Democratic investors in Big Oil
posted at 12:55 pm on July 2, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
One of the more serviceable of American political adages is Follow the money. However, that doesn’t always work, as The Hill discovers today in looking at how our elected officials on Capitol Hill bet on energy with their own money instead of ours. Leading Democratic members of Congress like to buy into their favorite bete noir, it seems:
More than a dozen Democratic members of Congress critical of oil companies have investments in the industry, according to a review of lawmakers’ financial assets.
At least 14 Democratic members of the House and one senator have holdings ranging from several thousand dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars in companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. or partnerships such as Schlumberger and Hornbeck Offshore Services. …
While many Republican lawmakers also have investments in the oil and gas sector, Democrats have generally been much more critical of the role oil companies have played in rising gas prices.
It’s hard to know how to feel about this. On one hand, credit should be given for elected officials who don’t automatically act to protect their individual investments. That has a certain amount of integrity, although Rep. Steve Cohen(D-TN) takes this a little too far:
“I always vote against the companies I own,” said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.). “I don’t give a damn.” Cohen owns $15,000-$50,000 of stock in Chevron, $50,000-$100,000 in Exxon Mobil, and $15,000-$50,000 in Schlumberger, a highly profitable oil-services company that provides technical expertise and equipment.
Always? That goes beyond integrity to just flat-out stupid. One would think that self-interest would eventually come into play just to divest assets from companies that one opposes. That’s the mystery of the large-scale Democratic investments into oil companies. Why sink all of their money into the kinds of companies they regularly demonize?
Well, it’s not all of their money — and that’s the bigger point here. They have larger investments in these companies that most Americans, but it’s a safe bet that most Americans with any retirement or money-market accounts have investments in the same companies. “Big Oil” is owned by a large investor class, not by a couple of stogie-smoking fat cats. The demonization that the Democrats indulge belongs to a bygone era, one that got retired in a mass movement over the last generation towards retirement planning and investment.
It’s a form of self-indulgent hypocrisy, and it comes at the cost of a rational and productive energy policy. Instead dislocating their shoulders with their back-patting, I’d prefer that they allow all of us to profit from that rational policy and make all of us feel better.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Maybe we can get them to sell their assets to lower the price of oil?
Politician, thy name is moron.
originalpechanga on July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I guess harry doesn’t have any stock in oil companies, he looks too healthy to be ‘sick’.
L
letget on July 2, 2008 at 1:05 PM
I’ve always suspected that the Democrats and the environmentalists are actually being run by the big oil companies and opec, and doing everything in their power to inflate the value of their product. They attack them to create the illusion of opposition.
Buddahpundit on July 2, 2008 at 1:05 PM
They vote always against the oil companies…but won’t allow more drilling to lower the price.
I am so confused…
right2bright on July 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM
Schlumberger is a French company, and the only serious competitor to Halliburton. Although they invest in the US, what does it say when an American congressman has invested significant amounts of money in a foreign company when there is an American alternative?
Speaking of oily hypocrites, it is well known that the enviro-savvy Kennedy family has significant investments in oil and drilling companies.
MB007 on July 2, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Bingo. Dead on, Ed.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM
It’s Soros logic: if I didn’t come up with this elaborate scam to make billions, or assist the Nazis, someone else would do it.
Beagle on July 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM
You mean like by blocking all new drilling and refineries so supply stays low and demand stays high so profits stay high? Oh I see, you mean by critisizing them in public and threatening higher tax rates. Oh, I see now. That would really cause the value of the equity to fall – not!
TheBigOldDog on July 2, 2008 at 1:15 PM
It’s pure pandering on the part of these Dems. They know that nothing is going to happen. Since the Dems took over both houses, gas prices have gone sky high. All the Dems do is act like hypocrites, by yelling and screaming, and marching out the oil company CEOs for grandstanding purposes. Typical.
Rick on July 2, 2008 at 1:19 PM
I’ve read about this in Peter Schweizer’s Do As I Say (Not As I Do). Most of their holdings are in the western part of the South, such as Texas and Oklahoma, if I recall correctly, and are in the form of mineral rights on plots of land owned by people who are far less well off then the Kennedys themselves. In most cases, the land owners receive little if any of the revenue produced by the oil.
Bigfoot on July 2, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Another example of the type of stellar, intelligent, competent quality leadership voters can count on from their elected leaders in Congress!
And yet another reason for invoking Term Limitation on every single solitary one of them!
pilamaye on July 2, 2008 at 1:25 PM
actually they are protecting them aren’t they? Higher Oil cost, means higher profits.
If Profit Margin is 7% or so for “Big Oil”….then Gas at $2 is a 14 cent profit, at $4 its 28 cent profit…
jp on July 2, 2008 at 1:36 PM
Maybe he’ll vote against Obama, even though he wants him to win.
whitetop on July 2, 2008 at 1:39 PM
Smiling right now.
Ed you have stumbled upon something not many in the American society is unaware of. Not all politicians (even with Ethics reform) admit to having certain types of Stocks in certain areas.
Now, everyone… think about it. The wealthiest people in the Senate are Democrats. Figure out which Stocks they own… and I bet you will be pissed off Americans. I have known for a LONG time which People owns what due to what I do.
upinak on July 2, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Hit the nail on the head.
But what about those who actually yank or freeze their Stock, commodities and trades before they go into office? Cheney did it with his…. but not many others have.
upinak on July 2, 2008 at 1:43 PM
Hypocrisy? No! Not liberals!
shick on July 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM
Always? That goes beyond integrity to just flat-out stupid. One would think that self-interest would eventually come into play just to divest assets from companies that one opposes.
ed you miss the point by voting to limit drilling the dems are forcing the price of oil up which thereby bids up their stock. Self-Interest is in play here. what would be not self-interest is voting FOR drilling which would lower the price of oil and thereby lower the stock price of these companies.
unseen on July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM
Buddahpundit on July 2, 2008 at 1:05 PM
Not so much as owned by them but more like used. take refineries for example. It is doable but the environmental activists bog it down. there are ways to strealine the process but niether the oil comapnies nor the environmental wackos want that. when the oil companies need to increase capacity they just build on to the present refineries.
Each blends into the other. The people that get screwed is of course the consumer.
unseen on July 2, 2008 at 2:14 PM
Then you have the Houston Democrat Oilman whose in Jail now over the Oil for Food Scandal, Oscar Wyatt? who may have persuaded some of the Dems to go anti-war…to protect his Oil Scandal $$$
Robert Kennedy says Oil Profits are “immoral”, yet he owns oil stocks in his Trust he lives off of, per Peter Sweizers book “Do as I Say, not as I do”
then of course, Ralph Nadar is a prime example of this type of game
jp on July 2, 2008 at 2:20 PM
TREASON = THE NEW DEMOCRAT PATRIOTISM
Don’t do as I do, just do as I say! /Sarcasm
byteshredder on July 2, 2008 at 2:29 PM
Always. No matter what your constituents want or is in their best interest. What a self serving, arrogant, holier than thou moron.
TinMan13 on July 2, 2008 at 2:45 PM
The Kennedy family own their very own oil company, Kenoil. Maybe they oppose drilling in ANWAR because they don’t like competition.
flenser on July 2, 2008 at 2:54 PM
A Jew stupid about money?
Bulls**t.
?
Liar.
If he didn’t give a damn, he wouldn’t own them. The money would be in the bank.
drjohn on July 2, 2008 at 3:06 PM
I’ll bet Joe was all for Prohibition, too.
misterpeasea on July 2, 2008 at 3:17 PM
Years ago, in Calif., new restrictions were being place on gas stations to have new high-tech holding tanks with electronic monitoring systems placed in all of the gas stations.
The environmentalists were ecstatic that they “bullied” the oil companies, and the oil companies finally gave in with very little fight, in fact they even upped the standards “under pressure from the environmental” groups.
The envior. groups were the shills, they just didn’t know it. It was a ploy and the oil companies used them to get what they wanted. And what was that you ask?
Independent operators could not afford the new standards, new tanks, new pumps, so they had to give up their businesses, their franchises back to the oil companies. The independents were keeping the price of gas low, because in most of their clauses they could buy from independent sources, in other words they were competitive.
So the “new” standards allowed the company to regain control of all of their stations, sign new agreements, or just make them company owned. And of course the new gas standards made the gas more expensive, which gave the oil companies more profits…thanks environmentalists, you sure showed them who’s boss.
right2bright on July 2, 2008 at 3:23 PM
I don’t think there is anything the present crop of congressmen won’t do for money. And it is so precious how they keep each other free of any ethics investigation.
snaggletoothie on July 2, 2008 at 4:55 PM
Well, heck…they don’t really mean it. They don’t mean half the crap they spew, they just want the power and control of the office.
Now some,like SanFran Nan, Murtha, Reid, Dodd, and yup Barry (carter2), they’re just out there…. and probably are filled with enough hate to go around.
shooter on July 2, 2008 at 10:32 PM