Anyone who has put in “apple pie” or “banana split” or even “rubber ball” is usually assualted with porn spam. I know I didn’t appreciate it as I was looking for a special ball for my dog. I wasn’t looking for a ball gag!

upinak on June 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM

People say this all the time. But I think you’re seeing a ghost image of the Web from a few years back.

Google’s politics suck, but their search queries have become far more relevant. For instance, doing a search on the three words you mentioned and drilling down 2 pages did not take me to any obvious pron sites.

What search engine/ truck stop are you using to log in and find this ubiquitous porn.

To further my point, I suggest doing a search on an vulgar term. P***y is an old fav. Google image search it. Only one picture of the flesh flower.

***
Save your ball gag search anecdotes for the swingers bridge club. And I’m sorry you need the web to find a “rubber ball” for your dog. Nice euphamism by the way.

You find pron because you look for it. The last time I accidentally clicked a porn link gas was $2.

Porn finds horny fingers everytime.

HERE is data for the US.

and HERE is the same data set for JUST California.

Pretty much the same. I guess people are people and they want their sex and porn.

I guess we know what’s on people’s mind most of the time. ;)

For the Google data to be persuasive, Walters also has to show that all residents of Pensacola use Google whenever they want to look for something. That means they don’t look in books, magazines, on the DIY network…just Google.

Yeah…Pensacolans who are looking for porn on Google go to Google. That’s all the “evidence” is saying.

Interesting!!

Check out the ‘orgy’ spike in 2006.

Did I miss out on something?

cjn on June 24, 2008 at 1:23 PM

Must have, though I’m drawing a blank.

NoDonkey on June 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM

You very obviously don’t get it, and that’s fine. Porn isn’t for everyone, but it’s not necessarily a replacement for “eating the goodies.”

I wonder if it was, perchance, related to Paris Hilton?

Wasn’t that event what got Obama his election win?

Check out the ‘orgy’ spike in 2006.

Did I miss out on something?

cjn on June 24, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I don’t think so. They haven’t released anything since 2005.

NoDonkey on June 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Eating goodies and stirring batter eh?

Pervert.

Like going to a bakery and slobbering on the window.

If I can’t get into the kitchen and eat the goodies, no point in watching the bakers stir the batter.

The human body is obscene? That is an obscene idea.

LevStrauss on June 24, 2008 at 1:47 PM

I like naked ladies. Red blood in my veins.

upinak on June 24, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Shoulda just told her it was an anti-snoring device :)

Hollowpoint on June 24, 2008 at 1:34 PM

2 yrs ago? I didn’t mention that fact… sorry.

From the individual perspective, whether another will take ‘offense’ is an unknown and unknowable subjective standard. To then craft law that penalizes people for such vague and potentially capricious ‘offenses’ is horrendous.

Suck. It. Up.

(OK….not a good choice of phrase given the subject matter)

Anyone who has put in “apple pie” or “banana split” or even “rubber ball” is usually assualted with porn spam. I know I didn’t appreciate it as I was looking for a special ball for my dog. I wasn’t looking for a ball gag!

upinak on June 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM

I just Googled all three terms with filtering off, and wasn’t “assaulted” with porn. In fact, I saw none on the first two pages of any of them.

That’s what they all say ;)

LimeyGeek on June 24, 2008 at 1:29 PM

Yeah, the sad part I was on my Mom’s computer during Christmas and she was standing behind me. Talk about embarrassing!

I wasn’t looking for a ball gag!

That’s what they all say ;)

We don’t need no stinkin’ constitution!