Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Obama flip-flop: Oil and Freddie Mac lobbyist as foreign-policy adviser

posted at 11:10 am on August 20, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Barack Obama and his campaign has spent most of the spring and summer demonizing lobbyists, especially those who work for the oil industry and those who now work for John McCain.  Now, however, lobbying is A-OK at Team Obama, as their new foreign-policy adviser, David Shapiro, also lobbies for the American Petroleum Institute, the main lobbying organization for what Democrats like Obama call “Big Oil” (via Matt Lewis):

Signaling an intensified effort to compete for the Jewish vote, the Obama campaign appointed Daniel Shapiro as a senior policy adviser and Jewish outreach coordinator on Tuesday.

Shapiro, who has long advised the campaign on issues connected to the Jewish community and Middle East policy, is taking on a heightened role as the campaign ramps up its staff ahead of the Democratic convention and the general election race this fall. …

Shapiro, who accompanied Obama on his recent trip to Israel, has worked as a Washington lobbyist as well as in several Congressional offices and the National Security Council during the Clinton administration. A former deputy chief of staff to Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Florida), he has also been a staff adviser to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) and former House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Lee Hamilton (D-Indiana).

Hey, Shapiro also has an indirect connection to …. Cindy McCain?  Like Jim Johnson, Shapiro also has ties to Freddie Mac, which the Fed had to rescue from its incompetence:

Daniel Shapiro, one of Obama’s foreign policy advisers on the Middle East, registered to lobby for several corporate clients in the last year, since leaving the office of Rep. Bill Nelson (D-Fla). Shapiro, who worked during the 1990s for President Bill Clinton’s National Security Council, counts some of America’s biggest corporate names among his clients, including beermaker Anheuser-Busch, carmaker Daimler Chrysler, the American Petroleum Institute and Freddie Mac.

As I have written in the past, lobbyists represent Americans to an increasingly distant Congress.  There is nothing inherently wrong with lobbying, and in fact is an activity explicitly protected by the First Amendment.  Lobbyists who act unethically and illegally should rightly get investigated, prosecuted, and jailed for any corrruption they commit or cause to occur, but demonizing the process of petitioning Congress is simply wrong.  If politicians want to curtail the influence of lobbyists, the most effective method open to them is to limit the reach of the federal government and thereby reduce the spoils that fuel lobbyists.

For those politicians who use populist demagoguery to demonize lobbyists, though, the act of making lobbyists their closest advisers represents a special kind of hypocrisy.  That doubles when the same politician routinely demonizes the industry that employed the lobbyist, and increases exponentially when said lobbyist worked for several industries castigated by the candidate.

Obama has shrieked about the oppressive nature of Big Oil and the failures of Freddie Mac and the entire housing and lending industry.  What does it say about Obama that he hired a man who represented both as a lobbyist?  It looks like  a great demonstration of that old Western aphorism: All hat, no cattle.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

It looks like a great demonstration of that old Western aphorism: All hat, no cattle.

More like, When your adversary begins to self-destruct, just get out of the way.

Akzed on August 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM

Akzed on August 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM

Timber!!!!

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on August 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM

Ed, did you see this article? CP linked it overnight:

Some Democrats Urge Delay in Building a U.S. Missile System in Eastern Europe

By ERIC LIPTON
Published: August 19, 2008
WASHINGTON — As the Bush administration speeds ahead with plans to construct a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, some Democrats in Congress want to put on the brakes, saying it has not been adequately tested.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was scheduled to be in Warsaw on Wednesday to sign an agreement on the missiles with Poland, which agreed to the basing of 10 interceptors last week, after the Russian attacks on Georgia. Justified as a defense against a missile attack on Europe by a rogue nation like Iran, the installation has provoked outrage from Russia.

Even before the agreement was reached, the Bush administration had proposed spending $712 million in the coming fiscal year to start digging silos in Poland; installing a related radar system in the Czech Republic, another former Soviet satellite that is now a NATO member; and buying initial parts for the first interceptor missiles.

But Democrats are now questioning all that spending as premature.

“Go ahead and move on with research and development,” said Representative Ellen O. Tauscher, Democrat of California, who is chairwoman of the House subcommittee that oversees the missile defense program. “But as far as putting holes in the ground in Poland, we are saying no.”

The two presidential candidates have also taken sides, with Senator John McCain supporting quick construction while Senator Barack Obama is urging caution, saying the system is unproven.

Obama may want to shake up his foreign policy team again…

Cue Powerline:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021248.php

funky chicken on August 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM

Jim Johnson was CEO of Fannie Mae. Shapiro lobbied for Freddie Mac. They are different institutions.

Freddie Mac paid a huge fine to the FEC in 2005 because it chief lobbyist hosted a series of fundraisers at a very expensive Washington restaurant which discounted its food and drink charges. The Wall Street Journal exposed the scam and Freddie fired the lobbyist. Those discounts should have been reported by the candidates as in-kind contributions but weren’t. I attended several of these fundraisers.

Freddie did not have the bareknuckles lobbying operation that Fannie did, but unlike Fannie it actually was cited for breaking campaign finance laws, and Freddie was much more deeply into subprime lending than Fannie ever was.

rockmom on August 20, 2008 at 11:21 AM

There is a simple explanation for this. It is for the greater good.

a capella on August 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM

I just hope Obama holds it together long enough to get to Denver.

If he implodes badly, as it looks like he’s going to, we could see a McCain vs. Clinton campaign after all.

Mew

acat on August 20, 2008 at 11:25 AM

The revelations come daily and often now. I thought Baracky was a joke before, now he is showcasing himself as the slimiest of the slimy.

Bishop on August 20, 2008 at 11:29 AM

We ink a deal with Poland for missiles, the Dems nix funding, Poland sits out on a limb in Russian’s front yard. Nice.

Akzed on August 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM

“Don’t interupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake”

BobMbx on August 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM

I just hope Obama holds it together long enough to get to Denver.

If he implodes badly, as it looks like he’s going to, we could see a McCain vs. Clinton campaign after all.

Mew

acat on August 20, 2008 at 11:25 AM

Lets hope Obama and McCain both crash and burn so we can start over and elect candidates that aren’t in the tank for amnesty.

saiga on August 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM

What??? A slimy politician from CHICAGO?

I’d have to be an idiot liberal to not expect this!!!

benrand on August 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM

It looks like a great demonstration of that old Western aphorism: All hat, no cattle.

All mouth and trousers

LimeyGeek on August 20, 2008 at 11:41 AM

Obama is tying his own cement shoes.

Connie on August 20, 2008 at 11:44 AM

All this Hope and Change garbage sounds like old tired politics.

coldwarrior on August 20, 2008 at 12:01 PM

Lets hope Obama and McCain both crash and burn so we can start over and elect candidates that aren’t in the tank for amnesty.

saiga on August 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Damn, but you’re tiresome.

a capella on August 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM

a capella on August 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM –

Yep.

While the house is buring down is not the best time to reflect on new wallpaper designs.

coldwarrior on August 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM

The Dali Bama is a TYPICAL CHICAGO POLITICIAN. Typical I tell ya.

DfDeportation on August 20, 2008 at 12:11 PM

Lets hope Obama and McCain both crash and burn so we can start over and elect candidates that aren’t in the tank for amnesty.

saiga on August 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Damn, but you’re tiresome.

a capella on August 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM

BUILD THE WALL…..DEPORT THEM ALL!

DfDeportation on August 20, 2008 at 12:13 PM

If politicians want to curtail the influence of lobbyists, the most effective method open to them is to limit the reach of the federal government and thereby reduce the spoils that fuel lobbyists.

Very well said Ed…

Bogeyfre on August 20, 2008 at 12:48 PM

some Democrats in Congress want to put on the brakes, saying it has not been adequately tested.

Why don’t the do the same with Obama? He’s got less “testing” than nearly any candidate they could have selected.

electric-rascal on August 20, 2008 at 1:14 PM

If politicians want to curtail the influence of lobbyists, the most effective method open to them is to limit the reach of the federal government and thereby reduce the spoils that fuel lobbyists.

Here, here!

This point should be made over and over every day, since it goes to the root of what is wrong with government today: too much power over far too many aspects of an individual’s life in America.

JDPerren on August 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM

If politicians want to curtail the influence of lobbyists, the most effective method open to them is to limit the reach of the federal government and thereby reduce the spoils that fuel lobbyists.

Amen, brother!

For those politicians who use populist demagoguery to demonize lobbyists, though, the act of making lobbyists their closest advisers represents a special kind of hypocrisy. That doubles when the same politician routinely demonizes the industry that employed the lobbyist, and increases exponentially when said lobbyist worked for several industries castigated by the candidate.

Hopenchange strikes, again! NOT!

He’s just another in a long line of pandering members of the political class.

Wildcatter1980 on August 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM

Why don’t the do the same with Obama? He’s got less “testing” than nearly any candidate they could have selected.

electric-rascal on August 20, 2008 at 1:14 PM

I’m waiting for the ad as we type. Title it UNPROVEN.

funky chicken on August 20, 2008 at 1:58 PM

and shouldn’t it be unproved anyway? is unproven even a word?

funky chicken on August 20, 2008 at 1:59 PM

Demogaugery we can’t believe in.

clghitis on August 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM

Obama a Noob we can’t trust.

Chakra Hammer on August 20, 2008 at 2:41 PM

BO, before:
“Freddie Mac officials, uh, Big Oil people, uh,& uh, lobbyists are evil!”
BO, today: “Shapiro can get some Jews to vote for me? It’s all good!”

jgapinoy on August 20, 2008 at 4:10 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.