Which Obama will we see — hard Left or nouveau Right?

First, I’d like to SEE a legal, certified copy of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate. As of date, he still refuses to furnish the MSM and America with a legal, certified copy of his BC. The BCs posted on the Daily KOS, and Obama’s anti-smear web sites, have been deemed forgeries.

Saddened that so many pro-security 9/11 widows are being ignored for somebody w/ a German-esque name… and yes, I have one.

If you want to posture as a conservative try something other then parroting the Daily Kos/Moveon.org party line. Try sounding like a Paulist.

Second, you seem not to have a very strong command of mathematical and economic concepts. If our defense spending equaled the WWII rate we would be spending more then 10 times the amount we are spending today. During the Second World War we spend over 50% of GNP on the war effort. John Maynard Keynes would say you are suffering from money illusion. I would say you are just delusional.

The YouTube version could end with the question “Is this why the Reverend Jackson wants to cut his nuts off?” In fact they could use that to end all the commercials going forward!

Given his single minded drive to be President and the people he selected along the way for his spring-board it appears that he is singularly driven. But what is it that drives him? He obviously felt using the really radical left as his spring-board. That suggests he is “naturally” far left. His wandering all over the political landscape to show people what he thinks they want to see tuned to their venue. That calls into question is real radicalism. It, of course, leaves most anything else up for question as well.

What IS his motive? What WILL he do to the United States of America once he is elected? I don’t think even Michelle Obama knows. I have a feeling that marriage was part of his plan of conquest.

Could he make it this far on his own? I doubt it. Who pulls his strings? What does that person want? (Will that person gets what he wants when Obama is elected? I doubt it unless the strings on Obama are more like anchor chains for an aircraft carrier.

Yes, a vote for Obama is a vote for a pig in a poke. You are getting something only Obama and God know for sure. It is certain that nobody else does.

{^_^}

The defeat of Al-qaeda in the central front of the War on Terror,the neutering of Sadr,and the Freedom of over 25 million people from a terrorist,genocidal dictator has happened in Iraq.

The people that said the violence would never stop,the Shia,Sunni,Kurds would never find social or political reconciliation,the Maliki government would never work,and America would fail in Iraq have been shown to be absolutely
beyond a shadow of a doubt 100% wrong.

Reality is a bitch,deal with it.

Al-Maliki: Iraq Defeated Terrorism
Sunday, July 06, 2008

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376821,00.html
BAGHDAD — Iraq’s prime minister said yesterday that the government has defeated terrorism in the country, a sign of growing confidence after recent crackdowns against Sunni extremists and Shiite militias.

Cheer up. We’re winning this War on Terror
Al-Qaeda and the Taleban are in retreat, the surge has worked in Iraq and Islamism is discredited. Not a bad haul
Gerard Baker
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4221376.ece

Bush made the world a safer place
We may jeer him and tell him to go home, but America’s allies continue to benefit from some of George Bush’s decisions
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/17/georgebush.terrorism

Even the Guardian,a European paper that makes the NYTimes
look right wing sees that the world is better off than before 9/11.

You can bet that when “Mr. Change”Obama,the hero of all sheep,comes back from Iraq,he will be spinning and pivoting
trying to tie himself into the success in Iraq,not the failure that BDS sufferers will chant over and over till they die of lack of oxygen from having their heads buried so
long up Olberman’s a$$.

Now I can see why you use the quotes of others.

right2bright on July 10, 2008 at 12:35 AM

Don’t be so silly. You couldn’t see the nose on your own face if the angel Gabriel were standing on it.

reasoning are becoming more and more uncoordinated.

MB4 on July 9, 2008 at 8:17 PM

Now I can see why you use the quotes of others.

Actually, he put the wishes of the Iraqi government, the advice of military commanders, and his own judgment before defeatists.

amerpundit on July 9, 2008 at 3:55 PM

According to most polls, depending on how they are worded, many to most of your fellow Americans are “defeatists” by your Dolchstosslegende redux.

History may be repeating.

Fast forward a bit.

Iraq nation building occupation ends with American troop withdrawal:

Faced with an ineffective Iraqi government, continuing hatred between Sunnis and Shiites with no end in sight, fatigue and deteriorating morale among the over used and abused American troops who were placed in between waring infidel hating Muslims, resistance to continue the war on the part of the American people and a rebellion in Congress with a threat to cut off funding, a newly elected Americant President agreed to bring American forces home.

The failure of the Iraqi war supporters to admit that President Bush’s Iraqi nation building occupation policies had been ill advised and a profound failure would have a huge impact on their psyches and its impact would be manifest in their desire to involve the American nation and it’s military in yet another war and nation building occupation that they felt could be won this time thus bringing them vindication.

Many Neocon internet web sites and Neocon radio talk shows would support the false idea that President Bush’s Iraqi nation building occupation policies had been going very well and with just a little more time and just a little more surging and just a little more stay the course the Iraqi nation building occupation would have resulted in the building of a successful democratic, rule of law Iraqi nation that would be an ally in the war against terror and serve as a shining example for the rest of the Middle East.

They believed that President Bush’s Iraqi nation building occupation policies had been visionary and brilliant and would have soon succeeded, except for being betrayed at home, the infamous ‘Stab in the Back’ theory. (Similar to the myth and betrayal theory [Dolchstosslegende] popular in Germany in the period after World War I which attributed Germany’s defeat to a number of domestic betrayals instead of failed geostrategy.)

This ‘Stab in the Back’ theory would become hugely popular among many Neocon internet web sites and Neocon radio talk show hosts who found it impossible to accept the fact that President Bush’s Iraqi nation building occupation policies had been an unmitigated disaster.

During the actual Iraqi nation building occupation fiasco, many Neocons became obsessed with this idea, especially laying blame on what they called “traitors”, “White flag wavers”, “defeatist cut and runners” and “surrender monkeys” in America for undermining the Iraqi nation building occupation effort. To the Neocons, and so many of their followers, the American congress men and women and their fellow Americans, the clear majority of whom did not support President Bush’s Iraqi nation building occupation policies, would become known as the ‘Defeatist Criminals.’

America is spending money on defense now at the same rate as we did on WWII.

alphie on July 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM

At least it’s not being spent on wasteful social programs like, let’s say, universal health care.

This is the man MB4 is trying to get elected…good luck, your like that weird poster who was anti-Fred, the one that kept talking about Fred’s red truck.

right2bright on July 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM

I’m not trying to get Obama elected. You are getting more and more hysterical and your attempts at reasoning are becoming more and more uncoordinated.

Pandering faster than a speeding bus, able to leap tall stories in a single bound, …look, up in the sky, it’s a nerd, it’s a pain, –no… it’s Barry’um Enema!

Olde soldier sends..!

What’s worse than flip-flopping? Consistently promising two opposing goals at the same time?

The larger problem is the contradictory ambitions of the McCain campaign. The candidate wants to stand for “leadership, courage, and choices.” Yet he also want to be both a supply-sider and a deficit-hawk. He wants to transform our health care system and Social Security without adding any money to either and without anybody getting hurt. He wants to be a tightwad on spending who doesn’t cut any spending anybody cares about. These are impossible policies to explain, because the policies themselves are impossible. No wonder he ends up talking out of both sides of his mouth.
- Robert Gordon and James Kvaal

Obama in the Br’er patch.

He keeps getting stuck every time he touches something or opens his mouth..

Nice roundup of Obama idiocy, Baxter Green.

How does Hillary Clinton justify voting NO on this bill? How can this possibly square with the fact that her constituents were a target of the 9/11 attack?

America is spending money on defense now at the same rate as we did on WWII.
alphie on July 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM

Hey that is a bargain, the same rate?
We spent 288 Billion or about $47 Billion per year (not counting what the Soviets paid us after the war). We are now at $450 Billion per year…You are only off by a factor of 10.
Had a tough time in math did you???

OBAMA FOR SPYING ON ORDINARY CITIZENS!!!!!!

JiangxiDad on July 9, 2008 at 3:12 PM

The gang phoning in their post-pot-smoking orders for Twinkies to the nearest 711 will be more paranoid than ever. Will someone possibly spying on their Recreate-68 Lollapaloooza plans?

But then, Nixon was 20 points ahead of Humphrey at the end of the historic Dem Chicago convention in late August 1968, and his lead dwindled every week until they were dead even in the polls on the weekend before the election.

but, there was Wallace then….

Time to ween the South off the government teat.

Obama is just the guy to do it.

alphie on July 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM

You’ve said this before.

Time to ween the South off the government teat.

Obama is just the guy to do it.

alphie on July 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM

I KNOW!

***GUSH!***

He’s wonderful, isn’t he?

I mean, is there anything he can’t do?

alphie on July 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM

Now you have truly lost all credibility. “Peasants”? I guess you think that we should treat any act committed by these peasants as a routine criminal offense, and let law enforcement handle it?