Don’t some cities in the UK want to allow for the ability of the Muslim segment of their population to be governed by Shiria?

To be announced on the BBC: Statutory rape laws for children 8 and under. Have at it Pedophiles. We’ll bus you into town for your weekend conversion to Islam.

When did Justice Anthony Kennedy learn Arabic?

RhymesWithRight on June 26, 2008 at 9:14 AM

I thought it was Ruth Bader Ginsburg who thought the age of consent should be 12.

If a child can consent to sex with another child, why can’t a child consent to sex with an adult?

Doesn’t make a bit of sense.

Al-Ozarka on June 26, 2008 at 3:26 PM

Sure it does, though I can see how an Arkansas might not agree.

Between children, it’s two approximately equal parties, and thus not as much chance of one exerting undue influence over the other or obtaining consent through fraud or force. Between a child and an adult, the adult has a lot more sophistication, experience, authority, etc, and a much greater chance of undue influence, fraud, force, or “overborne will.”

Woo Pig. Sooiee! I hope for your sake that Nutt doesn’t beat your’n with his’n.

If a child can consent to sex with another child, why can’t a child consent to sex with an adult?

Doesn’t make a bit of sense.

Somehow, I can’t imagine a trip that important…

I can’t understand why we Americans have a divided voice on this topic. Where is our collective condemnation of these these medieval practices?

Claypigeon on June 25, 2008 at 10:13 PM

Meh. The other side of the divide thinks it’s ok to murder their unborn children out of convenience so what would you expect? I don’t see why this schmuck is anymore of a neanderthal than the average liberal (which isn’t saying much).

Yeah, the left’s view of children: kill them before they’re born; if they make it that far, they’re fair game at any age.

Which is precisely why I’ve finally made it into McCain’s corner. I dont trust McCain, he MIGHT appoint good judges, he might not. He MIGHT control the border, he might not. He MIGHT win the war, he might not.
These are some of the things McCain might or might not do. However, we KNOW what Obama and a socialist democrat majority WILL do.
So I’ll be pulling the lever for McCain.

abcurtis on June 26, 2008 at 9:52 AM

That my friend is exactly how I feel…Its the republicans as a whole fault for nominating him in the first place…but its too late to go back now and Obama could quite possibly be the worst “change” this country has ever seen

A Saudi marriage official justified taking child brides, or, more specifically, infant brides, in that horrible country…

Everything is permissable…
Tony737 on June 25,2008 at 11:57PM.

But not all things are helpful.

ANY of us who intends not to vote, or intends to write in someone, to “teach the RINOs a lesson” needs to reflect soberly on the consequences of a Marxist administration.

davidk on June 26, 2008 at 6:59 AM

Which is precisely why I’ve finally made it into McCain’s corner. I dont trust McCain, he MIGHT appoint good judges, he might not. He MIGHT control the border, he might not. He MIGHT win the war, he might not.
These are some of the things McCain might or might not do. However, we KNOW what Obama and a socialist democrat majority WILL do.
So I’ll be pulling the lever for McCain.

There’s no way in hell Iran can get a ship close enough to hit and I doubt even liberals would object to taking them out

Obama has already stated terrorism is a matter for the courts. Based on that, I wonder if Obama and his socialist demcorats would really take out an enemy ship, or wait until we were attacked and then trot out the lawyers? It’s a shame that question even has to be asked.

Why do you assume that he/she would agree with it and therefore have a need to explain it?

Do Christians have to defend Fred Phelps?

DaveS on June 25, 2008 at 10:23 PM

Your equivocating.

Considering that this religious Muslem claims this evil deed is alright according to Mohammed, Allah’s prophet, yes she would need to explain it.

Considering that Fred Phelps claims to be a christian and yet quite clearly goes against Christ’s teaching of gentleness and reverence, Christians are obliged to not defend Phelps but rebute him.

My daughter would LOVE to have one of those for her birthday. Where can I buy one?

Why the hell do Muslims like this yokel insist on clinging tenaciously to a 7th Century mentality in the 21st Century?

pilamaye on June 26, 2008 at 7:24 AM

Because it’s in the Koran and Sunnah. They believe they have the precise Word of Allah, and Muhammad’s real life example, and these things can’t be explained away, “re-interpreted” or altered to fit the modern world. If a Muslim attempts to do that, he is accused of innovation and blasphemy – or worse – shirk and apostasy.

What cave have you been living in? Iran will soon have nukes, and can launch them from ships to either hit our cities, or have them detonate at high altitudes over the US.

And whose fault is it that they got nukes in the first place?

At any rate, our surveillance technology is top notch. There’s no way in hell Iran can get a ship close enough to hit and I doubt even liberals would object to taking them out (at least for now, give them a couple more generations and we’ll be completely pacified).

If they do the latter, they will zap us right back to the stone age!

No threat indeed.

stonemeister on June 26, 2008 at 1:43 AM

Did you read what I said, dumbass? I didn’t say they’re no threat, I said they WOULDN’T BE A THREAT IF IT WASN’T FOR LIBERALS! Iran would not have nukes if the first response to its nuclear enrichment program from the world community had been “bomb their ass”. Here’s an analogy of what’s going on:

Us = human body
Radical Islam = the common cold
Liberalism = AIDS

Under normal circumstances, the human body can disperse the common cold with little problems. Suffer from AIDS though, and even something as benign as a cold can kill you.