WaPo stirs the pot on a “platform fight” at the GOP convention
posted at 8:50 am on July 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
The Washington Post tries to inject a little drama into the GOP convention by conjuring up a fight over the party platform between John McCain and conservative activists. They give this Page One treatment, but the entire issue is speculative, and probably will amount to little more than a tempest in a teapot. Michael Shear reports that the activists have girded their loins for battle over a document hardly anyone will read, and which doesn’t bind candidates at all:
Conservative activists are preparing to do battle with allies of Sen. John McCain in advance of September’s Republican National Convention, hoping to prevent his views on global warming, immigration, stem cell research and campaign finance from becoming enshrined in the party’s official declaration of principles.
McCain has not yet signaled the changes he plans to make in the GOP platform, but many conservatives say they fear wholesale revisions could emerge as candidate McCain seeks to put his stamp on a document that currently reflects the policies and principles of President Bush.
“There is just no way that you can avoid anticipating what is going to come. Everyone is aware that McCain is different on these issues,” said Jessica Echard, executive director of the conservative Eagle Forum. “We’re all kind of waiting with anticipation because we just don’t know how he’s going to thread this needle.”
How will McCain thread the needle? Probably by allowing the activists to get what they want from the platform, while maintaining his own positions in the campaign. It would be an easy way to allow conservatives to demonstrate their stewardship of the party, without binding McCain in any way for the general election. A man with McCain’s military experience knows the value of a tactical retreat, allowing opponents to occupy essentially meaningless ground.
How many Republicans bother to read the party platform? Most of the delegates won’t make the effort, mainly because it does nothing to bind candidates to the party positions. Few if any voters of either party will even skim the party platforms, and even the media will use it only as a reference. It’s a document meant for activists within the parties to stake out ground and for factions to demonstrate influence over the direction of the whole.
The convention will produce an updated and modified platform, one that de-emphasizes George Bush and pays more heed to John McCain, as the party leader. Don’t expect significant changes in direction, however. Where disagreement exists, the McCain campaign will opt for ambiguous language that gives conservatives a sense of primacy, and where everyone agrees, bold language that can create some buzz in the Xcel Center during the final hours of the convention. McCain will still go his own way, in part to emphasize how he can differ from the party and stand on his own. A conservative-controlled platform actually helps in that regard, and it will help build badly-needed enthusiasm for the upcoming Congressional races.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
A very conservative platform will provide the Donks with targets they can hold up and attack.
njcommuter on July 7, 2008 at 9:05 AM
Let me see, an article in the NYT about how the Dem convention is falling apart (with real facts), and other articles regarding the same…
Now why would WaPo run a trumped up negative article about the Republican convention…let me think, why would the do that just days after…
right2bright on July 7, 2008 at 9:07 AM
Rush has been making the point for weeks that half of what passes for news in the MSM is gloom and doom secular prophecy and thumbsucking speculation, much of it on p. 1 of the NYT & WaPo. It’s like he’s reading their email, but then, you don’t have to read their email, you only have to read their work product (which fewer and fewer people do) to see that Rush isn’t hindered by fighting with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair.
Akzed on July 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM
I read somewhere in the WSJ today that their former senior Editor is likely to become the WaPo’s new senior Editor. Maybe we’ll see some differences. Then again, maybe not :)
JiangxiDad on July 7, 2008 at 9:21 AM
The DNC event in a complete shambles, over budget, under-represented and wildly out of control. versus this? Give me a break.
cannonball on July 7, 2008 at 9:23 AM
Recently, I challenged the objectivity and fairness of an article in the Washington Post that led to an emotional tirade by the author defending his journalistic values. He protested too much and only tended to confirm the intent of that paper and most its journalists. The Post is a left wing monolith of considerable rabidity (albeit a subtle one) that will do anything to undermine the conservative cause enhance the left.
rplat on July 7, 2008 at 9:29 AM
Make the Elephant blue and give him 3 big cuts in his back. Farking Brilliant GOP!
TheBigOldDog on July 7, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Yep, agreed! And it’s frankly healthy to have some give-and-take within the party over anthropogenic global warming and immigration. Maybe the experience would drill it further into McCain’s head that shamnesty must never happen again. (And now I will take off my rose colored glasses…)
Outlander on July 7, 2008 at 9:31 AM
This is good stuff. Let those who don’t follow politics closely think that McCain will support a light fair of nonsense issues, and it makes him appear less scary to those terrified of Republicans (like my mother, who is actually voting Republican for the first time evah).
The GOP is the party of grown ups, so I agree this will amount to nothing at the convention. Besides, the real three ring circus is already in play at the jack ass tent.
Hening on July 7, 2008 at 9:33 AM
Republicans have a platform??? I must have missed that memo. Where can it be found?
Just A Grunt on July 7, 2008 at 9:45 AM
This post starts out by turning an uplifting notion that conservatives will stand up to fight the liberals for the soul of the Republican Party, into a negative.
Then we are put at ease with assurances that some sneaky unprincipled ambiguousness will save the day.
Buddahpundit on July 7, 2008 at 9:54 AM
No need to “conjure up drama” between McCain and conservatives – he isn’t one of us, and I won’t settle for these weak-kneed Republicans anymore.
I’d rather marginalize myself by not voting for him and making my frustration with the GOP known. Better than
continuing to marginalize conservatism WITHIN the party.
They’ll have to move back to me before I move back to them.
Ludwig on July 7, 2008 at 9:59 AM
A man with McCain’s military experience knows the value of a tactical retreat, allowing opponents to occupy essentially meaningless ground.
But Ed, I thought you were a big McCain fan. Is it a good idea to clearly define who McCain’s opponents are in an article being read by mostly conservatives?
Buddahpundit on July 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Brilliant! The WaPo has nothing but concern for us conservatives. Ha!
Have a great week everyone!
Branch Rickey on July 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM
The WaPa reporters assigned to cover the nominating conventions will show up wearing blinders at the Democrat convention and wearing night vision goggles at the Republican convention.
We already know how they will report the events. Deomcrats unite in aura of love and peace, Republican crash and burn while eating their own young.
fogw on July 7, 2008 at 10:20 AM
What about the “platform fight” in BO’s own soul?
“I’m for ____!” “No, I’m against all of them!”
(NAFTA, gun control, unconditional chats w/ Ak-my-dumb-jihad, the death penalty, election-spending limits, laws protecting abortion survivors, FISA, immediate Iraq withdrawal, flag lapel pins, etc.)
jgapinoy on July 7, 2008 at 10:24 AM
I remember taking high school civics and first learning the term “platform” in regards to politics. Oh how far we’ve come since then!
Bob's Kid on July 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM
The Republican Convention will have some usual slashes over core ideology and serious issues.
The Dem Covention will be a mudwrestling match over identity politics.
profitsbeard on July 7, 2008 at 10:43 AM
You forgot the talking points put out by leftie groups that the Denver police have a “brown note” generator that they intend to use for crowd control. It might be wrestling, but it won’t be mud wrestling. . .
Outlander on July 7, 2008 at 10:55 AM
We (conservatives) had the opportunity to put up a serious contender for the nomination. We managed to only succeed in needling Fred Thompson to give it a shot, but he didn’t take off. McCain won by default, and it’s our obligation to support him in those areas where we agree (Iraq, deficit hawking, judges, and domestic drilling) and to persuade him to move to our position in those areas where we do not agree (shamnesty, anthropogenic global warming, ANWR, and campaign finance). Defining anyone within the GOP as an “enemy” of the party’s presumptive nominee is a horrible mistake, IMO.
Outlander on July 7, 2008 at 11:00 AM
The only party platforms I’ve ever even bothered to skim are those in foreign countries, where they mean do something given that most countries have parliamentary systems and the Green Party in the United States. I made the mistake of reading a Green Party platform to argue how crazy the Greens are. Upon reconsideration, it was a waste of time. Using a party’s platform to argue against a party is an invalid tactic as the platforms of Americans parties will tend to be written by extremists. Thus, I suspect that the Democratic and Republicans platforms also reflect large amounts of outright lunacy, but I doubt it’s worth my time to read them to satisfy my tiny curiosity about party platforms. I do seem to remember the Democrats wanting to have a very short platform just to avoid giving their opponents any ammunition. I’d suggest following the lead of the Dems on this issue.
thuja on July 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Well there we go. Don’t stand for anything, don’t tell anyone what you believe and they can never criticize us. We can promote “hope” and “change” and everybody can piss gold.
Big Orange on July 7, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Amen and amen
Sekhmet on July 7, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Remember Rush’s rule of life which says, and I am paraphrasing, “liberals can’t win national elections without pretending they aren’t liberals.” We should not be afraid to stand for something.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showplatforms.php?platindex=R2004
What in that platform is crazy?
Outlander on July 7, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Yeah and McCain’s virtually identical platform as the Democrats would be bulletproof from criticism, right?
Platforms are worthless and nobody pays attention to them but I’m hoping that the fight does happen and McCain and his mindless supporters truly understand who dearly it has cost them to go out of their way to stomp on social conservatives and evangelicals.
McCain’s arrogance has cost him the election and he’s simply too stupid to understand that fact. A fight at the convention will be a wake up call so he can actually “enjoy” his landslide loss in November with full knowledge that his defeat was by his own creation in alienating the GOP base in an attempt to woo left-of-center voters away from being part of electing the first black President.
highhopes on July 7, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Screw the Washington Compost. Just another rag attempting to gum things up. They really should have their nose under the
camel’sdonkey’s tent, to make ensure that socialistic jihad is heading in the right direction. /Sarcasmbyteshredder on July 7, 2008 at 1:47 PM
If this article doesn’t stir up the pot, the 3,497 other MSM articles and interviews between now and November which will scream “Look at this huge wedge between the Party and the Candidate” might help do so.
eeyore on July 7, 2008 at 2:04 PM
How, if, as you write, no one pays attention to the platform?
irishspy on July 7, 2008 at 2:14 PM
You forgot the closing images, my friend:
Obama – youthful, eloquent blank Messiah, speaking of change to 80,000, at stadium, out of control inspired young people…
McCain – old fart, tired Vietnam vet, speaking to 20,000, indoors, uninspired diaper-wearing seniors…
Entelechy on July 7, 2008 at 2:29 PM
PETITION SIGNING REQUEST
For the interested, please sign a petition demanding Barack Hussein Obama furnish America with a legal, certified, readable birth certificate. Because, the images of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that have been posted on the Daily KOS, and on Obama’s web sites, have been analysed as being FORGED.
Birth Certificate Now
byteshredder on July 7, 2008 at 2:46 PM
Now I’m really confused.
McCain is a conservative (and anybody who disagrees has MDS and secretly wants Obama elected)!
Why would he want to change the Republican Party platform? To make it more conservative, right?
misterpeasea on July 7, 2008 at 3:15 PM
If WaPo wants to influence the election it ought to build its propaganda on some kind of reality. Most of the delegates were handed over to McCain before the convention. There isn’t going to be a fight.
A convention fight happens when candidates use their delegates as bargaining chips. Even then the fight means something only if there are enough free lance delegates to change the nomination.
The only thing new about this convention is how they are going to reveal McCain’s platform which is being massaged now to lure back conservative voters but will have no value since McCain is already the nominee regardless of what is in the platform
This is messing up the Wapo propaganda machine. The only convention fight I see are the Hillary delegates playing cold shoulder to the Obamians.
Everyone will want to see how Bill enters the DEM convention arena, and how the crowd reacts. We will not see anyone kissing his royal behind. That happens backstage. If it doesnt happen, that will the story of the conventions
entagor on July 7, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Democrats would be happy to advertise unpopular sections of the Republican platform. Don’t assume that it is electorally inconsequential.
Big S on July 7, 2008 at 4:37 PM
Speaking as an independent, that party platform carries a lot more weight with someone who MIGHT vote Republican than someone who WILL vote Republican.
The platform is one of the things that has kept me from voting Republican in the past. Just an FYI.
I voted for W. in 2004 because of his stance on the Long War. It allowed me to overlook the party platform.
Rest assured, Dems will beat Repubs with the platform.
Meryl Yourish on July 7, 2008 at 7:19 PM
McCain is mostly conservative.
You do have MDS.
jgapinoy on July 7, 2008 at 8:18 PM
And humans are mostly water, I guess that makes me f*cking Aquaman.
You need to buy one of my patented McCain Colon Shaped Scuba Regulators because you have a serious brownnosing problem.
The only fight about conservatives there is going to be at the convention is whether to throw them out the window or through the door. This election is over for conservatives. Let the lemmings run wild. We wandered in the wilderness for decades before Reagan. Four years is a light walkabout.
austinnelly on July 8, 2008 at 12:13 AM