<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lefty heart-ache: McCain might have lifted three sentences from Wikipedia for speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: apparently McCain can use the internet - SpartanTailgate.com - Michigan State Spartans Forums</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1302845</link>
		<dc:creator>apparently McCain can use the internet - SpartanTailgate.com - Michigan State Spartans Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1302845</guid>
		<description>[...] of the free world to at least adhere to the same standard in formulating his foreign policy.&quot;  Hot Air: &quot;Three background sentences, that is, one of which closely tracks Wikipedia&#039;s entry on Georgia, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the free world to at least adhere to the same standard in formulating his foreign policy.&#8221;  Hot Air: &#8220;Three background sentences, that is, one of which closely tracks Wikipedia&#8217;s entry on Georgia, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299869</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299869</guid>
		<description>Hey, how about this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2007/10/30/edwards-and-obamas-cynical-hope/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;plagiarism&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;The “politics of hope” didn’t take four years to migrate from Edwards’ mouth to Obama’s — it took six months:
&lt;em&gt;“Our campaign is not based on the politics of cynicism; it’s based on the politics of hope”&lt;/em&gt;

    – John Edwards in a stump speech, 1/28/04

    &lt;em&gt;“Do we participate in the politics of cynicism or do we participate in the politics of hope?”&lt;/em&gt;

    – Barack Obama in his signature Democratic convention address, 7/27/04&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which brings us to a larger issue. I had not realized that David Axelrod was John Edwards campaign manager in 2004. [note to self: D&#039;uh!]

Lot&#039;s of speculation &lt;a href=&quot;http://baarswestside.blogspot.com/2008/08/axelrod-and-john-edwards-retreading.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;that Edwards was nothing but a stalking horse for Obama against Hillary, with David Axelrod sitting in the saddle.

Makes perfect sense, and from that perspective it would not matter a whit to Obama if Edwards was a philandering, lying cad as long as the short term goal of deposing Hillary was accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, how about this <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2007/10/30/edwards-and-obamas-cynical-hope/" rel="nofollow">plagiarism</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>The “politics of hope” didn’t take four years to migrate from Edwards’ mouth to Obama’s — it took six months:<br />
<em>“Our campaign is not based on the politics of cynicism; it’s based on the politics of hope”</em></p>
<p>    – John Edwards in a stump speech, 1/28/04</p>
<p>    <em>“Do we participate in the politics of cynicism or do we participate in the politics of hope?”</em></p>
<p>    – Barack Obama in his signature Democratic convention address, 7/27/04</p></blockquote>
<p>Which brings us to a larger issue. I had not realized that David Axelrod was John Edwards campaign manager in 2004. [note to self: D'uh!]</p>
<p>Lot&#8217;s of speculation <a href="http://baarswestside.blogspot.com/2008/08/axelrod-and-john-edwards-retreading.html" rel="nofollow">here </a>that Edwards was nothing but a stalking horse for Obama against Hillary, with David Axelrod sitting in the saddle.</p>
<p>Makes perfect sense, and from that perspective it would not matter a whit to Obama if Edwards was a philandering, lying cad as long as the short term goal of deposing Hillary was accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Schlussel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299784</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Schlussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299784</guid>
		<description>Lifting three sentences?  Hmmm . . . that still means he committed &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/1003470/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;less plagiarism than Monica Crowley&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.  Maybe there&#039;s a radio show and seat on &quot;McLaughlin Group&quot; in his future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifting three sentences?  Hmmm . . . that still means he committed <strong><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/1003470/" rel="nofollow">less plagiarism than Monica Crowley</a></strong>.  Maybe there&#8217;s a radio show and seat on &#8220;McLaughlin Group&#8221; in his future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299696</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299696</guid>
		<description>The Millennium Challenge program was a Bush Administration initiative that was championed by conservatives like Spencer Bachus, Katherine Harris, and Eric Cantor.  It was intended to restructure U.S. foreign aid to the Third World, so that aid is going to countries that are committed to free markets, free trade, and free speech, and not going down ratholes of socialism and into the pockets of corrupt dictators.  Countries that receive MCC funds have to sign an agreement that allows the U.S. to recapture the funds if they are not used to support development of market mechanisms.  This is a sea change in U.S. foreign aid policy after years of throwing money at corrupt regimes that never reached the people on the street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Millennium Challenge program was a Bush Administration initiative that was championed by conservatives like Spencer Bachus, Katherine Harris, and Eric Cantor.  It was intended to restructure U.S. foreign aid to the Third World, so that aid is going to countries that are committed to free markets, free trade, and free speech, and not going down ratholes of socialism and into the pockets of corrupt dictators.  Countries that receive MCC funds have to sign an agreement that allows the U.S. to recapture the funds if they are not used to support development of market mechanisms.  This is a sea change in U.S. foreign aid policy after years of throwing money at corrupt regimes that never reached the people on the street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299691</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299691</guid>
		<description>I would suggest that team Maverick buy a set of good electronic encyclopedias. Wikkipedia is mostly useless.

However, have they accidentally exposed the truth, do we now  know where team McMaverick gets their global warming &#039;facts&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that team Maverick buy a set of good electronic encyclopedias. Wikkipedia is mostly useless.</p>
<p>However, have they accidentally exposed the truth, do we now  know where team McMaverick gets their global warming &#8216;facts&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taznar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299669</link>
		<dc:creator>taznar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299669</guid>
		<description>OK. Let&#039;s try the following:

Find 10 people with extensive knowledge of Georgia.
Put them is separate rooms with no internet or computer access.
Give the paper and a pencil.
Ask them to write a summary of recent Georgian history.

I bet after a careful analysis of what they write, we find they all managed to somehow &quot;plagiarize&quot; Wikidpedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. Let&#8217;s try the following:</p>
<p>Find 10 people with extensive knowledge of Georgia.<br />
Put them is separate rooms with no internet or computer access.<br />
Give the paper and a pencil.<br />
Ask them to write a summary of recent Georgian history.</p>
<p>I bet after a careful analysis of what they write, we find they all managed to somehow &#8220;plagiarize&#8221; Wikidpedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BohicaTwentyTwo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299634</link>
		<dc:creator>BohicaTwentyTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299634</guid>
		<description>Citation Needed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citation Needed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299613</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299613</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) is a United States Government corporation designed to work with some of the poorest countries in the world. Established in January 2004, MCC is based on the principle that aid is most effective when it reinforces good governance, economic freedom and investments in people.  MCC’s mission is to reduce global poverty through the promotion of sustainable economic growth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

USA SOCIALIST GOVT. CORPORATIONS SPONSORED BY US TAXPAYERS, aka &lt;strong&gt;FASCISM WITHOUT ANY BENEFITS BUT WITH ALL THE COSTS AND LOSSES&lt;/strong&gt; 

Compassionate Bullshit US Government Corporations bleed our Constitution dry via diarrhea from the good intention bug.

I knew it.

The US Constitution does not provide for the US Government to be Fascistic, nor to own corporations that bleed taxpayers with ALL THE EXPENSES AND LOSSES AND NONE OF THE FINANCIAL REWARDS. 

Look at what Bush is doing with all of his bail-outs of banks and private industry using taxpayer money. And we&#039;re supposed to say &quot;we love you&quot; for the token &quot;refund&quot; that comes NO WHERE NEAR the expenses each of us are fined via &quot;tax&quot;. And don&#039;t forget your Ps&amp;Qs with China, Bush reminds Americans from the Olympics. (Ps, they own us now but are such wonderful hosts, not to worry.)

Backtrack a bit to Iraq, the &quot;alliance&quot; between the US/Georgia. Exactly what treaty benefits will the US be granted by Iraq for all of our aid? Nichts? So besides jabbing Russia in the ribs, Georgia and the US need some clarity in what Georgia has in mind with a US treaty.

If US treaties sind kaputt, referring all things to either NATO or the UN, then make our wimphood known now. Otherwise, exactly where&#039;s the beef?

An effective debate stipulates exactly what is being defended in an onslaught attack. An ineffective debate vaguely references ideals such as &quot;tolerance, patience, and all good intentions&quot;.

Our State Department at least owes all of us taxpayers a damned accounting for our official &lt;em&gt;Millenium Challenge Corporation&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;US taxpayer investment in Georgia&lt;/strong&gt;. Damned progressives and their financial corruption of our sovereign stability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) is a United States Government corporation designed to work with some of the poorest countries in the world. Established in January 2004, MCC is based on the principle that aid is most effective when it reinforces good governance, economic freedom and investments in people.  MCC’s mission is to reduce global poverty through the promotion of sustainable economic growth.</p></blockquote>
<p>USA SOCIALIST GOVT. CORPORATIONS SPONSORED BY US TAXPAYERS, aka <strong>FASCISM WITHOUT ANY BENEFITS BUT WITH ALL THE COSTS AND LOSSES</strong> </p>
<p>Compassionate Bullshit US Government Corporations bleed our Constitution dry via diarrhea from the good intention bug.</p>
<p>I knew it.</p>
<p>The US Constitution does not provide for the US Government to be Fascistic, nor to own corporations that bleed taxpayers with ALL THE EXPENSES AND LOSSES AND NONE OF THE FINANCIAL REWARDS. </p>
<p>Look at what Bush is doing with all of his bail-outs of banks and private industry using taxpayer money. And we&#8217;re supposed to say &#8220;we love you&#8221; for the token &#8220;refund&#8221; that comes NO WHERE NEAR the expenses each of us are fined via &#8220;tax&#8221;. And don&#8217;t forget your Ps&amp;Qs with China, Bush reminds Americans from the Olympics. (Ps, they own us now but are such wonderful hosts, not to worry.)</p>
<p>Backtrack a bit to Iraq, the &#8220;alliance&#8221; between the US/Georgia. Exactly what treaty benefits will the US be granted by Iraq for all of our aid? Nichts? So besides jabbing Russia in the ribs, Georgia and the US need some clarity in what Georgia has in mind with a US treaty.</p>
<p>If US treaties sind kaputt, referring all things to either NATO or the UN, then make our wimphood known now. Otherwise, exactly where&#8217;s the beef?</p>
<p>An effective debate stipulates exactly what is being defended in an onslaught attack. An ineffective debate vaguely references ideals such as &#8220;tolerance, patience, and all good intentions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Our State Department at least owes all of us taxpayers a damned accounting for our official <em>Millenium Challenge Corporation</em> <strong>US taxpayer investment in Georgia</strong>. Damned progressives and their financial corruption of our sovereign stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299611</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299611</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What’s with the snarky comment about Wikipedia? I hear this from lots of sources, and I’ll be damned if I know why so many have a negative opinion on this fantastic resource. The information on blogs and politics is sometimes slanted, but name me a resource on those issues that isn’t. On matters of practical knowledge, I think it’s a pretty damn powerful and accurate resource.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

HA is primarily a political blog. The Wiki info on politics is always biased and often deceptive. However, I still use it frequently, for basic info. on Georgia, for ex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What’s with the snarky comment about Wikipedia? I hear this from lots of sources, and I’ll be damned if I know why so many have a negative opinion on this fantastic resource. The information on blogs and politics is sometimes slanted, but name me a resource on those issues that isn’t. On matters of practical knowledge, I think it’s a pretty damn powerful and accurate resource.</p></blockquote>
<p>HA is primarily a political blog. The Wiki info on politics is always biased and often deceptive. However, I still use it frequently, for basic info. on Georgia, for ex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connertown</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299605</link>
		<dc:creator>connertown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299605</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the snarky comment about Wikipedia?  I hear this from lots of sources, and I&#039;ll be damned if I know why so many have a negative opinion on this fantastic resource.  The information on blogs and politics is sometimes slanted, but name me a resource on those issues that isn&#039;t.  On matters of practical knowledge, I think it&#039;s a pretty damn powerful and accurate resource.  Common sense lets us all know when to double-check the facts from any source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the snarky comment about Wikipedia?  I hear this from lots of sources, and I&#8217;ll be damned if I know why so many have a negative opinion on this fantastic resource.  The information on blogs and politics is sometimes slanted, but name me a resource on those issues that isn&#8217;t.  On matters of practical knowledge, I think it&#8217;s a pretty damn powerful and accurate resource.  Common sense lets us all know when to double-check the facts from any source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299604</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;maverick muse on August 12, 2008 at 7:03 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt; Yes, the Soros/Georgia ties exist. Google it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>maverick muse on August 12, 2008 at 7:03 AM</p></blockquote>
<p> Yes, the Soros/Georgia ties exist. Google it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299602</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299602</guid>
		<description>According to the CIA, since 1991, US taxpayers have provided Georgia nearly $2billion in aid. Also mentioned @ the CIA website in the  MILLENIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION that Georgia signed a 5 year assistance package for nearly $3million as of Sept.12, 2005.

So remind us all who the Millenium Challenge Corporation is. The name has an ominous ring to it similar to chosen &quot;front&quot; Newspeak words for progressively global socialists of the &quot;compassionate conservative&quot; genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the CIA, since 1991, US taxpayers have provided Georgia nearly $2billion in aid. Also mentioned @ the CIA website in the  MILLENIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION that Georgia signed a 5 year assistance package for nearly $3million as of Sept.12, 2005.</p>
<p>So remind us all who the Millenium Challenge Corporation is. The name has an ominous ring to it similar to chosen &#8220;front&#8221; Newspeak words for progressively global socialists of the &#8220;compassionate conservative&#8221; genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299582</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299582</guid>
		<description>Plagiarism is presumably not an issue when organizations issue collective unsigned works since they do not assign credit for originality to particular people. For example, the American Historical Association&#039;s &quot;Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct&quot; (2005) regarding textbooks and reference books states that there is no question about taking credit for someone else&#039;s ideas. Since textbooks and encyclopedias are summaries of other scholars&#039; work, they are not bound by the same exacting standards of attribution as original research. However, even such a book does not make use of words, phrases, or paragraphs from another text or follow too closely the other text&#039;s arrangement and organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plagiarism is presumably not an issue when organizations issue collective unsigned works since they do not assign credit for originality to particular people. For example, the American Historical Association&#8217;s &#8220;Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct&#8221; (2005) regarding textbooks and reference books states that there is no question about taking credit for someone else&#8217;s ideas. Since textbooks and encyclopedias are summaries of other scholars&#8217; work, they are not bound by the same exacting standards of attribution as original research. However, even such a book does not make use of words, phrases, or paragraphs from another text or follow too closely the other text&#8217;s arrangement and organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seixon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299559</link>
		<dc:creator>Seixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299559</guid>
		<description>How is this plagiarism at all? Those passages are not similar at all. Even if McCain based his speech on the Wikipedia entry, which doesn&#039;t have to be the case (and so what if it is?), it is clearly paraphrased and rewritten in original language. That&#039;s what you&#039;re supposed to do. You can&#039;t reinvent history. Well, the Left enjoys doing that, but you &lt;em&gt;shouldn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; reinvent history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this plagiarism at all? Those passages are not similar at all. Even if McCain based his speech on the Wikipedia entry, which doesn&#8217;t have to be the case (and so what if it is?), it is clearly paraphrased and rewritten in original language. That&#8217;s what you&#8217;re supposed to do. You can&#8217;t reinvent history. Well, the Left enjoys doing that, but you <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> reinvent history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299435</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299435</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate the humor in the insinuation that McCain himself is perusing Wikipedia for speech material, for that speech that he is writing himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate the humor in the insinuation that McCain himself is perusing Wikipedia for speech material, for that speech that he is writing himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D2Boston</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299418</link>
		<dc:creator>D2Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299418</guid>
		<description>Ahem... &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Paging Deval Patrick&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem&#8230; <strong><em>Paging Deval Patrick</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Race Card</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299413</link>
		<dc:creator>The Race Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299413</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dr. Charles G. Waugh on August 11, 2008 at 11:28 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It says a lot about Dems that his name is even considered for Veep. One would think that &lt;em&gt;actual&lt;/em&gt; plagiarism would be a career-derailing error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dr. Charles G. Waugh on August 11, 2008 at 11:28 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It says a lot about Dems that his name is even considered for Veep. One would think that <em>actual</em> plagiarism would be a career-derailing error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Race Card</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299410</link>
		<dc:creator>The Race Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299410</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Where did Wikipedia get them?

bnelson44 on August 11, 2008 at 10:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Precisely.

Connie on August 11, 2008 at 10:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are we all clear on how Wikipedia works? Pardon me if I am in correct in my assertion. But, it does not sound that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Where did Wikipedia get them?</p>
<p>bnelson44 on August 11, 2008 at 10:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Precisely.</p>
<p>Connie on August 11, 2008 at 10:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Are we all clear on how Wikipedia works? Pardon me if I am in correct in my assertion. But, it does not sound that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKennedy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299398</link>
		<dc:creator>BKennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299398</guid>
		<description>LOL at Obamites whining about sentences lifted from other speeches. Baracks speeches are comprised almost entirely of other famous speeches with some historical innaccuracy and hope and change thrown in for good measure.

&quot;Just words.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL at Obamites whining about sentences lifted from other speeches. Baracks speeches are comprised almost entirely of other famous speeches with some historical innaccuracy and hope and change thrown in for good measure.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just words.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorien1973</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299315</link>
		<dc:creator>lorien1973</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299315</guid>
		<description>Maybe this is why the left makes up facts all the time. They don&#039;t want to plagiarize the truth. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is why the left makes up facts all the time. They don&#8217;t want to plagiarize the truth. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaptain Amerika</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaptain Amerika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299311</guid>
		<description>Allah... you anonymous bastard... lol although I might change the entry on wikipedia to infamous instead of famous...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah&#8230; you anonymous bastard&#8230; lol although I might change the entry on wikipedia to infamous instead of famous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299307</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299307</guid>
		<description>Headline should be: &quot;Has McCain Caught the Dreaded Biden Disease&quot;?*

*Usually fatal to presidential aspirations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headline should be: &#8220;Has McCain Caught the Dreaded Biden Disease&#8221;?*</p>
<p>*Usually fatal to presidential aspirations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaptain Amerika</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299303</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaptain Amerika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299303</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahpundit&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahpundit" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahpundit</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhinoboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299294</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhinoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299294</guid>
		<description>Uh, McCain can&#039;t even send an email, remember?  Nice to see he went from computer illiterate to computer plagarist in 6.0 seconds.

Dems like to use the &quot;wall of accusations and see what sticks&quot; play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, McCain can&#8217;t even send an email, remember?  Nice to see he went from computer illiterate to computer plagarist in 6.0 seconds.</p>
<p>Dems like to use the &#8220;wall of accusations and see what sticks&#8221; play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merovign</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/lefty-heart-ache-mccain-might-have-lifted-three-sentences-from-wikipedia-for-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-1299288</link>
		<dc:creator>Merovign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21980#comment-1299288</guid>
		<description>You know, Democrats talk and all I hear is &quot;wah wah wah, wah wah wah wah wah, wah wah wah.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Democrats talk and all I hear is &#8220;wah wah wah, wah wah wah wah wah, wah wah wah.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
