UNSC takes watered-down action on Zimbabwe

posted at 7:05 am on June 24, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

After almost three months of sitting on the sidelines, the UN Security Council finally took some action on Zimbabwe — by going only as far as declaring reality.  The UNSC met last night and condemned the Robert Mugabe regime for its campaign of violence, and declared that the Friday run-off election would be a travesty and unrecognized by the international community. However, they stopped short of the first real, meaningful action that they could take:

Outraged at the turmoil in Zimbabwe, the U.N. Security Council declared that a fair presidential vote is impossible because of the “campaign of violence” waged by President Robert Mugabe’s government.

“Outraged”?  Well, not quite.  The US, Britain, and France tried to put some teeth into the resolution by declaring Mugabe’s rule illegitimate in light of the March election, and recognizing Morgan Tsvangirai as the elected president of Zimbabwe.  That effort got quashed by the usual suspects — China and Russia, the latter of which didn’t even want the matter discussed at the UNSC.

South Africa also opposed the stronger measures.  The Thabo Mbeki government, which has thus far managed to keep its lips firmly gripped to Mugabe’s gluteus maximus, offered a howler instead.  Their UN ambassador suggested that the UNSC leave it to Zimbabweans to determine whether to hold the run-off or rely on the March elections to determine whether Tsvangirai is the legitimate president.  Of course, if they could do that, the issue wouldn’t be at the UNSC at all.  Maybe South Africa missed the headlines, but Mugabe’s army and militias are raping, pillaging, and murdering through the districts that supported Tsvangirai, which makes it just a tad difficult to believe that Zimbabwe can hold any kind of poll or referendum at the moment.

I suppose we should be grateful that the UN has done anything after three months of inaction, but this shows once again how useless they can be.  Once again, China and Russia prop up murderous dictatorships, and once again, the UN winds up issuing declarations and refusing to take any action at all.  They’ll be the first to insist, though, that we need to send billions of dollars to feed Mugabe’s victims over the next few years, rather than act to solve the problem now.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

McCain’s League of Democracies looks better every day.

Their UN ambassador suggested that the UNSC leave it to Zimbabweans to determine whether to hold the run-off or rely on the March elections to determine whether Tsvangirai is the legitimate president.

What part of “dictator” don’t these people understand?

jimmy the notable on June 24, 2008 at 7:16 AM

I suppose we should be grateful that the UN has done anything after three months of inaction…

I’m having a hard time getting to grateful. This type of “action” might serve more to embolden Mugabe and like-minded thugs than silence, which at least breads some level of uncertainty as to what might happen.

12thman on June 24, 2008 at 7:54 AM

The US, Britain, and France tried to put some teeth into the resolution by declaring Mugabe’s rule illegitimate

Really? I must have missed the speaches by our un delegates calling the resolution a travesty and demanding action. Which countries ambassador beat the table with his shoe?

peacenprosperity on June 24, 2008 at 7:56 AM

McCain’s League of Democracies looks better every day.

So why doesn’t he talk about it more? Why doesn’t he freaking make a speech about the UN and China and Russia, and the brutality in Zimbabwe.

Why doesn’t Bush??

Why do we have the meekest and mildest people for our leaders?

What the hell has happened to our country?

JiangxiDad on June 24, 2008 at 7:57 AM

Here’s a plan of action that the UN should
consider,how about, when holding elections
in Zimbabwe,it would be a step forward if
Mugebe would stop killing,raping,pillaging
his voters in that order!

Send him the letter,he’s got 24hrs.

If not,have his entire military capabilites
wiped out!

canopfor on June 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM

Yes, we need to seriously work on a league of democracies, and China and Russia in their current incarnations need not apply.
Perhaps they can have their own league, of Kleptocratic Authoritarian Oligarchic Stooges, yes, KAOS, that will do nicely.

Maquis on June 24, 2008 at 8:16 AM

I suppose we should be grateful that the UN has done anything after three months of inaction, but this shows once again how useless they can be.

I hate to say “I told you so,” but …. Oh, heck. No, I don’t.

I told you so.

irishspy on June 24, 2008 at 8:27 AM

Thabo Mbeki probably wishes he could find a way do to the whites in S. Africa, what Mugabe has done them in Zimbabwe.

MarkTheGreat on June 24, 2008 at 8:38 AM

C’mon. Just put Mugabe in charge of a commission on racism in the US and call it a day.

awake on June 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM

It’s long past time for the U.S. to kick this corrupt and ineffectual organization to the curb.

AZCoyote on June 24, 2008 at 8:51 AM

What the hell has happened to our country?

JiangxiDad on June 24, 2008 at 7:57 AM

What happens to every prosperous society: its people become more and more complacent. If something doesn’t hit their comfort level, they don’t care.

Darth Executor on June 24, 2008 at 9:01 AM

Putin’s thugs are no better than Mug-abe’s. Neither are the Chi-coms. Bring on the League of Democracies!

jgapinoy on June 24, 2008 at 9:02 AM

Thabo Mbeki probably wishes he could find a way do to the whites in S. Africa, what Mugabe has done them in Zimbabwe.

Mbeki is an idiot, but not completely insane, as is Mugabe.

drjohn on June 24, 2008 at 9:03 AM

Zimbabwe: the next Rwanda. “Never again!” What a laugh!

One cruise missile associated with a meeting of Mugabe and his generals would go a long way in ‘expressing outrage’.

michaelo on June 24, 2008 at 9:17 AM

Good for the U.N. Their plan is working. It’s only a matter of time till Zimbabwe becomes a jihadi training ground, and begins a nuclear weapons program with foreign aid money or from the sale of donated foodstuffs on the black market. Inspection of the nuclear facilities will be done with the same attention to detail/political agenda to which we have become accustomed.

a capella on June 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM

Incompetent.
Corrupt.
Impotent.
Irrelevant.

Jaibones on June 24, 2008 at 9:24 AM

South Africa, the new Zimbabwe

davod on June 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM

“I suppose we should be grateful that the UN has done anything after three months of inaction”

An action that wasn’t worth a penny of what was spent to take it. Cindy Sheehan’s “actions” are worth more and have more force. Can we get her to do something?

We really ought to recall our ambassador from South Africa and maybe close our consulate there. There’s no reason to associate with tyrants or their support mechanisms. We ought to also find a willing neighbor to facilitate arming up Mugabe’s opposition quickly. It’s going to be bloody anyway, so it might as well not be a slaughter and I’m not in the mood for a President Obama doing a Clintonesque apology by saying he’s sorry Bush was President at the time.

Dusty on June 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM

he UNSC met last night and condemned the Robert Mugabe regime for its campaign of violence, and declared that the Friday run-off election would be a travesty and unrecognized by the international community.

Ooh. A UN condemnation. I bet Mugabe is shaking in his boots.

Too bad there wasn’t a stained blue dress as part of the equation. The bombing may have already started.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM

Zimbabwe? What state does that reside in? The Puritans called it “holy watching”; most people call it sticking your nose where it doesn’t belong. The comments on this board look more like something that I would see Clintonistas saying during the 90s. Let’s just change the name USA to WPD (World Police Department) and quit with the false advertising.

LevStrauss on June 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM

Once again, the SC shuffles it’s feet and mumbles, unwilling to meet your eyes.

mojo on June 24, 2008 at 12:23 PM

LevStrauss on June 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM?
You may see it that way, I see it a bit differently. I prefer that various idiots perceive the US as hostile to them. In fact, I believe the world would be a better place if the idiots thought it likely that we would give them the heave ho. While you smuggly sit there on your high horse, there are people dying in Mugabe’s hell and you have a problem with tough talk? I say we should try to scare the living Sh** out of them and if we have a decent shot? Yes, I’d pop a cruise missle or 2 up his tailpipe. Call it taking out the trash. BTW WPD? I believe we took that position in a strange little place called Korea a few years back.

Dawnsblood on June 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM

Jimah Catah installed the man, Jiamh should have to go dislocate him, clean up one of his messes himself for once.

And diplomacy is going to work with similar despots if Barry O does it? Why not give him a trial run…have Barry and Michelle go down there and fix things. Good experience for the man…and woman.

Harry Schell on June 24, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Dawnsblood on June 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM

I don’t have a problem with vocal condemnation of actions but I do have a problem with vocal call for action. It is none of our business. Yes people are dying, but they are also dying and oppressed in countries that are our allies. Should we talk tough to China? Do you agree with all this Olympic boycott nonsense? Yet we still heavily trade with China and the moral indignation seems to stop when it costs fifty cents more for a non Chinese widget. Saudi oil anyone? Granted some allies like this are great for torturing people we want to, since we (technically) do not engage in these actions, but they seem to be just as evil as Mugabe. I had no high horse to get off of, there are no high horses in foreign policy, just pretend ones.

WPD, you are damn right and selective enforcement is the rule.

LevStrauss on June 24, 2008 at 1:36 PM

I am still waiting for what the Democrat presumptive presidential nominee, Sen. Messiah Barack has to say about the situation. I mean, he is after all the first black to lead a major political party in the presidential election. He wants to be the commander-in-chief and I am s t i l l w a i t, yawn, i n g! This is a no-brainer, but without a script, I am not sure where Sen. Messiah Barack’s brains are.

righty64 on June 24, 2008 at 2:02 PM

UNSC;

A fair presidential vote is impossible due to the “campaign of violence’ waged by Robert Mugabe’s government. (Like we care.)

Mugabe’s military, reporting to Mugabe;

Mission Accomplished.

Mugabe to his military;

Not until you get Tsavangirai, it isn’t!(Remember My First Rule; Anybody Who Disses Me Needs To Die On General Principles.)

Jimmy Carter, Andrew Young, etc.;

My legs are tingling. (Does the Obamessiah know that this can be done?)

Things will get worse before they get better. And, I fear, not just in Mugabestan.

clear ether

eon

eon on June 24, 2008 at 5:44 PM

jgapinoy on June 24, 2008 at 9:02 AM

The League of Democracies would be a total sham because it would inevitably include pretend democracies.

aengus on June 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM