McCain offers 10 town-hall debates, Obama only wants one — when no one’s watching
posted at 10:40 am on June 14, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Talks between the two presidential campaigns on debates have stalled over a disagreement over the number and format of the events. John McCain suggested a weekly series of town-hall debates televised nationally between the conclusion of the conventions and the election. Barack Obama would only agree to one town-hall debate, and he wanted it scheduled when people were least likely to watch:
Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain squabbled over a format for their first one-on-one debate in the U.S. presidential race, as both pushed their economic plans amid fresh reports of surging inflation and sagging wages.
Obama on Friday rejected McCain’s proposal for 10 joint town-hall appearances, question-and-answer gatherings before small audiences that the Republican senator tends to favor. The Democrat has performed best at massive, emotional rallies drawing tens of thousands of people.
Obama has offered to meet McCain in five joint appearances between now and the Nov. 4 election, but only one of those would be town hall-style and it would be on the July 4th Independence Day holiday, when few Americans would be watching. McCain called the offer “a very disappointing response.”
McCain had said the more intimate town-hall format would allow real interaction with voters and would be more revealing than formal televised debates. It also would give him free media attention alongside the better-funded Obama.
Let’s stipulate a few things here. In every presidential campaign, a pas de deux over debates breaks out during the summer. Both sides try gaining a PR edge by seeming to offer more interaction while protecting themselves and favoring their own strengths. Eventually a series of commitments gets hammered out, with every detail of the debates negotiated down to the erasers on the pencils and the kind of water glasses provided to both candidates. This is the beginning of the 2008 version.
Even with that said, the response from the Obama camp hardly seems courageous. They only want their candidate to participate in a free-form debate on July 4th, when most people will be more interested in emptying their childrens’ college funds to pay for the gas for their vacation? It seems that hope and change do not bring testicular fortitude. Why not just do it at 2 am and have it televised on C-SPAN 3, or ESPN 2?
After Obama’s last debate performance, however, one can hardly blame David Axelrod for limiting Obama’s extemporaneous speech opportunities. The April performance in Pennsylvania was so bad that the campaign simply refused to debate Hillary Clinton at all afterwards, skipping out on a debate offer in the friendly territory of North Carolina. They will try to force McCain into the same game-show format as that Pennsylvania debate, not because it favors Obama but because he’s likely to do less damage to his cause than in a format in which an aggressive McCain can dominate him.
McCain will use this refusal to make the point that he’s ready to engage any time, any place — and that Obama isn’t. That may say something about Obama’s readiness to handle tougher events than a town-hall debate.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Bwahahahaha! I knew it.
MikeZero on June 14, 2008 at 10:44 AM
Ah, so it’s not Barack, but bawk, bawk, a la a chicken.
rbj on June 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM
What are they going to debate — the war in Iraq and a gas-tax holiday? I don’t think they’re very far apart on anything else, except abortion, which isn’t on the agenda this cycle, it appears.
BigD on June 14, 2008 at 10:48 AM
According to Fox, McCain quipped that Obama has more pre-conditions for a debate with him than with Ahmadinejad.
JiangxiDad on June 14, 2008 at 10:49 AM
The word is “coward”.
davenp35 on June 14, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Obama can’t speak extemporaneously, and McCain is boring. Less of a slam dunk for McCain than presumed, I think.
JiangxiDad on June 14, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Wait!
No!
That can’t be right!
He’s a Lightworker!
He’s smarter than you, buddy, and smarter than me. He’s certainly way, way, way, way smarter than George Dubya Boooosh.
Why, if you’da put him a a debate on physics with Albert Einstein and music with Beethoven and poetry with Shakespeare, he’d whup ‘em all and have ‘em beggin’ for their mommas.
It’s only Republicans who are so dumb that their handlers have to limit their appearances and keep them away from any awkward situations where they might have to think on their feet and not wind up dining on one of said appendages.
Right?
Typhoon on June 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM
I should have said that McCain’s comments would be superior if “read,” but in the visual, he may still lose.
JiangxiDad on June 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM
More and more, it looks like McCain’s a shoe-in for POTUS. Hillary would have been a far more formidable opponent.
JetBoy on June 14, 2008 at 10:53 AM
McCain: We’ve got to stop obscene profits in the oil companies.
Obama: I agree.
Moderator: Well, I declare this debate over! Stay tuned for some great Three’s Company reruns just ahead!
Bugler on June 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Thanks for that chuckle. Classic.
Very true. Mac would seem to have the advantage, but perception is reality sometimes.
How much play do you think that has, Cap? I’m of the opinion that it pales in comparison to Obama’s other associations/problems, but I do think it will be something that McCain would be willing to hammer him over – since it is of the McCain camp’s making by maneuvering. If it starts a pattern of aggressive criticism, that itself is a big bonus.
Spirit of 1776 on June 14, 2008 at 10:57 AM
Always all favoring the demofascists. For crying out loud, even the republican debates during the primaries were controlled almost exclusively by the leftwing media.
Don’t expect a fox moderator to even be allowed into the sites let alone involved and with russert gone there will be nothing but fluff questions for barry and do you still beat your wife questions for mccain.
peacenprosperity on June 14, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Obama is a chicken. He knows McCain will trounce him and make him look like the radical that he is.
dalec on June 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM
Nope. Even though hillary seemed to improve during the campaign it was still in a controlled liberal enviroment. The clinton camp would have done nothing different then barry’s camp, they would have wanted as limited and controlled situation as possible.
peacenprosperity on June 14, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Obama doesn’t know what to do without the TelePrompter.
dalec on June 14, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Wow….I pegged another one!(well, almost).
I knew Barry would take the why-talk-to-the-peons route.
Close up and personal he knows the plebs can smell him out.
Up on a stadium stage the footlights and special effects make him glow.
Hammer him John. Call him out. Take some respectful campaigning and roll it up into a bat and smash the SOB with it.
Limerick on June 14, 2008 at 11:00 AM
he won’t meet with McCain at a town hall but he’ll sweet talk the worlds worst dictators. bush league.
ctmom on June 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Maybe McCain should call his bluff and agree to July 4 and see what he does.
dalec on June 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM
I agree, Lim, the time has come, he needs to hit him, but kill him with good humor, like the crack about pre-conditions.
Squid Shark on June 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM
That’s just it tho…Hillary had improved during the campaign, and improved dramatically as I saw it. True, she may have wanted fewer debates than McCain’s proposed 10, but I don’t think she would have gone to Obama’s extent.
Just going by that last ABC debate, Obama stumbled hard. And although he can rebound from a couple of those stumbles, too many…and he’s done. Which obviously is why he wants as few debates as possible.
JetBoy on June 14, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Let’s face it, The Wizard of Uhhhs knows he’ll say something stupid or would be caught off-guard unable to answer some simple question.
He cannot debate without a prepared script or a TelePrompter.
McCain doesn’t exactly light up a room, but he’s on far more solid footing than the community dis-organizer.
JammieWearingFool on June 14, 2008 at 11:07 AM
The Supreme Court.
Yeah, I know McCain sucks on a lot of issues. I agree. But I believe him on the court. The thing is the guy just really doesn’t understand capitalism, so he’s always going to suck on economic issues. But he does understand loving his country and he does understand staying true to its precepts as he understands them. For that reason when he says he believes judges should interpret the constitution and not legislate from the bench, there’s no reason not to believe him.
The court’s provided him with a perfect opportunity to win the election on that issue alone.
Hopefully he won’t let it pass.
Typhoon on June 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM
the Barry camp should stipulate that it be sown at 3AM EDT between a No Money Down infomercial and a Tom Vu retrospective infomercial.
That way no one would watch it and no one would then know Barry is a bumbling imbecile.
benrand on June 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM
*Laughing outloud for real*
I’m stealin’ that.
Typhoon on June 14, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Jammie-
Wizard of Uhhs. Community dis-organizer.
Keep up the good work.
JiangxiDad on June 14, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Yeah, that is a big issue. Not sure how it actually plays out in a debate, though. Obama is not going to come out and say he wants to nominate judges (at any level) who will base their judicial decisions based on liberal policy preferences. McCain was not particularly supportive of Alito, although he did vote for him.
Plus, none of the current judges have said publicly that they’re going anywhere — it would all be hypothetical.
BigD on June 14, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Fox reported yesterday that Barry wants a “Lincoln-Douglas” style debate — with each candidate getting something like an hour to speak, uninterrupted! Of course, it wouldn’t really be a debate at all, just the two candidates reading prepared speeches off a teleprompter (which of course is why Barry wants to do it this way — the man needs that teleprompter).
Talk about something nobody would watch.
AZCoyote on June 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM
National Security talking points (not the border) that Barak needs to be hammered with:
1. The missile defense system
2. U.S. Navy carrier and SSGN conversion programs
3. Strike fighter production
4. Space based defense research
5. Expansion of conventional and non-conventional forces
6. NSA surveillance of oversea communications
7. Mutual defense agreement with Israel
There are more issues then Iraq troop levels and OBL.
Hammer him John. Ask him about those issues. Make Obama explain why no missle defense is better then some missle defense. Make him explain how a skinny Navy helps America stay safe. Hammer John, hammer, hammer, hammer.
Limerick on June 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Have you heard him lately?? He sounds like a sniveling old lady whose hair is pulled back too tightly.
Forgive me for suspecting that, at some point in whatever debates they do have, McCain is going to drift off policy into his trademark self-righteousness, attacking Obama personally, and Obama is just going to back off, pause and say, “Are you for real?”
BigD on June 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Let’s hear it for Jammie and the Great Community Dis-organizer, The Wizard Of Uuuhs.
thekingtut on June 14, 2008 at 11:29 AM
If Obama can’t handle McCain one-on-one, how in the world is he going to go face-to-face to negotiate with America’s enemies?
That ought to be a McCain talking point.
NeighborhoodCatLady on June 14, 2008 at 11:33 AM
What happened to big barack boasting a debate anytime, anywhere?
christophercube on June 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM
The Obama people are not stupid; they have realized that their candidate will suffer under the “open forum” conditions; let the media run damage control for Obama while selling his message for him, this is the way forward from here.
The videos of Obama stumbling and grasping for words that came out last week, were very damaging indeed. Soros will guide his crew from here; Soros has told his boy “go into hiding now, we’ll take it from here”… No one in the MSM will dare question Obama on any topic that has not been vetted thoroughly by Soros and his team. Obama will cruise the country in that empty suit, smiling and waving at the crowds; people will faint on que, giving the media talking heads shivers on their private parts.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1971411/posts
Keemo on June 14, 2008 at 11:35 AM
Come on now, Ed, debates are a Distraction™.
Seixon on June 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Obama will meet Iran’s leaders (whether Ahmadinejad or whoever the Leader of Iran™ is) without preconditions but… will not meet McCain without preconditions?
Hmmm.
Seixon on June 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM
JiangxiDad hit the mark I saw that on foxnews too, the quote / response from the McCain team regarding conditions was a perfect retort..
But something is missing from McCain’s campaign team, there is a disconnect somehwere because the good quotes, the retorts are not getting picked up in the media properly or often enough.. They are missing all the soundbytes.
This post for example deserves the punch, it is missing the money quote! The same goes on blog after blog, then the retorts don’t reach memeorandum, then the media doesn’t repeat them endlessly etc.. But go find that response at McCain’s blog, etc.. I know Goldfarb is brand new there, but Obama’s team has the advantage x10. McCain’s team needs to get a little sharper, a little more witty & quicker too, just because McCain is an elder statesman & much respected doesn’t mean his campaign needs to move like one.
There’s not much time to get on the free media bandwagon, McCain’s team will never match Obama’s money train.. Time to get moving already imho.
saus on June 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Personally, I could not care less how many idiotic debates or town meetings McCain has. We get enough talk from Senator McCain, what we need is action. McCain has come up with a big fat zero when it comes to the oil crisis (and a crisis it is) with his mostly empty promises of “energy independence”.
Giving people a “little relief” (as Mac describes it) with his gas tax “holiday” is an entirely inadequate response.
It’s important to note that the devastating Iowa floods are only going to make things worse, raising the price of all corn dependent commodities even higher than their already inflated prices, and it will make the ethanol “solution” more useless than ever.
Buy Danish on June 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Hypothetical? John Paul Stevens is 88 years old. Does he have to announce he’s going somewhere before we start to think about the possibility that a replacement will be needed for him in the near future?
Plus, there are three other justices who are already over age 70 (Ginsburg -75, Scalia-72, and Kennedy-71). It’s not exactly a young court.
AZCoyote on June 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Heh, good stuff. I’m not sure why they are even called deabtes anymore. Everything is so phony and staged, it all boils down to who can come up with the best (pre-rehearsed) “ad-libbed” one liner, or who doesn’t forget their lines or mess up a statistic.
I wonder why the candidates get to pick the format at all. We the people are voting for these clowns (this goes for all elections), we should decide where and when and what the questions are. Not some carefully crafted questions with deliberately vague answers so you can’t call them on anything later. These people work for us, damn it.
I am really so digusted with the whole circus are election cycle has become. I used to laugh about it, but now when I reflect on all the stupidity that goes on, the primary system, super delegates (ok that’s still funny), the voter registration fraud, the third and fourth party attack ads, the fact that the boob tube is the main factor in deciding our leaders… makes me sick.
reaganaut on June 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Could that be due to Obama’s views of America are more in line with extremists dictators than McCain views?
Oops…. did I say that outloud?
Hog Wild on June 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM
“If you want to debat on July 4th, then goddammit we’ll debate on July 4th – my friend!”
BacaDog on June 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM
“For both candidates: Please discuss how your personal commitment to limited government and individual freedom have been expressed in your policy positions.”
—
[crickets]
Bugler on June 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Hey, there’s a reason why Obama is the preferred candidate of Hamas, Fidel Castro, Chavez, etc.
AZCoyote on June 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM
John…..
Barak Obama (July 16, 2007)…
Barak Obama (Feb 29, 2008)
Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.
……
There is so much more to the National Security then just the border. Yes McCain is for ‘comprehensive’ immigration reform. So is Barak. But missle defense, Navy and weapons modernization, nuclear weapons? There is a world of difference between McCain and Obama. All this crud that McCain = Obama is a bunch of hooey.
Limerick on June 14, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Cannot handle a debate on Fox News. Cannot handle a debate with a 71 year old man. But put him toe to toe with a homicidal religious fanatic waiting for the twelfth Iman to pop out of a well somewhere to unleash his nuclear holocaust. What could go wrong?
tommylotto on June 14, 2008 at 12:12 PM
McCain will have him for lunch and Obama knows it. He’s not simply and empty suit . . . he’s a totally empty vessel.
rplat on June 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM
I don’t think it gets much more expicit than that.
And the next President is certain to appoint at least one. And with Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas all solidly constructionist and not going anywhere for a long, long time, and that one is enough to make all the difference.
Typhoon on June 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM
I wish they woulod debate about which one’s less likely to drill for our own oil. I’m dying to know.
Akzed on June 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM
“Please discuss your policy differences on the issue of illegal immigration.”
McCain: “Well, I’ve said I’d build a goddam fence.”
Obama: “OK. Whatever.”
Bugler on June 14, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Those that subscribe to this are obviously liberals at heart and are using the classic “relativity argument” be it moral, intellectual or social to justify their vote for Obama. It is a free country for now, these folks can lie to themselves all they want, remember Up is Down and Black is White and Obama is McCain….got it!
dmann on June 14, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Poltroon.
Little Boomer on June 14, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Even if there’s only one, if it’s not completely pre-scripted—Obama will blow it!!!
jeanie on June 14, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Yes but within a closed and controlled enviroment. I think she is probably better then barry thinking on her feet, but there is no way the would let her be in a situation where they couldn’t be absolutely sure what was coming. Here handlers never have and they never will. And by the way, I’m still not counting her out. hillary wants a floor vote. Not releasing delegates until someone else clinches is nothing new in the demofascist party but this time could be a big surprise for everyone if the gaff and surprise a week from barry continues.
peacenprosperity on June 14, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Dear Senator McCain,
Instructions: Play this clip at the debate and ask Obama to
tell the American people why ANY of those proposals will help America.
Barack on Barack
Thank you,
A voter for the fence but not stupid enough for Obama
Limerick on June 14, 2008 at 12:49 PM
Typhoon makes an excellent point in his post. Obama has already told us how he will select justices. He will choose judges based on their ability to empathize with “oppressed” classes of people — and not on their ability to impartially judge the facts and apply existing law. That means that an Obama administration will give us more liberal judges, legislating from the bench, just like we had this week with the ludicrous Boumediene decision.
In the Boumediene case, the liberal majority blatantly disregarded binding precedent, simply because it did not suit their purposes. In the 1950 case ofJohnson v. Eisentrager, the Supreme Court ruled that non-citizen enemies have no access to U.S. courts in wartime and that when captured and imprisoned abroad, they have no right to a writ of habeas corpus in a U.S. court. The Boumediene majority distorted the clear holding of Eisentrager, because the majority empathized with the poor, oppressed Gitmo detainees and wanted to create a new set of rights for them. An Obama administration will give us more of this kind of idiocy, and that is reason enough to vote for McCain.
AZCoyote on June 14, 2008 at 12:53 PM
The mighty orator, the great Red hope…poltroon.
whitetop on June 14, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Limerick on June 14, 2008 at 12:49 PM
When the Messiah changes his tune on these issues it will be reported as a sign of his continued growth and maturity, his superior judgment, his ability to bend light. Ya know, your starting to sound like a racist! ;->
All Hail the Messiah!
dmann on June 14, 2008 at 1:00 PM
Very disappointing? Huh?
Reagan had, what?, one debate with Carter and 2 or 3 with Mondale and that was enough. Bush had, I believe 3, with each of Gore and Kerry and McVain wants 10?
What an egomaniac. Who in the Hell would want to see and listen to him in that many debates? Or see and listen to Obama in that many debates?
The traditional 2 debates would be enough for me and more than enough for most people.
Ten debates? Gag me with a spoon.
MB4 on June 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM
traditional
23debatesMB4 on June 14, 2008 at 1:13 PM
Is it just so simply evident that Obama has more in common, has more to agree and dialogue, with ‘people’ like Ahmamadjihad, Castro, and Hugo?
He seems to have built a career with these ‘types’ around him.
( pre-bus anyway)
shooter on June 14, 2008 at 1:13 PM
Yeah, that worries me too. F’instance, like talking down to Obama on national defense because he has no military service rather than his asinine ideas, or going through the whole POW litany again. McCain’s opinion of himself is quite high. Obama has the same problem, but Obama is a lot slicker at disguising it. I don’t think McCain has any advantage in debate, regardless of format. Charisma and energy will drive opinion.
a capella on June 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Oh yah? I’m a voter. Will I be invited to interact?
What’s that?
Yah, I didn’t think so.
MB4 on June 14, 2008 at 1:18 PM
You walked into the nomination like you were walking onto Vicente Fox’s yacht
Your smirk strategically dipped below one eye
Your neck looked like an apricot
You had one eye on the mirror as you watched yourself gavotte
And all the Rinos dreamed that theyd be your VP partner
Theyd be your VP partner, and…
Youre so McVain, you probably think the world revolves around you
Youre so McVain, Ill bet you think the world revolves around you
Dont you? dont you?
You had me supporting you several years ago when I was still quite naive
Well you said that the country you were ready to lead
And that you would never give any grief
But you gave away the things you claimed to love and by doing that lost me
I had some dreams, they were foam in my beer
Foam in my beer, and…
I had some dreams they were foam in my beer
Foam in my beer, and…
Well I hear you went up to LaRaza and your ingratiating talk naturally all of them won
Then you flew in your wife’s private jet up to praise
Al Gore’s Global Warming total eclipse of reason
Well youre where you should be all the time
And when youre not youre with
Some money bags lobbyist or working on a bill with a close liberal friend
Working on a bill with a close liberal friend
And now you think that everyone wants to listen to you Pontificate all summer long in debate after debate instead of going outside and having some fun
Youre so McVain
MB4 on June 14, 2008 at 1:29 PM
Nature will take its course. Most of the liberal justices on the bench are ancient.
NotCoach on June 14, 2008 at 1:33 PM
Yeah, and while most of the young are liberal, they grow up and become more conservative. It’s the baby-boomer generation that is most liberal, and they are graying :)
JiangxiDad on June 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Lol! A bit morbid that. But not surprising someone makes a site like that considering that the boomers are the worst generation ever in this country.
NotCoach on June 14, 2008 at 1:41 PM
He thinks he’s ahead now, that will change.
easy on June 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM
Obama would prefer to avoid all debates from now until the election. The last ABC debate he had with Hillary exposed him nakid, yes, totally nakid, and it was a poor, empty and ugly site. He’d prefer never to repeat that expose.
Your hatred and vile of all things non-Obama are in plain site. It could affect your blood pressure, if you don’t watch it.
Entelechy on June 14, 2008 at 1:50 PM
I would like to see them debate ethanol subsidies. They do not agree and putting our entire corn crop into ethanol production to meet the expanded 35 billion gallon mandate the Democrats passed last December is so ridiculous on its face that I would love to hear Obama try to defend it.
KW64 on June 14, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Hussein Obama,
Add Chickens…,to America Hating Muslim, marxist, soros funded lackey, tool of the Chicago mob, empty suit, and friend of Juan McCain…
There RNC I said it for you and I didn’t turn into a toad or frog or even get blocked, deleted, sanctioned, sued, or thrown in jail.
Not yet anyway!
dhunter on June 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM
McCain could really hammer Obama over his statement about cutting off funding for “unproven” missile defense. The system already successfully shot down an errant satellite in earth orbit–a DARK target without any heat to detect, moving faster than a ballistic missile normally would, in an UNPLANNED test. The system IS proven, now we need to fund it to keep it operational.
Earth to McCain: Say you’ll drill for oil in the Continental Shelf, and you’ll walk into the White House with 350 electoral votes. Wake up!
Steve Z on June 14, 2008 at 2:59 PM
Barack is chicken. He’s not man enough to face real voters in a town hall debate.
indythinker on June 14, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Barack is chicken. He’s not man enough to face real voters in a town hall debate.
indythinker on June 14, 2008 at 3:00 PM
It isn’t that. He doesn’t want his inability to think on his feet to be observed by large numbers of people. He performed badly during the Democrat debates — and not just at the Pennsylvania debate. He did really badly in PA because he got really tough questions from ABC.
I just can’t believe Obama is probably going to win this. He’s an unabashed leftist and an empty suit to boot. If he wins, he’ll disprove Rush’s main hypothesis that the only way a liberal can win a national election is to pretend he isn’t liberal.
Outlander on June 14, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Funny!
Spirit of 1776 on June 14, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Of course the messiah doesn’t want MANY, or ANY open townhall debates. Because, take away Hussein Obama’s script, and teleprompter, and he’s an exposed, lost and stuttering idiot.
byteshredder on June 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM
Hmm, by that criteria, another Clarence Thomas would fit the bill! Poor, African American, heavily influenced by his grandfather (old). Okay, well, it was worth pointing out.
By the way, what I meant about Supreme Court appointments being hypothetical is that you can’t really debate Supreme Court appointments while there aren’t any announced vacancies and have it be in good taste.
I will say this: If McCain (who I really don’t like) is too old to be president, then every Justice, Senator, Cabinet member and Representative over 72 is tool old to serve, also. CEOs of public companies are not allowed to serve after 65; personally, I think 72 should be the age limit for elected and/or appointed politicians. Don’t scream at me about Reagan, please.
BigD on June 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM
Obama needs to stay away from debates so people remain ignornt of his policies and “ideas.”
They’re crap, but he knows he will get a majority vote based on his charisma. He is, afterall, a lightworker.
Grafted on June 14, 2008 at 7:17 PM
I honestly think that Obama is intimidating by McCain. Remember some time back McCain wrote Obama a letter calling him on the carpet about some promise that Obama had made but had renegged upon. McCain is a man; love him or hate him, he is a tough SOB. Obama has girl hands and an elitist attitude. It will be interesting to see McCain lose his temper in a discussion with Obama and see Obama wet his slacks.
carbon_footprint on June 14, 2008 at 7:31 PM
intimidating = intimidated. Preview is a friend.
carbon_footprint on June 14, 2008 at 7:32 PM
Next McCain Ad show be:
Barack Obama has said he will meet with Iran. He will Meet with N Korea. He will Meet with Venezuela. At these meetings he will explain the US position and listen to theirs and reach understanding.(Use suitably depressing visuals)
But Senator Obama is not even willing to meet with John McCain and make his case before the American people! He is unwilling to have the frank and open discussion we need to help decide the Next President of the United States.
If Obama cannot even speak to John McCain, a man who has served this country with valor all of his life, how will he handle meeting with our enemies? How will he speak to those who threaten us? What is he afraid of? (
John McCain is not afraid of straight talk. John McCain is not afraid to let people know where he stands on issues. John McCain is not afraid to stand up to those who would harm this country. John McCain is Ready! (Heroic visuals of McCain)
When Will Obama be ready?( show Calender with months pulling off)
paid for by the John McCain for Pres… I am not Afraid to approve this Message
OBQuiet on June 14, 2008 at 7:57 PM
I hope McCain holds the ten townhalls anyway and starts off each one wondering where Obama is. Then, I hope he answers himself with “Probably hiding from bitter people clinging to guns and religion.”
Kafir on June 14, 2008 at 7:59 PM
One “little” problem with that.
It would not exactly be “straight talk”.
MB4 on June 14, 2008 at 10:11 PM
‘post turtle’:
a turtle sitting atop a fence post. That is what Hussein Obama is:
‘You
know he didn’t get up there by himself, he doesn’t belong up there, he
doesn’t know what to do while he is up there, and you just wonder what
kind of a dumb ass put him up
there.’
dhunter on June 14, 2008 at 10:17 PM
Well if Obama is elected then the “dumb ass” who will have put him there is, well let’s just say his initials are JM.
MB4 on June 14, 2008 at 10:32 PM
Fixed that for ya.
platypus on June 14, 2008 at 11:28 PM
You owe me a keyboard and a latte. :)
platypus on June 14, 2008 at 11:49 PM
“The Democrat has performed best at massive, emotional rallies drawing tens of thousands of people.”
Like every other demagogue in front of a mob of mindless fools desperately seeking a Fuhrer. Also like most leftards, Obama is deathly afraid of reasoned discourse. We can rest assured that his FCC will do everything they can to abolish real debate.
Kalapana on June 15, 2008 at 11:15 AM
MB4,
So make it:
But Senator Obama is not even willing to meet with John McCain and make his case directly in front the American people! He has refused to let the people set subjects of the debate by meeting with McCain and taking their questions live.
——–
The point is that if he isn’t willing to discuss items off the cuff, how can he meet with our enemies with no preconditions. And I would like to see an ad that made that point. That whiole meet without condition thing worked so well for Kennedy that we had the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Vietnam war.
And Kennedy was a whole lot smarter and experienced that BO.
OBQuiet on June 15, 2008 at 8:06 PM
Sorry, Latte is too elitist. In our new Obamaland, all of us will drink plain coffee grown by Local organic farmers who are saving the environment from evil Multinationals.
OBQuiet on June 15, 2008 at 8:10 PM
Obama is willing to talk with any anti-American dictator, but he is afraid to talk with McCain.
This is a point that McCain needs to start hammering home.
MarkTheGreat on June 16, 2008 at 7:15 AM
I’m not suprised at all. Obama would get his ass kicked down the block on a Q&A from McCain. It would be the ultimate studder-fest.
Geronimo on June 16, 2008 at 10:10 AM