In the three years I have posted on HA, I believe this ranks as one of the most incredibly obscene, mean spirited, obnoxious, disgusting posts I have ever read.
You think…never mind, you won’t get it, but others (except for maybe one or two posting) will see your post and shake their head in disgust and realize that minds like yours is how we have reached a new low in society…complete intolerance, you are obviously not a Christian or a person of any real faith.
Unbelievable post, unbelievable hate…from someone with so little to offer, you must have a very lonely and pathetic life, or you keep your thoughts to yourself and use these posts to live a life you can’t expose publicly.
Here is a link that will make you feel comfortable and accept your vitriol…it is a gift to you (and a couple of others would embrace this also) from me, acknowledging your belief.
May you find peace…

right2bright on June 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM

This qualifies as nonsense.

How are true statements construed as hate? Truth is truth or as the phrase goes, it is what it is.

Anna, in a fit of desperation, played the my-mommy’s-one-of-them card. I guess she thought that since she was a nice person, that made her mommy less of a deviant.

Exactly how does that work?

Once again, hypocrisy seems to be rule #1. This deviant behavior is supposed to be acceptable and okay yet if I talk about it or draw conclusions from it, then it is somehow negative, hateful, and vitriolic to talk about.

So if it is not so good, why talk about it? We were having a perfectly good discussion until Anna played her “trump” card. Why, I haven’t got a clue.

And here comes a knight in battered armor to . . . ???

Please identify what I said that is not suitable for hotair. (I am fairly sure that this was put in to try to get the attention of AP or EM, hoping they might be upset.)

Just so we are clear, If I were to be quoting the Bible or making moral pronouncements, you might be justified in being upset with me. But I merely asked the three questions I always ask the deviant sexual practitioners:

1. How would I know if you didn’t announce it?

2. If you announce it in public, how can it be private?

3. How can it be natural if it cannot reproduce its kind?

Those are the three keys to opening up hell, as the post I quoted shows quite dramatically.

Soon we shall round you all up.

SouthernDem on June 28, 2008 at 11:31 AM

no doubt.

It’s ok, my list for the concentration camps to put people like right4life for their reeducation is growing.

Soon we shall round you all up.

No, dear Anna, your mommie is deceived but she doesn’t fight her own battles. She indoctrinates her child to do her fighting for her. This is not a good thing for children.

To the extent that your love for your mother has a condition of approving her deviance, it isn’t really love but merely a transaction. And not a fair one, since it deceives you into believing that your mother’s deviant behavior is both worth defending and worth proclaiming to the world.

The mark of a deceived mind is the loss of personal shame. Neither you nor your mother appear to have any shame about queer sex. That’s sad but it does not have to be permanent.

platypus on June 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM

In the three years I have posted on HA, I believe this ranks as one of the most incredibly obscene, mean spirited, obnoxious, disgusting posts I have ever read.
You think…never mind, you won’t get it, but others (except for maybe one or two posting) will see your post and shake their head in disgust and realize that minds like yours is how we have reached a new low in society…complete intolerance, you are obviously not a Christian or a person of any real faith.
Unbelievable post, unbelievable hate…from someone with so little to offer, you must have a very lonely and pathetic life, or you keep your thoughts to yourself and use these posts to live a life you can’t expose publicly.
Here is a link that will make you feel comfortable and accept your vitriol…it is a gift to you (and a couple of others would embrace this also) from me, acknowledging your belief.
May you find peace…

I read that person’s comment and I actually hoped you were done coming to this thread so you wouldn’t have to read the nonsense.
Ugh!

bridgetown on June 27, 2008 at 8:43 PM

I am seriously interested in what I said that you consider nonsense. Or is it something someone else said?

Before you answer, you might want to think about what it is that was added to the conversation by Anna outing her mother. And what it is that is so sacred about her momma’s lesbian behavior that I am condemned for my views about it?

Seriously – just what is it that is nonsense?

I know you think you are smart but you really aren’t. You keep coming back with nonsensical, liberal handbook statements. Trying to refute your stupid statements would be like banging my head against the wall and I am smarter then that

yeah these pro-gay types are legends in their own minds…only.

their like darwiniacs, they spew talking points, but are unable to think for themselves…it really is amusing…and sad…

but you know their savior will soon raise his wounded head….

How is it restricting speech Or thought on the rest of the population?

bridgetown on June 27, 2008 at 7:50 PM

this has gotten to the point of casting pearls before swine, but I enjoy seeing you run like a scalded dog when confronted (go ahead and tell me I’m full of HATE again)

As gays make gains, some religious institutions are coming under pressure. For instance:

• A Christian high school in Wildomar, Calif., is being sued for expelling two students on suspicion of being lesbian. The parents’ suit claims that the school is a business under state civil rights law, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.

• Catholic Charities in Boston, where same-sex marriage is legal, recently shuttered its adoption agency rather than serve gay and lesbian couples in conflict with church teaching. The church’s request for a religious waiver from state antidiscrimination rules has made no headway.

• Christian clubs at several universities are fighting to maintain school recognition while restricting their leadership to those who conform to their beliefs on homosexuality.

Meanwhile, the Christian Legal Society and similar groups are mounting a national effort to challenge antidiscrimination policies in court, claiming they end up discriminating against conservative Christians.

link

the gays are using this as a club against christians in order to silence and legally sanction christians, basically to drive us out of existence.

and given our judges, you’ll win, in the short term…in the long term…well…..you know about he who laughs last…right??

Lots of platforms have been repudiated for political expediency.

peacenprosperity on June 27, 2008 at 7:33 PM

what these clowns don’t get is that NAMBLA EXISTS…

and that says it all.

That platform has been repudiated over and over again by everyone outside of NAMBLA.

Squid Shark on June 27, 2008 at 7:30 PM

oh yeah a ’sister souljah’ moment…I DENOUNCE you…wink…wink….*smirk*

although you are naive enough to buy it!!

I came around here questioning people. I am simply trying to understand why people are so freakin afraid of the gay lifestyles.

we understand people like you all too well..you will never understand us…it would require intelligence, thoughtfulness, and maturity, none of which you have demonstrated

There you go, finally stating the only basis for your position that you have. A hollow, emotional statement. It means absolutely nothing and is without logic or reason. In your orwellian world partnership already equals marriage? So who will you deny “partnerships” to? And are you the one to decide that? Polygamists? People who love animals? How about those who love children? How do you feel about laws of consent?

you know she can’t answer that, it would require thought…none of these ‘gay rights’ types can answer that!!

oh no, because their ‘logic’ can be used to justify pedophiles, murderers, rapists, anyone…its ‘genetic’ so there’s an excuse for anything.

So sanctimonous yet arrogant enough to use G-d’s full name.

tsk tsk.

He’s my Father, and He lets me. too bad you don’t know Him.

See now I am imposing my morals on you.

this is just laughable…you think you’re making some profound point, when all you’re doing is revealing your stupidity…I mean you must be in a great deal of pain.

you are exercising your freedom of speech, your right…and you’re not imposing your morals on me….you would have to do that through force of law…like the gays are doing…

are you ever going to get a clue???

grow up.

thanks for the laughs…are you for real?? no one can be such a dope.

Squid Shark on June 27, 2008 at 7:00 PM

Apparantly you are too smart to actually have a dialogue here.
Are you afraid to answer my simple question? And what is the harm in ‘trying to refute my stupid statements’?

You have no idea what I think is okay or what I think about anything.
I came around here questioning people. I am simply trying to understand why people are so freakin afraid of the gay lifestyles.
Oh, but you are gone now..so I’m typing to myself. That’s actually a good thing. I tire of hearing you try and define what I am, and avoiding any discussion.

And I don’t think anybody would blame you for feeling that way.
I read that person’s comment and I actually hoped you were done coming to this thread so you wouldn’t have to read the nonsense.
Ugh!

There I go again? I asked a question. You won’t answer it? You kneejerk butter knife.
sheesh

I know you think you are smart but you really aren’t. You keep coming back with nonsensical, liberal handbook statements. Trying to refute your stupid statements would be like banging my head against the wall and I am smarter then that. I’ll make one more statement and then I’m on my way and you can add anything you want. I refer to people like you as flatlanders. You think nothing will ever change, nothing has consequences, that this country will be exactly the same in 100 years as it is now. And to answer your question, again, you think it is ok to fundamentally change something that most of your fellow citizens disagree with against their will and believe that nothing you feel strongly about will ever changed against your will. Your in for a rude awakening.

platypus on June 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM

This is the last time I will ever engage you in public discourse. I do not often hold people in contempt – but do not consider yourself privilaged that I do so to you.

There you go again. you knee jerk liberal.

peacenprosperity on June 27, 2008 at 8:21 PM

There I go again? I asked a question. You won’t answer it? You kneejerk butter knife.
sheesh

No. You are wrong.
Children do not consent to sex with people who molest them.
Two Adults DO consent.

blah, blah, blah with your trying to box me in and label what I am.
If I am not understanding how forcing sex on a child or animal is different than TWO Adults consenting…explain how you think I am wrong.
Get over your trying to define me.
We’re talking about Gay relationships. Try to focus.

A marriage contract doesn’t have anything to do with Sex either.

Well when you and your fellow moral relativists have your way it won’t mean anything. Gay people have all the rights that are bundled into marriage now. What possibly could a government conveying some kind of legitimacy on a relationship add to it?

And, again, from what you write, I assume you have no problem with lesbian sex. It’s just the men that you are against, huh?

There you go again. you knee jerk liberal.

And again, bringing up sex with children has nothing to do with consensual sex between two adults.

It absolutely does and that’s what you don’t understand. You feeling enlightened and compassionate today by throwing reality out the window leads where? What standard is next? What taboo is next? You are a post modernist and probably don’t even realize it. Most traditions, morals, taboos came out of practical reasons and were couched in religion to make it more palatable for the heathens. These things grew out of the negative and harmful results of bad behavior. Post modernism wants to tear down everything that came before, taboos, traditions, morals without consideration of the underlying purpose.

Well, knowing a few gay couples myself, I can tell you that things are not all about having sex. These are loving unions between two consenting adults.
A marriage contract doesn’t have anything to do with Sex either.
And, again, from what you write, I assume you have no problem with lesbian sex. It’s just the men that you are against, huh?

Nice. So you attack me, not even slyly, while I mention I’m not going to be around.

My mother is one of those ‘queer deviants’ you keep talking about. A Lady of Lesbos, if you will. (My posts always get moderated when I use the ‘L-word.’) I, on the other hand, am straight. What either my mother or I do in the privacy of our respective homes is nobody’s concern. While personally, I do not approve of gay marriage (civil unions are different), I choose to remember that gays are humans too, worthy of basic human respect.

Besides, there are more straights into ‘deviant sex’ than gays, because there are more straights than gays period. I say this, because I have a gut instinct anything other than basic missionary with the lights out is ‘deviant’ to you.

Anna on June 27, 2008 at 5:51 PM

Straw man (or straw woman). Logical analysis is not attack. Besides, the rest of your post indicates that you are quite comfortable with the queer lifestyle, to the point of identifying your mother as being of that persuasion.

It’s only fair that I point out that you would not be here if there was such a thing as a lesbian and if your mother actually was one. But I digress.

Most “straights” who practice deviant sex do not have hundreds of sexual encounters with hundreds of different people. If they do have deviant heterosexual practices, it is usually inside a monogamous relationship.

I agree with you that what you do in your private abode is your business. But I have a question – how would I know what you do in that private abode of yours? Assuming I am not committing a crime (trespass, voyeur, etc.), the only source of that information is YOU SPEAKING IT.

So how is it private if you SPEAK IT IN PUBLIC? Not to mention who is responsible (not me).

No, dear Anna, your mommie is deceived but she doesn’t fight her own battles. She indoctrinates her child to do her fighting for her. This is not a good thing for children.

To the extent that your love for your mother has a condition of approving her deviance, it isn’t really love but merely a transaction. And not a fair one, since it deceives you into believing that your mother’s deviant behavior is both worth defending and worth proclaiming to the world.

The mark of a deceived mind is the loss of personal shame. Neither you nor your mother appear to have any shame about queer sex. That’s sad but it does not have to be permanent.

we have melded the religious marriage with the contracted union endorsed by the state.

Yes, and besides the usual control and money the government seeks out of regulating our lives, government stepped into marriage to protect women and children, not help to Mike and Mike’s self esteem.