there to here a few months after Hot Air went online. It was great fun to go back through the archives and watch all the daily videos to get caught up.
Once those stopped this site did get pretty boring.
Maybe she can’t afford the bandwidth because of all the links? I don’t know how this stuff works, but I hope she explains herself. She must have known that she was committing herself to a couple of years when she agreed to do it.
Well, maybe they don’t care about their page hits on Sundays. I have no reason to come here on Sundays anymore.
Jaynie59 on August 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM
Word. Who is the talent?
Jaibones on August 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM
Strange turn of events indeed.
- The Cat
MirCat on August 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Has Michelle received threats, or is it just a change of direction for HotAir?
Most Sundays I read your post, Robert, though I don’t comment. Thanks for blogging for us.
jaime on August 24, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Thank you Michelle Malkin for allowing Robert Spencer to post at Hot Air for as long as you did. If you did not, I never would have known who he was nor learned as much about Islam an the threat to Western Civilization that it poses. I suppose, to be fair, I should thank David Horowitz as well.
Because of MM, Mr. Spencer you have sold several (dozen) books as I continue to buy them and give them to my friends.
Mr. Spencer, in your own words you stated your intentions thus:
So over the course of the next few months, I’m going to read it, and discuss it in a series of columns. All of it. Not “cherry-picked” or “out of context.” The whole thing, beginning to end. Some of you may be familiar with David Plotz’s series on Slate, “Blogging the Bible.” This series will be similar to that one, but rather than just write about what I think or feel about a certain passage, I will, unlike Plotz, refer to commentaries – all Muslim ones – on the Qur’an. I’ll try to explain how mainstream Muslims who study the Qur’an will understand any given passage, and what its import might be for non-Muslims.
Well I guess a few months turned into years but by continuing the series you show yourself to be a man of your word and an all around class act. Many people of accomplishment are not recognized in their own time. I hope (and pray) that it will not take another 9/11/01, or something much worse for the public opinion to think that of your work.
dentalque on August 24, 2008 at 7:05 PM
Perhaps Michelle Malkin has proclaimed the Shahadah.
:)
Shy Guy on August 25, 2008 at 4:18 AM
I have been reading this series for a while, never commented, but I will surely follow you to Jihad Watch.
That’s a bad Michelle!
Doppleganker on August 25, 2008 at 9:09 AM
Allow me to add my expression of disappointment with Mr. Spencer’s hasty departure. I trust that there is a perfectly legitimate reason, but it obviously left many of us blindsided, as it were.
fourstringfuror on August 25, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Well, that’s a bother; the day I finally get a HotAir comment registration is the day I discover that Mr Spencer is moving house, so to speak.
So, may I just say thank you, Mr Spencer, for making the effort to write these weekly articles and answering the questions that arise.
I believe you once remarked that you had a strong affection (my words, not yours) for the Qur’an which rather amazed me. I did try to read your articles each week but I confess that I do find the Qur’an itself to be a dreary, soul-destroying read and the supposedly special teachings of Islam to be tediously evil and foolish. I am glad that you have been able to grapple with it without, it seems, becoming depressed by your contact with it.
Thank you again for your contributions here, and the effort that you have put into this project.
YiZhangZhe on August 25, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Mr. Spencer,
I will definitely follow you to Jihad Watch, and I am extremely disappointed in this site’s decision to bump this most excellent, interesting, informative, and in this day and age, critically important series.
ncc770 on August 25, 2008 at 10:08 AM
We’ll see you over at J.W., Robert, sorry to see you leave us :-(
Tony737 on August 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM
I’ll follow to Jihad Watch, but I can’t say I’m not dissapointed in the decision.
See you over at JW.
crazy_legs on August 25, 2008 at 10:27 AM
I must say that I am saddened and disappointed.
It seems a bit odd that, a week after some numb nuts posted how stupid and boring this series was, suddenly it is no longer welcome here?
I usually don’t get to visit this site until Monday mornings, but one of the only reasons I made it a point to visit was this Blogging the Qur’an series.
I sure wish Michelle, et al, would post the reason for this move. I am sure (or at least hopeful) that it has a rational basis.
Thank you very much Mr. Spencer for sharing your knowledge and insight with us. This was really the only “reader friendly” way I had of finding out exactly what the Qur’an said, but alas . . . . .
Fatal on August 25, 2008 at 11:51 AM
See you all over at Jihad Watch!!
Thanks Mr Spencer we all appreciate your scholarship.
equidem on August 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM
I have been an interested reader and will continue to follow Dr. Spencer’s fascinating series over at his Jihad Watch site.
However, I would like to mildly chide my fellow readers- I personally hesitate to assume that Ms. Malkin is asking Dr. Spencer to move for any reasons other than professional. She has been a persistent fighter against Islamic creep in all its forms, and I feel certain that this move is for reasons that she and Dr. Spencer worked out together for their mutual benefit. Until and unless we are otherwise enlightened, it is churlish of us to assume motives that are otherwise.
In the meantime, I wish to add my voice to thank Ms. Malkin for hosting the ‘Blogging the Q’uran’ series (and all the other content that Allahpundit and Captain Ed provide) and Dr. Spencer for his monumental work in putting this series together for our education. I look forward to its continuance at the Jihad Watch site.
StoneHeads on August 25, 2008 at 4:00 PM
I’m sorry to hear that Robert’s moving out. I didn’t read the Koran blogs all the time, but the simple fact of having them on the HotAir site is an asset in itself. It beats me why Michelle doesn’t want them here anymore.
Like many of the other posters, I’m pretty disappointed by this move. Guess I’ll add Jihad Watch to my IE startup list then.
Aylios on August 25, 2008 at 4:22 PM
Sorry, I’ve been trying to think of one “professional” reason for this weekly feature to be shuffled off. I suppose if Mr Spencer were being compensated for his work here it might make sense in some way but that has never been mentioned. Somebody needs to say something non-cryptic about this if they don’t want the worst to be assumed. Wouldn’t that be “professional”??
TBinSTL on August 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM
I’m sorry to see this blog go. It was one of the most interesting things here at Hot Air.
I’m going to especially miss it since its the last gasp of a level of involvment by Michelle Malkin and other illuminaries here at Hot Air that we haven’t seen in a long while.
RAB on August 26, 2008 at 12:53 AM
Comment pages: