Comments on: Krauthammer: Mr Malleable

By: Wildcatter1980

Wildcatter1980 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:55:50 +0000

Well put, Ed.

By: jon1979

jon1979 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:43:41 +0000

Clinton won in 1992 in large part because the left allowed him to campaign to the center without raising any protests over things like the Sister Soljuah remarks, because they were confident it was just an act (which it was in 1993-94). The fact that there was no Internet then to allow a million dissenting voices to bloom made it easier to pull that off — just get the special interest groups’ leaders to shut up for seven months and you’re in the White House. As the Greenwald-Olbermann tiff shows, executing the same maneuver this time to allow Obama to move to the center without protest may be a lot more difficult.

By: Mojave Mark

Mojave Mark — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:27:52 +0000

USA FOR SALE BHO’08 maverick muse on June 28, 2008 at 8:03 AM

First he sells his own soul, then the US of A. The Dhimmicrats could not have picked a worse candidate.

By: T J Green

T J Green — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:56:06 +0000

Elect a smarmy metrosexual POTUS? It ain’t gonna happen.

By: drjohn

drjohn — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:25:52 +0000

Obama is not going to shake loose his core supporters- the delusional fanatics. He could tell them that the US is going to convert to Islam and they’d stand and cheer.

I do think he’ll lose the very few thinking moderate Democrats that exist, as evidence in the video a few days ago.

By: maverick muse

maverick muse — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:03:11 +0000

Kerry had his own real record, whether he owned up to it or not, Kerry had his own substance and backbone, even if crooked. When Kerry flipped, he’d explain why. That Kerry changed his mind provided ammo for his opponent.

BHO has his very real record that is kept under wraps to the best of Soros’ ability. Unlike Kerry, BHO has absolutely no backbone. Bobama is absolutely malleable. It doesn’t matter what is on the table for discussion–BHO will never say the same thing twice in a row, and there is NO SURPRISE that BHO jumps from one radical extreme position to the OPPOSITE because for BHO and MARXISTS, WORDS MEAN NOTHING other than what you can get from saying them. Gaddafi has Obama pegged correctly: The imported BHO will say anything in order to get elected while hoisting a carnival “clearance sale” as the Egyptians put it.

USA FOR SALE
BHO’08

By: maverick muse

maverick muse — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:50:01 +0000

Soros’ Pinocchio Piper at play.
Asinus asinum fricat.
Those who want Marx in their crotch support BHO.
Those with functioning brain cells see right through BHO.

The MSM has falsely propagated the presumption that Obama can not be defeated by anti-Obama votes. Even the RNC has wilted its premise, requesting support by matching Obama as closely as possible. Stupid is as stupid does. It’s one thing for democrat jackasses to play dumb; that’s their role in life. But it’s another thing for the greatest of land mammals, the elephant, to play the role of a jackass–and conservatives defy the RNC RINO because playing a jackass is as unnatural as it is foolish for the great symbol to immitate as for an educated person to emmulate.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. There is nothing NEW about BHO, whether you see the consistent inconsistency in the person or in his “virtual platform” that has no reality.

The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived:
Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur!

By: Ares

Ares — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:41:53 +0000

He didn’t learn from Kerry – flip flopping brazenly lying about your positions and condescending to the public didn’t work for Kerry and one suspects it won’t work for Obama.

It is becoming clear that he wants power for power’s sake and nothing more.

By: Terrye

Terrye — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:58:21 +0000

Obama is a charlatan. A tall skinny phony.

By: MB007

MB007 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:20:00 +0000

It seems like Hillary might be influencing Obama on the political game more than previously thought.

By: byteshredder

byteshredder — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:35:59 +0000

Krauthammer: Mr Malleable

Barack Hussein Obama =
Lightweight Gumby w/extra large ears!

By: InDubly

InDubly — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:34:43 +0000

I’ve noticed that Obama has a tell: “What I’ve said all along…” That line is almost always followed by a flip and/or flop.

By: Baxter Greene

Baxter Greene — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:13:52 +0000

Krauthammer is dead on as usual.

The only change going on with Obama is the MSM and hollywood have a candidate that they like and will spin for on a daily basis.

If this guy becomes President,he will not accomplish half of what Bush has but the democrats will proclaim him and his “legacy” the greatest of all time.

The same way they did the Clintons,but somehow that great
legacy and supreme leadership was not good enough to knock off a guy with no legacy and zero accomplishment in the democratic primary.

The democratic party,pretty much just Obama with his staff
leading a herd of sheep.

By: Connie

Connie — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:48:03 +0000

As all progressive/liberl/socialists do, he must fool enough people to get elected where he has the power to execute the real damage.

Unfortunately, Odrama seems to be doing just exactly that.

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:35:31 +0000

J_Gocht on June 27, 2008 at 7:36 PM

You’re a genuine idiot.

By: elduende

elduende — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:29:53 +0000

Once Obama is through with all of us the Clinton’s are going to seem like Reagan. A fading but warm memory.

By: Glynn

Glynn — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:00:15 +0000

Don’t forget Gumby’s horse, Pokey (Hillary?). Just having some fun.

By: thatcher

thatcher — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:52:45 +0000

OOPS! For all you kids out there, Gummy was a precursor to Claymation. He was an innocent little guy made out of clay who could shape shift into any shape he needed to be. Very lovable, and he never hit anyone over the head with an anvil which was the genre of the day.

By: thatcher

thatcher — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:50:07 +0000

He’s Gumby.

By: TugboatPhil

TugboatPhil — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:13:40 +0000

Why do lefties argue about what is going to happen to grandchildren, when their ideal world would have them aborted?

By: J_Gocht

J_Gocht — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:32:11 +0000

snaggletoothie on June 27, 2008 at 9:17 PM

With respect to what…?

By: KW64

KW64 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:29:18 +0000

Right you are Snaggletoothie. I grew up in Illinois and spent ten years in the Chicago area. What matters is what goes on in the backroom deals not what is said in public. That is just for show. Pelosi, Reid and Obama will take this country farther left and in the direction of the lefts special interests than the moderate independents in the middle would ever approve of.

By: snaggletoothie

snaggletoothie — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:17:16 +0000

Is he not a disciple of Saul Alinsky? Didn’t Alinsky advise saying or doing whatever it takes to get elected and then giving the people true reform?

By: J_Gocht

J_Gocht — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:15:04 +0000

“…(Remember when Bill Clinton was elected promising to cut taxes? Once elected he explained that he had to RAISE them. Then he apologized to his business cronies that he might have raised them too much! This will be Obama on every single issue!) jerseyman on June 27, 2008 at 8:27 PM

Gotta luv olde Billo CLINTON…!

Hey jerseyman he put US, that’s the US of A right into the plus side of the ledger.

The dope[r] [Bush] in the Whitehouse now has put your children and grandchildren and YOUR GREAT GRAND CHILDERN into the “poor house” !

You don’t getit…do yah?
Run “US” right into the goddamn financial ditch…!

Hey jerseyman!
U dah babe…!

By: Chakra Hammer

Chakra Hammer — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:04:33 +0000

Obama, BIG FAT LIAR.