Video: Penn & Teller versus Al Gore and the greens

posted at 6:44 pm on July 27, 2008 by Allahpundit

Via the ‘Busters, another sacred cow ritually slaughtered in the name of good sense. You may be asked to download and install a DivX plug-in, but it’s worth it to hear what “EPA” really stands for. This one, I suspect, will play better than last night’s offering. Content warning. Click the image to watch.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

After watching this I tried to sell my carbon footprint on eBay, but it was cancelled when eBay said I was selling an item that doesn’t exist. No joke.

It was up for 4 hours and I already had 3 bids. What a world.

Meric1837 on July 27, 2008 at 6:54 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree. When you “sell” it off you’re paying people to plant trees so more oxygen goes into the atmosphere. I keep reading these posts whenever this topic comes up and it sounds like so many of you are willfully inflating what a carbon footprint and offsetting it means.

Nonfactor on July 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM

They covered this kind of subject once before, and went to an environmental conference, and asked people to sign a petition banning Dihydrogen monoxide. H20. They got tons of signatures.

jimmy the notable on July 27, 2008 at 6:58 PM

another sacred cow ritually slaughtered in the name of good sense.

hmmm… way to stomp on folks beliefs…

And as much as I love P&T being arrogant about a subject does not a “slaughter” make. you can rip on the creationist for using silly science to try to prove their point, but that in itself will never prove that God does not exist.

thanks fer that. /eyeroll

-Wasteland Man.

WastelandMan on July 27, 2008 at 7:04 PM

I’m curious about what scientific qualificatins these two have.

Darth Executor on July 27, 2008 at 7:11 PM

I’m curious about what scientific qualifications Al Gore has.

Does an Oscar count?

AZCoyote on July 27, 2008 at 7:13 PM

Sumpin ain’t right!

I also have a Time magizene as well,and those ^%#$#$#%$%
people from Time have screwd me over to,I have a 1991,
Gulf War edition,and they have a page of all Iraqs,
chemical,biological,nuclear sites on a map,and they
blamed President Bush,piff,those freaggin liars!

So in 1974,Time said it was Global Cooling,piff,liars!
haha.:)

canopfor on July 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM

Hahaha Penn and Teller are awesome.

A little vulgar sometimes? Sure, but their totally clean in comparisonm to a lot of other acts, and sometimes there IS no descriptior for a hoax like Apocalyptic Global Warming than the big BS.

I loved the “And he won the f’ing Nobel f’ing Peace f’ing Prize because… prophesying doom is peaceful?”

BKennedy on July 27, 2008 at 7:19 PM

They are very skeptical about the enviromental movement. The best I have heard them explain it it here. As usual be prepared for rough language.

Dawnsblood on July 27, 2008 at 7:21 PM

Dawnsblood on July 27, 2008 at 7:21 PM

Hehe. The first comment on that video:

Like fat neo-con shill Rush Limbaugh before him, Penn Jillette fobs off his ultra right-wing propaganda as infotainment.

Translation? No logic or accountablility apply. – “Hey, we’re not reporters, we’re clowns who entertain drunks in Vegas!”

Penn’s membership in the pro-Bush regime, pro-corporate, anti-worker, anti-environmentalist Cato Institute? Television show in lockstep with Cato Insititute dogma? – “Hey, what are you, a communist?”

How the crypto-Nazi propaganda machine works…

jimmy the notable on July 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM

Al started a hoax. Which started the whole world thinking they were going to be a frying.
But what Al didn’t see was that the joke would be on he.
Oh, no, Al started to cry. Which started the whole world laughing.
Oh, if he’d only seen that the joke would be on he.

Al looked at the skies. Running his hands over his eyes.
And he fell from his throne. Hurting his head from things that he’d said.

Till Al’s power finally died. Which started the whole world living drilling.
Oh, if he’d only seen that the joke would be on he.

Oh, no, that the joke would be on he.

MB4 on July 27, 2008 at 7:26 PM

I’m curious about what scientific qualificatins these two have.

Darth Executor on July 27, 2008 at 7:11 PM

I’m a scientist, so I let these two borrow my qualifications for a while.
Also, unlike Al Gore, they’re more intelligent than a Kiwi fruit..

TexasJew on July 27, 2008 at 7:29 PM

It’s much simpler to debunk “global warming” than to defend evolution as a substitute for god. IMHO.

SouthernGent on July 27, 2008 at 7:35 PM

Man-induced global warming is an article of religious faith………..

A question to Penn & Teller and all those in the video……… Do they believe in God?

Seven Percent Solution on July 27, 2008 at 7:36 PM

jimmy the notable on July 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM

It is a known flaw on YouTube.com. They seem to have a system by which the craziest morons tend to comment on videos using words that I am convinced they haven’t the mental ability to understand. It has been a long while since I have bothered to read them. I am glad you enjoyed it though :)

Dawnsblood on July 27, 2008 at 7:41 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree

Yeah, except when it’s a scam to make money. Do you realize that if you take the train instead of driving on the interstate, Amtrak will try to sell you a carbon offset? That’s right, carbon offsets on public transportation with several hundred people inside not driving cars. Awesome. Guess you’re better off staying at home with the lights out.

fiatboomer on July 27, 2008 at 7:49 PM

Dawnsblood on July 27, 2008 at 7:41 PM

Yeah I know that about youtube, but it doesn’t make reading the comments of likely 15-year-olds any less entertaining over time. Its especially funny in this instance since a majority of the world’s governments, including the US government for the most part, believe in global warming, but this guy, supporting that stance, in line with all of these governments, seems to think an effort against them must be the working of a shadow-government. The same people who believe that Bush did 9/11 are the people who will stand basically on the same side as him on this issue. I mean, if you believe a government is capable of perpetrating something like 9/11, how could you ever support anything they do ever again?

jimmy the notable on July 27, 2008 at 7:53 PM

The atmospheric carbon released daily to sustain me may actually be offset by the amount of increased biota in the warmer water of the ocean surface by enriching it with just a few ounces of nitrogen dense organic effluvia. That’s why I pee off the dock.

Scribbler on July 27, 2008 at 7:59 PM

Again, even with the stuff I agree with them on, they’re dimwits.

– The Cat

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:01 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree. When you “sell” it off you’re paying people to plant trees so more oxygen goes into the atmosphere. I keep reading these posts whenever this topic comes up and it sounds like so many of you are willfully inflating what a carbon footprint and offsetting it means.

Nonfactor on July 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM

So what happens at night, when the trees predominately produce CO2: does the “carbon credit” provide for suffocation of the offending tree?

landlines on July 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM

P.S. And they get upstaged by Gilbert Gottfried.

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:03 PM

including the US government for the most part, believe in global warming, but this guy, supporting that stance, in line with all of these governments, seems to think an effort against them must be the working of a shadow-government

It is odd that if you do not believe in AGW and do not support the massive government intervention in our lives that proponents of the argument say we need you are somehow a fascist. That is, a proponent of dictatorial government and increased state power.

Really, if someone says the CATO institute is a fascist organization you might as well just tune out whatever else they’re going to say.

‘Cause they’re just not right in the head.

SteveMG on July 27, 2008 at 8:05 PM

Two days in a row of P&T bootleg postings. I’d like to use this opportunity to ask everyone to subscribe to Showtime if you can. Definitely the best original programming on TV outside of the big four broadcast nets. Weeds and BS in the same place. Awesome.

malan89 on July 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM

Man, do you realize how many trees and shrubs I could clone and grow to maturity on that crab grass ridden lot? Excuse me – labyrinth.

Don’t laugh though guys, as a botanist I’m going to make a killing of these fools. Mwahahahahahaah!!!!

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:14 PM

With so many people wanting answers instead of bullshit about this global warming business, and Penn seems like a good conflicted example of such a person, and I’m sure there are millions like him, you’d think that all of these news programs filling the airwaves would set up debates where the Warmists and the skeptics could battle it out and make their cases. So many people would tune in. How is that this isn’t happening?

The answer, of course, is that it is a total fraud which relies on complete message control to the masses and any debate would hurt their agenda. That goes for the beloved “fair and balanced” FOX also.

Buddahpundit on July 27, 2008 at 8:33 PM

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:14 PM

You should use sales pitches like “Extra CO2 absorbing” And the “Ever Greener”. . .

– The Cat

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:40 PM

Love these guys. They have never been wrong. In this case they were right to shrug at the larger question while making fun of all the Greenbots.

Dr. Manhattan on July 27, 2008 at 8:42 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree. When you “sell” it off you’re paying people to plant trees so more oxygen goes into the atmosphere. I keep reading these posts whenever this topic comes up and it sounds like so many of you are willfully inflating what a carbon footprint and offsetting it means.

Nonfactor on July 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM

Wow, its you who inflates the “value” of carbon offsets.

Its estimated a 39″ diameter full grown evergreen will produce 0.67 lbs of oxygen per day, the typical adult uses 1.85 lbs of oxygen per day – do you realize how many frigging trees we would have to plant to offset the carbon dioxide emitted by only one of Al Gores SUV’s?

And those would have to be mature trees not some sapling that is going to take twenty years to mature. But like I said, keep it up, one clone gives me a 1600% return in as little as two years – I actually love enviro-nuts…I need a bigger greenhouse.

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:40 PM

Wanna join my marketing team?

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM

Wanna join my marketing team?

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM

Dude, you’re page is down.

– The Cat

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:52 PM

MirCat on July 27, 2008 at 8:52 PM

What d’ya mean?

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:56 PM

Oh the url? Yeah I know, I tried to fix it earlier but WordPress is dumb. I have a new site in development and need to link the URL.

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 8:57 PM

Entertaining video, but we already know that Al Gore is one big hypocrite…. Nothing really new here….

nazo311 on July 27, 2008 at 9:11 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree. When you “sell” it off you’re paying people to plant trees so more oxygen goes into the atmosphere. I keep reading these posts whenever this topic comes up and it sounds like so many of you are willfully inflating what a carbon footprint and offsetting it means.

Nonfactor

Keeping this in context with the focus of this thread: Bullshit.

1) Carbon offsets “officially” include just about any feel-good Green nonsense afloat. All a company selling offsets has to do to avoid prosecution for fraud, is donate a certain percentage (and I guarantee this is eaten up by “operating expenses”) of their haul to other companies that likewise claim to be doing stuff to help the environment. This can include reforestation, but also includes cockamamie idiocy like dumping iron filings into the Pacific to deliberately start algae blooms, donating to the IPCC, donating to green “think tanks”, or funding research into carbon scrubbing or alternate power (non-nuclear, of course) research. But the specifics of what a given person’s “offset” money does, is up for grabs, because there is currently *zero* accountability or oversight.

2) Planting trees does not magically offset carbon dioxide output, nor does it necessarily have any impact on global warming. Botanical respiration is fairly complicated, and the actual amount of CO2 they use and release depends upon their species, the season, and their latitude, as well as immediate local conditions. On top of this, the *color* of the tree matters… the Canadian shield, for example, is a net heat sink, because the dark color of alpine and northern coniferous forests lowers the surface albedo in those regions, and absorbs more sunlight than a boreal forest.

3) Assuming you plant the right kind of trees to offset your personal output…. what precisely do you think happens when those trees die? They rot, they decay, and that carbon (among other things) returns to the environment at large… this is in fact one of the biggest sources of CO2 output on Earth (beating human industry out by several orders of magnitude).

E1701 on July 27, 2008 at 9:14 PM

It was 90-something degrees outside today and I did not turn on the AC. Send me your money!

Bob's Kid on July 27, 2008 at 9:17 PM

You do realize that offsetting the “carbon footprint” is done by simply planting a tree. When you “sell” it off you’re paying people to plant trees so more oxygen goes into the atmosphere.
Nonfactor

Yep, trees are carbon based lifeforms, so as they grow the absorb carbon (to make more tree matter). And they remove this CO2 from the atmosphere. Perfect solution.

Then they die and they rot, and all the carbon is released back into the atmosphere.

So, depending on the tree, you’ve simply pushed your emissions back 50-200 years (presuming they make sure the tree doesn’t die sooner) while releasing exactly the same carbon into the atmosphere that the tree removed.

Was this supposed to be a good plan, or a bad one?

I’m glad that trash service doesn’t work like this.

gekkobear on July 27, 2008 at 9:27 PM

E1701 on July 27, 2008 at 9:14 PM

#3 is an excellent point, we are constantly monitored by the EPA and Department of Agriculture, not for particularly dangerous pathogens but for emissions from our composting system.

And Photosynthesis depends on the amount of H2o intake; what is generally left out of the equation is that higher temperatures lead to higher evaporation rates which in turn creates more cloud cover which not only leads to lower temperatures but greater water distribution – resulting in higher oxygen yields. And higher CO2 benefits the established plants at a higher rate than the younglings.

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 9:36 PM

What the *hell* is yelling “hello” at me every facking minute on that website?

Midas on July 27, 2008 at 9:43 PM

Nonfactor on July 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM

Yes, we are aware. I have been cutting leaf-bearing branches off of trees and bushes in my yard for the last couple of weeks, and am going outside right now to burn them in a large, hot fire. Just for you. Nitwit.

Jaibones on July 27, 2008 at 9:43 PM

Midas on July 27, 2008 at 9:43 PM

The DivX dims the surrounding area serving to make them areas less distractive and enhance the presentation…HAHAHA.

HULU has a similar option

Ciannaky on July 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM

Nonfactor on July 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM

Naw, even better. I’m going to have the guys with the gas-powered chain saw, the gas-powered thresher, and the diesel-powered trucks come out and cut down that ugly 60-foot tall Silver Maple that I hate so much, with it’s million leaves and gutter-clogging load of helicopter seeds.

I’ll have them leave me everything: I’ll burn the small branches and chip the big ones, and I’ll split the big trunk sections for some huge autumn bonfires.

Thanks for the inspiration!

Jaibones on July 27, 2008 at 9:50 PM

I’m inspired to create my own website to solicit carbon credits with my standards and formulas.

Man I love capitalism with a big smacking carbon $$$

Kini on July 27, 2008 at 9:52 PM

AZCoyote on July 27, 2008 at 7:13 PM

Heresy! Al Gore simply is. In the beginning was the Gore, and the Gore was Obama.

P.S. I did what I could for the creation/evolution/atheism v. religion thread. I tried.

emailnuevo on July 27, 2008 at 10:09 PM

Two days in a row of P&T bootleg postings. I’d like to use this opportunity to ask everyone to subscribe to Showtime if you can. Definitely the best original programming on TV outside of the big four broadcast nets. Weeds and BS in the same place. Awesome.

malan89 on July 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM

“Weeds”? Night unwatchable…but more than made up for by “Dexter,” which is justification for the subscription fee all by itself.

As for “Bullshit,” the first five seasons are also available on DVD. (The sixth season, from which the “Green Movement” episode hails, is currently airing.)

Blacklake on July 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM

I’m buying a Hummer this week. I’ve driven a lot of them under lease and as rental vehicles in the oil field (EXTRA carbon footprint, there!) and they are great off-off-road vehicles in 4 wheel and low-low drive.

Disclaimer – I’m just getting a 5-cylinder H3 which gets better gas mileage than my Jeep Commander, so I guess that I’m really just a greenie-weenie wuss.

TexasJew on July 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM

Ecoguilt is bullshit. Roger that Penn.

Spirit of 1776 on July 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM

Nonfactor, meet facts.

Facts, this is Nonfactor.

Ouch. That collision with reality must have hurt.

Professor Blather on July 27, 2008 at 10:41 PM

TexasJew on July 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM

I’m jealous! :)

OldEnglish on July 27, 2008 at 11:57 PM

I wonder if Nonfactor can recommend a type of penisprint for John Edwards, to relieve him of his guilt. He could certainly pay for it.

Entelechy on July 28, 2008 at 12:17 AM

I have to say, as much of an anti-global warmist as I am, Penn & Teller made a weak case here. Harping on hypocrites doesn’t help our side. This is my problem with Hannity on this issue too.

There are mountains of science DEBUNKING man made global warming, and I realize it takes more time to explain this, but it’s what needs to be done. Simply pointing out Gore et al’s hypocrisy doesn’t change opinions of the idiots.

Things like this can
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24036736-7583,00.html

Former man made global warmists, admitting to being sucked in for the wrong reasons, and explaining why the entire theory is complete and utter BULLSH**!

Sadly, because of how they handled it, Allah guessed wrong (in my case anyway) when he said:

This one, I suspect, will play better than last night’s offering.

Granted, I don’t like how they handled the Creation/Evolution debate by mocking just a handful of people, building a number strawmen, misrepresenting what most of us believe, etc. But I can see global warmists making that same case against this presentation. In both cases, I wish science was being dealt with, not mocking of eccentric people. That’s what’s really BULLSH**!

RightWinged on July 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM

Entelechy on July 28, 2008 at 12:17 AM

Party policy: “Put some ice on it”.

Spirit of 1776 on July 28, 2008 at 12:41 AM

Make me wonder how long it will before these green sillies realize what fools they have been to believe in the Goracle, and how the great and all powerful Goracle removed green from their wallets.

Kini on July 28, 2008 at 12:53 AM

I wish science was being dealt with, not mocking of eccentric people. That’s what’s really BULLSH**!

RightWinged on July 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM

But these people are mainstream warmists. And humor is much more effective, in any case.
Mocking them is simply much more time-efficient than trying to make sense and get into scientific minutia about polar bears or microscopic 1 millimeter-per-year ocean level rises or shrinking or growing glaciers or any of that other stupid meaningless shit. The 6-10 trillion dollars these scumbags are trying to shake us down for is all the evidence that needs to be shown.
Just show the public the crooked money-grubbing freak show behind this scam, and it’ll fall apart under its own accord.

TexasJew on July 28, 2008 at 1:14 AM

TexasJew on July 28, 2008 at 1:14 AM

But you need to put yourself in the mind of the average person/citizen who has been told “scientific consensus on GW”. This episode, similar to the mocking of creationists, is only preaching to the choir. So, while I am on their side on this one, as a creationist I recognize how the “other side” could shrug this off completely.

Did you follow my link? It was very plain, even for the very uninformed on the matter. This is the point that needs to be made to those who have been sucked in. The P&T piece is humorous for those of us who recognize the nonsense already… but the goal is to wake up others.

RightWinged on July 28, 2008 at 2:00 AM

Al Gore went from being worth a couple million to over $100 million. What more do you need to know about global warming. By the time most dummies get this sorted out he’ll be long gone and living large on his own private island. Whad-a-guy!

Mojave Mark on July 28, 2008 at 2:14 AM

E1701 on July 27, 2008 at 9:14 PM

The trick is to cut down the tree in it’s prime and turn it into furniture. That way the tree doesn’t rot and the carbon remains trapped in the wood. So what we have is the answer to global warming. What? You don’t want me to cut down trees?

Browncoatone on July 28, 2008 at 4:07 AM

Things like this can
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24036736-7583,00.html

Former man made global warmists, admitting to being sucked in for the wrong reasons, and explaining why the entire theory is complete and utter BULLSH**!

RightWinged on July 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM

Nope, it doesn’t fly. Just go to the Randi forums and you will see why. The AGW folks there just pull out the “I don’t recognize him as a legitimate scientist” or “follow the money trail” and the always popular “he’s just a shill for big oil”. It doesn’t matter who the scientist is or what their credentials are because if they have an uncle’s cousin’s friend’s sister that dated a guy that applied at Exxon 40 years ago then they are in the pocket of big oil and can not be trusted to tell the truth about AGW.
They are supposed to be skeptics but in reality they border on religious frenzy when it comes to AWG. The IPCC report is their bible, the UN their Vatican, Manning their prophet and Gore their savior.

jmarcure on July 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM

Cool, I’m going to start my own “non profit” carbon credit site and pay meyself tons of dough as the CEO, Web Master, CFO, Sales Director and “INVEST” the rest into a still to make alcohol to fuel my **cough cough** car!

Alden Pyle on July 28, 2008 at 8:15 AM

meyself = myself, because it can never be about “me” enough.

Alden Pyle on July 28, 2008 at 8:16 AM

That goes for the beloved “fair and balanced” FOX also.

Buddahpundit on July 27, 2008 at 8:33 PM

I gave up on Fox several months ago; Liberalism ate through the core of that network like acid on plastic. The only recent time my TV was tuned in to Fox News was an episode of Hannity’s America. I used to watch H&C, but I just got to the point where I couldn’t stand even (1) minute of Colmes.

Keemo on July 28, 2008 at 8:20 AM

but the goal is to wake up others.

RightWinged on July 28, 2008 at 2:00 AM

You’re right.
And that way is to spell out the fact that it is going to tank our jobs, our entire economy, in fact, destroy our nation’s future, our military and that these many trillions of dollars all going right into the pockets of a passel of lying, generally politically-connected leftwing crooks.
Getting into a knife fight with a bunch of hacks and grant-hugging academic whores like Hansen, et al, is just a sideshow.
It’s all about the money…

TexasJew on July 28, 2008 at 9:19 AM

I’m a scientist, so I let these two borrow my qualifications for a while.

Sorry, doesn’t count. The fact remains that they’re a pair of assclowns who have no more business preaching on just about any subject than Al Gore does.

Also, unlike Al Gore, they’re more intelligent than a Kiwi fruit..

TexasJew on July 27, 2008 at 7:29 PM

Really? From what I’ve seen they’re just as dumb as Gore, if not dumber.

Darth Executor on July 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM

@ Darth Executor on July 28, 2008 at 10:41 AM

AWWWWWWWW.

Did someone get mad when they called out one of their activities or beliefs as bullshit? Hahahaha.

muyoso on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

I’m glad to see this Penn guy taking on the AGW hoax, but what’s with all the swearing? I can’t send this to anyone, and it’s not funny. What’s the point? So the Algorytes can snicker and say, “See, those idiots can’t say anything intelligent. It’s all four-letter words.”

If you want to watch some intelligent commentary on AGW, watch this lecture by Prof. Bob Carter (Australia), in four parts (total time about 37 minutes):

Part One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI

Part Two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN06JSi-SW8

Part Three: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXDISLXTaY

Part Four: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQQGFZHSno

This is what school kids, not to mention the press, should be watching, rather than unscientific propaganda from Al Gore.

MrLynn on July 28, 2008 at 11:28 AM

What’s the point of all the vulgarity? It isn’t funny, and it just makes this Penn guy look like an idiot.

For an intelligent video on the subject, watch this lecture by Prof. Bob Carter (Australia), in four parts (total time about 37 minutes):

Part One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI

Part Two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN06JSi-SW8

Part Three: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXDISLXTaY

Part Four: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQQGFZHSno

This is what school kids, not to mention the press, should be watching, rather than unscientific propaganda from Al Gore.

MrLynn on July 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM

So how many trees will it take to absob the CO2 from a volcanic eruption?

“Carbon footprints” are BS.

catmman on July 28, 2008 at 11:46 AM

muyoso on July 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM

No, I get mad when people who have no business speaking on a subject run their mouth anyway and zounds of morons on the Internet think they have any credibility. And speaking of uninformed drivel, HI! ^_^

Darth Executor on July 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM

What’s the point of all the vulgarity? It isn’t funny, and it just makes this Penn guy look like an idiot.
MrLynn on July 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM

In my opinion he doesn’t want to reach any of the rational adults but he does have to reach out to the average liberal idiots which think and talk that way. Just go over to DK, DU or HP and you will see what I mean.

jmarcure on July 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM

Wow, I just spent 28 minutes watching someone celebrate the ability to use curse words on cable. Now if I can just get rembursed for the time wasted watching that pointless piece. Oh well, Sponge Bob is on.

Zaire67 on July 28, 2008 at 2:15 PM

Is there a link that doesn’t require the installation of an IE plugin?

kurtzz3 on July 28, 2008 at 2:48 PM

I am trying to view this – I installed the DiVX s/w. But now the site wants something called “zango” installed. And my computer quarantines it like a virus.

Anyone else have this problem?

PoeMangonel on July 31, 2008 at 9:19 AM