Here.

While BBC Online currently covers the story “Bulldozer rampage hits Jerusalem,” this was not the original headline. Offering a glimpse into the BBC’s warped journalism, the initial headline read “Israel bulldozer driver shot dead”.

Gotta love the Beeb. Here’s the full article
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/critiques/new/Caught_BBCs_Shocking_First_Response_to_Terror_Attack.asp

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c6_1215020045

At the start of the video people are congratulating the bank security guard who fired once into the cab of the bulldozer but he was still conscious, a soldier comes in from the foreground carrying a black back pack who will later use his Sub-MG to shoot the terrorist for good measure after the policeman shoots him 4 times.

Hamas rejoiced in todays horrific attack

Can you show me this? Was the rejoicing anything like this?

GAZE

infidel2 on July 2, 2008 at 2:31 PM

What is GAZE?

Video: Palestinian bulldozer attack kills 2 in Jerusalem

The religion of peace, eh!

Since 9/11, Islamic terrorists have carried out 11,355 deadly terror attacks!

The information in the article all comes from the UN source and the UN report.

Post it then. While you are at it post the follow up investigation by the reporter with the interviews with the Israeli soldiers and the ‘farmers, and any eye witnesses to the events. Somehow I have a feeling the reporter will not be able to any of those things.

You are a typical liberal. You accept single unidentified source information as fact.

While you are looking for that information you also might want to figure out why Hamas rejoiced in todays horrific attack and Abbas condemned it.

Um, sorry, but your sources source doesn’t identify Jamil al-Gahoul, it was the reporter.

Sometimes it is simply amazing how stupid you really are. The information in the article all comes from the UN source and the UN report. The reporter did not independently find the name of Jamil Al-Gahoul, nor any other information in the article. It’s like talking to a rock. Of course, maybe you’re really smart and acting like a rock to try and frustrate me.

dave742 on July 2, 2008 at 3:08 PM

Um, sorry, but your sources source doesn’t identify Jamil al-Gahoul, it was the reporter. Are there restrictions on approaching the security fence? Walk up to the triple wire around Huntsville sometime and see what kind of reception greats you.

doesn’t include the rocket attack on Southern Israel with Kazams

The report includes the incident that was the suppposed “truce breaker” by Islamic Jihad. That’s why the article said “The first violation committed by the Palestinians was recorded a day later, on June 24, when Islamic Jihad fired three rockets at Sderot from the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun.” The rocket attack that was not included was the “most recent rocket attack” which supposedly occured the same day as the article, on June 27. The reason for this is because the report had already come out before these “most recent” attacks, and the UN report failed to include attacks that occurred in the future. Try reading with comprehension, genius.

an unnamed UN source

You’re right. The source must have made up the existence of this report, included details of injured vctims such as “70-year old Jamil al-Gahoul”. Is all a lie. I am surprised that yediot ahronot would report such an obvious fabrication.

dave742 on July 2, 2008 at 2:40 PM

LOL….your ‘source’ had identified their ‘source’ as an unnamed UN source. That should be your first clue. Second your ‘source’ does admit it doesn’t include the rocket attack on Southern Israel with Kazams. Rocket attacks don’t count it seems.

Proverb: You can’t argue your way out of a bee sting.

Moral: Don’t piss-off a bee.

Keep your head-meds stocked up. The next few months might end up giving you an episode.

Hellooooo……

Everyone here is an IDF soldier.

BTW, this is one of the justifications that Hamas uses for their attacks. I see you are a Hamas sympathizer.

Dave742 is an open Iranian shill and anti-semite. He wants to kill Jews and Americans, so is rather openly an enemy of the United States and Israel.

I’m coming for you….. booga booga!

Swinehound:

an infant is always innocent

OK. All Israelis over 17 are IDF soldiers.

RE: You Jenin Harping.

How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.
–Abraham Lincoln

With that said, an infant is always innocent and therefore a civilian but I guess all the Joooooooos are guilty in your eyes. You’re pathetic.

Everyone here is an IDF soldier.

A terrorist attacks civilians. Everyone in Israel is an IDF soldier. How is it possible that there are Palestinian terrorists?

Dave742 is an open Iranian shill and anti-semite. He wants to kill Jews and Americans, so is rather openly an enemy of the United States and Israel.

It’s too bad he didn’t get run over by his fantasy IDF soldier crushing houses. I don’t view him as a noncombatant at all.

It’s called society – Stop wasting my time. Do you think I know who, why, where or when that crap was written, more importantly I could care less, I didn’t even bother clicking your link.. You are the reason I am responding, not your silly googled articles. I promise you, much worse was plastered on the front page of most newspapers, then retracted in shame as lies. Saeb Erekat chief negotiator for Palestinians was on CNN with Bill Hemmer lying about 500 civilians massacred, he had to retract days later in embarrassment. You are making a fool of yourself.

dave742 on July 2, 2008 at 1:50 PM

Oh, I’m focused. Sorta suxs when even the Palestinian Authority won’t back up liberal mythology. What’s the world coming to?

So the IDF’s soldier who gave his account is a “trooferr”? He is simply lying?

dave742 on July 2, 2008 at 1:29 PM

Perhaps the IDF soldier got his “firsthand accounts” of what happened in Jenin the same way that Scott Thomas Beauchamp got his…