Videos: Dueling NAFTAs
posted at 5:50 pm on July 2, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
“You can’t open up negotiations unilaterally,” senior Barack Obama adviser Linda Douglas told Joe Scarborough this morning about NAFTA. Really? You could have fooled Barack Obama himself. She claims that Obama made it clear that we cannot act to end a trade agreement without working with our partners … but Obama in fact made the opposite point during a February presidential debate.
First, here’s Douglas:
You can’t open up negotiations unilaterally. What he has said, he certainly wants to speak when he’s president of the United States, to Canada and Mexico to see about strengthening NAFTA. There are concerns about NAFTA. But he has made it very clear, you cannot as the United States go in and unilaterally open up trade agreement like that. It’s very important to Senator Obama to see that all of our trade agreements are, both, he supports free trade. He supports fair trade. And he supports trade that has strong enforcement mechanisms. Trade that has labor protections, environmental protections. Those are the kinds of things that he’s going to be pushing for when he is president.
And here’s Obama from February 26th, campaigning in Ohio and trying to out-populist Hillary Clinton:
Tim Russert: A simple question. Will you as president say to Canada and Mexico, this [NAFTA] has not worked for us, we are out?
Obama: I will make sure that we renegotiate in the same way that Senator Clinton talked about, and I think actually Senator Clinton’s answer on this one is right. I think we should use the hammer of a potential opt-out as leverage to ensure that we actually get labor and environmental standards that are enforced.
Douglas would have been better advised to stick to the new Obama position, which is that he engaged in typical overheated rhetoric like any other politician. Perhaps Douglas has problems in keeping pace with the reversals issued by Obama — haven’t we all? — but as a senior adviser, one would expect her to have the playbook du jour.
Quite obviously, Obama made it clear to voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio that he planned on taking exactly the kind of unilateral action that Douglas eschews now, or at least threatening to do so as extortion for major changes to NAFTA. Quite obviously, the Obama campaign still hasn’t figured out YouTube or a public record. One has to wonder whether they’re really this foolish, or whether they’re just convinced American voters are.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Before anyone asks, this helps Michelle’s kids by taking the heat off their poor abused mother.
misterpeasea on July 2, 2008 at 5:58 PM
his flip flops are now boring and expected…
SoCalInfidel on July 2, 2008 at 5:58 PM
I love cafeterias. Not this one though.
RBMN on July 2, 2008 at 5:59 PM
I’m convinced it’s the latter. The Dems are drunk on their own wine. They think they’ve got it figured out this time. It’s not the message, it’s the bright shiny symbols. Wear a pin on your lapel, call your opponent a coward, tell them whatever they want to hear and go straight to the White House.
Typhoon on July 2, 2008 at 6:01 PM
Well it is getting easier to tell what answers Obama will give, the one different from a couple of months ago.
He is going to do this so often, that people will begin tuning this out. They will think writers are making this up, no one could be this indecisive.
right2bright on July 2, 2008 at 6:05 PM
TYPHOON:
it’s both: they are as foolish as their supporters: all dupes of leftism and their own propaganda.
it’s called self-delusion and mass-delusion.
reliapundit on July 2, 2008 at 6:08 PM
Quite obviously, he let his Alligator-Mouth overload…
franksalterego on July 2, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Just so everyone knows, I checked both Google and Altavista’s Babel Fish and neither has a translation option from Weasel to English.
Dusty on July 2, 2008 at 6:13 PM
Wait, why can’t we talk one on one with countries for trade deals? Or negotiate for ourselves?
- The Cat
P.S. If they say it’s bad, it must be working. Of course thing’s will be rough in the beginning like any investment. But I still say that Japan moving factories to the U.S. was a win win, so . . .
MirCat on July 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM
hehe
MirCat on July 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM
Really? Would one expect this? I seem to recall a couple of his top advisers insisting he wasn’t going to meet with Ahmadinejad without preconditions, even though he’d repeatedly said he would and the promise was on his own web page. This isn’t unexpected in my mind at all, it’s par for the course. It’s as if he’s trying to out flip-flop the King of Flip Flopping – John Kerry…. reporting for duty.
Again, I’m not sure who this “one” is that you’re referring to, but it ain’t me. But to answer you question, it’s the latter. They are just convinced American voters are that foolish… and sadly they’re right. Look at all the support for this inexperienced, lying, friends with terrorists, racists, and America haters scumbag. Clearly a lot of American voters are “just that foolish”. Oh wait, I forgot he did say “Change” and “Hope” a whole bunch of times, so I guess I have to give him that. Carry on voters, you’re not foolish, you’re quite intelligent and principled, and knowledgeable about your candidate. Tell me again why you all support him…… (crickets). Luntz needs to get some of those focus groups together again and expose them for knowing nothing about their candidate.
RightWinged on July 2, 2008 at 6:27 PM
Any room under the bus for Linda Douglas?
To paraphrase Queen:
And another one gone
And another one gone
Another one under the bus
Somebody should be cutting and pasting lots of videos and comparing either Barack Before vs. Barack After or
Barack Before vs. Barack Advisor Later or
Barack Advisor 1 vs. Barack Advisor 2 vs. Barack Yesterday
with all these flagrant contradictions, and making each comparison into a 30-second ad, ending with “Do you know what Barack Obama would do as President? Neither do we!”
If the McCain campaign won’t do this, will the RNC? These could sink the Barque of Barack come October!
Steve Z on July 2, 2008 at 7:15 PM
Could somebody diagram this sentence?
Obama wants to see that our trade agreements are both WHAT and WHAT? Or maybe Obama hasn’t seen anything yet?
Steve Z on July 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM
This is really striking. I truly hope that someone is saving up all of these flip-flop examples so they can be dumped on Sen. Obama’s head. This is beyond simple “re-positioning” for the general election. It’s beyond simply explaining that additional information has led to a change in policy. It’s darn near Orwellian.
We must negotiate with Eastasia. No, you didn’t hear what he said before correctly. You are not goodthinkful. He’s always been in favor of negotiations with Eurasia. He’s never been in favor of negotiations with Eastasia.
Jill1066 on July 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM
How could voters not support Obama, when he says exactly what they want to hear? Don’t like his position on an issue today? No problem, tomorrow he’ll be taking the opposite position. He’s on all sides of every issue. Something for everybody.
AZCoyote on July 2, 2008 at 7:55 PM
Do I need tell you the previous occupation of Linda Douglas?
corona on July 2, 2008 at 9:39 PM
Do I need to inform you of the previous occupation of Linda Douglas?
corona on July 2, 2008 at 9:40 PM
His missteps don’t matter. He can make all the blunders he wants. It won’t matter.
But if Obama puts a stop to the Mexican/Canadian truckers driving professionally on U.S. taxpayer roads/highways [without work permits/visas] and he re-creates drop-off zones on both borders he’s going to save the US trucking industry. Because if it continues unchecked, 70% of it will be run out of Northern Mexico by Mexican companies within 5 years. And way too many high paying truck driver jobs will be lost to Mexican drivers. And you don’t think the Teamsters and OOIDA will be extremely grateful to Obama if he takes this course? And award him their endorsement just prior to 11/4/08?
The GOP was warned to cease with its fatal attraction relationship with Mexico. And they were warned to curb their globalism and return to a more National centric stance. Too bad they didn’t look a little harder at Ronald Reagan who worked hard for and won the Teamsters endorsement in both ’80 and ’84!
Certain aspects of Nafta must be re-visited. We don’t have to get permission nor do we apologize for doing so. DD
Darvin Dowdy on July 2, 2008 at 9:57 PM
One of the core tenets of liberalism, is that the masses are stupid, and must be led by those who know better.
Of course Obama thinks the people are this stupid. The problem is, in the case of 50% of them, he may be right.
MarkTheGreat on July 3, 2008 at 7:07 AM