Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


New McCain ad: “Maybe”

posted at 5:30 pm on August 15, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

John McCain’s campaign has released another television ad today, making them rather busy spending the money they raised in June. This ad appears only in Ohio and answers allegations made by Barack Obama that McCain’s policies caused unemployment in the key battleground state:

Maybe the applause has gone to his head … Saying John McCain cost Ohio jobs, though it’s just not true. It’s Obama’s taxes that will hurt Ohio families. Higher taxes on your paycheck, your life savings, your electric bills.

His taxes are a “recipe for economic disaster.” That’s the real Obama.

Ready to tax. Not ready to lead.

This ad mixes offense with a little defense. It hinges on Obama’s use of a rather obscure legislative battle over DHL and whether it wound up costing jobs at all. Factcheck explains the actual issues at hand, and how little McCain had to do with any of it:

The ads would be correct to point out that McCain opposed the version of the Stevens amendment that would have effectively prohibited the DHL sale. They would even be correct to point out that he opposed the watered-down version, which merely made the merger less attractive. But it’s a stretch to suggest that McCain alone could have prevented the deal. There was considerable opposition even to the watered-down version, and President Bush opposed altering military contracts in the midst of two ongoing wars in Asia. Stevens’ amendment might have passed if McCain supported it, but there is no way to know that.

Moreover the ads go too far in attributing motives to McCain. The Arizona senator has long crusaded against the practice of inserting pet projects into spending bills, and his April 17 press release lists the Stevens amendment as just one of the spending bill’s 51 earmarks and 16 policy changes that he opposed. We can’t judge people’s motives, but we’ve seen no evidence to suggest that McCain’s activities were directed at helping DHL do anything at all. And certainly we’ve seen nothing to suggest that McCain “turned his back on” Wilmington’s workers.

And did the merger, which took place when Congress declined to enact protectionist legislation, actually cost Americans their jobs? Even that seems a stretch, according to Factcheck:

The ads also engage in some fishy causal reasoning. The mailer and the radio ad both argue that it’s the 2003 merger that is the direct cause of the job losses. But that’s far from obvious.

In fact, for several years, the merger provided significant benefits to the residents of Wilmington. It allowed DHL to invest $1.2 billion into its North American Operations. Part of that investment included transferring operations from an older hub in northern Kentucky to the Wilmington facility, a move that added about 1,000 jobs in Wilmington. And while a 2003 article in Aviation Week warned that the merger could affect the survivability of either ABX Air or DHL Airways (which later became ASTAR Air Cargo), the warning proved to be, at best, premature. ABX Air stock rose more than 600 percent in its first year of operation (ASTAR is privately held).

Airborne’s former employees were happy with the deal, as well. A press release from the Teamsters union praised the “historic” agreement it reached with DHL after the merger. The agreement protected more than 6,000 Airborne jobs by including a “no-layoffs provision” and held out a promise of “more Teamster jobs” as the result of anticipated growth. That prediction proved true for a while.

And in fact, the jobs haven’t been “lost” overseas at all. DHL will contract with another American carrier, one 150 miles away from their previous partner.

Playing defense is always difficult to do in 30-second spots, but McCain needs to answer the spurious allegations raised by Obama in Ohio. This spot mixes in the theme of celebrity, as all of McCain’s ads do these days, suggesting that the adulation Obama gets on the road has swelled his head to the point where he can’t use it any longer. It’s a good jab, and maybe it will work. The latest Rasmussen poll in the state has McCain up 10 points, and McCain can’t afford to lose it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

The people who might vote for McCain already are suspicious of Barry. McCain has to start giving reasons for them to vote for him.

RobCon on August 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM

Obama – Ready to Lie!

marklmail on August 15, 2008 at 5:38 PM

RobCon on August 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM

That’s where McCain’s problem lies and why he’s gonna lose.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:42 PM

That’s where McCain’s problem lies and why he’s gonna lose.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:42 PM

If he’s just get off the global warming bull$hit, as well as shore up some other minor problems…McCain has got the job.

BigWyo on August 15, 2008 at 5:46 PM

That’s where McCain’s problem lies and why he’s gonna lose.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:42 PM

He has come along way with his support of Georgia. McCain’s leadership during this crisis as switch my vote from “voting for McCain because he isn’t BHO” to “voting for him because he has a good forgein policy views” so no change from the actual outcome of my vote but a world of difference in attitude and willingness to work for his election. I’m sure I’m not alone

unseen on August 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM

Obama’s a Noob!

Do you trust a noob with YOUR Money?

Trusting America to a Newbie is dangerous anytime and everytime, but at a time of war…? Unconscionable.

Chakra Hammer on August 15, 2008 at 5:53 PM

unseen on August 15, 2008 at 5:52 PM

In a month, everyone will forget Georgia. Maybe less than a month.

DNC will put out ads showing McCain and Bush on the same page, foreign policy wise, and ask “do we want more of the same?” and this is gonna backfire on McCain.

Look, I’m gonna vote for the guy, but I can’t see him winning. And I’m not even sure I want him to win – he’s not the guy who is going to get us a majority in the house or senate nor steer republicans back to fiscal responsibility. He’s just not. I have a feeling that if he’s elected, republicans will look worse than they already do. Because he’s just your average big government guy with a decent foreign policy.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:57 PM

I feel McCain is still unfairly representing Obama’s stance on taxes though. You might argue that Obama’s tax plans might hurt the economy, but they will not tax the lower brackets of the wage earners. Using the Las Vegas Review Journal (wtf?) as a single source to front their fight against Obama looks weak and pathetic.

Seixon on August 15, 2008 at 5:58 PM

And with bank failures occuring around the country, just wait for the “keating 5″ ads to start running.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:59 PM

Seixon on August 15, 2008 at 5:58 PM

When Bush’s tax cuts expire, bracket creep will move quite a few people into wage groups they weren’t before. Read up on bracket creep and bush’s tax cuts for a little bit different picture.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM

McCain won’t lose, lorien1973. I can’t say he will WIN, but Obama will lose.

Obama will lose every state that Waffles lost, and a few more for bad measure

Then, the knashing of teeth will begin, and the Dems will have their own Night of the Long Knives

Janos Hunyadi on August 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM

Bracket Creep after bush tax cuts expire:

Going back to the tax rates of the 1990s doesn’t mean that households will pay 1990s taxes. Because the tax brackets haven’t risen along with incomes, average taxes would be significantly higher, and grow each year.

If the tax cuts expire, income-tax revenues by 2018 will rise to 10.8% of the total economy from 8.7% today – an increase of 24%. Compared to the average over the last 50 years, allowing the rates to rise would increase tax revenues by 32%.

Believe it or not, income taxes will rise even if the tax cuts remain in place, because the revenue-increasing effects of bracket creep more than offset the lower rates. With the lower rates, total income-tax revenues will increase to 9.3% of GDP by 2018. This level is 7% higher than today, and 13% above the 1957-2007 average. Thus even with the tax cuts, revenues will increase by more than enough to fix Social Security.

So even if the tax cuts are made permanent, future Americans will pay a greater share of their incomes to the government than in the past. But for some in Washington, that’s not enough.

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 6:02 PM

McCain isn’t just “Not Obama”. He has a history that annoys me terribly as a conservative, but that sells well with that huge chunk of the electorate that is just to the right of center (you know, the ones who decide elections). The fact that he doesn’t send a thrill up the legs of conservatives like me doesn’t mean he has given no positive reason to vote for him. I’ll hold my nose and vote McCain, but those to my left, but still right of center, will vote for him because they think he’s exactly the right man for the job.

Buford Gooch on August 15, 2008 at 6:14 PM

Obama – Ready to Lie!

marklmail on August 15, 2008 at 5:38 PM

“Yes, he can!”

Frozen Tex on August 15, 2008 at 6:44 PM

Buford Gooch on August 15, 2008 at 6:14 PM

ditto ( it’s been explained before, but needs ’splainin’ every day until it’s finally over with )

Janos Hunyadi on August 15, 2008 at 7:01 PM

I feel McCain is still unfairly representing Obama’s stance on taxes though. You might argue that Obama’s tax plans might hurt the economy, but they will not tax the lower brackets of the wage earners. Using the Las Vegas Review Journal (wtf?) as a single source to front their fight against Obama looks weak and pathetic.

Seixon on August 15, 2008 at 5:58 PM

If I understand it correctly, Sen. Obama plans to tax 401K’s, and the rumor I heard was 15%. I don’t know about anyone else, but I see little sense in continuing to donate.

Cindy Munford on August 15, 2008 at 7:48 PM

You might argue that Obama’s tax plans might hurt the economy

Might? Obama’s tax-n-spend desires, if fully implemented by a willing congress, will cause a depression. Obama insists on punishing the very people and companies that are in a position to invest and create jobs.

Obama is clueless when it comes to all things economic; he wants to raise capital gains taxes as well as many others.

Obama cites “fairness” in raising the capital gains tax; it’s veiled codespeak for “Let’s do it the Marxist way: redistribute wealth from those that earned it to those that did nothing to earn it.”

Let’s put it this way: If Obama were a fireman, and the alarm was sounding for “The US Economy, Main St., USA” he’d arrive with a pumper truck filled with gasoline and say I’m from the federal government and I’m here to help!

electric-rascal on August 15, 2008 at 9:42 PM

Obama’s a Noob!

Do you trust a noob with YOUR Money?

Trusting America to a Newbie is dangerous anytime and everytime, but at a time of war…? Unconscionable.

Chakra Hammer on August 15, 2008 at 5:53 PM

I like it.

Do an internet ad targeted at gamers.

“Obama’s a N00b! Would you let a N00b pilot your spaceship America? I don’t think so!”

fossten on August 15, 2008 at 10:25 PM

Obama – Ready to Lie!

marklmail on August 15, 2008 at 5:38 PM
“Yes, he can!”

Frozen Tex on August 15, 2008 at 6:44 PM

He not only can…..he does.

tgharris on August 15, 2008 at 10:26 PM

lorien1973 on August 15, 2008 at 5:59 PM

And with bank failures occuring around the country, just wait for the “keating 5″ ads to start running.

Won’t happen. The only people bringing up the Keating Five are the angry kids who know nothing about it except “scandal” and “McCain”.

The reason real pundits and support groups won’t bring it up is that McCain came out smelling like a rose while the other four (all of the Democrats) did not. It will only serve to highlight Democrat folly, which is why no one who matters has brought it up yet.

ynot4tony2 on August 16, 2008 at 8:03 AM

Obama’s a circus clown and anyone who’s seriously thinking about voting for him is about 50% likely to be hallucinating on election day, unable to find his or her polling place.

This election is in the bag.

NoDonkey on August 16, 2008 at 8:51 AM

Obama is so shallow, he can’t even qualify to star in a “Liberty Mutual” commercial.

MsUnderestimated on August 17, 2008 at 7:07 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.