Free naked grannies. Naked grannies. Free naked old grannies videos. Old naked grannies….

T. Boone Pickens most certainly is NOT right. Wind Energy is a joke and we can drill our way out of this…

Reserves:
- 1.8 to 6 Trillion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Oil-Shale Reserves (DOE)
- 986 Billion barrels of oil are estimated using Coal-to-liquids (CTL) conversion of U.S. Coal Reserves (DOE)
- 173 to 315 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the Oil Sands of Alberta, Canada (Alberta Department of Energy)
- 100 Billion barrels of heavy oil are estimated in the U.S. (DOE)
- 90 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the Arctic (USGS)
- 89 Billion barrels of immobile oil are estimated recoverable using CO2 injection in the U.S. (DOE)
- 86 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (MMS)
- 60 to 80 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in U.S. Tar Sands (DOE)
- 32 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in ANWR, NPRA and the Central North Slope in Alaska (USGS)
- 31.4 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the East Greenland Rift Basins Province (USGS)
- 7.3 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the West Greenland–East Canada Province (USGS)
- 4.3 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Bakken shale formation in North Dakota and Montana (USGS)
- 3.65 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Devonian-Mississippian Bakken Formation (USGS)
- 1.6 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Eastern Great Basin Province (USGS)
- 1.3 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Permian Basin Province (USGS)
- 1.1 Billion barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Powder River Basin Province (USGS)
- 990 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Portion of the Michigan Basin (USGS)
- 393 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. San Joaquin Basin Province of California (USGS)
- 214 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Illinois Basin (USGS)
- 172 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Yukon Flats of East-Central Alaska (USGS)
- 131 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Southwestern Wyoming Province (USGS)
- 109 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Montana Thrust Belt Province (USGS)
- 104 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Denver Basin Province (USGS)
- 98.5 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Bend Arch-Fort Worth Basin Province (USGS)
- 94 Million barrels of oil are estimated in the U.S. Hanna, Laramie, Shirley Basins Province (USGS)

“There are no turbines on my ranch, because I think they are ugly.“ – T. Boone Pickens, 2008

The Wind Cries ‘Bailout!’ (FOX News)
Is T. Boone Pickens ‘Swiftboating’ America? (FOX News)
Pickens Gives New Meaning to ‘Self-Government’ (FOX News)

Corruption on the City Council

Pass the damn law!!

More people trust Mccain on energy than tire gauge boy, and energy is now the dominant issue in this election.

‘…But, it’s not really about wind power. It’s about using this eco “front” to sieze land. This guy is trying to be the John D. Rockefeller of water. marklmail on August 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM

So for all the money [trillions] that’s to be made in the production of energy; you’re saying there’s also, or will be [trillions] to me made in water.

You may have something there; the Saudis can’t drink their oil. In Dubai they spend billions to desalinate seawater.

Be carefull, before you know it, people around here will be declaring that you don’t believe there is any difference between the US and Russia.

MarkTheGreat on August 18, 2008 at 1:55 PM

The “keto decision” will let Pickens sieze private land and, maybe more importantly, water rights from the middle of the country to the Pacific and the Atlantic. Private property will have to be taken via eminent domain to get the power from the wind units in the middle of the US, out to the coasts. But, it’s not really about wind power. It’s about using this eco “front” to sieze land. This guy is trying to be the John D. Rockefeller of water.

Do Democrats actually listen to T Boone Pickens?

Perhaps they should actually listen to Pickens, . . .

In fact, Pickens has actively endorsed the Republican “kitchen sink”
plan. He wants to drill in the OCS, in ANWR, in……

rslancer14 on August 18, 2008 at 1:53 PM

We; “she who must be obeyed” and my own self, are thinking of our children and grandchildren with our investment in alternative energy resources.

A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often….

Says “this is one pickle we can’t drill our way out of.”
I subscribe to his news letter, so can you.

Pragmatism is his gambit and a diversified approach to filling our continuing need for additional energy is his hallmark.

A combination of wind, solar, geothermal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear development is the type of diversified, hybrid, approach that is both necessary and required for our energy independence.

He will use the flawed “Kelo” decision of the Supreme Court to

Be carefull, before you know it, people around here will be declaring that you don’t believe there is any difference between the US and Russia.

Put the derricks 40 miles out and paint them blue. Nobody onshore will ever see them.

40 miles out, nobody will see the, whatever color their painted. Beyond being too small to see at 40 miles, their over the horizon anyway.

The reason Pickens is putting out all these ads is because their is a huge subsidy on wind power that is about to expire.

California just approved using just over 12 square miles to build a solar facility to generate at best 800 MW. A single reactor will generate just over 1000 WM and are a bit smaller than 12 quare miles.

Who cares how much space is used by a solar plant? Are you worried about the fate of the desert flea? Mining coal for power is far worse if you’re worried about the enviornment.

By the way, the 800 MW plant is under development by a major utility PG&E, not a state government.

Pickens does support drilling expansion but also wants a national energy policy that favors alternative energy. If you look at US military spending in the gulf region, it’s clear that oil costs more than what consumers pay at the pump. Neither party is behind this direction. It’s too easy to get the party lackeys fired up by pointing fingers across the aisle.

Seriously though, the Dems are nuts to put any trust in that guy. He wants to get pork for his wind and gas interests, and he wants to drill too. This doesn’t help them at all, but then again, I don’t think anything can help them besides reversing course.

marklmail on August 18, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Perhaps Pickens, being an olde oil man; could convince some of the oil companies to let him use some of those 68,000,000, acres they haven’t seen fit to drill on as wind generator sites?