Comments on: Put Gitmo detainees where?

By: old trooper

old trooper — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:14:03 +0000

Place them Where?

Hah!

The Kennedy compound in Massachusetts.
No worries then!

By: Buzzy

Buzzy — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:50:32 +0000

I just keep wondering where those invisible prisons and fleets of secret black planes are when you need them.

By: Rick554

Rick554 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:03:17 +0000

HMMM………letting these savages loose on the court room steps. Maybe giving an equal number of Club Gitmo “detainees” to each of the States… (50 States barry, not 57). …….. Alas,Its too simple a concept for politicans to grasp.

By: JIMV

JIMV — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:28:57 +0000

I recommend we take them all to the steps of the court and let them loose, preferably when the court is in session and in time for the evening news.

By: james23

james23 — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:56:01 +0000

Every Senator voting to close Gitmo should have to take an equal # of Gitmo detainees home with him or her, and then they can explain their votes to their constituents.

By: Big Orange

Big Orange — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:05:36 +0000

Pick lettuce for fifty bucks an hour you pigs! Take That!!!

By: Gunslinger

Gunslinger — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:57:41 +0000

Roberts and Brownback have invited the Senate to take a tour of Leavenworth to see the problems inherent in such a transfer. I'm sorry for being the cynic here, but don't you all know the smell of pork by now? I'm sure that Mr. Brownback and Mr. Roberts could find it in their hearts to allow the transfer of these unique criminal, er alleged criminals, if there were some minor modifications made to this single-use prison. I'm sure the economic supplement, the creation of jobs, the need for several more permanent, civilian positions coul help them understand the need for these prisoners to be relocated there.

By: Big Orange

Big Orange — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:52:03 +0000

Lets give McCain and every other person who wants Club Gitmo closed three or four to take home with them. They can employee them as staff, after all, they’re just doing jobs Americans won’t do.

By: jimmer

jimmer — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:53:23 +0000

this close gitmo thing is crazy.

want to really inspire these imprisoned nut jobs to revolt, cause chaos
or even escape — put them within the interior of the U.S.A.

the current facility is perfect, unless appeasing the internationals is more important than our security.

Mc should get a real pair and rethink his short comings, fast.

By: Zorro

Zorro — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:35:02 +0000

If they must be moved, send them to Phoenix. Juan can be the warden.

By: diaphanous

diaphanous — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:20:02 +0000

I’m all for putting gitmo detainees in pelosi’s back yard.

Of course I’m kidding but geez, some of these people need a dose of reality.

By: maverick muse

maverick muse — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:52:50 +0000

lonesomecharlie on June 26, 2008 at 12:31 PM

The Supreme Court Justices who voted for their release into our Judicial system should take these terrorists into their own homes and personally provide complete room and board and security.

By: old_dawg

old_dawg — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:21:20 +0000

The Supremes did leave open the possibility of moving them to another country. There is a new prison in Iraq being built to replace Abu Graib. How about there?

By: Django

Django — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:43:24 +0000

The many sanctuary cities need to take in these poor, unfortunate victims of Amerikkkan hegemony. Let’s start with San Francisco.

By: BL@KBIRD

BL@KBIRD — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:11:42 +0000

Can any of them mow lawns and lay sod?

By: pc

pc — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:44:35 +0000

Wasn’t this covered on an episode of The Unit.

By: Hollowpoint

Hollowpoint — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:33:13 +0000

Put em on those ice caps that are supposedly melting. Polar bears gotta eat, too.

By: Vntnrse

Vntnrse — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:03:09 +0000

If they are brought onto US soil the cries for civilian courts to try them will be much much louder! Leave ‘em there! I don’t want them on US continental soil!

By: Send_Me

Send_Me — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:44:08 +0000

As said by others here: Send them to “the Rock”!
Then again, it may be a security risk to have so many traitors sitting on the other side of the bay who’d actively try to break the captured insurgents out. But hey, it’s not like most San Franciscans do anything besides hold signs, yell loudly, or use a little spray paint anyway. My question though would be when the judges of the 9th Circuit Court frees the prisoners whether they’ll be let loose in San Francisco or not.

By: Travis Bickle

Travis Bickle — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:31:00 +0000

Why stick Kansas with the problem? Send the lowlifes to a blue state. A modest proposal: build a new facility for the terrorists at the abandoned Coast Guard base on Governors’ Island in New York Harbor. It would be worth it just to see the sweaty reaction from Hillary, Chuckie Schumer and the rest of the rogues’ gallery of N.Y.’s pro-terrorist Democrats (e.g., Jerrold “I ate the whole thing” Nadler). Added benefit: there could be supervised visits to sample Manhattan’s nightlife, cultural attractions and fine restaurants, as mandated by Justice Kennedy. It would also make it easier on the terrorists’ Communist/ACLU lawyers, the poor dears.

By: Tantor

Tantor — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:25:23 +0000

Don’t we have a base in Antarctica that would be perfect for housing terrorists?

By: rockmom

rockmom — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:39:28 +0000

How about housing them in a General Motors plant that used to make SUVs but has been closed thanks to the Democrats and their $4 a gallon gas policy? I’m sure some of those UAW workers can be retrained as terrorist prison guards!

By: jdkchem

jdkchem — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:15:20 +0000

ThePrez on June 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM

Not the Gitmo Obama remembers!

By: jukin

jukin — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:00:59 +0000

Best if they go into the most liberal of cities. San Francisco, Boston, New York, or Seattle come to mind.

By: kirkill

kirkill — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:54:36 +0000

foreign combatants, u r doin it rong.