Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


McCain ad: “Broken”

posted at 12:40 pm on August 5, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

John McCain goes back to positive messaging in his newest ad … well, only in the campaigning sense.  With “Broken”, McCain positions himself as an outsider and makes the claim that he’s the solution:

Washington’s broken. John McCain knows it. We’re worse off than we were four years ago.

Only McCain has taken on big tobacco, drug companies, fought corruption in both parties. He’ll reform Wall Street, battle Big Oil, make America prosper again.

He’s the original maverick.

One is ready to lead — McCain.

The “Washington’s broken” line is a risk for McCain.  He wants to attack Barack Obama’s strength by positioning himself as the real reformer, and with good justification.  He has fought corruption and taken political risks for reform, neither of which Obama can claim in his three short years in the Senate.

However, it provides a harmonic to Obama’s message, and Obama can counter by asking why Washington is still “broken” after McCain spent 26 years there.  The answer doesn’t make for good sound bites; one man in 100 can’t do much more than McCain has attempted, and even a President only has limited ability to change the air in DC.  McCain shouldn’t run on a theme that DC works, but perhaps he should look for better messages that resonate to his benefit and doesn’t underscore the message of his opponents.

Why not keep hammering Obama on energy?  McCain has barely mentioned his own Lexington Project since its launch.  Instead, he adopts the “big oil” nomenclature on which Obama’s populist drivel depends.  “Big Oil” isn’t the problem; it’s Big Government getting in the way of the people who can produce American energy from American resources.

We need more message discipline from the McCain campaign.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

wise_man on August 5, 2008 at 5:43 PM

So then how will he “battle Big Oil” differently than Obama?

MadisonConservative on August 5, 2008 at 5:48 PM

Obama:

The new Obama ad trumpets his proposal to revive a windfall profits tax on energy companies and asserts that McCain favors TAX BREAKS for the oil industry.

“A windfall profits tax on big oil to give families a thousand-dollar rebate,” an announcer in the ad says. Obama has pushed for such a tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs.

Congress enacted a windfall profits tax in 1980, during an earlier era of high oil prices, but repealed it in 1988 amid concerns the tax was discouraging domestic oil development. Last year, the House approved $18 billion in new taxes on the largest oil companies, but they were blocked by Republicans in the Senate. Monday August 4, 2008

McCain:

McCain plans to continue Bush’s giveaways to big oil
Working families are feeling the squeeze – record high gas prices, record home foreclosure rates and skyrocketing health care costs. But President Bush and John McCain both have Big Oil’s interests at heart. Despite record profits and executive pay in the oil industry, neither Bush nor McCain is willing to cut back on Big Oil’s windfall profits and tax breaks. McCain already has proposed giving $3.8 billion more in tax breaks to Big Oil and has voted to protect their profits.

wise_man on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM

“…“Broken”, McCain positions himself as an outsider and makes the claim that he’s the solution:

“Broken” you say.

I’ll tell you and Saint Mc what’s broken.

That’s the goshdamn lack of military discipline in this sorry despicable War in Iraq.

“……Women serving in the US military are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire in Iraq.”

What the hell is that?
Doesn’t surprise me though; when their glorious leadership has given our brave troopers nothing but continuing “Hobson’s Choice’s”… consider, “stop loss” consider, “extended tours” …what the hell can you expect?
There was a “little number” used in Vietnam that helped to rid the leadership of poor leaders…
Dose anyone recall the immediate effectiveness of such action?
My thought would be, that; St Mc as much as anyone, would be cognizant of those actions and present conditions?
Where’s Holy Joe?

J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM

‘Suicide is Painless’
Through early morning fog I see
visions of the things to be
the pains that are withheld for me
I realize and I can see… Songs from Korea and Vietnam sung so many times again in Iraq…

Damn this sorry War!

J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM

wise_man on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM

no, sorry, that doesnt hold water. you are using what obama accuses mccain off to defend mccain? sorry, no dice. mccain has mentioned obscene profits in relation to oil companies way too many times to think he means anything positive when he says “battle big oil”. the guy is getting more liberal all the time.

chasdal on August 5, 2008 at 7:25 PM

“J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM

My final stanza was…

So painfully …!

J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 8:25 PM

Washington’s Broken?

Is this a Mitt Romney ad?

iamse7en on August 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM

McCain plans to continue Bush’s giveaways to big oil
Working families are feeling the squeeze – record high gas prices, record home foreclosure rates and skyrocketing health care costs. But President Bush and John McCain both have Big Oil’s interests at heart. Despite record profits and executive pay in the oil industry, neither Bush nor McCain is willing to cut back on Big Oil’s windfall profits and tax breaks. McCain already has proposed giving $3.8 billion more in tax breaks to Big Oil and has voted to protect their profits.

…in other words, he isn’t “battling” them at all. So which is he? Oil industry hater or oil industry protector? Either way, he’s grossly misrepresented himself. Either those positions you posted are correct, or his ad is. And don’t tell me “battling Big Oil” is ambiguous, because that’s intellectually dishonest.

MadisonConservative on August 6, 2008 at 12:11 AM

There was a “little number” used in Vietnam that helped to rid the leadership of poor leaders…

J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM

Number of fragings?

MB4 on August 6, 2008 at 3:55 AM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.