First Gitmo conviction a split decision
posted at 11:30 am on August 6, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The first of the military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay’s detention center ended in a split decision today for Osama bin Laden’s driver, Salim Hamdan. Hamdan won acquittal on two counts of conspiracy, but his multiple convictions on material support will put him in prison for life:
A U.S. military jury Wednesday convicted Osama bin Laden’s driver of war crimes — making him the first war-on-terror captive convicted by contested tribunal at the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
The jury announced the verdict against Salim Hamdan at 10:16 a.m.
It cleared him of the more serious crime of conspiracy but convicted him of multiple counts of providing material support for terror.
Conviction can carry a maximum life imprisonment.
The same panel that convicted Hamdan will also sentence him. They took just over 6 hours to reach their complex decision, and one has to assume that sentencing will take an even shorter period of time. The man prosecutors described as an “al-Qaeda warrior” will almost certainly never see freedom again, having been with bin Laden through the attacks on the African embassies, USS Cole, and 9/11.
Hamdan’s case has been a test in several ways. He challenged his detention, forcing Congress and the Bush administration to re-engineer the tribunals twice. As a driver, he had less obvious culpability for the deaths of thousands of American civilians than Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. In the end, the verdict recognized the differences. They put aside emotion and acquitted him of being a member of the AQ conspiracy in these attacks, but recognized his role in supporting the organization.
Essentially, they recognized Hamdan as a smaller part of the terrorist group, but that doesn’t absolve him from responsibility for his support of AQ. The verdict demonstrates that the Gitmo tribunals are not kangaroo courts, and that justice can be found in this process.
Update: John McCain released a statement about the conviction:
I welcome today’s guilty verdict in the first trial held under the Military Commissions Act (MCA). This process of bringing terrorists to justice has been too long delayed, but I’m encouraged that it is finally moving forward. I supported that legislation, which was a good-faith effort by Congress to meet the Supreme Court’s direction to establish a process to bring terrorist detainees to trial. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a trusted confidante of Osama Bin Laden, was provided a full hearing of the charges against him and was represented by counsel who vigorously defended him. The jury found that the prosecution lawyers had proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Hamdan had aided terrorists by supplying weapons to Al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Afghanistan. This process demonstrated that military commissions can effectively bring very dangerous terrorists to justice. The fact that the jury did not find Hamdan guilty of all of the charges brought against him demonstrates that the jury weighed the evidence carefully. Unlike Senator Obama who voted against the MCA and favors giving Al Qaeda terrorists direct access to U.S. civilian courts to contest their detention, I recognize that we cannot treat dangerous terrorists captured on the battlefield as we would common criminals.
Haven’t seen one yet from Obama, but I’ll add it verbatim when I see it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
American courts should not be for terrorists.
They should be put in a prison full of the family members of victims of their violence, and left to roam freely.
THAT would be justice.
madmonkphotog on August 6, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Not the it matters to the Left.
GT on August 6, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Question – should they put this creep in the general population, is he a hero, or is it a death sentence?
TheUnrepentantGeek on August 6, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Massive appeals (at the massive cost to taxpayers) in 3…2…1…
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on August 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Drop him in the hole at the SuperMax, and don’t let him out until the maggots start to eat his corpse.
Oh, and feed him pork chops.
john1schn on August 6, 2008 at 11:46 AM
The left reacts from HUFFPO
William Amos on August 6, 2008 at 11:48 AM
All this guy needs to do is change his name to Tookie Bin Hamdan and write a few Children’s books and the left will open their veins for his cause. However, It wouldn’t be a stretch for them because they’re already on the same team.
Claypigeon on August 6, 2008 at 11:51 AM
What more do these morons want? Good lord.
loganthompson on August 6, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Gotta love how the same morons that want more government in people’s lives equate the same government with Al Qaeda.
amerpundit on August 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM
One down, a bunch more red jumpsuits to go.
Kini on August 6, 2008 at 12:14 PM
As soon as he admitted to working for AQ, and we squeezed all useful information out of him, why wasn’t he shot? Ignoring the norms of war in such an egregious fashion as we have been doing these last few years will come back to haunt us in the future.
And Lord help us if BO becomes president.
18-1 on August 6, 2008 at 12:29 PM
we should outsource GITMO to Texas
jp on August 6, 2008 at 12:31 PM
I thought they were just going to do tribunals for these freaks.
This is nonsense. Things like intent and level of complicity are completely irrelevant; if you’re an ununiformed combatant, you have exactly the same rights as any other dead man. And a case like that takes ten minutes to prove.
logis on August 6, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Are the Huffers huffing about the Geneva Convention any more, the one which says he should have been summarily hung?
drunyan8315 on August 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Oh my god! They’ve convicted Tony Orlando!
Shy Guy on August 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM
McCain was one of the voices saying that wasn’t good enough to protect the rights of terrorists.
highhopes on August 6, 2008 at 1:24 PM
Hamdan becomes the Left’s new anti-Solzhenitsin.
whitetop on August 6, 2008 at 2:18 PM
That right there is a great idea! Texas just executed an illegal despite the outrcy from the illegal’s nation of origin (basically saying F-you to them) so I’m certain Texas would have no problem at all putting these AQ animals down!
Liberty or Death on August 6, 2008 at 2:26 PM
GOOD IDEA!
Had it not rained yesterday, I would have driven to Huntsville where death row is conveniently located across the street (literally) from Sam Houston State University and taken pictures.
If your idea doesn’t work, we could just tell the prison population he’s a pedophile. The other inmates just love pedophiles.
They’d treat him right.
madmonkphotog on August 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Yep. I was right.
.
GT on August 6, 2008 at 2:59 PM
Fixed it for you, Cap’n.
Maquis on August 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Bad Headline. It should have said “divided decision.” Acquittal, for Salim Hamdan, would have been a “split decision.”
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on August 6, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Comment pages: