Comments on: No Name That Party?

By: Blue-eyed Infidel

Blue-eyed Infidel — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:31:17 +0000

Orange is a great color on her.

This guy is a “Wizard”? Puhleeze.

Love their supporter – another Useful Idiot.

Karma baby. Karma.

By: JDinSC

JDinSC — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:07:35 +0000

Folks, this is a gift in an election year… just think of the marketing possibilities…

Satan-Worshipping Democrats

I’m having difficulty thinking of a better way to promote McCain among evangelicals…

By: Cylor

Cylor — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:13:57 +0000

Man, if this doesn't take the cake, I don't know what does. It's almost poetic.

Gets you to wondering what you would hear if you played a B.O. speech backwards. pilamaye on July 1, 2008 at 1:40 PM

I'm thinking Mayhem, myself.

By: Send_Me

Send_Me — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:53:08 +0000

“Certainly we wish her the best during this trying time.” ~Sen. Floyd Kissack (D-Durham County)

What’s this supposed to mean? Does it mean, “May justice be done?” Nope. How about, “I hope the truth be found and told?” Um, no. Does anyone else smell what this guy is stepping in here? Apparently this man does not either A) understand the gravity of the charges, or B) have any real sense of good and evil.
In his eyes, and those of most moral relativists, these things are merely “unfortunate” or “disappointing” events, solely because it’s an inconvenience to either them or their organization, and nothing more.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as the “Death of Satan,” which is ironic in and of itself given the circumstances.

By: DanKenton

DanKenton — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:27:02 +0000

Name that party? Sure, the Democratic Party as mentioned at the beginning of the piece. Not much going on today for you, Ed?

By: aengus

aengus — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:34:13 +0000

“Investigators say Johnson is involved in a Satanic cult..”

That is not a very nice way to characterise the Democratic Party.

By: Sergei

Sergei — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:58:48 +0000

You have to put yourself in Michelle’s shoes… if the press printed this story (w/ the party affiliation), she would have a hard time explaining this to the children. If they leave out the party affiliation, it just makes for a safe assumption it’s got to be a cracker republican who come from a small town, that cling to their religion and guns. If the press starts showing a “D”, then the template doesn’t fit no mo.

By: eeyore

eeyore — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:49:27 +0000

The Durham People’s Alliance didn’t form as a result of the lacrosse case. The PA has been Durham’s MoveOn since long before MoveOn was even a gleam in any “progressive”‘s eye. Sort of MoveOn + Code Pink + Worker’s World Party + all the other usual suspects.

By: jukin

jukin — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:48:55 +0000

Sorry, I think it does represent democrats.

By: snaggletoothie

snaggletoothie — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:57:53 +0000

In a effort to redress past wrongs Democrats are now shackling white people.

By: shaken

shaken — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:41:04 +0000

They must be victims. I have every confidence that the MSM is hard at work ferreting out the of what for us.

Must. Patiently. Wait.

By: Jens

Jens — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:40:05 +0000

Ed, I agree with your point, especially the part about the lede’s missing affiliation; had it been a Republican party official it would have led, “One of them is a well-known Republican political activist.” But the article does state that Ms. Johnson resigned her post with the Democratic Party; which post one would assume the party fills solely with Democratic party members. Near the end of the article, yes, but it is there. Just trying to be fair.

By: Just A Grunt

Just A Grunt — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:29:39 +0000

Just trying out for that Super Delegate designation. The competition has been extremely tough this year and it would seem half of the Dem convention will be delegates and the other half parole officers making sure their clients don’t violate the terms of their bail.
And we aren’t even talking about the demonstrators.

By: righty64

righty64 — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:54:14 +0000

Ed, the local fishwrap, the Charlotte Observer does note that Johnson is a Democrat activist. I note that maybe Sen. Messiah Barack could use these two deviants for “religious outreach”. What do you think?

By: Christine

Christine — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:49:29 +0000

I forgot to say that I was deemed intolerant by my step mom because i was living in California and watching FNC. When I told her that i got my info from local news, she said that that was FNC. Needless to say, i won’t try to enlighten her again.

By: Christine

Christine — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:45:42 +0000

OhEssYouCowboys on July 1, 2008
Well said. I tried to explain what was happening in the California public schools (the gay lobby has succeeded in removing all mention of mother and father in textbooks, any kid ‘feeling gay’ could use the other restroom, new classes for educational/indoctrination purposes, etc), to my step mother who told me what I was saying was “BS”.
No one can indoctrinate straight kids to homosexuality and there is no threat to American tradition and the family. Ignorance runs deep in the heartland of Ohio.

By: Glynn

Glynn — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:44:03 +0000

Palamino!

2Tru2Tru on July 1, 2008 at 1:24 PM

LOL!!!

By: right2bright

right2bright — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:38:31 +0000

They were going to sacrifice a pig…but being Democrat they had too many choices…

By: Christine

Christine — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:35:53 +0000

I agree with Hawaii, but come to think of it, only Demos defend perverts–because, (you must know by now), perverts are victims too. We must make the world safe for ALL victims to come out of their closet of perversion and even criminal activity so that they can get help.
I know several people who agree with this. They all are far lefty ‘Goddess worshippers’; one described herself as a liberal in 2004.

By: OhEssYouCowboys

OhEssYouCowboys — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:16:00 +0000

jeff_from_mpls on July 1, 2008 at 1:49 PM

Lenin said “Destroy the family, and the society will collapse.” Look at what has happened, in America, since the 60s:

1. No-fault divorce.

2. Adultery is portrayed as being irrelevant. And, sometimes, even healthy for the marital relationship.

3. Abortion. The extermination of tens of millions of children, by their own mothers.

4. Homosexual marriage.

The family collapses. The children become irrelevant. The children become wards of the State. The State will then nurture and raise the children. Socialism becomes all that the children know.

All of these are directly related to the Socialist desire to eliminate God from the public forum, and from the public schools. That is how they seek to destroy the family.

When God is eliminated from the minds of the people, the family is destroyed. When God is eliminated, and the family is destroyed – the people will serve the State. The people will serve, fear and worship the State.

The Socialists of the 60s knew exactly what they were doing.

By: wise_man

wise_man — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:07:54 +0000

I did not disregard the overall point. I commented on one part.

By: Merovign

Merovign — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0000

They were just in the wrong place – if this had been San Francisco, no one would have noticed. Except they might have been invited to the Mayor’s parties.

By: jp

jp — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:03:15 +0000

Mary K on this yet? this is her neck of the woods

By: jp

jp — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:02:35 +0000

amazingly the Observer and News and Observer, both very liberal indicated party this time too.

By: maverick muse

maverick muse — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:59:37 +0000

This strangle hold alliance of bobama dope hopes include his black woman delegate in Colorado who telephoned government officials with her lies to set the gross CPS wheels into commotion in Eldorado. What a party! They are stuck on stupid, abusing everyone.