Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Tsvangirai’s Optimism

posted at 7:40 am on June 16, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Morgan Tsvangirai spoke with Time Magazine as he risks his life and his freedom to challenge Robert Mugabe for power in Zimbabwe. Tsvangirai has already been arrested several times during the run-off campaign, one Tsvangirai and his MDC party insisted was unnecessary. With Mugabe threatening to hold power regardless of the result of the election, Time wondered what kept Tsvangirai focused on his campaign:

After the first round of elections in March, you told TIME that the country was entering a new phase, which was about the transfer of power and easing Mugabe out of office. Do you still see it like that? How has the post-election violence changed the game?
It still remains the focus. It is the transfer of power. It’s a contest for power now; it’s no longer about voting in terms of what percentages, et cetera. It still remains, How do we transfer power from a man who believes he has got the divine right to rule forever and who does not respect the will of the people, because the will of the people was expressed clearly on March 29, and it will be reaffirmed again on the 27th of June. But still the remaining question is, Will he concede? Will he accept a smooth transition? That still remains a vexing question.

You’ve been detained four times since returning to Zimbabwe [after six weeks of seeking support in Africa and abroad following the March poll], your supporters are being attacked and you’re essentially being prevented from campaigning. How badly has the MDC been weakened since the March elections?
There’s no way you can underrate the impact of this violence, especially in the rural areas. But we are really encouraged and inspired by the will of the people to finish off what they started on March 29. Were it not for the will of the people and the claim by the people that we can’t look back, one could have said, “What’s the point of continuing this campaign?” But for the sake of those who have died and been traumatized, I think it’s the fulfillment of their wish to have this change that has kept us in the field and that will keep us fighting on.

You’ve said that the military is essentially in charge in Zimbabwe now. What do you have to gain, beyond showing once more that this is a regime that is determined to keep itself in power now matter what the Zimbabwean people want?
We want them to say that. We want them to act that way, because then they will have removed any residual legitimacy they had. In fact, they should act to that extreme, and then they will have exposed themselves. And I’m sure that the South African Development Community and the African Union and the whole international community will see the military junta that is in place for what it is.

Reading through this interview, one detects a strong note of fatalism. Tsvangirai clearly does not expect Mugabe to peacefully hand over power if he loses the run-off. He expects the Mugabe regime to become an explicit military dictatorship in the aftermath of a run-off loss, and Tsvangirai apparently expects that to make a difference to the international community.

Unfortunately, Tsvangirai gives the multinational organizations too much credit. No one seriously considers the Mugabe regime democratic, and neither the UN nor the SADC has given any indication that they want to bother with Zimbabwe. South Africa’s Thabo Mbeki has busied himself pretending that Mugabe isn’t a murderous dictator for the last three months and shows no signs of removing his lips from Mugabe’s backside now. The UN can’t even deal with an Iran that wants to go nuclear while funding terrorist groups all across the Middle East. It’s no wonder that they feted Mugabe in Rome earlier this month while Mugabe used food aid as a political weapon on his starving people.

The ugly truth is that Mugabe will almost certainly rig the election results, if he can’t achieve the same end by burning his opposition alive. When he does, the world will ignore it, perhaps issuing a tut-tut while emulating Mbeki and embracing the tyrant.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Tsvangirai is a walking martyr. And, perhaps, as you alluded, a victim of the fantasy that the UN is what it claims itself to be, something no African should have any illusions about. This is a difficult thing to watch.

Maquis on June 16, 2008 at 7:48 AM

How could this guy be so naive?

Carl in Jerusalem on June 16, 2008 at 7:51 AM

Zimbabwe has been the victim of muddle-headedness on the part of international “social reformers” for the last thirty years, going back to Jimmy Carter. To expect the UN, at this late date, to stand up to a thug like Mugabe is expecting the Sun to rise in the west tomorrow morning.

And even if there is some sort of international move to censure Mugabe, it will not last. For the simple reason that too many of those very same “reformers” secretly (or not so secretly) admire Mugabe. To paraphrase the late, great Graham Chapman re the Piranha Brothers (Doug and Dinsdale), Mugabe does what they can only dream of doing. Their response to him is precisely what it was to Saddam Hussein;

Who cares if he’s slaughtering his own people en masse and at random? He’s just acting as a True Socialist Great Leader should!

As for Mr. Tsavangirai, I fear he will become the Benigno Aquino of Zimbabwe. Make of that what you will.

clear ether

eon

eon on June 16, 2008 at 7:57 AM

Someone please remind me…

Just exactly what is the role of the UN in African affairs or anywhere else in the world for that matter. I’m having a hard time figuring this out.

Someone please tell me why we give them prime New York property, money, security, etc etc…..

Bogeyfre on June 16, 2008 at 8:10 AM

I might be naive,but I thought that the UN was
created as to not allow a tin horn dictator to
run his or her country into the ground!

And again I thought that the UN was formed to
use its teeth if necessary to deal with these
Dictators like Saddam,and I know, what teeth!

Also interesting,is that the Liberal Party normaly
says it cares about third world countries,and not a
peep from the Liberal leadership on this one,and
during a election cycle to boot!!

canopfor on June 16, 2008 at 8:19 AM

Expect what’s left of this guy to be found floating in some crocodile infested river any day now. Also expect the U.N. to do diddly squat about it if that does happen to him.

pilamaye on June 16, 2008 at 8:19 AM

How could this guy be so naive?
Carl in Jerusalem on June 16, 2008 at 7:51 AM

I’m guessing it’s that people (like the UN) have taught them that the UN is all powerful, all wise. They haven’t had exposure to the Western world to know otherwise.

bikermailman on June 16, 2008 at 8:23 AM

!Expect whats left of this guy..
pilamaye on June 16,2008 at 8:19AM

pilamaye:Adding to your point,as the UN operates,
5 years from now,we will find what kind
of UN scam they were running,if any!

However,the UN has an excellent scam record
as in Koff’s son,with the infamous “oil for
food scam” with Iraq!

So,Is the UN a social club! jus sayin ! :)

canopfor on June 16, 2008 at 8:29 AM

Zimbabwe grows food for China but lacks a deepwater port. South Africa has the port. Hungry mouths in China need the Zimbabwe garden. Pieces fit together now?

shaken on June 16, 2008 at 8:53 AM

How could this guy be so naivestill be alive?

peacenprosperity on June 16, 2008 at 9:02 AM

The “soft” racism of low expectations–
Because Mug-abe is Black, the world says, “Nothing unusual or outrageous there.”

jgapinoy on June 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Re. toothless UN: Bring on McCain’s League of Democracies!

jgapinoy on June 16, 2008 at 9:25 AM

Will he concede? Will he accept a smooth transition?

Hopefully he will. But most likely he won’t. And we all know the UN won’t intervene. What will happen to Zimbabwe?

The ugly truth is that Mugabe will almost certainly rig the election results,

He rigged the first round and still lost. Why didn’t he just make himself the winner? This is going to be interesting. June 27. The world will be watching…hopefully.

malan89 on June 16, 2008 at 9:51 AM

To admit that Mugabe is a murderous dictator would be to admit that the events that led to his rise in power were a mistake.

The left is incapable of admitting error. They will continue to pretend that nothing is wrong until the last innocent is dead.

MarkTheGreat on June 16, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Someone please remind me…

Just exactly what is the role of the UN in African affairs or anywhere else in the world for that matter. I’m having a hard time figuring this out.

Someone please tell me why we give them prime New York property, money, security, etc etc…..

Bogeyfre on June 16, 2008 at 8:10 AM

Its role is to support and reinforce dislike of the USA while trying to redistribute the wealth of the USA to others. As a side activity they also try to bring the USA completely under their control by making us feel guilty about, well pretty much everything we do, have or say.

jmarcure on June 16, 2008 at 10:35 AM

To admit that Mugabe is a murderous dictator would be to admit that the events that led to his rise in power were a mistake.

MarkTheGreat on June 16, 2008 at 10:06 AM

I was always under the impression that he was one of the greats in the same league as Che, Castro, Arafat and Chaves. I never got the impression that he was a thug that was ruining his country for personal gain and glory. Don’t forget he was legally elected and continues to get reelected time after time. He must be doing something right.

jmarcure on June 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM

He may be a little naive, or he may have things more finely gauged than do people, like me, who have never set foot in Zimbabwe. But regardless, you can’t fault his courage. My opinion is that we owe more to people like Tsvangirai and Kasparov than we realize. We certainly owe them more than a tut-tut about the unwisdom of their quixotic quests. What people like Tsvangirai and Kasparov do is change the narrative. Who dares now to refer to Mugabe, or Putin, as “democratically elected?” And to whom do we owe that change?

Splunge on June 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.