Too bad to check: New York cop knocks bicyclist over for no apparent reason
posted at 8:51 pm on July 28, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Three weeks on the force and already stripped of his badge and gun. Even worse than the crime, the apparent cover-up:
What the video doesn’t show is Pogan arresting Long for attempted assault in the third degree, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct – charges that kept the Bloomfield, N.J. man behind bars for 26 hours before his release late Saturday…
In court papers, Pogan accused Long of purposely swerving his bicycle to block traffic and then using it as a weapon to run down the officer, knocking him off his feet and causing a “laceration” on his forearm.
Watch the clip to see who ran down whom; linebackers get paid good money to make open-field tackles as crunching as this. The only semi-exculpatory explanation I can think of would be if there was a run-in earlier with the same bicyclist such that the cops had reason to believe he was dangerous and needed to apprehend him by any means necessary. I’m skeptical, but we’ll see. Exit quotation: “If it wasn’t caught on video people would not have believed it.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 Next »
Wow, the sheer ignorance and hate does wonders for your argument. *rolls eyes*
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM
rokemronnie on July 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM
dose ridding 4-5 days a week 50 miles a day on my old iron head count. Seems I havent had to bad of a time with cars , then again i watch them real close because i know they don’t watch for me {but they do hear me } .
Mojack420 on July 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Exactly, and by trying to avoid the cop, the biker knew that the cop was moving towards him. He understood the cop’s intentions and ignored them by refusing to stop.
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:00 PM
It’s freaking dangerous for the people in the cars, too. I was stuck behind a cyclist in the hill country on a winding road with no shoulder and too many curves to pass safely. I was stuck behind the guy for miles and miles, and about 6 cars behind me got too pissed off and took the risk of passing us both. There were three near-misses in just a few miles’ distance because of the dangerous situation created by this one a-hole cyclist who had “every right” to share that road with cars. Laws need to be changed, alright – to get cyclists off roads like that! If there’s a shoulder, fine – cyclist’s own risk, I say. But when there’s no shoulder and it’s not safe for cars to pass, it should be just as illegal as granny driving 20+ mph below the speed limit.
I blew a tire outside Phoenix one time and had to drive into the city on I-10 on a donut spare. The spare said not to go over 50 mph. So I drove in the right lane, a little over the line of the shoulder with my hazards on (couldn’t ride completely in the shoulder because it was strewn with trash that likely would have popped the flimsy spare). I got pulled over and got a citation for driving too slow and causing a hazard, spare tire notwithstanding. The cop wanted me to find an alternate route that was not I-10 (there wasn’t one that I knew of since I’m from Texas and not familiar with NM at all). So I just drove 70 mph on my donut, praying all the way that I’d make it into the city without having an accident because of it. Point is, if I got a ticket for going 50 mph on I-10, surely a cyclist should get ticketed for going 10 mph in car lanes anywhere.
aero on July 28, 2008 at 11:01 PM
So then why did he ignore all of the other cyclists on the road?
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:01 PM
Why don’t you dip into your vast store of wisdom and correct me then?
Why do members of CM not deserve to be beaten within an inch of their worthless lives?
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Jimmy, you sure are being stupid when it comes to this. Just because the cop was moving towards him means he wanted to stop, could it be he moving towards him to attack him? Why didn’t the cop raise his hand or anything. I’d try to avoid the cop the same way, as a lot of stupid people do run across the road and bike path without looking.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM
exactly… another bike rider got way closer to the cop then his particular guy, this guy was singled out for a reason.. not sure why..
Chakra Hammer on July 28, 2008 at 11:03 PM
Unless the cop had given me some indication he wanted me to stop I would have just assumed he was walking to the sidewalk for some reason and steered clear of him.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:03 PM
So the correct way to address NYC police officers on NYC streets is to assume that they are aggressive and are planning on attacking you? Is that what you are honestly arguing?
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:03 PM
The same reason you don’t deserve to be beaten within an inch of your worthless life. It’s just silly and pointless, and does no good.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Try to put your last three working brain cells to work and explain why they don’t deserve it.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:05 PM
In this case yes, because he was looking straight at this guy and made ZERO indication that he wanted this guy to stop. If the cop had made indication that he wanted him to stop, then I could come to the conclusion that he wanted him to stop.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:06 PM
LOL, keep bringing the insults. Let’s nuke the middle east, that’ll solve all our problems, just like killing all the members of mass effect will solve this problem, right?
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM
I think the cop ver reacted. And Im no fan of Critical Mass.
Cops are required to make judgement calls. There was no life threat to the cop and he didnt need to body block the guy. If it was an arrest to be made could have just grab the guy wihout knocking him over.
HOWEVER. If the cop had heard this guy was armed then the bodyblock would be OK. But havent seen or heard evidence to bear that out.
William Amos on July 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM
I’m considering this argument over because you don’t seem to understand the basic rules of society. A police officer is not just another guy in the street. If he seems to be singling you out, it isn’t because he wants to beat you up in the middle of a crowded street and steal your wallet. Its because he wants you to stop. This is the basic rule of society. When a police car behind you turns on his lights, do you wait for him to turn on the megaphone and explicitly telling you to stop before you pull over?
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM
I think the hard check was more then enough indication he wanted the punk to stop .
I mean if after the fact they started tuning him up with club in hand well then there might be something but this was nothing , the guy should just man up take it and get over it.
Mojack420 on July 28, 2008 at 11:09 PM
This is however a sign I spend too much time on this blog
Just put it up so give Youtube sometime for it to appear
William Amos on July 28, 2008 at 11:10 PM
I notice you still can’t/won’t answer the question. Typical lefty.
Well, it would. But I’m not suggesting that, as even a moonbat should be able to notice. It would be sufficent if they were “discouraged” from their youthful hijinks.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Your example holds no water, because a cop turning his lights on is a clear indication he wants you to pull over. In this case, the cop did nothing. Basically what you’re arguing that if a cop happens to be driving behind you without his lights on, he expects you to pull over.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:12 PM
To the left, that’s exactly what he is. Or maybe a little less than some other guy on the street.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:12 PM
BWWAAAAAHAAAA. Sheer ignorance again, if you actually knew who I was, and what my view points are, I’m anything BUT a lefty. I get singled out all the time for being a staunch conservative.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:13 PM
Well, yeah, that’s all there is—and I’ll admit I haven’t read anything else on the story, but I’m not judging and condemning the cop, I’m simply judging what’s in the video.
That’s not entirely true, you and a few others have made up an absurd fantasy about the bicyclist trying the run the cop over in the video. Otherwise I think we are all in agreement that something could have provoked the cop before entering the video.
No, we’re only commenting on the video portion.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:14 PM
Leave it to this dipshit to remind me never to criticize the cops for rough play. No, mushmouth, if he was a murder suspect you play it like the cop played it. But he’s not a murder suspect.
Jaibones on July 28, 2008 at 11:14 PM
Critical Mass exists to piss off drivers. Period. I do more to promote cycling as transportation than all the Critical Massholes combined.
I rode 19.4 miles today, and try to get in ~20 or more 6 days a week. I’ve been using a bike for transportation for 15 years and have been hit by cars three times, twice by careless drivers who turned into my path and once that was my fault when I entered a crosswalk on a very stale signal. I’ve been honked at, sworn at, been called a nigger by white trash teens (I’m a fair skinned redhead w/ a bright red beard), been forced off the road by hostile drivers and in general I’ve experienced the spectrum of abuse that drivers can shower on adult cyclists.
It’s precisely because I’m a cyclist that I oppose critical mass. They are not just counterproductive, they make things more dangerous for those of us who seriously ride.
For those of you who whine about them obstructing traffic, do you yourself know the rules of the road? I’d take the time to learn them before ridiculing because in a lot of states, bicyclists are are allowed to take up the right lane if there’s two or more riding.
I’ve ridden over 25,000 miles and I think you’re insane, regardless of what the law allows. Cyclists should ride single file a safe distance from the curb when there is traffic. Riding two abreast in a traffic lane is asking to get killed. The difference in speed between a car and a bicycle makes taking a full lane a very dangerous thing. I’ll stay 18-30″ from the curb, away from the glass in the gutter and the curb so I don’t strike a pedal, giving traffic enough room to pass in a standard lane.
I’m pretty assertive as a cyclist but I treat drivers with the respect and knowledge that I’ll lose any confrontation. I don’t hold up traffic and try to be considerate of drivers.
rokemronnie on July 28, 2008 at 11:15 PM
I know who you are, moron, I’ve read your comments on this blog.
By the other faculty at Columbia?
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:15 PM
test
xplodeit on July 28, 2008 at 11:16 PM
Kini on July 28, 2008 at 11:17 PM
D’oh! I meant Arizona, not NM. Unless they moved Phoenix, that is. Heh. Oh, well – the world outside Texas doesn’t matter all that much, right? ;-)
aero on July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Just choosing a target. At random.
The cop clearly goes after this one cyclist. It doesn’t matter why. Just like a lion chasing the herd, whatevah gets close gets caught.
crap….
Kini on July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM
So then, the other cop must be telepathically connected to this cop, because they both turn and start moving at this specific cyclist at the same time. I didn’t realize lions had mastered telepathy.
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Bicycle bullsprockets aside, if there wasn’t a previous incident with this cop and this biker that led to the report, this man should NEVER carry a badge again, for filing a fairytale report.
Cops that make up reports out of thin air are the enemy of EVERYONE.
My first reaction to the video was: “God, that lunkhead bastard needs to go to jail.” But at first look I thought it was just some bikers in some kind of parade or rally. After reading a little about Critical Mass, I’m not so sure that this is the whole story.
hillbillyjim on July 28, 2008 at 11:21 PM
Sorry but the law says that drivers have to share the road with cyclists, who in turn have to obey traffic laws, including those concerning obstructing traffic.
Anyone who can’t get by me on my bike near the edge of the road shouldn’t be driving in the first place.
There are very few road lanes in the US that don’t have enough space for both a bike and a car.
rokemronnie on July 28, 2008 at 11:22 PM
Exactly. Cops on bikes need twirling red & blues on their hats. Hell, why bother walking up to perps? If you walk, ride or jump, they must be innocent. Since they WEREN’T CAUGHT ON CAM FOR GOD’S SAKE
Ugly on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 PM
That may be true, but I still do not feel that’s justification for others to call for their death.
Well around here, riding that far from the curb puts you in the right lane.
I don’t do either of those either, and just out of curiosity where do you ride around? Problem is for me the drivers in Orlando show zero respect towards cyclists and oftentimes go out of the way to harass and even attack cyclists.
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 PM
/sarc
//OJ
Ugly on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 PM
looks bad — the cop appears to be aiming for the kid as the kid swerves to avoid him… it’s quite apparent in the slow motion… not good.
D2Boston on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 PM
Sorry Allah but the video doesn’t justify judging either one. More facts must be presented.
wepeople on July 28, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Testors
*SNIIIIIIIIIIFFF*
aaahh
Ugly on July 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM
The second cop came over after the first cop knocked the cyclist to the ground. Or didn’t you see that? And like similar predators, came in for make the kill, or in this case, the arrest. The second cop wasn’t gonna let his big buddy make the arrest all by himself. Management would be wwatching…
Besides, what purpose did the cop attack the cyclist for anyway?
Never mind answering, because the cop just wanted someone, anyone, that that cyclist just got unlucky.
Kini on July 28, 2008 at 11:31 PM
The pathological dishonesty of the left never ceases to amaze me. It’s like you people CANNOT stop yourselves from lying.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:31 PM
Directed at Flenser and your disgusting comments:
Stop trolling this board you are an embarrassment and don’t deserve to post here.
sirmyth on July 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM
The abilty of people to be manipulated by a few seconds of video is fascinating, and depressing.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM
So, anyone who disagrees with you is a Lefty?
ViperPilot on July 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM
I already explained the justification numerous times. And it wasn’t an attack. The biker was avoiding being stopped, and at the last second, instead of stopping, or going around, he clearly makes a decision to ram the cop. The cop responds by throwing him off in the other direction. Plus there is an account that they were already after him for something else, and were treating him as a perp resisting arrest, the same as any guy on foot and they took him out in the same manner. And the other cop didn’t come over afterwords. Both of them are already walking in the direction of that biker before he even enters the frame.
It most certainly was NOT some sort of primal “lion” “attack” by this vicious bloodthursty cop hell-bent on attacking a biker at random.
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:36 PM
All right, sirmyth, I’ll try to raise my comments to your lofty standards.
What do I do again? Accuse people of saying things I don’t like of “trolling”? That’s original.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:36 PM
It’s probably just you.
hillbillyjim on July 28, 2008 at 11:36 PM
I’ve never been to NY so I don’t know what the curbs are like, but even if it’s one of those Roman Ogee curbs that are rounded, they probably still have a steep portion near the middle to help keep cars off the sidewalks. Riding a bike over a steep curb like that at a severe angle is very risky. Generally you approach a curb like that more perpendicularly. Any motorcycle rider uses the same theory at RR crossings.
If the guy were going to ride up on the curb he would have had to have planned ahead, to be safe about it. Even if he popped is front wheel up on the curb, his back wheel probably would have skidded out at that angle. The only ideal way to do it in that circumstance would have been to bunny-hop it, but that takes a moment of preparation as well.
Some here have suggested that he should have applied his brakes. Even that requires more time than he had when the cop lunged at him.
Again, he probably had it coming, but it isn’t evident from this video.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:36 PM
but even if it’s one of those
RomanOgee curbsFloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:37 PM
The ones who pathologically lie are. You know, like you.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:37 PM
I consider calling people ‘leftys’ who clearly aren’t and suggesting that people need to be shot or be beat-down as trolling. You obviously want to just stir up the bee-hive rather than have an intelligent discussion. I guess you are lucky this board is poorly moderated.
sirmyth on July 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM
Believe me, at the speed he was going, he had more than enough time to brake and slow down as opposed to directing himself towards the cop. He was at least 24″ from the curb, there was no danger of that at all.
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:39 PM
When you see a cop walking over to intercept you, normal people hit the brakes.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:39 PM
You’re off to an outstanding start.
hillbillyjim on July 28, 2008 at 11:41 PM
Critical Mass has an extremely violent history in NYC, including pulling a cabbie out of hi car and beating him a few years ago. They have a whole YouTube channel full of contextless clips like this which “prove” that cops/motorists/the world are out to “get” cyclists.
Most times they set up the incident then turn on the camera when someone reacts to their provocations. I’ll bet the same happened here, but the spineless NYPD bowed to the rich White cycle cult and punished this cop.
My bet: The cyclist did something just prior to the arrest, the cameraman’s a critical mass plant and all the “witnessess” are about as creibe a the people who stood up for Germain Talis when he beat up that girl in a wheel chair.
Rob Taylor on July 28, 2008 at 11:41 PM
If the cops ever need to stop a violent criminal on a bike that would be OK with me, but if they decide to start breaking up these Critical Mass demonstrations I think it would be best to seize up the rear wheels with their nightsticks, but only if the intent is clear in advance.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:42 PM
i have no problem sharing the road but critical ass dosnt want to share the road they want to hog the road. Big freaking difference.
Mojack420 on July 28, 2008 at 11:43 PM
It only becomes obvious that the cop was going to intercept him in the last fraction of a second. Braking takes longer than that.
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Can you provide any names? I assure you I’m not accusing any people of being lefties who clearly are not.
I don’t recall calling for anyone to be shot. Can you provide a cite? Being the top-notch commenter you are, I’m sure you did not say that without knowing what you were talking about. Right? So back it up or admit you are wrong.
Whenever I see a person calling for somebody else to be banned, I’ve noticed that the person tends to be a liberal.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:46 PM
I agree, that particular bike rider must have done something wrong not shown on video before he got his a*s handed to him.
Maybe he assaulted another bike rider so whatever, but that cop definitely was eyeing that guy from a long was off.. had nothing to do with the closeness he was riding my the cop, because other riders were getting closer to that same cop and he didn’t lash out at them..
Chakra Hammer on July 28, 2008 at 11:46 PM
I agree, that particular bike rider must have done something wrong not shown on video before he got his a*s handed to him.
Maybe he assaulted another bike rider or whatever, but that cop definitely was eyeing that guy from a long ways off.. had nothing to do with the closeness he was riding by the cop, because other riders were getting closer to that same cop and he didn’t lash out and tackle them..
(fixed my spellings) :}
Chakra Hammer on July 28, 2008 at 11:48 PM
I’ve been riding bikes my whole life. A lot of people stop when they get their drivers licenses. I know from nearly 40 years of experience how long it takes to stop a bike. Based on your appraisal of the video I would guess that you haven’t ridden one since you were a kid, am I right?
FloatingRock on July 28, 2008 at 11:49 PM
I happen to know most NYC Cops would laugh the whole stunt off and being another NYC stunt.
That cop attacked that cyclist…. there is no doubt. The cop was swimming on adrenaline. The video clearly shows the cop singling out that cyclist.
The fact that he lost his badge and will probably loose his job proves my point. AND, I hope he gets sued for assault.
Kini on July 28, 2008 at 11:50 PM
I ride a bike; I ride very fast; and you are absolutely correct. He could have stopped that bike in 5 feet.
Jaibones on July 28, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Take it up with whoever made that stupid remark, not me.
Just avoiding debris and drain grates can put you about 18-24″. On most roads that leaves enough room. In general, I try to avoid major roads because I’d rather not ride w/ one eye on my helmet mirror all the time. However, if I have to, I’ll ride on a major road even if there’s no shoulder. Generally that doesn’t create a problem if you’re considerate of drivers and get their eye when needed. Going alone on the right edge of the lane in traffic isn’t usually what makes cycling dangerous. You’re not likely to get rear ended or sideswiped.
If you watch where you are, make sure that drivers can see you and if they can’t, take precautions, you can ride in traffic, but cycling is inherently dangerous even without traffic.
I’m pretty assertive as a cyclist but I treat drivers with the respect and knowledge that I’ll lose any confrontation. I don’t hold up traffic and try to be considerate of drivers.
Some drivers are jerks. I think Critical Massholes makes the problem worse. I ride in suburban Detroit, occasionally in the city. I’ve ridden on Telegraph Road, on Eight Mile, and on Woodward going both up to Pontiac and all the way downtown.
I was in Orlando once. I brought my bike and rode from the strip on International out to Disney and back most days. There was a lot of undeveloped land still along the route, I even got chased by a bull that had somehow gotten alongside the road. I think a couple of times I took my bike in the rental car and rode around a lake outside of town. I didn’t have trouble on my bike there, but traffic was a hassle and I had an accident in the rental car leaving a KMart parking lot. Lady tried to pass me on the right exiting the lot as I turned into traffic. Cop gave me a ticket for improper lane usage but I fought it by mail and won, because the damage on my car where she hit me could only have happened if I had already made the turn, making me part of the flow of traffic with right of way.
rokemronnie on July 28, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Word to the wise, be careful with our cops, they shoot to kill and they will kill if they feel it’s necessary.
And they have been known to push the crazy envelope to prove a point…
AprilOrit on July 28, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Because video always tells the truth.
flenser on July 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM
Nope, you’d be wrong. I ride my bike at least 5 days a week for commuting to my university campus. And at speeds certainly faster than what that guy was going when the cop knocked him off his bike. I’m always aware of my surroundings and pedestrians. That guy KNEW that the cop was moving towards him, that’s why his path was clearly wide of where the cop was, and where he was heading. He saw the cop, knew where he was walking, and still made no efforts to slow down. He’s 29 years old. He knew he what he was doing. I am certain he believed the cop intended for him to stop, and he had no intention of stopping. The cop realized this midway into his intersection and sped up to ensure the biker couldn’t get around. Then the biker reacted to this, and instead of braking, as fruitless as it MAY have been, decided to continue at his constant speed and swerve towards the cop. The cop then reacted by pushing the biker, perceiving the last-second swerve as an act of aggression, something cops don’t take lightly, especially at night in a city surrounded by notoriously violent anarchists. I honestly believe that if this guy was innocent, he would have tried to brake. There is absolutely no evidence he ever tried to brake or avoid the cop while slowing down. I think if he had started slowing down, the cop would not have pushed him like he did.
jimmy the notable on July 28, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Very astute observation. Also, they don’t like making work for themselves during situations like this. It’s a grin and bear it stunt. Traffic slows down, people get angry, cops keep the peace.
There was no violence, except for the cops actions.
Kini on July 28, 2008 at 11:59 PM
I watched it several times. Seems pretty clear to me.
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Whenever something comes up involving cyclists, critical mass or not, people parade their hatred of bicyclists. Being right leaning, it really saddens me to see that disdain for cyclists is part of the conservative uniform. I would like to know why having to slow down and go around someone so you don’t kill them engenders so much hate. Why are people so pissed off at showing respect for the life of another? I’ve been driving for more than 30 years and some of it was driving trucks. I have encountered a lot of cyclists. It’s as easy as slowing down, using the steering wheel and then accelerating. As someone already said, if people can’t safely maneuver around a cyclist it is they who do not belong on the road.
deewhybee on July 29, 2008 at 12:01 AM
You saw exactly what CM wanted you to see, nothing more.
flenser on July 29, 2008 at 12:01 AM
But you don’t know this. It seems like you’re basing your entire opinion of the incident on this single video. There is a report that goes along with it that some have interpreted to say that the cyclist that was singled out because he was already suspected of something else. I mean, if you look at just the video, and assume there is absolutely NO reason for the cop to go after the cyclist, (which the video gives you no reason to think, because both cops single out this cyclist before he ever enters the frame), then yes, the cop was acting out of line. But as I said, there is no proof to support your assertion that this cyclist was absolutely innocent, especially not on the video.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:03 AM
You flippin idiot. By trying to AVOID the cop who was moving into his path as he moved towards the curb? WTF? Are YOU a cop? Cause you sure sound like one in trying to defend that one. I hope you or one of your children gets a take down like that sometime, then lets hear the tune you start singing. Jerk.
KMC1 on July 29, 2008 at 12:04 AM
CM?
Pretty much what the camera shows is lots of cyclist and a cop.
Like a bear standing in a stream waiting for the salmon to swim up for a catch.
You see something else?
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:04 AM
Nice to see you’ve got your vicious, murdering animal metaphors down.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:06 AM
Unfortunately living in Orlando means all of the roads are major roads. Riding in FL is dangerous, period. All kinds of jerks out there who try to spook you or attack you. I can guarantee you that 90% you won’t get people’s attention in Orlando as they’re too self absorbed, which resulted in me getting hit twice, because they were too busy either dialing on their cell phone, or they were only looking at oncoming traffic further down the road.
ViperPilot on July 29, 2008 at 12:06 AM
Perhaps, I’ll grant you that. But look who’s losing their badge.
The arrest record shows something else than what the video shows.
Gatta admit, pretty damning evidence. against the cop
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:07 AM
Here’s how I see the sequence. The cop spots him before he enters the frame. Bike starts to veer left almost as soon as you see it, to my view trying to avoid the cop. Cop continues on an intercept vector. Bike continues to veer left as cop nears him, then leans right, accelerating with the right pedal. I think he knew the cop had him targeted and he was trying to go around the cop.
Other cyclists might react differently, but in the same circumstances (well, I’d never ride with Critical Massholes) I’d hit my brakes as soon as I saw a cop on intercept vector to my bike. The guy had plenty of time to stop.
I have been stopped by cops on my bike three times. Once was a jerk cop who didn’t like me riding on an empty freeway service drive (the road was there before the freeway) near the Detroit Zoo, so I thanked her and turned out of her jurisdiction. Another stopped a friend and I for not having lights when we were doing intervals up and down the blvd in front of the cop shop. The other time was on a Sun morning ride w/ the Wolverines, a local sports club that has produced cycling and skating champions and olympians. When I’m fit, I can barely hang with them on the 70 mile ride. On the way back, while riding pretty much single file on some winding roads through the lakes in Oakland county, some jerk in a van got angry, crossed the yellow line unnecessarily to pass us, and apparently called the cops to say we were obstructing traffic, which we weren’t. The cop was coming from the other direction, crossed traffic and dove onto the shoulder, stopping our path. We were riding pretty much in a pace line, maybe a foot from the wheel in front, and it was pretty hairy how we had to swerve and brake to avoid crashing into her cruiser or going down on the gravel shoulder. The ride leaders cooled her out, but when I got home I called the duty officer and complained how unsafe her actions were. He was a mountain bike enthusiast and agreed.
Still, in this case, unless proved otherwise, I’m going with the cop on this one.
rokemronnie on July 29, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Yeah man! Down with the law!! Those cops are all jerks!! How could anyone defend them!! /sarc
What I’m trying to say is that this specific cyclist understood the cop wanted him to stop. He saw the path of the cop was one that was trying to intercept them. He wanted to avoid this interception. This act alone is suspicious, regardless of what happens off-camera. The cop sees that he is trying to avoid the interception and speeds up. Then the cyclists escape route is blocked, and he tries getting through using brute force. With many cops this may have worked. With this one, it didn’t.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM
I see that simply as a symptom of mob mentality. People are outraged by this 40 seconds of footage, and want the seemingly aggressive cop to be punished. It doesn’t matter whether he deserves it or not, or whether he is guilty. However, I think his guilt and his punishment lie in the fact that he embellished a police report. This doesn’t necessarily prove he was in the wrong, and I’m not saying he was right to attack the cyclist, but I don’t believe for a second that this was an unprovoked lion-hearted bear attack against an innocent cyclist.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:12 AM
Which would be similar to the cop holding his hand out and yelling “STOP!”.
FloatingRock on July 29, 2008 at 12:14 AM
I think I have an interesting perspective on this. I generally side against cops. To enforce the law you can’t be above the laws. I’m also a serious cyclist who knows a thing or two about riding and avoiding trouble. So, as a cop hater and cyclist I say that If he wanted to avoid hitting the cop he could have slowed down or stopped. He had plenty of time and if I was riding and a cop was staring me down and moving in an intercept vector you can damn well be sure that I’d stop. I’m just telling you how I’d react as a cyclist. Remember, the video is shot from an angle close to the POV of the rider. If I saw a cop acting like that to me, I’d stop and ask him what the problem was. As a cyclist it looks to me like he’s trying to go past the cop by veering left and then accelerating.
That’s just how it looks to me. He had an opportunity to avoid a collision and instead tried to outrun the cop. Whether the cop had legal grounds to stop him or not, the guy didn’t act prudently.
rokemronnie on July 29, 2008 at 12:18 AM
So it’s the car driver’s fault when a cyclist is in a car lane going a tiny fraction of the speed limit and the driver feels it is not safe to try to pass? I described a situation above in which I was on a 2-lane winding road with no shoulder. A cyclist was in the lane, to the right, but not particularly close to the edge of the lane. There was poor visibility to see oncoming cars. A dozen or more cars piled up behind the cyclist and several ended up making extremely risky passes of multiple cars and the cyclist. I finally passed in a climbing lane, but not before getting the life scared out of me multiple times as drivers took insane risks to pass the cyclist, who seemed irritated at us all for wanting to go something close to the speed limit. It was my fault and the fault of the other drivers who were unwilling to pass the cyclist in a no-pass zone for not figuring out how to safely maneuver around him? Dude. I live in Lance Armstrong country, and every cyclist thinks he’s wearing the yellow jersey around here. It’s dangerous for everyone involved.
If car drivers get tickets for going too far below the posted speed limit, cyclists should, too, if they’re in a car lane – even if they’re all the way over on the edge and someone could theoretically pass them without crossing the lane lines. A defensive driver will try to pass them with a few feet to spare, just to be safe. I don’t want to clip a cyclist with my passenger side mirror and knock him off his bike.
aero on July 29, 2008 at 12:21 AM
It should be noted that Critical Masshole rides most likely violate all sorts of laws.
The criminal justice system and the NYPD IAB will resolve this matter. There is likely other video, from surveillance cameras and other bystanders, from other perspectives, that will shed light on what happened.
I just don’t think the cop went batshit crazy and decided to single out some innocent anarchist.
The cop and his partner’s motions look too deliberate.
rokemronnie on July 29, 2008 at 12:24 AM
I had the same thing happen to me with a tractor once. Thinking back it was pretty scary, but my time playing driving video games really helped. Basically, this tractor was in the road, going slowly, and there was very little visibility. I started to pass him, and all of the sudden there was a car coming in the opposite direction basically right on top of me. Nobody was going over 30 MPH, but I managed to brake and slide back in behind the tractor. It was definitely scary though.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:26 AM
This is why there is in any police dept. an internal affairs that reviews these things. You might be correct that there was something else that we did not see on the video. However, that’s why cops have training in dealing with situations like this. IN this case, the cop was way outta line, dontcha think?
I don’t see good judgment on the cops part, during the act and writing it up. He’s a rookie, but they are trained on how to deal with these things.
Being NYC, and one of the centers of the American Liberal Pastime “Sue Thy Neighbor”, the cop showed poor judgment towards his city, his fellow officers, his family and himself.
If anything, he’s guilty of bad judgment.
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:27 AM
As I said, very few roads in America are that narrow. Even roads that make me feel less safe for various reasons, still have enough room to pass a cyclist and not cross the yellow line. Sure, most drivers move over a little to be prudent, but it’s not completely necessary.
In any case, the law in most states treats bicycles on the road as vehicles (except when in the crosswalk), subject to all traffic laws except minimum speeds. Whether you are freaked out passing a cyclist and feel that you need a wide berth or not, cyclists still have the right to be on the road.
If you don’t want to share roads with bicycles, have your governments build bike lanes and bike paths.
rokemronnie on July 29, 2008 at 12:29 AM
I can not speak to the specific incident. However, we have Critical Mass bicyclists here in Seattle, and they are nuts.
They deliberately block traffic, and are notoriously aggressive towards police officers. There are some anarchists in that group who openly discuss methods of resisting the police, starting riots, and discuss how to get innocent bystanders caught in the mess, (as a way of increasing “public awareness”). Accusing police officers of brutality is a common publicity ploy.
That said, because of their repeated antagonism, many police officers do not like them, and I know enough to know that sometimes an officer will abuse his power to obtain revenge against these sorts of groups.
Since I don’t know what the cyclist did to cause the officer to decide to stop him I can not pass judgment. However, I would be suspicious of both the cyclist and the officer.
Sackett on July 29, 2008 at 12:31 AM
No, they need something like a voice and a hand.
FloatingRock on July 29, 2008 at 12:32 AM
Not if I stand by my interpretation of the video that at the last second the cyclist turned towards the cop in aggression. If that is the case, then his pushing was simply a defensive move.
Could he have stepped out of the way and let it go? Sure. A more experienced cop may have done just that. But that doesn’t mean he isn’t within his rights as a police officer to pursue a potential suspect of…whatever. His actions were possibly more aggressive than they could have been, but that alone does not clear the cyclist of his suspicious behavior. In situations like this, you do need cops who are more level-headed because things can escalate quickly. What’s even more telling is how none of the other parties seem to think the cop was particularly out of line. Not his partner, not the cyclists who rode up afterwords. It makes me believe that the cyclist must have done something. Did he do something deserving of brain damage? Probably not, but I still think his behavior was very aggressive and in the heat of that moment, the cop was defending himself, after realizing that not only wasn’t the cyclist going to stop, but he had just turned towards him.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:37 AM
Flensor, you’re just the opposite side of the wise_man coin. You should heed the same advice he was given a few days ago.
FloatingRock on July 29, 2008 at 12:38 AM
This cop probably got his spot because of his father and grandfather, and doesn’t have the temperament required for the job. It sure looked at first watch that he just lost it and clobbered that dude. The fact that he’s three weeks on the job supports this theory.
If this is the case, and he filed that report bringing false charges to cover his fat ass, he should be put through the justice system grinder to the full extent possible.
There’s just not enough information to know until we find out if there was something else leading up to this video vignette.
hillbillyjim on July 29, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Body. Language.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:38 AM
That’s the elusive point on this thread. We don’t know what happened before and after the video. Except the cop wrote a phony report that he couldn’t back up.
We all are aware of militant groups that do this for, a lack of a better word, public intimidation! However, not all groups are like that. Most of the militant groups I’ve ever seen are in the Pacific North West.
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:40 AM
It sounds like you are a great deal more courteous than many of the cyclists around here, then, if you leave plenty of room for cars to pass you without crossing the yellow line. It doesn’t “freak me out” to pass a cyclist, but I won’t pass them with less than two feet between my vehicle and them. All it would take would be a small obstruction in the cyclist’s path, like a discarded bottle, to cause him to veer enough at the exact wrong moment to get creamed. Unlike others here, I have absolutely no desire to kill cyclists.
And believe me, people are agitating for bike lanes everywhere they can around here. They’ve gotten quite a few, probably due to the city’s pride in one of our most famous sons, Lance Armstrong. But it’s just not possible to build them in some of the more cramped areas of town, and it wouldn’t be cost effective out in the hill country, where the Tour de France wannabes like to train.
aero on July 29, 2008 at 12:40 AM
You’ve got to be kidding!
Kini on July 29, 2008 at 12:42 AM
That’s all he had, is about 5 feet. The cop ran the last few steps in a fraction of a second. of course, there is also the time that it takes for the impulses to travel through the nervous system and for a decision to be made, but that doesn’t seem to matter because clearly the cop signaled telepathically that he wanted the bicycle to stop. That, at least, is obvious.
FloatingRock on July 29, 2008 at 12:51 AM
‘Fraid not. I’ve watched the video countless times now, and I really believe, judging by the way that the cyclist acts, and the way the cop sort of stumbles after throwing the cyclist, that the cop’s original intention was not to push the cyclist, but only did so in defense. I think he probably may have pulled him off the bike otherwise. I mean, his feet stance suggest that is simply trying to obstruct the bike’s path, and the cyclist NEVER stops pedaling. Even as the cop is right on top of him, he’s still able to give one more pump of the right pedal before lowering his shoulder in the direction of the cop. He NEVER considered stopping.
jimmy the notable on July 29, 2008 at 12:51 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 Next »