Malkin, Ingraham & Coulter!

TheSitRep on June 13, 2008 at 11:57 AM

Oh no! I’m getting stiffy.
Can you imagine the ratings?
Throw in Banderas and some of the other babes on Fox.
Then It would be the true FOX news newtwork
Maybe they could beat up on Shep,Geraldo,Colmes,etc.
Never mind. They would enjoy it too much
Me go now!
Thoughts of Julie dancing in my head.

As for Laura, please hold off on judgements or gossip on what is going on contract wise. We really have no idea of the facts. What business she is in is a tough cut throat business and sometimes it has to get cutthroat. I often am skeptical of “leaks” that come out on what happened in something like this.

I like Laura and Like she takes no prisoners.

The perfect show to me would be Malkin, Laura, and Coulter. I’d be in heaven.

Laura was funny but lately she is too shrill and too angry. Rush puts his heart into it which is why he is where he is in the ratings/ad rates race.

She claims it’s all management’s fault. Not a conservative statement, I’d say. It’s unreasonable to believe that she can present a genuine conservative persona on the air when she can make such a whiney liberal statement in real life. At least Colbert knows he’s a put-on and doesn’t pretend to be genuine conservative.

She became a legend in her own mind and it is blowing back on her big time.

Is Michelle Malkin physically accetable to you? MKH? Ann Coulter? What’s the cutoff cup size for Republican women?

Keep up the good work.

What is her personal story? Is she married? I looked, but can’t find info. She’s a looker. With a set of D implants she could take over America. She’ll do well on TV.

RWLA on June 13, 2008 at 11:52 AM

Eff you. Laura fought Cancer in the body that she has. What would breast implants do for her?

Does your mom have breast implants? Would they make her a better mother? You diminish Laura Ingraham’s professional achievements in law, literature and broadcast entertainment.

You’re an ass and I feel sorry for the women in your life. Again, eff you.

Laura WILL NOT be on the air one year from now – neither will Rush, Sean,Michael, Glenn, Hugh…

one year from now, the President Of The United States (POTUS) will oversee the removal of all ‘right-wing’ talkers from the airwaves – that’s a FACT

a President Obama will. a President McCain will. FACT!

so I don’t see how just a few more months of Laura make much difference – well, enjoy it while you can, but might as well resign yourself to what will be in effect at least a 4-year suspension of our First Amendment rights

we need to focus our energies on a RESTORATION in 2012 – probably our last chance, after which (if not by then) we’re looking at our country going into Lexington/Concord mode… know what I’m saying?

Michelle Malkin also needs a TV show. How about replacing Greta Van Susteren’s “Crime and Punishment” show with “Malkin Talkin’?”

Steve Z on June 13, 2008 at 12:24 PM

I second that. Greta’s show doesn’t fit in. But rather than “Malkin Talkin”, I’d prefer a more “ballsy” title like “Talkin MalkinS“

Malkin, Ingraham & Coulter!

What would you call it? “2 girls and a somewhat feminine looking guy”?

Laura’s syndicator, TRN, will miss the revenue caused by this ‘conflict of interest’, and soon resolve the situation.

They wouldn’t have taken her off the air if they were making all that much on her show.

revolution on June 13, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Wow, sounds like you have quite an emotional beef with Laura. So, you think she’s “the most shameless self-promoter in the history of conservatism;” that she “has this god-awful nasal voice that grates on [your]nerves,” which makes her “the MOST overrated personality in the conservative movement.” You also state that she “has a terrible television presence with cakes of makeup and a stale, dry, and forced presentation.”
It’s rather amazing how you don’t mention one substantive, reason-based critique of the woman. You whole post was nothing more than an ad hominem argument. I have to ask: why?
You probably didn’t intend to do this, but, in essence, you said nothing of Ms. Ingraham, but rather said a great deal about yourself.

Ed Morrissey at Hot Air has the latest on Laura Ingraham’s disappearance from her own radio show these past few weeks….

How about replacing Greta Van Susteren’s “Crime and Punishment” show with “Malkin Talkin’?”

Steve Z on June 13, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Because they’re waiting for new, breaking news in the Natalee Holloway disappearance.

She has “debates” on her show which consist of her, and someone who agrees with her, tag-teaming some opponent while one of her monkey-boy assistants turn the opponent’s microphone down when she starts losing the upperhand.

She has this god-awful nasal voice that grates on my nerves. She is the MOST overrated personality in the conservative movement.

She has a terrible television presence with cakes of makeup and a stale, dry, and forced presentation, and of course promoting all things Laura with every word.

Stay off the air Laura. Fox will keep your show on for years even though no-one will watch it. They kept Gibson forever when he had fewer viewers than can be counted.

They should have given the show to Michelle. Michelle is gorgeous, compelling, effective and has more balls than 99% of the males in the Republican party. She also manages to do it all without acting like a one person self-marketing firm.

One of my favorite talk radio hosts, Laura Ingraham has disappeared from the airwaves in the last 2 weeks due to a contract dispute. It comes at a bad time for Talker magazine’s “Woman of the year“, with one of the largest talk radio…