Moral Relativism Is Killing Our Country

The Big Mac Index is The Economist’s light-hearted guide to exchange rates.
The First Lady Free-For-All: Michelle vs. Cindy
Detailed report of Obama’s communist links.
Should U.S. media use the term …

jackmac on July 24, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Classic!

To me, the most frightening aspect of Obamasage’s comment is the fact that he is obvioulsy prepared to let Iran become a nuclear State.

OldEnglish on July 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM

Unfortunately, he’s not the only one. If anyone was really serious about Iran, they would have been hit years ago, when it wouldn’t have been nearly as risky as today. Of course, with every passing day it just gets even riskier to deal with this problem. And the way everyone spazzed out when Israel ran those recent war games does not bode well. Not one bit.

Many in the West think that they can leave it to Israel to handle the situation, and then they (the Euros) can castigate and try to destroy Israel (for attacking Iran, of course), which makes it a two-fer. A dispensable country takes out an intolerable threat and is then dispensed with. But if people think that the middle east is a mess with Israel there they have NO IDEA how bad things would be if Israel were not there. Part of what keeps the middle east passably stable is that the arabs are obssessed with destroying Israel. If Israel were gone we’d get to see a full sunni-shiite war (along with ancillary inter-arab battles) that would end up destroying everything of value over there. There would be, in the end, nothing left for anyone. Just look at how Iran and Iraq fought each other and what Saddam did when he was driven out of Kuwait. Multiply that by 1000 and you’re getting close to how things would be without Israel to draw their attention.

“we,we shouldn’t,ah ya know,Iran may spend 1/100th of what
we spend on the Military,I mean,if,if,Iran ever tried to
pose a serious threat to us,they,they wouldn’t stand a
chance”!

I hope Obama realizes that a lot of Americans have died
at the hands of the Iranians!

The Iranian’s have been at war with America,since 1979,the
“Hostage Crisis”!

Iranian goons have been training,suppling and killing
American’s in Irag!

And the way Obama is speaking of Iran,is very simple,
his comment “wouldn’t stand a chance”,in his Libspeak
is a hefty nuclear exchange of multiple MERV’s heading
on a downward spiral towards Tehran!

I don’t know why he thinks he’ll be able to do better than Bush

Maybe he just needs a cigarette.

Khrushchev’s aide, after the first day, said the American president seemed “very inexperienced, even immature.” Khrushchev agreed, noting that the youthful Kennedy was “too intelligent and too weak.” The Soviet leader left Vienna elated — and with a very low opinion of the leader of the free world.

right2bright on July 23, 2008 at 6:32 PM

I’m reminded of this every time some fawning media idiot refers to Barry O as “Kennedyesque.”

They’d better be careful what they wish for — they might get it.

The Iranian timeline endgame is over 5 years old,and their
still stalling,period!!!

“Many of these countries,including Iran have ties
to terrorist organization”

Well,shazam,and DUH,your kidding!!!!!

“I will take no options off the table”

Ya,well,will see if Pelosi,gets her sharp claws into Barack!!!

“Ah series of BIG STICKS and BIG CARROTS to the Iranian
Regime to stand down on this is a paramount concern”

Oh,that was really good,Obama here the solution,there’s
a really stiff wind,turn in that direction,and go Number 1,
you’ll have your answer!

This has got to be the best of the best!!!!

Behold,the best Liberalspeak,of Obama!!!!

“I think there are oppurtunities FOR US TO MOBILIZE A MUCH
MORE SERIOUS REGIME OF SANCTIONS ON IRAN”

Can someone splain,WTF,what a REGIME OF SANCTIONS ON IRAN
freaggin means!!!!!!!!!!

And there you have it,in all glorious Liberal speak!

he admitted in the Terry Moran interview that his policy towards Pakistan is essentially the same as Bush’s

he admits here that there’s basically no difference between his policy towards Iran and Bush’s except that it’d be a new administration/new opportunity for them to capitulate to US demands re nukes and terrorist support

he wants more troops for Afghanistan just like McCain wants
he wants US troops out in 16 months (May2010 vs end of 2010/early 2011 which is what ground commanders are aiming for)

What’s next? Is he gonna say something about North Korea-that gig’s done.

I’m not seeing much difference between Obama and Bush in foreign policy. How do the nutroots love him?

I guess by the time he comes back to the states he will have changed his mind. He is embarrassing himself.

We just have to vote for him with our gonads and our sense of being evil white people.