Dave Rywall on June 16, 2008 at 5:19 AM

Bill… Did you sneak in and use Hillary’s computer without permission again?

Some of you blame Clinton for not finding him pre-911 but give Bush a free pass for 7 years of failure. How retardedly (emphasis mine) partisan, immature – and predictable.

The “R” word? How enlightened you sound when you go around calling people retards!

You miss the real point about Clinton’s involvement with the 9/11/01 atrocities. It isn’t that he was offered OBL and refused. Clinton is blamed for essentially ignoring terrorism for his entire era of bad stewardship. Instead of prosecuting the GWOT he and Janet Reno decided to prosecute each terrorist act as a stand-alone crime. He, Reno, Gorelick, and a host of other minions should have seen the pattern and done something about it- other than to blow up an empty factory.

GWB didn’t get a “7 year pass” on OBL it is just when you are engaged in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, taking out the operation is more important than tracking down a single individual. An individual that could well have been taken care of during the Clinton years had terrorism been prosecuted with the zeal that Clinton prosecuted Microsoft and big tobacco.

Close this WindowBookmark and Share This Page Save to Browser FavoritesAskbackflipblinklistBlogBookmarkBloglinesBlogMarksBlogsvineBUMPzee!CiteULikeco.mmentsConnoteadel.icio.usDotNetKicksDiggdiigodropjack.comdzoneFacebookFarkFavesFeed Me LinksFriendsite…

Some of you blame Clinton for not finding him pre-911 but give Bush a free pass for 7 years of failure. How retardedly partisan, immature – and predictable.

Hell, I’d do exactly the same thing too if I were him. It’s easy poll-building points to score on the stupid unwashed masses.

Zawahiri might have been able to get it done without Osama… He is pretty much the only one in AQ that has any brains, but without Osama writing the checks an handling internal ‘morale’, it would have been a lot harder to do, and a lot more likely to fail.

‘Special projects’, are a lot easier to accomplish when the boss can just write a check for them, rather than having to send the laborers out on the street to beg for money.

Terrye on June 15, 2008 at 10:55 AM”

That is quite a clueless and misinformed observation but you’re more than entitled to believe yourself.

This is what makes some people just as silly about McCain as the BDSers are about Bush, they make stuff up to fee their hate.

Terrye on June 15, 2008 at 10:53 AM

I’m assuming you meant “feed” their hate. Beyond that typo you are absolutely incorrect. McCain’s efforts on behalf of the detainees led to the SCOTUS ruling. He may be spewing dismay over the ruling but it is only because it went far further than his half-measure that essentially bashed the administration and called for greater rights for the detainees. He (and you) can’t dismiss the fact that McCain gave rights to terrorists this past week. In may not have been as intentional as his amnesty scheme but McCain is a terrorist enabler.

As to another post where you think I am claiming that McCain has special knowledge. You are off your nut. I was updating the hypothetical “clock question.” And pondering if a President McCain would use certain military force or would he risk troops to capture OBL alive so that a trial could occur. The answer to that question remains key as to how far MCain would go to coddle terrorists.

Bush isn’t going to get a man that has been long dead…. Unless maybe he already has his DNA stashed somewhere and cloning science is much more advanced than we can imagine.

I think ObL is with the virgins ants, since Dec. of 2002.

In the event that it’s not true, whatever they do, please, please, please DO NOT BRING HIM IN ALIVE.

Musharraf has always been the ‘good cop’ in international relations with Pakistan. They play ‘good cp, bad cop’ so that they can get our money. Bin Laden got away from Tora Bora because we were ‘cooperating with Pakistan’. Pakistanis were paid off (by Bin Laden) to let him go. If the US had conducted that entire operation instead of relying on Musharraf and Pakistan, we’d have gotten Bin Laden the last time we had definitive information on him at Tora Bora.

We need to conduct our operations there regardless of what Pakistan wants. If we don’t engage their military, and their military isn’t in control of a region, then it isn’t Pakistani sovereignty – and we don’t need Musharraf nor Pakistan.

If we kill Osama Bin Laden, we’re no different than he is.-

-Standard Moonbat OBL Motto #1b.

(Motto 1a is: “But, we created Bin Laden!“)

I just wonder if such an event will be good for Michelle Obama’s children.

“I want Bush to get him. After all the unimaginable bilge and grief the man has taken for keeping us safe and taking the fight to our enemies I want him to be able to retire to Texas knowing Osama is rotting in the ground.

I don’t even give a damn how it plays out politically. I just want him to be the one to finish the job.

Typhoon on June 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM”

Right there with you…

I don’t even give a damn how it plays out politically. I just want him to be the one to finish the job.

Typhoon on June 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM

I agree Typhoon. I’m mighty afraid if W doesn’t get him .. no one will.

I wonder, what passport does Osama have, anyway? Any?

We should start calling it the, “Take no prisoners decision.”

TheBigOldDog on June 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM

True. But if the “5 Betrayers” wanted to do their job right they would have done what good legislators do.

The 5 Betrayers should have written instructions on how this new law should be administered. Special wording for the Miranda Rights that would be read to terrorists before our military fires the first bullet. We would want to be sure there are interpreters in the field for the English impaired. As our troops approach the enemy the interpreters will need to be out front conveying our intentions. Battlefield lawyers are a NECESSITY. Maybe the Donks can get some of their own to volunteer for the front lines, doing the moral thing in providing the terrorists all of the benefits of a free society.

The sad truth is Bush has had to take as much crap from the right as he has from the left and now they are pissy because the Supreme Court did not go their way. But then again, they see no reason to vote for McCain. No siree, might as well let Obama pick the next three judges. After all the fact that McCain voted for Alito and Roberts and even Bork is not an indication of where is loyalty lies. No, just like Bush who wanted to sell our ports to terrorists from Dubai so that they could kill us all, it is McCain who is the real enemy. blah blah blah.

Personally I think chances are Osama Bin Laden is already dead. And I think that the Supreme Court decision means that in the future a lot of these people are going to end up in a Turkish or Jordanian prison.

If the Democrat who had the White House before him had killed Osama bin Laden in any one of the half dozen chances he had to do it, there would not be any need to go after him now. In fact there might not have been an attack on the WTC on September 11 at all.

McCain did not manufacture that SCOTUS decision, he did not even support it. This is what makes some people just as silly about McCain as the BDSers are about Bush, they make stuff up to fee their hate.

I do not think anyone is going to bring Bush up on charges either.

I guess W really needs a win before leaving the White House in a pukey mess of fail.