Hmmm. Oh well, since we can’t seem to find anybody like that, I give you: President B. Hussein Obama.

My take on it is that if the Messiah picks a man for VP than McCain will pick up the executive experienced VP just to shut up all critics….. McCain is just that short tempered, “Alright fine then, I’ll take Romney!!”

But if Barack Hussein Obama picks a woman than McCain will pick Palin in order to one up him.

What are the chances that Obama picks a woman? About 35% is my guess. I just don’t think that Michelle is that secure about the “other women”. She seems very insecure of herself.

Talk about executive experience!!!

But lack of personal chemistry could derail the pick…

Who REALLY likes John McCain? Linda Grahamnesty? Joe Lieberman? Juan Hernandez?

McCain should stick with someone closer to his maverick ideology, like Chuck Hagel.

jaime on June 30, 2008 at 7:43 PM

Don’t worry Mitt Romney changes his positions enough he’s Maverick enough..

Pretty slimy, not2bright either. Big dig contracts were all let before Romney. Nice try.

eaglesdontflock on June 30, 2008 at 5:29 PM

Pretty slime eaglesdontflock (and how boring is it that you twist my moniker around…never seen that before, except by little girls), I never said Romney issued the contracts, I said he bailed out the contractors.
Nice try.
Now learn to read…

However, if McCain is going to be the next president anyway, I would much rather have VP Romney than Jindal.

Remember there are roughly about 1 million mormons in California, all of whom are being asked by their church to vote for the California Marriage Amendment this November. Only about 12 million Californians voted in the 2004 election. And that was a 6.7 to 5.5 split. So, one million votes can make a huge difference, especially when you consider there is likely to be close to 100% turn out among Mormons in CA.

McCain might not like Romney personally, but he can’t win without him.

While the Libs have their wheels clogged up with
bodies thrown under da bus,and as they would say,
by Red State Update,freggin pick him,just pick em!

Once Mitt is on the McCain(F–k it McCain* 08)bus,
Republican’s can get this campaign into high gear,
and get this political show on da road!

*( canopfor deeply regrets, shamelessly,stealing
Red State Update’s campaign slogan,”F–k it
McCain 08″).————————–:).

(BTW, interesting how the individual business that helped bail out the Olympics, are the same ones that he “consulted” for, that helped in the big dig, and are now his major donors and supporters, what a coincidence…they all made so much money, what are the odds?)

right2bright on June 30, 2008 at 5:16 PM

Pretty slimy, not2bright either. Big dig contracts were all let before Romney. Nice try.

How much experience does a vp need?
Conservative Voice on June 30, 2008 at 2:27 PM

Exactly, the only thing important is…which candidate can bring in the most money and votes. And priority is votes.

BigD on June 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM

You never answered my question:
Which President was a great businessman before he became the President?

You think that experience on a senate budget committee outweighs experience with private business ownership, leading the Olympics and being governor of a state for four years? Boggles my mind, whether we’re talking about Romney or somebody else.

Clinton was a Governor of a state, so that qualified him as an economic expert?
I will state again, what correlation do you have that a good businessman is a good politician?….Soros is a billionaire, I guess you really think he would be great for the economy…want me to name some others?
Working for decades with a government budget, hammering out details, working “within the system” is much greater experience then running a “consulting” business, whose majority of customers belong to the same church as you, or are from your dad’s powerful contacts.
When you answer my question, I will answer yours…
(BTW, interesting how the individual business that helped bail out the Olympics, are the same ones that he “consulted” for, that helped in the big dig, and are now his major donors and supporters, what a coincidence…they all made so much money, what are the odds?)

Obama picks a VP and raises an unprecedented amount of money. McCain picks Romney, message communication dramatically improves, then they raise an unexpected and also unprecedented amount of money.

Obama and the Left accuse Romney of putting in his own money (more than he actually has).

entagor on June 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM

Maybe she figured it would be a waste of zillions of dollars in litigation to fight something that her legal advisors thought she’d lose?

swami – thanks

Conservative Voice on June 30, 2008 at 4:06 PM

That ship has already sailed for me. I really don’t understand why anyone would change their vote based on VP unless the candidate was from your home state and popular, though that would still not change my vote.

Conservative Voice on June 30, 2008 at 4:01 PM

Yes there will be a few, maybe I was too absolute in my last post on the subject, but those are wildcard voters nonetheless. Old people always vote, they have nothing better to do. Dems need old people, that’s why they tell Social Security ghost stories. Some old people still think they are still voting for FDR in the booth when they vote Dems in for president. Both of these factors will be negated because somebody from a different time will not vote for a black person. That is near 25% of the general election voters, in the Dem primary alone they went 70-30 to Hillary, just wait until you throw in all other political affiliations that are not Dem centric. I really think that will outweigh the new voters that are coming into the fold by a lot.

Amen. It is so simple and all the more frustrating for their lack of implementation. For crying out loud, guiding principles and core philosophy should be easy to articulate!