Having just read Hugh Hewitt’s Letter to a Young Obama Supporter, this quote of the day really stands out. Hewitt was patronizing to his young reader’s IQ, and I don’t think that he countered the effect that Wolff has on the idealistic, inexperienced, highly energized, intelligent/ignorant American youth. Wolff’s blather was indeed to insult conservatives and attempt to built the tsunami of propaganda to isolate and obliterate conservatives, attempting to coerce submission to his radical destruction of our world.

When change comes, it is going to be devastating and absolute.”

Them’s fightin’ words. Talk about a direct threat! The world has seen fascism kicking in bedroom doors at night, dragging out the conservatives to be executed/assassinated. American youth fall into two GENERAL catagories. 1) Radicals who’d love to clear out the responsibilities that traditional Constitutional life requires; prefering a mother state (whether national or even global mother earth state preferable) and no personal responsibility. 2) Ignorance is bliss youth suffering the universal idealism that we all experienced as a passage in life while innocent or naive, who don’t realize where marxism leads, who don’t know our own American experience with fascism, who refute that THEIR GOOD INTENTIONS (often swayed by dope hope) could result in anything bad because THEY are not bad, “the system” “the establishment” “the conservatives” THE NEO-CONS are bad. These young voters actually look around and blame everything that they find UNCOMFORTABLE on other people than themselves. It is called immaturity. These youth believe THEY could never be blamed for the consequences of what happens because of what they either do or neglect to observe; and couple that lack of insight with their ignorantly convoluted projection blaming conservatives for the ills that the progressives have wrought in America! Now triple that with their blind inexperience and indoctrination from school and the media that the DNC is where popularity lies. Now compound everything with their stupidity (rejection of truth as taught/experienced) as they think fascism would come from our Constitutional conservatives, and that their progressive marxist mentors would NEVER allow fascism in their utopia! Tralala, follow the Bobama Pied Piper over the cliff.

As per conservative talk radio hosts, they all play their own unique role in our world; to each their own. I like them all to one degree or another. Like some here, I take my daily dose of Rush for a while to hear what he has to say. That most radio hosts stick to one topic for an entire lengthy segment is usual, regardless of a host’s politics. People tune in/out, and the point needs to be made for those who don’t stay for the entire program. That some radio hosts move the conversation along and cover a wider array of topics within the overall framework of a subject makes them more “interesting” to stay with over the duration of the program. That personalities come into play is what performance entails. How the host uses persona determines who is attracted or disturbed. But that each “sincere” conservative host plays a unique role in motivating and securing the conservative MOVEMENT is appreciable. I do wish that the “artist” portion of each host could endure a summit of sorts, that they’d convene on occasion without personal barbs over jealousy or spite over perceived slights. Maybe El Rusho will host a summer BBQ for a media blitz? How cool to see Michael Savage talking nice–heh, we know he can be nice, and they can all get over their insider cliques to show conservative voters HOW TO ALLY and converse appropriately to sway social conversations, coin our own rebuttals and pass around the spare change, verbally let the air out of the opponents’ tires.

KUDOS, RUSH! Glad to hear Rush is endorsed and well funded.
(And so glad to hear Laura Ingraham back live on the radio!)

maverick muse on July 3, 2008 at 8:08 AM

“to a liberal, truth is”…

as Pilot figured, “Truth, what is truth?!”

Ironic to remember, Pilot was the “conservative” in his day.
But then, those who call themselves “liberal” are not classical liberals, only radical marxists. They have played revisionism with language. So whatever they say, following their lack of credential, following the word’s convolution by revision, what all they say is unfounded.

All of the “neo-con” ranting also fails to come from the historical record. Even “revisionism” requires an original text to massacre. These radicals live the lie, wherein there is no truth in their darkness; they do not comprehend the light of truth, but deny its veracity and seek its obliteration. They ERASE more than they revise. (Arnold made a movie that’s as much biographical as sci-fi.)

maverick muse on July 3, 2008 at 9:15 AM