<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post: Thaddeus McCotter on &#8220;unpopular presidents&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Give &#8216;em Hell Thad! &#124; The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1289354</link>
		<dc:creator>Give &#8216;em Hell Thad! &#124; The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1289354</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air has an exclusive post from McCotter that&#8217;s worth your time today. He&#8217;s not gentle with the President, nor should he be. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air has an exclusive post from McCotter that&#8217;s worth your time today. He&#8217;s not gentle with the President, nor should he be. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1288429</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1288429</guid>
		<description>Nathan:

There is another reason: It will do no good if the House leadership will not go along with the Republican agenda. And why would they? Did a make a difference that they were in session last week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan:</p>
<p>There is another reason: It will do no good if the House leadership will not go along with the Republican agenda. And why would they? Did a make a difference that they were in session last week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1288424</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1288424</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous. If these guys had worried about this issue when they had the majority it would not be a problem now. But nooo, they were too worried about Dubai and illegal immigration to even give this a passing thought.

Bush does not need to stand by them. He is not a part of the House of Representatives. He lifted the executive ban, now let these guys do their job and get the Congressional ban lifted.

This is just another attempt for the Congress to blame their failings on the White House. They do it all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous. If these guys had worried about this issue when they had the majority it would not be a problem now. But nooo, they were too worried about Dubai and illegal immigration to even give this a passing thought.</p>
<p>Bush does not need to stand by them. He is not a part of the House of Representatives. He lifted the executive ban, now let these guys do their job and get the Congressional ban lifted.</p>
<p>This is just another attempt for the Congress to blame their failings on the White House. They do it all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan_OH</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1288074</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan_OH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1288074</guid>
		<description>The only justification that I can buy for Pres. Bush not calling them back is he understands he is electoral poison and does not want to make himself too large of a focus of this debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only justification that I can buy for Pres. Bush not calling them back is he understands he is electoral poison and does not want to make himself too large of a focus of this debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glendower</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287810</link>
		<dc:creator>glendower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287810</guid>
		<description>Several posters have said, in effect, &quot;Call them back and make them take an up-or-down vote.&quot;  How?  Pelosi wouldn&#039;t permit that to happen when Congress was in regular session.  Why would she cave and allow it in a special session?

By calling Congress back into session, Bush could indeed play &quot;Give &#039;em hell&quot; George and gain some points.  Just how would this help McCain and his chances (and the party&#039;s chances) in November?

It&#039;s better to give &lt;strong&gt;McCain&lt;/strong&gt; and other Republicans a month to hammer the Democrats and their leadership on this issue.  Bush doesn&#039;t gain any points (what would be the point of that?), but McCain certainly can if he works it right.

Come to think of it, gasoline prices spiking to about $4.75/gal nationwide would make for some interesting political ads, wouldn&#039;t it?  Any of us could write the dialog:

&quot;The Democrat Congressional leader refused to allow an up-or-down vote on expanding domestic oil drilling and lowering gas prices--and then the Democrats went on a five-week vacation.  Now gas prices are at an all-time high.  You can&#039;t afford to go in vacation this August, but they can.  Is this the kind of &#039;leadership&#039; they promised when they took control of Congress in 2006?  Call your congressman today and wish him a happy vacation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several posters have said, in effect, &#8220;Call them back and make them take an up-or-down vote.&#8221;  How?  Pelosi wouldn&#8217;t permit that to happen when Congress was in regular session.  Why would she cave and allow it in a special session?</p>
<p>By calling Congress back into session, Bush could indeed play &#8220;Give &#8216;em hell&#8221; George and gain some points.  Just how would this help McCain and his chances (and the party&#8217;s chances) in November?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better to give <strong>McCain</strong> and other Republicans a month to hammer the Democrats and their leadership on this issue.  Bush doesn&#8217;t gain any points (what would be the point of that?), but McCain certainly can if he works it right.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, gasoline prices spiking to about $4.75/gal nationwide would make for some interesting political ads, wouldn&#8217;t it?  Any of us could write the dialog:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Democrat Congressional leader refused to allow an up-or-down vote on expanding domestic oil drilling and lowering gas prices&#8211;and then the Democrats went on a five-week vacation.  Now gas prices are at an all-time high.  You can&#8217;t afford to go in vacation this August, but they can.  Is this the kind of &#8216;leadership&#8217; they promised when they took control of Congress in 2006?  Call your congressman today and wish him a happy vacation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Greene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287766</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287766</guid>
		<description>I support President Bush through thick and thin even though I disagreed with him on immigration and not fighting back harder against the democrats with their &quot;Bush lied amnesia driven propaganda&quot; on the Iraq war,and Harriet Myers.

 McCotter is right on this and Bush should have stood with them.This issue has a chance to drive a serious wedge between the democrats and help wipe away the support from independents that they have.

 Any positive daylight the GOP can get on issues right now combined with the success in Iraq should be supported 100%.

 Bush should have stood and fought with the rest of the GOP,they have done a pretty good job of standing strong with him though the tough times of 05-07.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support President Bush through thick and thin even though I disagreed with him on immigration and not fighting back harder against the democrats with their &#8220;Bush lied amnesia driven propaganda&#8221; on the Iraq war,and Harriet Myers.</p>
<p> McCotter is right on this and Bush should have stood with them.This issue has a chance to drive a serious wedge between the democrats and help wipe away the support from independents that they have.</p>
<p> Any positive daylight the GOP can get on issues right now combined with the success in Iraq should be supported 100%.</p>
<p> Bush should have stood and fought with the rest of the GOP,they have done a pretty good job of standing strong with him though the tough times of 05-07.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keving</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287658</link>
		<dc:creator>keving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287658</guid>
		<description>McCotter seems high off the response he&#039;s received from being &#039;courageous enough to stand up to the Dems&#039;. /sarc

And now he&#039;s using that to attack the President?

Why doesn&#039;t he use that to go after all of the Dem&#039;s other lunatic policies? Like welfare / social security / government expansion, etc...

It seems wasted on someone that is on his way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCotter seems high off the response he&#8217;s received from being &#8216;courageous enough to stand up to the Dems&#8217;. /sarc</p>
<p>And now he&#8217;s using that to attack the President?</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t he use that to go after all of the Dem&#8217;s other lunatic policies? Like welfare / social security / government expansion, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems wasted on someone that is on his way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabbott</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287359</link>
		<dc:creator>sabbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287359</guid>
		<description>Ouch...better put some ice on that Mr. President!  Have a good time slapping backs with the ChiComms while the real conservatives are doing the heavy lifting in the House of Representatives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch&#8230;better put some ice on that Mr. President!  Have a good time slapping backs with the ChiComms while the real conservatives are doing the heavy lifting in the House of Representatives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperCool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287256</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperCool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287256</guid>
		<description>He forgot to mention how The Accidental President actually left the world a far more dangerous place than when he took over by losing China and North Korea to the reds, two problems we&#039;re still struggling with the effects of 60 years later.

At least George will be able to say he actually &lt;em&gt;won&lt;/em&gt; the wars he waged, even if he &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; blind to the fact that The People need him here now with the congressional Republicans to take this fight to the Do Nothing Dems rather than hobnobbing with the same red appartcheks Harmless Harry inadvertantly helped put into power so many years ago.

Still, fight on GOP! Take it straight to those slackers and pound &#039;em into rubble! Expose them as the gutless Power For The Sake of Power authoritarian scumbags that they are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He forgot to mention how The Accidental President actually left the world a far more dangerous place than when he took over by losing China and North Korea to the reds, two problems we&#8217;re still struggling with the effects of 60 years later.</p>
<p>At least George will be able to say he actually <em>won</em> the wars he waged, even if he <strong>is</strong> blind to the fact that The People need him here now with the congressional Republicans to take this fight to the Do Nothing Dems rather than hobnobbing with the same red appartcheks Harmless Harry inadvertantly helped put into power so many years ago.</p>
<p>Still, fight on GOP! Take it straight to those slackers and pound &#8216;em into rubble! Expose them as the gutless Power For The Sake of Power authoritarian scumbags that they are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287138</link>
		<dc:creator>RJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287138</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face it, Bush promised a China vacation on Air Force One to Laura and his daughter Barbra.  He&#039;s not going to let an energy crisis stop the family vacation, especially when taxpayers are paying for the fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it, Bush promised a China vacation on Air Force One to Laura and his daughter Barbra.  He&#8217;s not going to let an energy crisis stop the family vacation, especially when taxpayers are paying for the fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadisonConservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1287118</link>
		<dc:creator>MadisonConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1287118</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Damn, I love this guy! McCotter for POTUS!

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on August 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m thinking the same. Imagine the press conferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Damn, I love this guy! McCotter for POTUS!</p>
<p>Dr.Cwac.Cwac on August 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking the same. Imagine the press conferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKennedy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286942</link>
		<dc:creator>BKennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Bush went to the Olympics, in part, because China is helping us with North Korea, and, we hope, Iran.

Bush is right in not demanding congress reassemble just to have the Dems knock down the Republicans

bnelson44 on August 5, 2008 at 6:34 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now when you say &quot;help,&quot; do you mean doing the same thing Russia and Iran and NK have been doing to us recently, e.g. putting on a friendly face and stonewalling our efforts?

Honestly, the only difference between China and Africa is that the Chinese are too proud to beg other nations to bail them out. They both end up being tribalist paradises for the power-mad thug du jour. I gotta say, the quantum jump from feudalism to communism didn&#039;t much change their lot in life. Unless the Chinese wake up and smell the stench of failure emanating from Marxism, they;&#039;ll basically be the same theoretical superpowert they have always been: Purely theoretical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Bush went to the Olympics, in part, because China is helping us with North Korea, and, we hope, Iran.</p>
<p>Bush is right in not demanding congress reassemble just to have the Dems knock down the Republicans</p>
<p>bnelson44 on August 5, 2008 at 6:34 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Now when you say &#8220;help,&#8221; do you mean doing the same thing Russia and Iran and NK have been doing to us recently, e.g. putting on a friendly face and stonewalling our efforts?</p>
<p>Honestly, the only difference between China and Africa is that the Chinese are too proud to beg other nations to bail them out. They both end up being tribalist paradises for the power-mad thug du jour. I gotta say, the quantum jump from feudalism to communism didn&#8217;t much change their lot in life. Unless the Chinese wake up and smell the stench of failure emanating from Marxism, they;&#8217;ll basically be the same theoretical superpowert they have always been: Purely theoretical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fossten</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286876</link>
		<dc:creator>fossten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286876</guid>
		<description>Bush:  &quot;It won&#039;t matter anyway...[sniffle]&quot;

Jeez what a quitter.

FIGHT, DUDE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush:  &#8220;It won&#8217;t matter anyway&#8230;[sniffle]&#8221;</p>
<p>Jeez what a quitter.</p>
<p>FIGHT, DUDE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashoverride</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286725</link>
		<dc:creator>flashoverride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286725</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are now so much in hock to &lt;strike&gt;China&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;Japan&lt;/em&gt; thanks to so many America’s proclivity to “shop till you drop” that no American President dare say too much about &lt;strike&gt;China&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;Japan&lt;/em&gt; least they pull the rug out from under our financial “House of Cards”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don&#039;t have a real good understanding of how the bond system works, huh?  Good, recruit.  Now I see how you went up that hill so many times.

See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Public debt (private and government debt)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are now so much in hock to <strike>China</strike> <em>Japan</em> thanks to so many America’s proclivity to “shop till you drop” that no American President dare say too much about <strike>China</strike> <em>Japan</em> least they pull the rug out from under our financial “House of Cards”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t have a real good understanding of how the bond system works, huh?  Good, recruit.  Now I see how you went up that hill so many times.</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt" rel="nofollow">Public debt (private and government debt)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286575</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286575</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Neocon Peg on August 5, 2008 at 7:47 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
He may be right, I&#039;m not sure what the presidents capability to keep them there is in practice, but it seems that Truman managed it somehow.  Maybe the circumstances are different.

But if it is possible for Bush to call them back and keep them their until they either vote on the issue or their vacation time has elapsed I think I would prefer that route, though I see merits to both sides of the argument.

They simply haven&#039;t earned a vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Neocon Peg on August 5, 2008 at 7:47 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>He may be right, I&#8217;m not sure what the presidents capability to keep them there is in practice, but it seems that Truman managed it somehow.  Maybe the circumstances are different.</p>
<p>But if it is possible for Bush to call them back and keep them their until they either vote on the issue or their vacation time has elapsed I think I would prefer that route, though I see merits to both sides of the argument.</p>
<p>They simply haven&#8217;t earned a vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowandslow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286565</link>
		<dc:creator>lowandslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286565</guid>
		<description>Representative Thaddeus G. McCotter should turn some of that scorn to his fellow members of Congress that have been there prior to 2006 (including himself). There have been plenty of opportunities squandered by the House Republicans when it comes to addressing our energy concerns. Granted everyday that goes by without addressing this hurts our economy but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s all that fair to say Bush isn&#039;t doing his part. I remember plenty of State of the Union addresses where Bush pointed out the need and urgency to cut our dependence on foreign oil yet congress failed to bring any useful legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Representative Thaddeus G. McCotter should turn some of that scorn to his fellow members of Congress that have been there prior to 2006 (including himself). There have been plenty of opportunities squandered by the House Republicans when it comes to addressing our energy concerns. Granted everyday that goes by without addressing this hurts our economy but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s all that fair to say Bush isn&#8217;t doing his part. I remember plenty of State of the Union addresses where Bush pointed out the need and urgency to cut our dependence on foreign oil yet congress failed to bring any useful legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286532</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286532</guid>
		<description>Thad rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thad rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon Peg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286530</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon Peg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286530</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;FloatingRock on August 5, 2008 at 7:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I got that from John Carter (R) Texas from CSPAN today as they were holding a press conference outside the house.  One of the press or visitors (I couldn&#039;t see as it was behind the cameras) asked that question and that was his response.  He said that Pelosi has all the power.  The President could call it, but it would only take Pelosi to adjourn, which, to me means that she sets the agenda. I can see why President Bush refused to do it. He didn&#039;t want it to appear that it was his fault, playing right into Democraps hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>FloatingRock on August 5, 2008 at 7:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I got that from John Carter (R) Texas from CSPAN today as they were holding a press conference outside the house.  One of the press or visitors (I couldn&#8217;t see as it was behind the cameras) asked that question and that was his response.  He said that Pelosi has all the power.  The President could call it, but it would only take Pelosi to adjourn, which, to me means that she sets the agenda. I can see why President Bush refused to do it. He didn&#8217;t want it to appear that it was his fault, playing right into Democraps hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286528</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286528</guid>
		<description>pabarge on August 5, 2008 at 7:33 PM

&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/pelosi-to-at-risk-dems-go-ahead-and-oppose-me-on-drilling/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Allah posted this earlier&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pabarge on August 5, 2008 at 7:33 PM</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/pelosi-to-at-risk-dems-go-ahead-and-oppose-me-on-drilling/" rel="nofollow">Allah posted this earlier</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrLynn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286517</link>
		<dc:creator>MrLynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286517</guid>
		<description>From the article Pabarge linked:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Even as they face heat from constituents during the August break, Democrats say they aren’t going to cave in to popular pressure. 

“We feel pretty comfortable with where we are,” said Rep. Michael E. Capuano (D-Mass.), who is close to the Democratic leadership. “This is a not a new issue. This just didn’t happen today. We’ve been working on this for months.” 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Looks like the Dems are betting they can hold off and do whatever they want with a new big-majority Dem Congress.  The President is betting that stalling on this issue will turn the election around for Republicans.

If the price of gas stays high (speculate you traders! bid it up!), the President will win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article Pabarge linked:</p>
<blockquote><p>Even as they face heat from constituents during the August break, Democrats say they aren’t going to cave in to popular pressure. </p>
<p>“We feel pretty comfortable with where we are,” said Rep. Michael E. Capuano (D-Mass.), who is close to the Democratic leadership. “This is a not a new issue. This just didn’t happen today. We’ve been working on this for months.”
</p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like the Dems are betting they can hold off and do whatever they want with a new big-majority Dem Congress.  The President is betting that stalling on this issue will turn the election around for Republicans.</p>
<p>If the price of gas stays high (speculate you traders! bid it up!), the President will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pabarge</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286497</link>
		<dc:creator>pabarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286497</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12304.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this and weep&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12304.html" rel="nofollow">read this and weep</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buford Gooch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286493</link>
		<dc:creator>Buford Gooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286493</guid>
		<description>Calling them back would put an end to this way too soon.  Attack Bush all you want (he was certainly not my first choice in 2000), this was the right move on his part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling them back would put an end to this way too soon.  Attack Bush all you want (he was certainly not my first choice in 2000), this was the right move on his part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286486</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even if he did call a special session, all Pelosi would have to do is to adjourn immediately!

Neocon Peg on August 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Are you sure?  What about &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/boehner-calls-bluff-of-pro-drilling-dems-prove-youre-not-liars-by-joining-with-us-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1286151&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;?
he [the president] may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even if he did call a special session, all Pelosi would have to do is to adjourn immediately!</p>
<p>Neocon Peg on August 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you sure?  What about <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/boehner-calls-bluff-of-pro-drilling-dems-prove-youre-not-liars-by-joining-with-us-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1286151" rel="nofollow">this</a>?<br />
he [the president] may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286471</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286471</guid>
		<description>And let&#039;s make a long list of the things that the Republican majority should have done and another list of what Republican majority should not have done so we wouldn&#039;t have to call them the minority.  I guess Rep. McCotter has cast the first stone but I can guarantee that there will be no stones returned from the President. How is it helpful to sound like the Democrats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#8217;s make a long list of the things that the Republican majority should have done and another list of what Republican majority should not have done so we wouldn&#8217;t have to call them the minority.  I guess Rep. McCotter has cast the first stone but I can guarantee that there will be no stones returned from the President. How is it helpful to sound like the Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon Peg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/05/guest-post-thaddeus-mccotter-on-unpopular-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-1286452</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon Peg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=21264#comment-1286452</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;One, big difference: Bush is not running for reelection. I agree with him, let the Dems hang themselves out to dry.

Kafir on August 5, 2008 at 6:56 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly.  Bush needs to distance himself from this.  He has already done what he needed to do (lift the executive order on drilling).  Even if he did call a special session, all Pelosi would have to do is to adjourn immediately!  Yeah, I watched Cspan today!  Bush sees the bigger picture.  Let&#039;s  not turn on ourselves now that we have discovered we have a little fortitude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>One, big difference: Bush is not running for reelection. I agree with him, let the Dems hang themselves out to dry.</p>
<p>Kafir on August 5, 2008 at 6:56 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly.  Bush needs to distance himself from this.  He has already done what he needed to do (lift the executive order on drilling).  Even if he did call a special session, all Pelosi would have to do is to adjourn immediately!  Yeah, I watched Cspan today!  Bush sees the bigger picture.  Let&#8217;s  not turn on ourselves now that we have discovered we have a little fortitude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
