The obligatory “high school girls make pact to get pregnant, and succeed” post
posted at 11:29 am on June 19, 2008 by Allahpundit
There are fads, my friends, and then there are fads.
As summer vacation begins, 17 girls at Gloucester High School are expecting babies—more than four times the number of pregnancies the 1,200-student school had last year. Some adults dismissed the statistic as a blip. Others blamed hit movies like Juno and Knocked Up for glamorizing young unwed mothers. But principal Joseph Sullivan knows at least part of the reason there’s been such a spike in teen pregnancies in this Massachusetts fishing town. School officials started looking into the matter as early as October after an unusual number of girls began filing into the school clinic to find out if they were pregnant. By May, several students had returned multiple times to get pregnancy tests, and on hearing the results, “some girls seemed more upset when they weren’t pregnant than when they were,” Sullivan says. All it took was a few simple questions before nearly half the expecting students, none older than 16, confessed to making a pact to get pregnant and raise their babies together. Then the story got worse. “We found out one of the fathers is a 24-year-old homeless guy,” the principal says, shaking his head…
The girls who made the pregnancy pact—some of whom, according to Sullivan, reacted to the news that they were expecting with high fives and plans for baby showers—declined to be interviewed. So did their parents. But Amanda Ireland, who graduated from Gloucester High on June 8, thinks she knows why these girls wanted to get pregnant. Ireland, 18, gave birth her freshman year and says some of her now pregnant schoolmates regularly approached her in the hall, remarking how lucky she was to have a baby. “They’re so excited to finally have someone to love them unconditionally,” Ireland says. “I try to explain it’s hard to feel loved when an infant is screaming to be fed at 3 a.m.”
Any theories? It screams hoax, but the principal’s corroboration rules that out. The article hints that the phenomenon may have been triggered by an economic downturn in Gloucester, but if that were true this sort of thing would happen periodically everywhere. Likewise the boldfaced part about kids so desperate for love that they’d be willing, literally, to manufacture it. When I read it I thought of the Salem witch trials as another example of teen group psychology being capable of some mighty interesting ideas when the dynamics are just right, but as to what those dynamics are and why this idea, I haven’t a clue.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Says a lot about the innocence of a child that they would love even parents like these.
We are truly a “no consequences” society.
pecan pie on June 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Good grief. Where are these girls parents?
I raised 2 daughters as a single mom and I told them when they even started thinking about becoming sexually active, to tell me! They did and I took them to family planning.
I used my own situation as a deterrent. It sure isnt easy raising children on you own. I feel bad for these girls.
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM
I feel bad for the babies. These are babies having babies and no doubt most will not attend college.
I blame parents, schools and those damn magazines I’m bombarded by in convenience stores with pregnant girls on the cover. This is “IN” now folks. This shouldn’t shock anyone.
Geronimo on June 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Leave it to Mass…
davenp35 on June 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM
The Blue State Blues.
misterpeasea on June 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM
(shakes head)
Some people just have to learn the hard way.
CurtZHP on June 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM
**blank stare**
amerpundit on June 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM
And when are they going to file the statutory rape charges against the 24 year old bum and any other sperm donor involved in this mess?
rbb on June 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM
What else did you expect from government schools that impart their values? Something does not seem right with this.
Exit question: Are any of these girls African-American? I feel like making a donation to Planned Parenthood.
/sarc
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 19, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Global warming.
whitetop on June 19, 2008 at 11:43 AM
I bet at least one of those kids will look like a Kennedy.
Syd B. on June 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM
DISTRACTION !!!
Dirthead on June 19, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Where are the parents? My same thought.
What exactly is family planning?
shick on June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM
I think we should bring back our state marketing slogan/motto of the late 70s/early 80s: Making It In Massachusetts!
D2Boston on June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM
I wonder if this has anything to do with the latest Hollyweird fashion accessory – the “baby bump”.
reaganaut on June 19, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Do they get credit for a group science project?
whitetop on June 19, 2008 at 11:49 AM
I feel sorry for the babies when reality sinks in and these teenagers realize what they’ve gotten themselves into.
AZCoyote on June 19, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Shame died a long time ago. /rolls eyes
It’s really sad for everybody involved (except the 24year old).
rockbend on June 19, 2008 at 11:49 AM
I had a T-shirt that said that back in the day (I think it was Make it in Massachusetts, actually with a big “thumbs up”)
It just changed to Pay it in Taxachusetts. I should make a new one, “If you make it, we’ll pay for it.”
reaganaut on June 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM
All it takes, really, is a gang leader who can convince other susceptible peers to a Great Idea™ and away we go… How’s the 20-something homeless guy come into this? What, did they just roam the streets looking for someone who’d have sex with them?
Seixon on June 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Seems like it.
amerpundit on June 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM
I believe that today’s youth really are this stupid.
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM
I think this is the ultimate consequence of marginalizing the family unit to thinking that marriage, and with that fathers, are unnecessary. These girls are likely from broken or dysfunctional homes and they think that having a child will fill that gap, not realizing that raising a child is the one of the most difficult tasks anyone can take on, plus with the added likelihood that the child will grow up just like them in resenting their parents.
Viewtifulgare on June 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Seems like some folks took “Girls Gone Wild” a little too literally. But God forbid one criticize MSM/mainstream entertainment for its role in influence.
Lockstein13 on June 19, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Obviously this is the fault of gay marriage.
SnarkVader on June 19, 2008 at 11:53 AM
According to the intrawebs age of consent is 16 in Massachusetts.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Is there any doubt that the state Democrats are lining up to offer abortion procures to these young girls?
Geministorm on June 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM
How ugly must you be when your only recourse is to trawl the streets for a bum to impregnate you?
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM
shick on June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM
oops…it’s the free clinic that provides birth control. I had no problem putting them on it and they both went on to graduate from college.
My oldest has been married for 6 years and I now have a 3 yr old grandson and my youngest, who is 20,is still living with me. They both turned out well…if I do say so myself!
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 11:58 AM
At this rate, it’ll sound like a Dyson factory in those clinics…..
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 11:58 AM
“They’re so excited to finally have someone to love them unconditionally,” Ireland says.
They’re teenaged girls. I guess they love their own mothers unconditionally, and never, ever act like a pain in the ass or anything like that. Great thinking there.
Sheesh. You want “unconditional love,” get a friggin’ dog.
Alex_SF on June 19, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Very well done :)
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 11:59 AM
If I’d known this when I was 24. Who knew that 16-year olds were into homeless guys. I could have pretended, taken her back to my box in the alley, softened her up with some Mad Dog and gotten busy.
I kid. I kid, because I love. But hey, this is a dozen new babies McCain can have for his centuries of war. Don’t tell MoveOn.
Vote Sauron 08 on June 19, 2008 at 11:59 AM
One thing that popped out at me in the article was the amount of pregnancy tests they had given out before realzing, “Hey, something is up here.” 150? And some of these girls were going in repeatedly for tests. Something is so very wrong with society and with a school district when tests can be administered over and over and over again to the same girls, and the parents are not contacted about it.
StephC on June 19, 2008 at 11:59 AM
What’s interesting about the article is watching the broken liberal gears work in it. It starts out about these kids choosing to get pregnant and morphs into a rant about how more access to birth control is needed so that kids who want to get pregnant can…um…make balloon animals. Yeah, that’s it.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Anyone ever take a look at the reality programming on MTV or VH1 or any of these other cable channels that pass as “popular culture” these days? The are no taboos anymore- other than being the “white southern Christian” guy. It’s a regular sterotype they cast so that all the cool kids have somebody to mock while they sit around naked in the hot tub.
highhopes on June 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Thank you very much. :)
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM
“Hey, times are economically tough. Let’s get knocked up and live off of government assistance or mommy and daddy.” Everybody involved in this, from the school staff to the girls themselves, are idiots.
Don’t worry though, they’ll get plenty of “conditional” love from Democratic politicians who will be more than happy to take care of them in exchange for their (and their illegitimate kids’) votes (using our tax dollars of course).
Mack08 on June 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Oh yeah, how does this help Michelle Obama’s kids?
Vote Sauron 08 on June 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Hey, my first serious girlfriend got pregnant when we were dating and she was 14 (I was 15). Of course I was a bit surprised, seeing as we hadn’t gone past 2nd base when we broke up (and one month later she was 3 months pregnant).
But, so far as I could tell, she really wanted a kid, and I was one of the “choices” for father figure. There’s a lesson to scar future relationships in there somewhere.
And I have to say, “The Talk” my dad had with me didn’t cover this portion of relationships. I’m not exactly sure how you cover that situation talking to your kids.
gekkobear on June 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM
More true than you believe. Certainly part of the regrettable trend that’s turning matrimony from a basic building block of society, and building block of families, into an archaic irrelevancy, a joke.
RBMN on June 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Soylent Green
You know it makes sense
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:03 PM
I was kidding.
SnarkVader on June 19, 2008 at 12:04 PM
I thought they only used old people in Soylant Green to give it that rough texture and hard to chew toughness.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Holy cow! That was some situation you faced.
As for Dad’s, I’d bet these girls don’t have any. Dad’s teach boys what to do with their physical power over others, and teach girls that they’re precious and special and deserving of proper respect from men.
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Yes. Women can be just as treacherous as men. Be highly discriminatory.
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM
News Flash!! Jamie Lee Spears has had her baby!
Maybe these girls were trying to be like her?
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Think progressive ;)
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Great point!
(I was just going to respond that way when I saw that you already did). : )
jgapinoy on June 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM
At least these kids aren’t killing their babies in the taxpayer-supported abortion mills.
jgapinoy on June 19, 2008 at 12:09 PM
This has to be a hoax. My guess is someone gave the principal bad information, and he’s incautiously repeating it. This simply can’t be true.
Enrique on June 19, 2008 at 12:11 PM
And from the article: “All it took was a few simple questions before nearly half the expecting students, none older than 16…” That implies that quite a few are not 16 and therefore not of the age of consent.
rbb on June 19, 2008 at 12:11 PM
AKA Celebrity Bastard Babies.
Akzed on June 19, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Worldviews matter. Our overall national morality is in the toilet. So do whatever you want to do, there is no God, so be your own god.
Plain and simple.
AP, the Theory you highlighted is a big part of this too: “They’re so excited to finally have someone to love them unconditionally”
kirkill on June 19, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Apropos the need to manufacture someone to be loved by…
Seixon on June 19, 2008 at 12:13 PM
My wife and I turned our house into a maternity home several years ago. We were surprised at the sentiment of several of the girls: “I wanted someone I knew loved me just for me.”
Buford Gooch on June 19, 2008 at 12:13 PM
The article left me with the impression that they were looking for someone to love them unconditionally. Perhaps they are taking the looking for a boy to love because the parents aren’t loving them to even further lengths, creating someone who will love them no matter what.
infidel2 on June 19, 2008 at 12:13 PM
That has to be one of the sadder things I’ve read in recent memory.
I hope their children are born safely … and that they have either the resources and family to raise them well or the courage to give them up for adoption.
TheUnrepentantGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Well when men are marginalized and dads on tv are portrayed is idiots. Fathers aren’t wanted anymore, only sperm donors.
rbj on June 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM
It appears that the media are now promoting one ultra-weird story every day as part of their normal routine.
Every day as a journalist, your job is to lock onto the one “weird” story, especially if it has a sexual angle, and promote that through the roof.
This is partially why it always looks like the world is going to hell. Every day there is some other exaggerated news story promoting weirdness.
indythinker on June 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM
To me the pertinent part of the article was when they discussed the big effort by the school in question to support unwed teen mothers, helping them stay in school and graduate- which predated this explosion of teen pregnancies.
My guess is that most of these girls didn’t see a realistic chance of going to college anyways, and with these highschool support programs for teen mothers the true consequences of having a child so young and out of wedlock was concealed from them. (In fact the attention the pregnant girls received might have made pregnancy appear attractive as a way of gaining attention from adults).
Sackett on June 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Maybe yes, maybe no. But even if most of them got pregnant at 15 no one will be prosecuted because they were trolling for sex themselves and that’s only one year under the age of consent.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM
There is a lot of truth in what you say. These support programs legitimize teen pregnancy if nothing else.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:20 PM
My collie says:
It’s not just the teenage girls that are clueless about love. It’s the parents, as well. Want proof? Most adults in today’s modern, secular society can not even supply the correct answer to the following simple question:
What is the opposite of love?
(It has been my experience in life that only the Christians know the correct answer to this question — and even then, not all of them know the correct answer.)
CyberCipher on June 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Depends on which brand of cornflakes packaging you learn your pop-psych from
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:26 PM
I was able to send my daughter to Penn State with grants,loans and alot of hard work! It is possible to go to college..if you have the desire to do so.
These girls needed parents who cared and encouraged them.
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM
How do you know it wasn’t printed on a Starbucks cup?
My collie says:
CyberCipher on June 19, 2008 at 12:34 PM
I commend you on your success with your daughters. But what you said earlier about your daughters coming to you before they became sexually active would freak me out as a male if my daughters (I have no children myself) came to me with the same information.
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Jimmy likes Elaine very much!
LimeyGeek on June 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Where are the boys/men? Our society has all but given up on celibacy, marriage and monogamy as a possible path. So why are we surprised?
kirkill on June 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM
“They’re so excited to finally have
someone to love thema $1,000 welfare check come in each month unconditionally,”max1 on June 19, 2008 at 12:44 PM
And here I thought you were Unrepentant. Sounds like you might have a soft spot on your heart somewhere after all.
kirkill on June 19, 2008 at 12:45 PM
max1 on June 19, 2008 at 12:44 PM
that’s cold.
kirkill on June 19, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Yet another reason to homeschool your… Wait a sec!
newton on June 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Maybe then could give them up immediately to John McCain for the war effort.
Mack08 on June 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Bottomline: Attention. That’s what these girls want. If they can’t get it from their parents or boys, they’ll seek it from their peers or a kid. We 80s kids had “For Keeps”; these girls have “Juno”. Throw in Hollywood Bump Watch and special teen pregnancy programs and it makes the whole thing so much more fun, I suppose.
Mrs. Happy Housewife on June 19, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Wouldn’t be at all surprised to find this happen in my school, and as long as we provide the money to enable girls to do it without consequences, it’ll continue to happen.
I’ve a 10th grader in my summer school class–her mother is EXCITED about the coming baby. She’s 7 months preggers. 15. Her mom was buying baby clothes before the first prenatal appointment.
Sheesh.
Bob's Kid on June 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Seinfeld is part of the problem.
My collie says:
CyberCipher on June 19, 2008 at 12:58 PM
one of the fathers is a 24-year-old homeless guy
I’m either doing something very right, or very wrong.
I R A Darth Aggie on June 19, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I used to live in a state where you could find dozens of ‘households’ where 3-5 generations live together off of government assistance, all the so-called adult females having gotten pregnant between 13-17.
Not so coincidentally…
I went to the last home highschool football game to see my friend’s son play and they had a ceremony to honor the senior players that would be leaving highschool in the spring. Each senior was walked out one at a time with their proud parents to the applause of the crowd. 80% of the children of one race has both parents walk them on to the field. 95% of the children of another race had only one parent (or no parent, with other relative or girlfriend walking with them) walk them out to the field.
There were probably a million reasons, but it didn’t look good.
rockbend on June 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I question the timing method…
CBarker on June 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I suspected that possibility. Parents are very protective of their children and their methods of raising them and you seem confident that telling them to use birth control was the right decision. I can only imagine the difficulty of raising your girls on your own. I am glad they are doing well. Congratulations grandma!
I understand your concern that their careers would have been stunted if you hadn’t. But does the end (college graduation) justifiy the means (birth control)?
I have four children of my own. One is coming of age and College graduation would be a plus. I too would prefer that they wait for children so I suggest abstinence until marriage. But this isn’t the main or only reason for this suggestion. I suggest to my kids to save virginity for the right person. They will know who the right person is after getting to know their level of spirituality, responsibility and selflessness.
I think this level of conditioning children helps prepare them for a sick and twisted world.
I’m not smart enough to think of this on my own. God’s word has provided me wisdom.
shick on June 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
NotCoach on June 19, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Thanks a lot. Trust me..I wasnt thrilled. My daughters though were both in long term relationships, had been dating the same boy for 2 yrs. I knew it was only a matter of time so as much as I wanted to cover my eyes and ears…I didnt. I also didnt want to be like my mother..who said nothing to me about sex.
I also didnt want details. yikes!
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 1:01 PM
And it irritates me because I have two college-educated daughters who don’t have babies because they’re not married. They’d love to have a baby and they’d be good mothers–but they very inteligently want to be married first.
If only they could find a couple of good ones!
Bob's Kid on June 19, 2008 at 1:02 PM
…Ted Kennedy was unavailable for comment…
danarchy on June 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM
The social stigma surrounding having bastard children seems to have been entirely obliterated among poorer demographics. Undoubtly this was aided and abetted by the very enlightened folks who now bemoan this outcome.
Sometimes social stigamas and prejudices are rather useful things, and their abolition yields disastrous results lihe this.
phronesis on June 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM
I promise to say a prayer for your daughters.
Look at the bright side — at least your daughters are looking for “good ones.” I am astonished at how many young women enthusiastically latch-on to the “bad boys.” AllahPundit posted a link in the headlines about it just yesterday.
CyberCipher on June 19, 2008 at 1:10 PM
Well, when you hear the following every day, I can understand.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 19, 2008 at 1:11 PM
shick on June 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I also stressed the value of abstinence and I made sure we attended church regularly. They both were in the church choir, went to church camp and in high school they were involved in band,chorus and drama club. That too gave them activities to keep them busy and boosted their self-esteem.
I have a very supportive church that I had belonged to all my life, that accepted my girls even thought I wasnt married. Their father walked out on them, preferring to be drunk than be a dad.
I have friends who also thought I was crazy to put my girls on birth control. These friends are now raising their grandchildren due to the mother’s drug addictions.
It all boils down to kids needing parents who care to be involved and to be active parents. I see too many children born to mothers too young and the children suffer. In the end, it is up to parents to love their children. :)
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 1:11 PM
Great that your daughters turned out so well. However, what if they thought they were ready for sex at age 12? 15? 17? Sorry, but the pill doesn’t protect against life altering STDs and condoms are only effective 85% of the time – in preventing pregnancy mind you. A girl can only get pregnant a couple days a month, but can catch an STD 24/7.
I cannot imagine giving the go ahead to my children regarding sexual activity. I believe teaching them to wait for marriage is the best lesson a parent can teach their child.
wytammic on June 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM
They will! We’re in the same boat, except our daughter is still in college. She realizes the importance of 2 parent families. Their time will come. :)
wytammic on June 19, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Don’t tell me…this is a public school.
And their parents should be educated, kids need to be taught what responsibility is, from parents and the school. Instead it’s; you want sex, here is how to make it work.
The parents, teachers, and kids have reaped what they have sown.
*
I have news for these girls, the baby doesn’t “love you” unconditionally. Babies only know how to take, you perceive what they “give”. Babies only want, if they are hungry they tell you, messy diapers they tell you, sleepy they tell you. They demand, and you obey.
right2bright on June 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Someone should tell those girls that Katie’s baby bump was FAKE!
The prosthetic baby bump should be more widely marketed. Then girls can pretend to be pregnant. They could get all the attention of a pregnant girl from their teen friends. Then when they tire of all the attention and cash in their baby shower gifts, they can ditch the bump.
Lothar on June 19, 2008 at 1:22 PM
wytammic on June 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM
My girls weren’t interested in boys at that age(12,13,14) and they weren’t allowed to date until they were 16. They had curfews and I knew where they were at all times(or thought I did). They also were almost 18 and had been seeing these boys for several years. They then dated these boys for 5 to 7 years.
Trust me..my youngest is a nurse and my oldest is a vet assistant so they were educated on STD’s..they also went on Depo-Provera, not the pill.
I just felt it was a good choice for me and my daughters. I wasnt going cover my eyes to the fact that kids have sex….even if they have been taught to abstain. My daughters were always open and talked with me about everything. I was not advocating for teens to have sex at all.
becki51758 on June 19, 2008 at 1:23 PM
I agree that parents are not being responsible. I believe that good parenting is the central artery that has been cut and causing everything good in this country to go gangrene while bandaids of parental substitution wether it be TV, school, friends, or Hillary’s village only exacerbate the problem.
The turning away from God’s word is what’s causing people to turn away from good parenting. I’m not saying that a person can’t be a good parent if they are not Christians. God’s common grace has given levels of wisdom to unbelievers.
shick on June 19, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Understood. It’s what we do as parents, the best we know how. :)
wytammic on June 19, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Yep, a gaggle of 17 year old girls running around so desperate to have sex that they’ll bed a homeless man. Used to happen to me all the time.
Potfry on June 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM
Sadly, the whole concept of the baby as “someone that will love you unconditionally” is somewhat common among high school girls.
It always confused me when my peers in high school would say that, since, I thought the whole thing was that a mother’s love was unconditional. That’s God’s way of keeping mom’s from killing whiny little snot-nosed, smelly-diapered, temper throwing kids that have just gotten done telling their parent that they hate them just because mom said it was nap time. It keeps us from going extinct.
I don’t recall anything at all about a child’s love being unconditional.
JadeNYU on June 19, 2008 at 1:41 PM
One other note. God’s law says that we should not commit adultery. Christ said, “But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. – Matthew 5:28″
Sin resides not simply in the act of fornication but within the heart. That’s where man and woman must protect themselves from temptation.
The devil will always be their to tempt. He does it well. This must be understood.
I prepare my children against the temptation of lust and that we may respond in sin against God in our thoughts before we even sin in deed. We must shield ourselves with the gift of faith from God to extinguish the arrows of evil one.
God bless.
shick on June 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »