Laugh of the day: Obama blames McCain for messianic imagery
posted at 12:30 pm on August 17, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Earlier, I linked to the CBN interview David Brody conducted with Barack Obama to point out the Democrat’s continued untruthfulness on the infanticide-prevention measure that Obama opposed in the Illinois legislature. In reading one other portion of the interview transcribed by Brody, Obama accuses John McCain of deliberately targeting him with both messianic and anti-Christ imagery in an attempt to impugn his character:
Brody: Let me ask you a little about some of these ads that John McCain has been running not just on television, but on the web. Let’s face it, let’s call a spade a spade, there has been some Messianic references, there’s been some antichrist stuff going on, the celebrity, they’re trying to pigeonhole you a certain way. Do you believe this is being done on purpose?
Obama: Well of course it’s being done on purpose. They’re not spending a whole bunch of money to make me out as a good guy. They’re engaging in the kind of politics that I think we’ve become accustomed to which is you try to tear your opponents down and you engage in sort of slash and burn tactics. And very personal sort of personal character attacks. And one of the challenges for us in this campaign is how do you make sure those attacks are answered quickly and forcefully, but also truthfully and that we don’t fall into that same kind of tactic.
Obama doesn’t fall into the same tactic? Really? How about on June 21st in Jacksonville, when he accused McCain of preparing racist attacks on him?
“It is going to be very difficult for Republicans to run on their stewardship of the economy or their outstanding foreign policy,” Obama told a fundraiser in Jacksonville, Florida. “We know what kind of campaign they’re going to run. They’re going to try to make you afraid.
“They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?”
Or perhaps July 30, when Obama claimed that McCain had already begun racist attacks:
“They know that you’re not real happy with them and so the only way they figure they’re going to win this election is if they make you scared of me,” Obama continued, repeating an attack from earlier in the day. “What they’re saying is ‘Well, we know we’re not very good but you can’t risk electing Obama. You know, he’s new, he doesn’t look like the other presidents on the currency, he’s a got a funny name.’”
As for the anti-Christ imagery, no one can actually point to anything coming from the McCain campaign, except for Obama’s own logo coming out of a sunset in one commercial poking fun at his celebrity, which apparently resembles the cover art from Tim LaHaye’s rapture-based Left Behind novel series. On the charges of racism, Dan Balz notes that the Obama campaign cannot produce a single example from either the McCain campaign or the RNC. Obama hasn’t let a lack of evidence keep him from perptuating his smear campaign against John McCain — which means he’s doing exactly what he claims here that he isn’t.
Besides, who was it that came up with these images? They didn’t come from McCain supporters:



As far as I know, it wasn’t McCain that had women fainting at his feet in a series of campaign events. And McCain didn’t write the speech in which Obama claimed that his nomination was the moment “the oceans began to recede and the planet began to heal”:
Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.
McCain didn’t invent Obama’s arrogance. He’s merely having a lot of fun pointing it out.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6 Next »
I really feel bad for all those people under the Obama bus; when the faltering wheels finally go flying off, they will be crushed to bits. Sad sad way to to go.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Good stuff Ed.
I left this on an old thread. I think you may enjoy it:
Aug 17, 2008 10:02 | Updated Aug 17, 2008 17:41
The audacity of resume-padding (or, why Obama makes things up)
By ABRAHAM KATSMAN AND KORY BARDASH
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1218710381368&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 12:35 PM
There has to be hundreds under that bus by now.
becki51758 on August 17, 2008 at 12:36 PM
It’s now clear . . . Obama is an absolute lunatic.
rplat on August 17, 2008 at 12:39 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/us/politics/05text-obama.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
Maybe McCain wrote that speech too?
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 12:40 PM
So, the hundred million or so that Obama spent for the ads (reflected in the posters, among other things) were something that is Mccain’s fault.
America, meet arrogant victimization, taken to the extreme.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Son of Promise, Child of Hope
ninjapirate on August 17, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Believe Again
ninjapirate on August 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Yea, though his bus runneth over.
dragondrop on August 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Any art experts or dilettantes out there in Hot Air land?
What is the genre of Obama’s propaganda art, or is propaganda itself a genre? Seriously, I have a book of old Soveit political art I used to page through — until last week — with a sense of triumph — and I see similarities in the forms.
Is this just my expecting to see Obama’s imagery in a certain way, or is there really a form here?
jeff_from_mpls on August 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM
I can’t wait for Gilda to chime in, with commentary and pictures. Gilda, you are the best.
The books, the image-making, the 20 years in the church, the calculation, the making of a Messiah…, the triple-nuanced take on every issue, whatever is need to say/do to win…and then reality sets in that mortals actually are the ones who vote.
Heh, just smile of the day, but it must be hard to get back to Earth. This is “change” I believe in!
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM
These Obama pep rallies are becoming offensive to me. He is, after all, running for one of the highest offices in the land. Instead of giving it SOME dignity, however small, he, his people and his constituency have started to come across as adolescents running a pep rally for other adolescents and are becoming increasingly childish and silly. They have these chants, logos, tee shirts, designer clothing, rock concerts, handshakes and swooning and screaming and on it goes!! It seems lost on them that some of us may actually be looking for an ADULT to run this country.
jeanie on August 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM
jeff_from_mpls on August 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM –
The genre? Socialist Realism.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Looks like a sign of the future…we’re going from “It’s Bush’s fault!” to “It’s McCain’s fault!”.
JetBoy on August 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM
JetBoy on August 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM –
Ya think they’ll ever figure out that finding fault is often times faulty?
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Not to mention, when asked why he was running for president, he responded that America “is no longer what it could be, what it once was.”
Implying that the USA sucks now and BO personally has the power to restore us to our former glory!
RushBaby on August 17, 2008 at 12:57 PM
I hope the Baracky campaign provides a link showing that Obama absolutely detested the ‘Rolling Stone’ halo-image of himself.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Saint Mc should spend lot more time polishing his own image than he does ridiculing and ostracizing Obama’s.
Only if you can “handle the truth”…the real unvarnished truth should you expose yourself to the “Real McCain”.
Remember, I warned you!
J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I thought everything was Rove’s fault.
HawaiiLwyr on August 17, 2008 at 1:01 PM
Obama gives me the tingle of new respect for the honesty and integrity that was present in the campaigns of Kerry, Gore and Clinton.
Dusty on August 17, 2008 at 1:03 PM
What is “infanticide-prevention?”
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 1:06 PM
Ok, what the heck is this supposed to mean? Why would anybody want the oceans to recede? Sounds kinda creepy to me.
surrounded on August 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Gocht, that was fabulous.
McCain was such a crappy combat pilot that he managed to collide with an anti-aircraft missile, though one would wonder why his admiral daddy didn’t pull more strings to keep his son out of combat.
Then McCain…GASP!…was involved in enemy progaganda. Sure, he had the living hell beaten out of him on a daily basis for six years but don’t pay attention to that. How long would you last if your back and legs were striped with a rubber hose day after day?
What a pathetic attempt to slander McCain.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Bahahaha!
surrounded on August 17, 2008 at 1:08 PM
If he ISN’T the messiah, then what is left really?
He can’t say, oh, I’m just a humble guy.
Then why are you running for President, humble guy?
Because you have no accomplishments or experience.
You have lots to be humble about, but why should you be in the White House?
NoDonkey on August 17, 2008 at 1:09 PM
Hey Gocht, might you have a link detailing how McCain purposely had himself terribly injured so that he could get preferential treatment from the North Vietnamese? You know, something that outlines his desire to be bayoneted and have his teeth smashed out so as to get a bigger rat-infested cell than the rest of the prisoners.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 1:12 PM
Again, did McCain write this speech, Obamanuts?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/us/politics/05text-obama.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 1:12 PM
Hey Gocht ya
What is “You Tube”? Is that where one goes to find the absolute truth of things? My goodness! I was going to vote for McCain but now I don’t know…. Oh heck! Just to piss you off I think I will vote for McCain.
Vince on August 17, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Remember, I warned you…!
My point being…”Those who would live in glass houses are ill advised to cast rocks at other [houses] and such…?”
Hey; you’re right, I might not have lasted ten minutes under the same duress?
My admonishment still stands.
J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 1:22 PM
Barack Hussein Obama ( Snob-ama).
.
The Inartful Dodger.
shooter on August 17, 2008 at 1:23 PM
What? No one has pilloried this guy for his obvious coded racism yet?
Hannibal Smith on August 17, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Ed, your reasoned deconstruction of Obama’s finger pointing is racist.
AbaddonsReign on August 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM
Not befitting a special forces guy. My admonishment will stand, and so will my respect and gratitude for your service, some of your commentary notwithstanding. Respectfully,
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM
J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 1:22 PM
Yeah, those glass houses. Perhaps you should advise the Obama campaign to start a wholesale program of ridiculing McCain’s POW experience. They could start by claiming that being dragged into the Hanoi Hilton with injuries so terrible that McCain’s comrades didn’t he would last the night wasn’t really all that bad.
Your admonishment is built on a foundation of sand, but feel free to answer why McCain’s “Admiral Daddy” saw fit to give his son a cushy job flying into the most lethal anti-aircraft system ever devised.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 1:32 PM
[J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 1:22 PM]
Then why are you throwing rocks?
Dusty on August 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM
The new “Buy America” logo is the winged beast of the antichrist!!
MayBee on August 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM
Well, I guess if you can’t blame GWB much longer, you need to get used to blaming MC CAIN… Yeah, and when chickens get lips, they will learn how to whistle!!!
pueblo1032 on August 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM
A law that would have prohibited hospitals in Illinois from treating babies that survived abortion attempts from being dumped in dirty utility closets and left there to die — without being provided any type of medical care, including palliative care.
This type of infanticide was being practiced in a Chicago hospital when a nurse in the hospital went public about it. Illinois legislators tried to put a stop to it with a law that would have required that live infants who survived abortion attempts be provided with medical care, but their efforts to pass the law were thwarted by Illinois Senator Barack Obama, who has repeatedly lied about his reasons for doing so.
But you knew this already, didn’t you alphie?
AZCoyote on August 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM
I forgot about that one. I was ready to give Obama the benefit of the doubt based on the rest of the record. But this is just so ridiculously over the top, it’s a deal breaker. This is straight out of the Gospel, healing the sick, and “even the winds and sea obey him” — stopping global warming, and healing the planet. FYI, the Gospels were about Jesus who’s widely recognized as a Messiah. If Obama’s own rhetoric paints himself as a modern-day Messiah, then he can’t really blame others for the characterisation.
Paul-Cincy on August 17, 2008 at 1:47 PM
[J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 1:22 PM]
Why do we always get at least one “nut case” on every thread?
duff65 on August 17, 2008 at 1:49 PM
Obama and his fan club want it both ways. They want to appear above it all, imagery and all, but they also want to sling some mud themselves.
Hypocrite.
Terrye on August 17, 2008 at 1:49 PM
duff:
They coordinate their assaults.
Terrye on August 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM
Never heard of it before, AZ.
Would you Rapture Republicans favor raising taxes to pay for the support of these unfortunates?
Or would you guys just see them “dumped in dirty utility closets and left there to die,” too?
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM
Why raise taxes to pay for their care, we could always cut spending.
Sorry…that idea must have been hard on your nervous system. My apologies.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 1:59 PM
There were many who managed (as per your reference) to fly their aircraft into the way of hostile enemy fire during the Vietnam conflict. Some made it back, some did not, and some are still MIA.
I have to assume that you, then, would place all of them at the same level of incompetence.
If you were able to “handle the truth” you might discover that most who ascribe to your version of the “truth”, and especially one such as Barack Obama, could not even qualify to carry these mens helmet bags to the flight line.
Yoop on August 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM
Defense makes up almost all of the federal government’s discretionary spending, Bishop.
I’m all for wacking the “Defense” budget in half.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM
“Hey, how come Karl Rove said he’d write all my speeches for free? I’m starting to smell a rat around here.”
-Barack Obama
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 2:02 PM
Duff_, we’re like Timex, you keep on kickin’ and we keep on tickin’!
How else would your heart get the appropriate exercise it needs with you spending so much time hovering over that keyboard of your’s?
J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 2:05 PM
Defense makes up almost all of the federal government’s discretionary spending, Bishop.
I’m all for wacking the “Defense” budget in half.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM
I wouldn’t agree with you, I was thinking more along the lines of not having the government pay for a woman’s abortion.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 2:08 PM
[alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM]
Why?
Dusty on August 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM
I am a registered Independent, not a Republican, “Rapture” or otherwise. I support a limited right to abortion in some circumstances.
Even so, it seems to me beyond dispute that every live-born baby in this country is entitled to medical care, regardless of the circumstances of his or her birth. And yes, I would support a tax increase if it was necessary to insure that infants in need of medical care received it.
There is no justification — moral, legal, or otherwise — for the practice that was going on in Chicago, and probably in many other hospitals and abortion clinics across the country. Many, possibly even most, of these babies would not survive long term. But that is no excuse for so-called medical professionals to treat human babies like trash and deny them any care at all, if only just palliative care for the hours or days that they remained alive.
Regardless of the point during pregnancy at which one believes human life begins, surely we can all agree that once a baby is living outside the womb, it is a human being and deserves to be treated as such.
AZCoyote on August 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM
McCain has proven his courage, strength and patriotism, to all but the whiny left and a few disgruntled tighty righties, anyway.
What I want to know is this: how well would Osama Obama stand up to one-tenth of what McCain has endured.
Watching his responses to those “tough” questions from the tame media and light razzing from MCain, I’d say The Messiah’s endurance of real stress could be measured in milliseconds.
MrScribbler on August 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM
He shoots! He scores!
myamphibian on August 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM
Fixed.
MrScribbler on August 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM
OK Yoop; but a bunch of our guys managed to get some of them [or your] guys minus their helmet bags out of the jungle, anyhow!
They were all our guys, Yoop!
J_Gocht on August 17, 2008 at 2:14 PM
The One blocked legislation to offer these infants comfort and any reasonable medical care in order to avoid spending tax dollars? That was his motive? Is that what you are saying? Were any of those botched abortions paid for with tax dollars, do you suppose? If I recall correctly, Obama laid a little pork on the university employing his wife before she was promoted to VP. He apparently felt that was more appropriate than helping infants with some basic life needs.
a capella on August 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM
But like Timex, you are almost phased out. With cellphones, one does not need the watch on the wrist any longer.
carbon_footprint on August 17, 2008 at 2:17 PM
I wonder if he knows that when the ocean suddenly recedes you’re about to get hit with a tsunami.
When will people finally realize that The One that claims he holds some special power to bring the country together, across party lines, economic lines, racial lines, and whatever other lines he sees can’t even unify his own party?
RW_theoriginal on August 17, 2008 at 2:20 PM
McCain “proved himself” over 40 years ago, Scribbler(in a failed and wrongheaded war, btw).
His behavior since then has been rather questionable.
McCain acts like America owes him something.
Obama acts like he owes America something.
That’s why Obama will get my vote.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:21 PM
He’s doing a fine job of unifying the GOP. Timing is impeccable. I never thought this would happen.
a capella on August 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM
What I want to know is this: how well would Osama Obama stand up to one-tenth of what McCain has endured.
Easy now, we aren’t supposed to ask questions like that lest we be condemned as racist.
When Baracky answers a tough question with “that’s above my pay grade”, the answer arrives all on its own, he doesn’t even have the courage to voice his own beliefs.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM
Obama will get your vote because you’re a flaming socialist.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM
Defense makes up almost all of the federal government’s discretionary spending, Bishop.
I’m all for wacking the “Defense” budget in half.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM
I cannot let this false assertion go unchallenged.
Federal spending on defense pales compared to federal spending on social programs (health and Human Services, Social Security, other non-defense requirements, to include debt servicing.) Feel free to hit on some of the links as well.
As for discretionary spending, if we got out of Iraq today, and repaid ALL monies spent on that campaign, it would barely make a dent in the overall scheme of things.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Too funny.
This from the Rapture Republicans who have increased the size of the Fedearl government over the past 8 years far more than any Dem president ever has.
Y’all are just self-hating socialist.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:28 PM
Now if we could just get the five GOP members in the “gang of ten” to quit trying to ununify the GOP we might be getting somewhere. Sad to say, but my Senators makeup 40% of those five.
RW_theoriginal on August 17, 2008 at 2:28 PM
His behavior since then has been rather questionable.That’s why Obama will get my vote.
Ohhhh….it’s questionable behavior you were concerned about, why didn’t you say so? And here I thought carousing with the likes of William Ayers was “questionable”; I may have to rethink things.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 2:29 PM
alphie, was, am, and always will be a registered independent. I despise both parties, at the extremes. They will both destroy this country, with your side contributing to the faster demise.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Contrary to the views of some, little of it qualifies or to my mind resembles “Socialist Realism.” Much – by no means all – of it follows various streams of leftwing “agitprop” (agitational propaganda) which was in turn heavily influenced by the Russian Avant-Garde. The style continued to develop in different contexts, but in the Soviet Union in particular it was largely replaced by Socialist Realism, which eschewed abstraction and anything smacking of “art for art’s sake” in favor of realistic representations of the “heroic working class” and its leaders (esp. Uncle Joe). The state of art of Communist China showed similar tendencies.
In other countries – Germany is a prime example – where revolutionary movements persisted or were revived outside of Stalin’s control, the spirit and the techniques of early 20th Century revolutionary avant-gardism continued to evolve. The Berlin poster reminded me of a lot of German political art that I’ve seen over the years, in particular the graphic elements, which tilt to the left and rocket toward the horizon (embedded in the Obama symbol). You can’t even read the poster without tilting to the left! There’s even a suggestion of the blessed aura that was a customary feature of medieval art: Obama’s face seems to glow in a way that illuminates the text (notice the play of shadow). It’s as though the sunlight of his own political aspirations (the sun over the horizon in the Obama symbol) reflect off his face, spreading illumination over the poster’s main text, which refers to and therefore stands in for the masses summoned to his rally.
It’s nice work, taken on its own terms, which doesn’t make it any less creepy. If you need a genre, I think you’d have to call it Avant-Garde, but the term is unwieldy, since on the one hand it refers to the newest of the new, but on the other it refers to artistic movements of 100 years ago.
CK MacLeod on August 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM
If I’m a socialist, then the Earth is still flat.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM
You may not have the chance. The superdelegates know they bought a poseur whose coat tails have become noticably shorter now the voting public sees him for what he is. You need to hope Pelosi changes her mind on drilling and lets him off the hook. Will you be in Denver? I hope you have budgeted time to do volunteer work for his campaign so you might get a ticket for his acceptance speech, if he gives one. They aren’t free, ya know.
a capella on August 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM
Ent, you and coldwarrior are textbook Rapture Republicans.
You’ve bankrupted America with huge increases to the “Defense” budge(pork for Southerners) and then affect that Aw shucks, who us? rube act.
Maybe we’ll just give the Probationary States to China to pay off all the debt y’all have racked up.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 2:36 PM
They aren’t free, ya know.
a capella on August 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM
John Edwards can certainly afford one, I wonder if he received his yet?
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 2:38 PM
Most defense contracts are done in the northwest and northeast. I’m not sure where the south factors here.
lorien1973 on August 17, 2008 at 2:38 PM
alphie, let’s just say that I have lots of insight into defense matters. The day will come soon when even you will be glad the investments in Defense have been, and continue to be made. If Russia last week didn’t wake you up, it will take way more, I can see.
p.s. I’m no “rapture” anything. Any thorough observer would know that by now.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:40 PM
I have many flaws, alphie, but not being accountable is not one of them. I own everything I’ve ever said and done. You never need to worry about that.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Rubes are indignant.
It’s also, always, amazing to me how elitist lefties, who claim to be for the “rubes” are the first to call people “rubes”.
Phoniest, most hypocritical, of all the people in the world – the leftie elite.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 2:44 PM
We could certainly go back a few decades and save quite a bit of money if we so desired.
500k for a smart bomb against a lone sniper because we don’t want to damage the house next door, or a few grand for artillery shells that knock down everything.
We pay a lot of money in our quest not to kill people who don’t need killing, its why the Russians still employ the creeping artillery barrage as a town-clearing tactic.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 2:50 PM
CK MacLeod on August 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM –
Decent analysis. Some very good points raised. As for Socialist Realism, there are plenty examples, this being one, this being another. The Sparticist Movement in Germany spawned similar stylistics.
We now have a further step along the evolutionary line…Obamacist Art, perhaps?
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 2:51 PM
Good lord! The one with Obama walking roses out of the water was done by a SUPPORTER!? I assumed it had to be a joke.
Anybody know the backstory?
S. Weasel on August 17, 2008 at 2:56 PM
I thought the “president” engraved on the campaign airplane seat said it best. Did McCain do a black bag job on the plane or what — Cool.
Childlike, that’s how Obama looked last night, did you catch his appeal to the ignorant young voters?
tarpon on August 17, 2008 at 3:03 PM
But, but, but he’s a college professor! LOL
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Rubes are never embarrassed, Ent.
That’s why they’re rubes…and Republicans.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 3:09 PM
Coldwarrior – I’d say that most of the “Obamessiah” tendency art, like the light-worker thing above, is almost by definition kitsch. In an overlapping way, putting Obama in a Warholized Che pose, then investing the result with a quasi-religious expectancy is kitschy in itself and at the same time exposes the kitschiness of the original.
We can’t seem to decide as a culture whether Warhol portraiture celebrates or undermines its subjects, but the Obamaphiles who copy it naively, in attempting to achieve the former, almost inevitably achieve the latter. By the same token, you might even wonder if the McCain campaign, by going too far in trying to reduce Obama to a Pop Art figment, might eventually achieve the opposite result!
CK MacLeod on August 17, 2008 at 3:13 PM
But, but, but he’s a college professor! LOL
funky chicken on August 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Well shiite, I forgot about that. Let me cross domestic terrorist bomber Ayers off the “questionable” list and add him to the ‘Esteemed Colleagues of Obama’ list; I wouldn’t want alphie to have any doubts about his presidential choice.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Main Entry: rube
Pronunciation: \ˈrüb\
Function: noun
Etymology: Rube, nickname for Reuben
Date: 1891
1 : an awkward unsophisticated person : rustic
2 : a naive or inexperienced person
Sure doesn’t sound like the Republicans I hang with.
Matter of fact, definiton 2: sounds a bit like Obama.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Inspiration vs. Substance
By Joe Klein
February 7, 2008.
Ripclawe on August 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM
A rube is anyone who makes less than $133,000 a year and votes Republican, cold.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 3:16 PM
a rube is anyone who thinks the democrats care about the poor, or anyone else.
right4life on August 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM
CK MacLeod on August 17, 2008 at 3:13 PM –
Have been trying to find some examples of the Kim Chong-il school of art…a lot of this Obamaesque Art seems more toward that genre in quite a few cases.
The McCain Campaign does indeed need to rein in a bit, lest their efforts be seen in a way that undermines the message. I mentioned this a few times a couple weeks ago. The pin pricks, satire, and playful play-offs of Obamamania had their purpose, getting attention off McCain for a while and setting up the Obama strawman…but the McCain campaign had better start doing some serious ad work at setting our McCain’s vision for America, and soon. The present model may indeed be counter-productive.
Letting people know in no uncertain terms what McCain stands for, what the Party platform is, and how America will benefit when they vote for Mccain. Give people a reason to vote for McCain, not just a reason to vote against Obama. In other words…a positive campaign.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 3:22 PM
A rube is also anyone who clings to Bibles and guns and doesn’t eat arugula.
Speaking of arugula, have you seen how much Whole Foods is charging for that stuff? Man, its outrageous!
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 3:23 PM
according to who? the press? then mccain would have to praise the obaMAHDI without ceasing.
negative campaigning (ie the truth) works.
right4life on August 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM
We’ll see, right4.
I have a feeling that, come December, Fudge Haus McCain will be lying around one of his wife’s 13 houses suckling on her $100,000,000 trust fund instead of hiring a transition team.
alphie on August 17, 2008 at 3:27 PM
you’ll have your savior!! are you gonna get your mark?
what’ll be funny as hell, is watching Obama implode. he’s a clueless moron, ie a typical lib. he’ll make carter look like Lincoln.
right4life on August 17, 2008 at 3:30 PM
how many liberal failures do you need to figure out that socialism doesn’t work?
you want liberal policies enacted which will lower the standard of living in this country, impoverish people, cause great suffering, even death….all in the name of some undefinable notion of ‘equality’
and you’ll think you’re helping people. delusional.
right4life on August 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM
right4life on August 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM –
If portraying the truth, as it were, is negative campaigning (which it is not) then let’s have at it. Negative campaigning is “my opponent hasn’t answered the question ‘Do You Still Beat Your Wife? Yes or No!’ ” or constructing out of whole cloth innuendoes and circumstances meant to de-rail an opponent’s campaign. [Sound familiar? The Keating Five episode comes up time and time again, even though Mccain was exhonerated and gave the US Treasury all monies accepted from Keating, monies not related at all to the Lincoln Savings and Loan scandal. Didn't give it to "charity" as so many Dems do when caught tend to do, playing on the sympathies of other liberals, but the the US people.]
In my discussions with Dems/liberals in my town, I have found that I can take apart their seemingly slavish support for Obama by asking them seemingly neutral questions about a topic, elicit their response, and then point to McCain as the author, of sorts, of their reply…and Obama being in opposition to that same idea. I’d like to see more McCain positivism. It helps take apart the liberal argument. I saw a lot of that watching the Saddleback conversation last night. We need more.
coldwarrior on August 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM
I
hatelove to disappoint you, then.Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM
Then McCain would join Kerry, lying around one of his seven houses suckling on Tereza’s $600 million widow fund.
Didn’t Kerry run for POTUS a while back with some guy who cheats on his cancer-stricken wife? Inquiring minds want to know.
Bishop on August 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM
Also, if this is not a clear description of an elitist socialist, then Rosie qualifies for Miss Universe.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 3:39 PM
On the huge deficit, alphie, the defense budget is peanuts, compared to built in socialist programs from the 60s, and thereafter, mostly supported by your side. Yes, the ones enacted from the right are just as stupid and ineffective.
Entelechy on August 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6 Next »