<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Progressive stagnation on energy policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think_b4_speaking</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1202149</link>
		<dc:creator>Think_b4_speaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1202149</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We can’t drill our own oil because it won’t solve anything, but let’s sue OPEC for not drilling more of theirs.  
posted at 4:15 pm on June 23, 2008 by Ed Morrissey 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
.
This hypocrisy is not pointed out strongly enough....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We can’t drill our own oil because it won’t solve anything, but let’s sue OPEC for not drilling more of theirs.<br />
posted at 4:15 pm on June 23, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
</p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
This hypocrisy is not pointed out strongly enough&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srhoades</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1202115</link>
		<dc:creator>srhoades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1202115</guid>
		<description>Some one needs to tell BHO that the reason were not drilling in the US is because the Oil Companies are sitting on 68 million acres that they don&#039;t want to exploit because it&#039;ll drive prices down and profits up . . . wait, profits up and prices down?  Danged Democrat talking points never make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some one needs to tell BHO that the reason were not drilling in the US is because the Oil Companies are sitting on 68 million acres that they don&#8217;t want to exploit because it&#8217;ll drive prices down and profits up . . . wait, profits up and prices down?  Danged Democrat talking points never make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irenaeus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201872</link>
		<dc:creator>Irenaeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201872</guid>
		<description>If drilling would help...he would consider it...??!!

Gee thank you almighty one for even considering, to consider it. 

I think &lt;strong&gt;we the people &lt;/strong&gt;should have a say on that too, wouldn&#039;t ya think Mr.O?!

God help us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If drilling would help&#8230;he would consider it&#8230;??!!</p>
<p>Gee thank you almighty one for even considering, to consider it. </p>
<p>I think <strong>we the people </strong>should have a say on that too, wouldn&#8217;t ya think Mr.O?!</p>
<p>God help us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerseyman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201220</link>
		<dc:creator>jerseyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201220</guid>
		<description>I left out war as a means of reducing demand. Dems now oppose war becuase the US is fighting to reduce suffering, save lives, and improve prosperity. Notice how the Dems do not say or do much about the one-sided despot/revolutionaries who kill innocent civilians and farmers (in large numbers.) When you look at the 1 million murder club you find some very interesting characters that tend to be looked up to (Stalin, Mao, Hitler (Hitler was a good guy until he turned on Stalin), Pol Pot, Castro, to top the list) and received a pass. This is the economic reality that Democrats/Progressives/Liberals/Socialists are dealing with and their solution to reduce demand (including the demand for freedom, prosperity, and happiness) has always led to death and suffering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left out war as a means of reducing demand. Dems now oppose war becuase the US is fighting to reduce suffering, save lives, and improve prosperity. Notice how the Dems do not say or do much about the one-sided despot/revolutionaries who kill innocent civilians and farmers (in large numbers.) When you look at the 1 million murder club you find some very interesting characters that tend to be looked up to (Stalin, Mao, Hitler (Hitler was a good guy until he turned on Stalin), Pol Pot, Castro, to top the list) and received a pass. This is the economic reality that Democrats/Progressives/Liberals/Socialists are dealing with and their solution to reduce demand (including the demand for freedom, prosperity, and happiness) has always led to death and suffering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerseyman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201189</link>
		<dc:creator>jerseyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201189</guid>
		<description>The Democrat/Progressive/Socialist solution is to reduce demand rather than increase supply. Wear sweaters, pay higher gas prices (just don&#039;t let it go up TOO fast). The final solution: reduce demand by reducing people. That is the Obama solution - more abortions, more euthaniasia, take people off life support and feeding tubes (Terry Schiavo). Convert food into fuel to increase prices and initiate famine. Take out the oil companies and pharmaceuticals for making things better and saving lives. Abortions, famines, and epimdemics: the Dems solution to high gas prices. The solution is amazingly clear for the Dems. Unfortunately, they can not state their final and ultimate solution right now, and must wait until they have the power and the means to keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrat/Progressive/Socialist solution is to reduce demand rather than increase supply. Wear sweaters, pay higher gas prices (just don&#8217;t let it go up TOO fast). The final solution: reduce demand by reducing people. That is the Obama solution &#8211; more abortions, more euthaniasia, take people off life support and feeding tubes (Terry Schiavo). Convert food into fuel to increase prices and initiate famine. Take out the oil companies and pharmaceuticals for making things better and saving lives. Abortions, famines, and epimdemics: the Dems solution to high gas prices. The solution is amazingly clear for the Dems. Unfortunately, they can not state their final and ultimate solution right now, and must wait until they have the power and the means to keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201126</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201126</guid>
		<description>The &quot;well-educated Obama cult&quot; were RECENTLY educated by ultra-liberal professors within the last five years or so. They don&#039;t remember the Carter years because they weren&#039;t born yet. Their professors are part of Murphy&#039;s Law: If you can&#039;t work, teach. 

I had an interesting conversation today with a black co-worker, who was a toddler during the Carter years. She was complaining about the price of gasoline, and I shared with her that the US has lots of shale oil and offshore oil, but that Obama doesn&#039;t want us to use it, but tax the oil companies, and that was tried in the 1970&#039;s, when we had odd/even gasoline rationing and mile-long lines at gas stations at 6:00 AM. I also explained that McCain is in favor of drilling offshore, and that the scare stories about oil spills are hyped--how many oil spills were there when Katrina hit the Gulf of Mexico?

Obama might well have lost a black voter today...

Maybe if we give them a history lesson, Obama might lose some of his young cult following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;well-educated Obama cult&#8221; were RECENTLY educated by ultra-liberal professors within the last five years or so. They don&#8217;t remember the Carter years because they weren&#8217;t born yet. Their professors are part of Murphy&#8217;s Law: If you can&#8217;t work, teach. </p>
<p>I had an interesting conversation today with a black co-worker, who was a toddler during the Carter years. She was complaining about the price of gasoline, and I shared with her that the US has lots of shale oil and offshore oil, but that Obama doesn&#8217;t want us to use it, but tax the oil companies, and that was tried in the 1970&#8242;s, when we had odd/even gasoline rationing and mile-long lines at gas stations at 6:00 AM. I also explained that McCain is in favor of drilling offshore, and that the scare stories about oil spills are hyped&#8211;how many oil spills were there when Katrina hit the Gulf of Mexico?</p>
<p>Obama might well have lost a black voter today&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe if we give them a history lesson, Obama might lose some of his young cult following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201083</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201083</guid>
		<description>They needed to date Carter&#039;s talk.  Without the date no-one knows it has been thirty years of saying the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They needed to date Carter&#8217;s talk.  Without the date no-one knows it has been thirty years of saying the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201048</link>
		<dc:creator>eon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201048</guid>
		<description>Once more we see the &quot;progressives&quot; doing a bob-and-weave on energy. Now it&#039;s 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;&lt;em&gt;Let&#039;s move beyond oil, and invent new energy sources to replace it.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 We did that sixty-six years ago, Baby. It&#039;s called &lt;em&gt;Atomic Power&lt;/em&gt;. You know, the &quot;evil&quot; power you forbid us to use?

 As for Obamessiah&#039;s claim that &quot;we should wait&quot;, &quot;waiting for newer and better technology&quot; is why;

1. It took 22 years to get the F-22 into even limited service

2. The B-52 is still our primary heavy bomber

3. We are still using aircraft carriers built when Ford was President (and one launched under JFK)

4. And our standard infantry rifle is a fifty-two-year-old design that has been cursed by the troops throughout its tenure (yes, the M-16 series.)

 This &quot;bait-and-switch&quot; has been used quite successfully by the &quot;progressives&quot; to thwart nearly every R &amp; D program for improving our military&#039;s technology (and almost every procurement program just to &lt;em&gt;replace&lt;/em&gt; worn or outdated equipment) since their &quot;Camelot&quot;, the Vietnam debacle&#039; in 1975.

 Today, they are re-deploying the gag to do the same number on our energy development. But this time they are playing for much bigger stakes. The last time around, all they wanted to do was to defang the U.S. military, and so help the Soviet Union conquer the world in the belief that they would be part of the new global &lt;em&gt;nomenklatura&lt;/em&gt;.

 Today, they want to turn out the lights on our civilization once and for all. And start over again- without most of the rest of us.

 But don&#039;t worry about Baby Alex, their new &quot;poster child&quot;. He&#039;ll have a job for sure.

 When the &quot;enlightened ones&quot; need a country conquered so that they can have energy to heat their cappucinos (while the rest of us-who are still around- are heating our yurts with dung), you can bet that they&#039;ll hand by-then-eighteen-year-old Alex a rifle and tell him to get on with the job.

 And it will probably still be some variant of M-16.

 (Bring a can of Break-Free CLP, Alex. You&#039;ll need it.)

clear ether

eon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once more we see the &#8220;progressives&#8221; doing a bob-and-weave on energy. Now it&#8217;s </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;<em>Let&#8217;s move beyond oil, and invent new energy sources to replace it.</em>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p> We did that sixty-six years ago, Baby. It&#8217;s called <em>Atomic Power</em>. You know, the &#8220;evil&#8221; power you forbid us to use?</p>
<p> As for Obamessiah&#8217;s claim that &#8220;we should wait&#8221;, &#8220;waiting for newer and better technology&#8221; is why;</p>
<p>1. It took 22 years to get the F-22 into even limited service</p>
<p>2. The B-52 is still our primary heavy bomber</p>
<p>3. We are still using aircraft carriers built when Ford was President (and one launched under JFK)</p>
<p>4. And our standard infantry rifle is a fifty-two-year-old design that has been cursed by the troops throughout its tenure (yes, the M-16 series.)</p>
<p> This &#8220;bait-and-switch&#8221; has been used quite successfully by the &#8220;progressives&#8221; to thwart nearly every R &amp; D program for improving our military&#8217;s technology (and almost every procurement program just to <em>replace</em> worn or outdated equipment) since their &#8220;Camelot&#8221;, the Vietnam debacle&#8217; in 1975.</p>
<p> Today, they are re-deploying the gag to do the same number on our energy development. But this time they are playing for much bigger stakes. The last time around, all they wanted to do was to defang the U.S. military, and so help the Soviet Union conquer the world in the belief that they would be part of the new global <em>nomenklatura</em>.</p>
<p> Today, they want to turn out the lights on our civilization once and for all. And start over again- without most of the rest of us.</p>
<p> But don&#8217;t worry about Baby Alex, their new &#8220;poster child&#8221;. He&#8217;ll have a job for sure.</p>
<p> When the &#8220;enlightened ones&#8221; need a country conquered so that they can have energy to heat their cappucinos (while the rest of us-who are still around- are heating our yurts with dung), you can bet that they&#8217;ll hand by-then-eighteen-year-old Alex a rifle and tell him to get on with the job.</p>
<p> And it will probably still be some variant of M-16.</p>
<p> (Bring a can of Break-Free CLP, Alex. You&#8217;ll need it.)</p>
<p>clear ether</p>
<p>eon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upinak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1201040</link>
		<dc:creator>upinak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1201040</guid>
		<description>I love how we were almost out of oil in the 70&#039;s.  yet we are still going strong!

Anyone else think that the Bell Curve is a hoax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how we were almost out of oil in the 70&#8242;s.  yet we are still going strong!</p>
<p>Anyone else think that the Bell Curve is a hoax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel sutherland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200993</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200993</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Failed Domestic &amp; Foreign policies, gas lines, nothing worthy of merit accomplished, four long disapointing years and out he went to cause mischief and mayhem, violate the Logan Act and support evey tyrant, marxist and Islamic Fanatic, representing US as the Worst Ex-President ever.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How ironic it is that a former President that told us to roll back everything we do ended up the foreign minister of OPEC.

OPEC has no interest at all in cutting back consumption in anything.  And still President Carter jetsets around the world on petrodollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Failed Domestic &amp; Foreign policies, gas lines, nothing worthy of merit accomplished, four long disapointing years and out he went to cause mischief and mayhem, violate the Logan Act and support evey tyrant, marxist and Islamic Fanatic, representing US as the Worst Ex-President ever.</p></blockquote>
<p>How ironic it is that a former President that told us to roll back everything we do ended up the foreign minister of OPEC.</p>
<p>OPEC has no interest at all in cutting back consumption in anything.  And still President Carter jetsets around the world on petrodollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200986</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200986</guid>
		<description>Well if the REps had not been acting like Carter&#039;s lapdogs for the last 8 years we wouldn&#039;t be in this place.   

the reps kicked the ball down the field on ANWR, on OCS drilling, on nuclear power, on refineries etc.   they had the power for 6 years to get these things done.  I know filibusters in the Senate etc  but still you would think with majorities for 6 years they would have got something done.   

I&#039;m sure the dems with majorities will get stuff done.  No one is going to like what they get done but I bet they get their dsocialism passed quickly.   Look how fast the CFL lightbulb energy policy was enacted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if the REps had not been acting like Carter&#8217;s lapdogs for the last 8 years we wouldn&#8217;t be in this place.   </p>
<p>the reps kicked the ball down the field on ANWR, on OCS drilling, on nuclear power, on refineries etc.   they had the power for 6 years to get these things done.  I know filibusters in the Senate etc  but still you would think with majorities for 6 years they would have got something done.   </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the dems with majorities will get stuff done.  No one is going to like what they get done but I bet they get their dsocialism passed quickly.   Look how fast the CFL lightbulb energy policy was enacted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200974</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200974</guid>
		<description>The Jimmy &#039;the dumb&#039; Carter speech I remember is him saying the world will be completely out of oil by the year 2000. He is a nuclear engineer afterall. Of course that came after his other speeches failed to excite the needed fear, so he went for the long bomb. You have to ratchet up the rhetoric, which is where we are at today.

Too bad he didn&#039;t do that with the Iranians, who established terror central under his watch. Carter also installed that nice fellow Mugabe.

Hansen, a government scientist, testifying before a government committee, saying Oil Exces should be tried and jailed -- That&#039;s just too rich. Government anything, at the top of the list scientists, are not honest brokers of fact. Never have been and it&#039;s getting worse. When Government scientists testify before government committees to alarm and frighten, we are clearly reaching new for new levels of control.

The Environmental Marxists, that is exactly what they are, want you to believe that you should pay more in taxes so government can PRETEND to control the weather. How will you know if they are telling the truth or when you should just laugh in their faces?

The most recent example the polar bear hoax. Polar bears numbers have grown once world market hunting was controlled. Polar bears are nothing more than brown bears who migrated north and turned white to better hide from seals. They have only been around 150,000 years or so. If we need, we can make more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jimmy &#8216;the dumb&#8217; Carter speech I remember is him saying the world will be completely out of oil by the year 2000. He is a nuclear engineer afterall. Of course that came after his other speeches failed to excite the needed fear, so he went for the long bomb. You have to ratchet up the rhetoric, which is where we are at today.</p>
<p>Too bad he didn&#8217;t do that with the Iranians, who established terror central under his watch. Carter also installed that nice fellow Mugabe.</p>
<p>Hansen, a government scientist, testifying before a government committee, saying Oil Exces should be tried and jailed &#8212; That&#8217;s just too rich. Government anything, at the top of the list scientists, are not honest brokers of fact. Never have been and it&#8217;s getting worse. When Government scientists testify before government committees to alarm and frighten, we are clearly reaching new for new levels of control.</p>
<p>The Environmental Marxists, that is exactly what they are, want you to believe that you should pay more in taxes so government can PRETEND to control the weather. How will you know if they are telling the truth or when you should just laugh in their faces?</p>
<p>The most recent example the polar bear hoax. Polar bears numbers have grown once world market hunting was controlled. Polar bears are nothing more than brown bears who migrated north and turned white to better hide from seals. They have only been around 150,000 years or so. If we need, we can make more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200963</link>
		<dc:creator>forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200963</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s why the Democrats have been such pessimists about, well, everything...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No doubt, but Obama is still getting away with being relentlessly pessimistic while appearing to be optimistic (hopechange blah blah).

I don&#039;t think the magic act will hold up for another 6 months - even with the complicity of the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s why the Democrats have been such pessimists about, well, everything&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>No doubt, but Obama is still getting away with being relentlessly pessimistic while appearing to be optimistic (hopechange blah blah).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the magic act will hold up for another 6 months &#8211; even with the complicity of the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200921</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That was a bit short. I’d like to see some of this.

Buy Danish on June 23, 2008 at 4:33 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Barack Obama simply makes me sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That was a bit short. I’d like to see some of this.</p>
<p>Buy Danish on June 23, 2008 at 4:33 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Barack Obama simply makes me sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200903</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200903</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t want a football coach who doesn&#039;t believe his team has a chance of winning now or in the future.  

Unless said football coach was oily enough to convince the fans that he would siphon the bank accounts of the players and give it to the fans.  

Barak Obama - Gerry Faust without the morals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t want a football coach who doesn&#8217;t believe his team has a chance of winning now or in the future.  </p>
<p>Unless said football coach was oily enough to convince the fans that he would siphon the bank accounts of the players and give it to the fans.  </p>
<p>Barak Obama &#8211; Gerry Faust without the morals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old trooper</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200900</link>
		<dc:creator>old trooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200900</guid>
		<description>Carter, I remember those years. Failed Domestic &amp; Foreign policies, gas lines, nothing worthy of merit accomplished,  four long disapointing years and out he went to cause mischief and mayhem, violate the Logan Act and support evey tyrant, marxist and Islamic Fanatic, representing US as the Worst Ex-President ever.

It is so typical that Obama would choose the failed Carter policies as the template for &quot;hope and change&quot;. Not a lick of common sense there folks!

What amazes me is that the Obama cult, some of them well educated, can&#039;t remember those dark days of the Carter Administration. 

I recommend term limits for Congress and raising the voting age to 50. 50 year olds were not taught revisionist history in school. They had to live with the results of poor judgement on the part of fools that elected folks like Carter to the Presidency. They have grandchildren that are fighting for freedom right now and perhaps have had the time to see the consequences of voting foolishly.

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carter, I remember those years. Failed Domestic &amp; Foreign policies, gas lines, nothing worthy of merit accomplished,  four long disapointing years and out he went to cause mischief and mayhem, violate the Logan Act and support evey tyrant, marxist and Islamic Fanatic, representing US as the Worst Ex-President ever.</p>
<p>It is so typical that Obama would choose the failed Carter policies as the template for &#8220;hope and change&#8221;. Not a lick of common sense there folks!</p>
<p>What amazes me is that the Obama cult, some of them well educated, can&#8217;t remember those dark days of the Carter Administration. </p>
<p>I recommend term limits for Congress and raising the voting age to 50. 50 year olds were not taught revisionist history in school. They had to live with the results of poor judgement on the part of fools that elected folks like Carter to the Presidency. They have grandchildren that are fighting for freedom right now and perhaps have had the time to see the consequences of voting foolishly.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterpeasea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200865</link>
		<dc:creator>misterpeasea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200865</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/21/with-rising-gas-prices-reluctance-to-drilling-fades/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;That reminds me&lt;/a&gt;:

119 Paul Says: You know, if thenation had enacted Jimmy Carter’s energy plan when he proposed it we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.

bmw 528 Says: &lt;blockquote&gt;Paul @ 119: 

You know, if thenation had enacted Jimmy Carter’s energy plan when he proposed it we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Amen, brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/21/with-rising-gas-prices-reluctance-to-drilling-fades/" rel="nofollow">That reminds me</a>:</p>
<p>119 Paul Says: You know, if thenation had enacted Jimmy Carter’s energy plan when he proposed it we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.</p>
<p>bmw 528 Says:<br />
<blockquote>Paul @ 119: </p>
<p>You know, if thenation had enacted Jimmy Carter’s energy plan when he proposed it we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KelliD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200858</link>
		<dc:creator>KelliD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200858</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget according to the McCotter &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/20/how-to-speak-democrat-a-lecture-by-rep-thad-mccotter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Primer&lt;/a&gt;, Progressive=Regressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget according to the McCotter <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/20/how-to-speak-democrat-a-lecture-by-rep-thad-mccotter/" rel="nofollow">Primer</a>, Progressive=Regressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200856</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200856</guid>
		<description>That was a bit short. I&#039;d like to see some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXIvmJ8xenc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a bit short. I&#8217;d like to see some of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXIvmJ8xenc" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200854</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200854</guid>
		<description>Democrats say that we can&#039;t drill our way out of the oil problems, I say, well can&#039;t tax, regulate and sue our way out of the oil problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats say that we can&#8217;t drill our way out of the oil problems, I say, well can&#8217;t tax, regulate and sue our way out of the oil problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel sutherland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200843</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200843</guid>
		<description>This video is remarkably terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video is remarkably terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maquis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200817</link>
		<dc:creator>Maquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200817</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
    Progressive stagnation stagflation on energy policy

Fixed it to a more Carter-appropriate term.

thirteen28 on June 23, 2008 at 4:18 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps &quot;stagfection&quot;?  All the Libs have caught it after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
    Progressive stagnation stagflation on energy policy</p>
<p>Fixed it to a more Carter-appropriate term.</p>
<p>thirteen28 on June 23, 2008 at 4:18 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps &#8220;stagfection&#8221;?  All the Libs have caught it after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-1200795</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/23/video-progressive-stagnation-on-energy-policy/#comment-1200795</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Progressive &lt;strike&gt;stagnation&lt;/strike&gt; stagflation on energy policy&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fixed it to a more Carter-appropriate term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Progressive <strike>stagnation</strike> stagflation on energy policy</p></blockquote>
<p>Fixed it to a more Carter-appropriate term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
