McCain ad: “Broken”
posted at 12:40 pm on August 5, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
John McCain goes back to positive messaging in his newest ad … well, only in the campaigning sense. With “Broken”, McCain positions himself as an outsider and makes the claim that he’s the solution:
Washington’s broken. John McCain knows it. We’re worse off than we were four years ago.
Only McCain has taken on big tobacco, drug companies, fought corruption in both parties. He’ll reform Wall Street, battle Big Oil, make America prosper again.
He’s the original maverick.
One is ready to lead — McCain.
The “Washington’s broken” line is a risk for McCain. He wants to attack Barack Obama’s strength by positioning himself as the real reformer, and with good justification. He has fought corruption and taken political risks for reform, neither of which Obama can claim in his three short years in the Senate.
However, it provides a harmonic to Obama’s message, and Obama can counter by asking why Washington is still “broken” after McCain spent 26 years there. The answer doesn’t make for good sound bites; one man in 100 can’t do much more than McCain has attempted, and even a President only has limited ability to change the air in DC. McCain shouldn’t run on a theme that DC works, but perhaps he should look for better messages that resonate to his benefit and doesn’t underscore the message of his opponents.
Why not keep hammering Obama on energy? McCain has barely mentioned his own Lexington Project since its launch. Instead, he adopts the “big oil” nomenclature on which Obama’s populist drivel depends. “Big Oil” isn’t the problem; it’s Big Government getting in the way of the people who can produce American energy from American resources.
We need more message discipline from the McCain campaign.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
So then how will he “battle Big Oil” differently than Obama?
MadisonConservative on August 5, 2008 at 5:48 PM
Obama:
McCain:
wise_man on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM
“Broken” you say.
I’ll tell you and Saint Mc what’s broken.
That’s the goshdamn lack of military discipline in this sorry despicable War in Iraq.
What the hell is that?
Doesn’t surprise me though; when their glorious leadership has given our brave troopers nothing but continuing “Hobson’s Choice’s”… consider, “stop loss” consider, “extended tours” …what the hell can you expect?
There was a “little number” used in Vietnam that helped to rid the leadership of poor leaders…
Dose anyone recall the immediate effectiveness of such action?
My thought would be, that; St Mc as much as anyone, would be cognizant of those actions and present conditions?
Where’s Holy Joe?
J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM
‘Suicide is Painless’
Through early morning fog I see
visions of the things to be
the pains that are withheld for me
I realize and I can see… Songs from Korea and Vietnam sung so many times again in Iraq…
Damn this sorry War!
J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM
no, sorry, that doesnt hold water. you are using what obama accuses mccain off to defend mccain? sorry, no dice. mccain has mentioned obscene profits in relation to oil companies way too many times to think he means anything positive when he says “battle big oil”. the guy is getting more liberal all the time.
chasdal on August 5, 2008 at 7:25 PM
My final stanza was…
So painfully …!
J_Gocht on August 5, 2008 at 8:25 PM
Washington’s Broken?
Is this a Mitt Romney ad?
iamse7en on August 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM
…in other words, he isn’t “battling” them at all. So which is he? Oil industry hater or oil industry protector? Either way, he’s grossly misrepresented himself. Either those positions you posted are correct, or his ad is. And don’t tell me “battling Big Oil” is ambiguous, because that’s intellectually dishonest.
MadisonConservative on August 6, 2008 at 12:11 AM
Number of fragings?
MB4 on August 6, 2008 at 3:55 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2