theregoestheneighborhood on June 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM

very good one!

Iran is no threat to anyone, especially not Americans.

The fringe right, however…is the most violent gang in the world today.

alphie on June 24, 2008 at 9:48 PM

You do realize people are snickering at this nonsense….

Heck, I wish John Bolton has run for president. He would eat Obama alive in the debates.

dmann on June 24, 2008 at 10:24 PM

very true, its not a good idea to cast pearls before swine!

alphie does that to people….its not worth the effort!

Seem your Antisemitism is showing.

this from a supporter of the mad mullahs in iran!!

and by the way you talk, you’re a muslim, an iranian right?

again, are you a plant??

sure sounds like it.

whatever you are, you’re a wacko nut job who doesn’t deserve the freedoms of this country…go back to iran you no good piece of trash.

Seem your Antisemitism is showing.

You one of those Christians who expect all the Jews to be burning in hell soon?

Seems you left what little grey matter you have in the porta-potty tank!

The fringe right, however…is the most violent gang in the world today.

oh you must mean those NEO-cons (ie jews) right??

yeah you sound like one of those aryan iranians…

If Iran is so bad…why did Reagan(and Israel) sell Iran (and Hezbollah) missiles in exchange for cash for the Contras, right?

since they’re so nice, why are you here? why don’t you move over there? or are you some kind of plant?

Iran is no threat to anyone, especially not Americans.

yeah they just need nukes to ‘protect’ themselves from big bad Israel and Amerikkka…right. all that talk about wiping israel off the map is just the good ole iranian boys way of ‘making nice’

sure…

After the Lebanon bombings.

Because Israel and America’s right wing wasn’t so crazy back then…

Iran is no threat to anyone, especially not Americans.

The fringe right, however…is the most violent gang in the world today.

Is Israel capable of staging an attack on Iran without U.S. air/logistical support?

The IAF has acquired 2 airframes designed for such long- range deep penetration surgical strikes. The F-16i and the F-15i; the F-16i Sufa is the most advanced strike version of the Falcon on the planet and the F-15i Ra’am is the Israeli version of our F-15E strike eagle. Both aircraft are arguably the finest strike aircraft in existence and should have little difficulty handling Iranian air-to-air and ground based threats w/o additional escort aircraft. Both aircraft are two up which allows for a much more complete and sophisticated ECM and weapons suit to be employed. It is a question of will, not capability.

I’d say the Iranian civilian jetliner the U.S. Navy shot down is worse than everything Iran has done over the past 25 years, right.

I’d say they richly deserved it, and much more, they were behind the Lebanon bombing of our marines that killed 241 american.

and given the Iranians, I would have no doubt they used that jet to violate our airspace to try to get international sympathy. I have none for them.

but you don’t have a problem with that, now do you? they were also behind the murder of our diplomats in lebanon in the 80s…they are terror central…

but you don’t have a problem with them killing jews and americans, now do you?

All our hostages lived…remember?

Unlike the bloated children Iran had to fish out of the Gulf…nice shootin’, Navy.

Iran hasn’t attacked another country in hundreds of years…Israel attacks one about once a week.

Who’s the problem here?

really? so taking our diplomats hostage isn’t an act of war? uh huh..so funding hamas, and sending bombs to Iraq to kill our soldiers isn’t an attack?

are you an iranian plant, or just a quisling?

A Russian retaliation? I doubt Russia is invested enough in the welfare of Iran, which hasn’t exactly been timely with payments and has had sanctions already leveraged against it by Russia, to retaliate against Israel/US.

amerpundit on June 24, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Iran will be in the lead, Russia will enter that war reluctantly, but enter it they will

Iran hasn’t attacked another country in hundreds of years…Israel attacks one about once a week.

Who’s the problem here?

For a strike at that distance, they would not be able to carry close to that much armament.

NOt for the level of strike that would be necessary to destroy the Iranian nuclear program. Much more likely to be a relatively small strike on a small number of targets that are central to the program; that would delay but not eliminate the potential for the bomb.

Or does “reality-based” mean it’s jew season again.

JiangxiDad on June 24, 2008 at 6:51 PM

That’s correct. But alphie is a pvssy so it really doesn’t matter.

it would look like a panic move precipitated by a total lack of confidence in the new administration to handle the Iranian threat.

barry’s foreign relations team will be even less qualified to deal with an even more dangerous world then they were the first time with carter. Things are going to be very scary this time next year.

We’re back in reality-based times.

Thank god.

alphie on June 24, 2008 at 6:31 PM

I would understand your point better if you thought Israel shouldn’t attack, or if you hoped Iran would win, or any number of opinions. But to think that Israel will allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon while threatening to destroy Israel with it will not lead to war is to live in a fantasy world.

I’m beginning to think your return to “reality-based” times might have something to do with Mr. Obama. Am I getting close? Or does “reality-based” mean it’s jew season again.

Why does the most violent country in the Middle East have to strike again?

Pork, plain and simple…

alphie on June 24, 2008 at 5:56 PM

That’s not Kosher, troll.