Tsvangirai withdraws after violence escalates
posted at 9:39 am on June 22, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
It looks like Robert Mugabe won’t have to worry about rigging the run-off election after all. After a crescendo of violence in Zimbabwe that culminated in “thousands” of pro-Mugabe militia members attacking an MDC rally today, Morgan Tsvangirai will withdraw from the June 27th election. He will announce later today that the contest was useless anyway and that he wants to end the violence:
Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai was preparing to announce he was pulling out of a run-off presidential election, a source in his party said on Sunday, after President Robert Mugabe’s supporters attacked his rally.
The source in the opposition Movement for Democratic Change said Tsvangirai would cite violence and strong-arm tactics by Mugabe’s pro-security forces and militia for his decision to withdraw from the June 27 vote.
“A decision has been taken that it is not worth our while to go into the election because of the violence and because (the ruling) ZANU-PF has decided on the outcome already,” the MDC source said on condition of anonymity.
The MDC estimates that at least 70 of its activists have been murdered in the period between the last election and now, mostly in the last three or four weeks. Supporters have been driven out of their homes by the thousands, and Mugabe’s forces have begun raping female MDC supporters in a campaign of intimidation. Two spouses of MDC officials have been burned to death, along with at least one child.
Last week, Mugabe insisted that he would not turn power over to Tsvangirai regardless of the results of the election. The Zimbabwe military has made it clear they support that decision. Under those circumstances, it makes little sense for Tsvangirai to continue in a process that would allow Mugabe to manipulate a vote to bolster his own credibility, especially when the military has itself embarked on a campaign of terror against Zimbabweans to ensure Mugabe’s victory through intimidation.
In the short term, this leaves the field clear for Mugabe, but at a high cost. The scales have begun to fall from the eyes of his neighbors, who announced a few days ago that conducting an election under these circumstances would be a travesty. The economy, already at the point of collapse, will now be burdened with thousands of more homeless people, while foreign nations will be even less likely to provide assistance to Mugabe.
Tsvangirai’s withdrawal may wind up having more resonance than his opposition. It is a form of non-violent protest meant to expose tyranny. The question will be whether the world will respond, especially Tsvangirai’s fellow Africans, to what Tsvangirai has exposed. So far, the world has not shown the slightest inclination to do so.
Update: One commenter asks whether this means we should “bomb bomb Harare” to intervene. There are intermediate steps that can take place before bombing. The UN and the SADC could take the following actions:
- Charge Mugabe and his military commanders with crimes against humanity
- Seize all assets held abroad by Mugabe and his advisers
- List Zimbabwe’s military and militias as terrorist organizations
- Refuse to offer diplomatic status to Zimbabwean officials traveling abroad
- Close the borders to all shipments going into Zimbabwe — a complete embargo
The first would not do much, but the rest of these would cripple Mugabe. Unfortunately, no multilateral organization has even begun to consider these steps or anything close to them.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“The question will be whether the world will respond, especially Tsvangirai’s fellow Africans, to what Tsvangirai has exposed. So far, the world has not shown the slightest inclination to do so.”
Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Mugabe?
Omega_Rage on June 22, 2008 at 9:50 AM
Rock, hard place. If MDC stayed in the result would be more deaths at the hands of the dictator, but this withdrawl will also mean that the other African nations, and the west, can just go away and forget about the whole thing. The UN isn’t going to be inspired by this play by the MDC, they will be relieved.
I don’t blame MDC. They had to choose between slaughter and principle. I blame the UN, they are men of butter and Zimbabwe is too hot for them.
Limerick on June 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM
The world will not respond. The media has decided that Black dictators typically do things like rape, torture, & murder political opponents, so there’s no news here.
jgapinoy on June 22, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Some sort of intervention MUST happen now.
malan89 on June 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM
S.Africa has not shown sufficient interest in the plight of those living under black dictatorships. You may wish to contact their embassy to register your request.
JiangxiDad on June 22, 2008 at 10:05 AM
It’s time for the US Gov’t to rethink it’s position on political assassination.
harrison on June 22, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Just how many US Universities gave this guy honorary degrees?
ParisParamus on June 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Has anyone asked Obama if Carter’s judgment on Mugabe mirrors his own since wealth redistribution is certainly involved. Just wonderin’.
a capella on June 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM
I wonder this myself. Russia and China remain uncivilized governments whose foreign policy pronouncements are meaningless acts of Machiavellian self-interest.
But is it simply that Europe regards 9th century behavior on the part of black African leaders as a given, and not worthy of condemnation? No wonder liberals admire Europeans.
Jaibones on June 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Britain would love to help but that last time Britain spoke up Mugabe silenced them simply by raising the spectre of the ‘gay gangsters’.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/508712.stm
Cue: Multi-culti cognitive dissonance meltdown followed by total silence from the UK.
Ares on June 22, 2008 at 10:23 AM
The only way Mugabe would ever be charged would be if he were a Jew and his victims were ‘Palestinians.’ That’s the only thing the ‘international community’ cares about these days. Ask the Sudanese in Darfur.
Carl in Jerusalem on June 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM
So justice is finally achieved and the democratically elected benevolent and much loved Mugabe takes his rightful place. It was touch and go for a while but we of the left knew truth and justice would prevail as it will this November when the magnificent BO takes his rightful palace and perfection blankets this country and quite possibly the world. I continue to be amazed at the blindness the conservatives show to the accomplishments of the greatest leaders of the last century Castro, Mao, Kim Jung Il, Che, Imadinnerjacket, Chaves, Carter, Sheehan and of course Mugabe. These men have brought such greatness to their countries and are some of the most loved men of history. I for one will drop to my knees this November and thank Gaia for giving us BO and saving her wonderful polar bears. I will weep for joy as BO joins the list of the greatest men of history.
jmarcure on June 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM
I wonder if Jimmy Carter and Andrew Young still think it was a good idea to nix the original political deal for Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, thus clearing the way for Mugabe.
They have a helluva legacy, there.
irishspy on June 22, 2008 at 10:39 AM
I have friends over there right now working in one of the smaller towns as missionaries. They (and their family) have been over there for decades, and they say that this is about the worst it’s ever been.
its vintage duh on June 22, 2008 at 10:46 AM
Rrriiiggghhhtttt.
Heehee
peacenprosperity on June 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Robert Mugabe is a little Hitler and needs to be dealt with. Him and Hugo Chavez need to be dealt with by means other than elections.
Maxx on June 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Damn blue-eyed devils at it again eh?
DfDeportation on June 22, 2008 at 11:35 AM
ParisParamus (10:12)
UMass
Edinburgh
MSU is debating the idea
Mugabe holds a degree in economics from London University
Either London University isn’t much of a school, or Mugabe didn’t learn anything about economics while there.
rockhauler on June 22, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Don’t worry, animal rights activists (including those on this board) will be more up in arms over throwing a sick puppy to its death by a Marine than they will over there. Nothing to see, move along.
Tim Burton on June 22, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Yeap. And these two will be carted about Denver as Pashas on elephants with rose petals thrown at their feet. They don’t care what happens in any country such as this, as long as it is purged of U.S. or Western influence. That is how Clinton and Albright operated and the way Obama would operate as POTUS. The Donks for some sick reason believe U.S. national interests should never be protected.
JonRoss on June 22, 2008 at 12:36 PM
jmarcure on June 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM
And this event gives us Barack Hussein Obama’s re-election plan for 2012.
Tommygun on June 22, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Wait, an African country is completely screwed up, barbaric and chaotic?
The HELL you say!
Folks, I say the same thing I said a coupel months ago: while Zimbabwe is the the worst in degree, it is qualitatively on the same spectrum as the rest of sub-Saharan africa. The only time Africa was even somewhat civilized was when it was ruled by Europeans.
Which is why these calls to “intervene now!” and, presumably, spread democracy to Zimbabwe are nothing short of insane. You think we got more than we bargained for going to into Iraq? Just wait until you try to make a semi-decent, minimally-functional place out of an African country.
Muswell Hillbilly on June 22, 2008 at 1:12 PM
That is so sad…and such a price he has paid already, I can’t blame him. Has anyone asked Jimmy Carter if he’s proud of the work he did to ensure Mugabe’s rule?
Crater REFUSED to honor the will of the people who DEFEATED Mugabe in a real election. Carter REFUSED TO MEET with the democratically elected government when they came to the US…no, Carter knew BETTER than the people that elected Mugabe’s opponent…Carter insisted Mugabe be part of “reconciling the best outcome of the election” and paved the way for Mugabe to rule.
Obama is Carter-appeasement x 10. God save any countries that Obama decides to throw under the bus.
JustTruth101 on June 22, 2008 at 1:18 PM
Progessives and the left support this type dictatorial intimidation…..by washing their hands of the problem.
Let it be known that if was in the power the ultra idalistic, uber liberal neo-cons, this barbarism would be struck down by force.
mylegsareswollen on June 22, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Why should the US bomb Mugabe? The US (and Europe) put Mugabe in power in the first place. He and his merry band of Communist thugs were using the exact same tactics they are now.
aengus on June 22, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Actually that was the one time when Tony Blair did respond to abuse but whatever you have your narrative to follow.
aengus on June 22, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Strap Carter to a JDAM and deliver it to Mugabe.
Maquis on June 22, 2008 at 3:05 PM
mugabe=nyt=human rights watch=pol pot=stalin=idi amin=satan.
But the MSM lobbied tirelessly to run off the colonial people who turned Rhodesia into the breadbasket of Africa. Ahh yes, Dicky Durbin, there are special corners in hell for the likes of you, msm and those mentioned above. When the world stands by and does nothing, it will soon be in our own back yard. And the one who can make it happen (come apart that is) is running for our nations highest office.
wepeople on June 22, 2008 at 3:52 PM
In that picture of Tsvangirai, what is in his hand? Is that a joint in a cigarette holder?
misterpeasea on June 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM
Dude, it’s a pen.
Someone has their mind going in a particular direction…
Muswell Hillbilly on June 22, 2008 at 5:45 PM
The “scales may have fallen” from the eyes of Mugabe’s neighbors, but I’m not holding my breath waiting for a similar moment of lucidity from the likes of Carter, Andrew Young, Dick Durbin, or Senator Obama. As far as they’re concerned, Mugabe is the very model of a True Socialist Great Leader- and they envy him for the way he can “dispense” with his political opposition at his whim.
Speaking of which, if anyone thinks that Mr. Tsavangirai will be safe if he leaves
RhodesiaZimbabweMugabestan, as I said before, consider the fate of Beningo Aquino. In Mugabe’s mind (such as it is), such “defiance” as actually daring to run against him in a (semi)free election cannot be allowed to go unpunished.And after the fact, if anyone protests, he’ll just smile, tell them to f**k off- and go back to figuring out new ways to slaughter people wholesale.
As for why he does any of it- it’s about time we realized that there really are monsters in the world. And they don’t hide in forests, mountains, or “lochs”. In fact, they have an irritating habit of standing on balconies and being cheered by crowds who either do not understand the nature of the beasts that rule them- or do so because they are all too acutely aware of what happens to those who do not cheer and applaud on cue.
And it is our “best and brightest” ( or at least our elites who believe themselves to be such) who keep helping these monsters attain the power they lust after.
With the very best of intentions, of course. Rather like Faust.
cheers
eon
eon on June 22, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Carter stressed that this murderer of tens of thousands “needs to be treated with respect and assured that if he does deal with those issues [democratization and human rights], he won’t be punished or prosecuted for his crimes.“
Carter has also stated recently that it is so much easier to talk to a dictator as opposed to a Democratically elected leader, since the “dictator speaks for all the people.”
JellyToast on June 22, 2008 at 8:20 PM
“In the short term, this leaves the field clear for Mugabe, but at a high cost. The scales have begun to fall from the eyes of his neighbors, who announced a few days ago that conducting an election under these circumstances would be a travesty.
Cover-up more likely. What was the response from South Africa, Zimbabwe should have a coalition government. Mugabe stays, Zimbabwe gets off the front page, the world forgets and Mugabe goes on killing.
This is the same as what happened in Kenya. The opposition leader who lost the election (Yes, I know questions were raised, but by who?) gets into a coalition government as Prime Minister. This is the guy who made a pact with the Kenyan Muslims to push Sharia for all of Kenya. This is the guy whose party activist torched a Christian church with parishioners inside. This is the guty Obama campaigned for in 2006 and who Morris advised.
Great win-win solution.
davod on June 23, 2008 at 9:25 AM