Want an Obama lawn sign? Cough up the cash!
posted at 5:50 pm on August 18, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Maybe Barack Obama has a fundraising problem in the Twin Cities. When Monte Bute wanted to display his support for Obama on his lawn and communicate Hope and Change to his neighbors, he got a rude awakening from the local Obama HQ. After securing a commitment from Bute to door-knock on a weekend in the future, they gladly offered him a lawn sign … for $8 and up:
A few days ago I received a letter from Barack Obama, pleading that I “rush a generous contribution” to him. I placed the return envelope in my checkbook.
The same evening I got a call from his campaign asking me to door-knock on the weekend. I already had plans but I agreed to future weekends.
Then I requested a lawn sign. The volunteer informed me that I could buy one at campaign headquarters.
Buy one? Purchased in bulk, a two-color lawn sign might cost the Obama campaign $1. I checked the Obama ’08 Web site. They offer the budget-conscious supporter a generic 26-by-16-inch sign for $8. For those Obamites into conspicuous consumption, the site advertises a variety of 22-by-15-inch designer signs for $19.99. If this were an oil company, the Democrats would be accusing it of price gouging. As Kurt Vonnegut put it, “So it goes.”
That’s one hell of a markup at Team Obama.
As Bute points out in his cri de coeur, the Obama campaign looks pretty mercenary for a “movement”. Last week its “free” tickets to the acceptance speech at Invesco Field turned into a demand for uncompensated labor. Now it wants to charge people for the privilege of advertising on their property.
Even more laughably, when Bute challenged them on this policy, they explained that they had to find a revenue source after rejecting “contributions from PACs and lobbyists”. Really? On the same day that Bute’s column appeared in the St. Paul Pioneer Press, the Los Angeles Times reported on Obama’s solicitation of contributions from those same PACs and lobbyists to get the DNCC out of the red in Denver. How many more lies can Team Obama tell to get cash out of the saps who want to support The One?
They won’t get any from Bute. He says he will not donate to the Obama campaign nor work on their behalf until they stop charging for lawn signs. Bute also wants to charge the Obama campaign for the hours he spent writing an early op-ed singing his praises. Perhaps Bute, a professor of sociology at a local university, should learn from his experience and understand the fundamental baloney of Hope and Change.
And a note to Team Obama: If you’ve started to disillusion the academics in Minnesota, you’re really in big trouble.
(via King Banaian, who wonders whether the true value of a lawn sign is in advertising or revenue)
Update: Some note that John McCain sells campaign signs through his website as well. However, that would appear to be for those who don’t go down to a campaign office to get one for themselves. (The McCain site doesn’t charge for shipping, for instance.) I’ve never heard of anyone getting charged for a sign at an HQ, especially not those who volunteer to work for the campaign.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Oh, good: Iranian hackers trying to break into the American energy grid

Reason: Will ObamaCare and patent attacks kill medical innovation?







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.
Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2