Of course Obama thinks the people are this stupid. The problem is, in the case of 50% of them, he may be right.

But if Obama puts a stop to the Mexican/Canadian truckers driving professionally on U.S. taxpayer roads/highways [without work permits/visas] and he re-creates drop-off zones on both borders he’s going to save the US trucking industry. Because if it continues unchecked, 70% of it will be run out of Northern Mexico by Mexican companies within 5 years. And way too many high paying truck driver jobs will be lost to Mexican drivers. And you don’t think the Teamsters and OOIDA will be extremely grateful to Obama if he takes this course? And award him their endorsement just prior to 11/4/08?

The GOP was warned to cease with its fatal attraction relationship with Mexico. And they were warned to curb their globalism and return to a more National centric stance. Too bad they didn’t look a little harder at Ronald Reagan who worked hard for and won the Teamsters endorsement in both ’80 and ’84!

Certain aspects of Nafta must be re-visited. We don’t have to get permission nor do we apologize for doing so. DD

It’s one thing for a candidate to tack to the center after winning a primary. It’s not a surprise. Primary and general election voter pools are different. An emphasis on certain issues in one race works better than in the other. Voters hav…

We must negotiate with Eastasia. No, you didn’t hear what he said before correctly. You are not goodthinkful. He’s always been in favor of negotiations with Eurasia. He’s never been in favor of negotiations with Eastasia.

It’s very important to Senator Obama to see that all of our trade agreements are, both, he supports free trade.

Could somebody diagram this sentence?

Obama wants to see that our trade agreements are both WHAT and WHAT? Or maybe Obama hasn’t seen anything yet?

To paraphrase Queen:

And another one gone
And another one gone
Another one under the bus

Somebody should be cutting and pasting lots of videos and comparing either Barack Before vs. Barack After or
Barack Before vs. Barack Advisor Later or
Barack Advisor 1 vs. Barack Advisor 2 vs. Barack Yesterday
with all these flagrant contradictions, and making each comparison into a 30-second ad, ending with “Do you know what Barack Obama would do as President? Neither do we!”

If the McCain campaign won’t do this, will the RNC? These could sink the Barque of Barack come October!

but as a senior adviser, one would expect her to have the playbook du jour.

Really? Would one expect this? I seem to recall a couple of his top advisers insisting he wasn’t going to meet with Ahmadinejad without preconditions, even though he’d repeatedly said he would and the promise was on his own web page. This isn’t unexpected in my mind at all, it’s par for the course. It’s as if he’s trying to out flip-flop the King of Flip Flopping – John Kerry…. reporting for duty.

One has to wonder whether they’re really this foolish, or whether they’re just convinced American voters are.

Again, I’m not sure who this “one” is that you’re referring to, but it ain’t me. But to answer you question, it’s the latter. They are just convinced American voters are that foolish… and sadly they’re right. Look at all the support for this inexperienced, lying, friends with terrorists, racists, and America haters scumbag. Clearly a lot of American voters are “just that foolish”. Oh wait, I forgot he did say “Change” and “Hope” a whole bunch of times, so I guess I have to give him that. Carry on voters, you’re not foolish, you’re quite intelligent and principled, and knowledgeable about your candidate. Tell me again why you all support him…… (crickets). Luntz needs to get some of those focus groups together again and expose them for knowing nothing about their candidate.

Dusty on July 2, 2008 at 6:13 PM

hehe

- The Cat

P.S. If they say it’s bad, it must be working. Of course thing’s will be rough in the beginning like any investment. But I still say that Japan moving factories to the U.S. was a win win, so . . .

“You can’t open up negotiations unilaterally. What he has said, he certainly wants to speak when he’s president of the United States, to Canada and Mexico to see about strengthening NAFTA. There are concerns about NAFTA. But he has made it very clear, you cannot as the United States go in and unilaterally open up trade agreement like that. It’s very important to Senator Obama to see that all of our trade agreements are, both, he supports free trade. He supports fair trade. And he supports trade that has strong enforcement mechanisms. Trade that has labor protections, environmental protections. Those are the kinds of things that he’s going to be pushing for when he is president.”

Just so everyone knows, I checked both Google and Altavista’s Babel Fish and neither has a translation option from Weasel to English.

Quite obviously, Obama made it clear to voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio that he planned on taking exactly the kind of unilateral action that Douglas eschews now, or at least threatening to do so as extortion for major changes to NAFTA.

Quite obviously, he let his Alligator-Mouth overload…

it’s both: they are as foolish as their supporters: all dupes of leftism and their own propaganda.

it’s called self-delusion and mass-delusion.

One has to wonder whether they’re really this foolish, or whether they’re just convinced American voters are.

I’m convinced it’s the latter. The Dems are drunk on their own wine. They think they’ve got it figured out this time. It’s not the message, it’s the bright shiny symbols. Wear a pin on your lapel, call your opponent a coward, tell them whatever they want to hear and go straight to the White House.