Video: Eligible bachelor of the day!

posted at 9:00 pm on June 12, 2008 by Allahpundit

Yes, it’s really him. Click the image to watch.

Update: Um … is bachelor number one Squiggy?

kozinski.jpg

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Disorder in the court!

jgapinoy on June 12, 2008 at 9:04 PM

Looks like he, er, took matters into his own hands back then too.

bikermailman on June 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM

LOL c’mon

funky chicken on June 12, 2008 at 9:08 PM

This is one horny judge.

SteveMG on June 12, 2008 at 9:09 PM

That is indeed Squiggy.

GoodBoy on June 12, 2008 at 9:12 PM

Bachelor #1 was David Lander, aka Squiggy of “Laverne and Shirley.”

Terrie on June 12, 2008 at 9:12 PM

Great its Squiggy and Squicky

William Amos on June 12, 2008 at 9:23 PM

As my 12 year old daughter would say “Ew”

LOL

funky chicken on June 12, 2008 at 9:26 PM

I found another video of the scumbag judge, bungie jumping. You can find it on his archived websites at the Way Back Machine.

MrC_5150 on June 12, 2008 at 9:28 PM

Two winners right there…

Pent. on June 12, 2008 at 9:28 PM

Bachelor number two is a cape-wearing boy from the Land of Fantasy. Although he lives with seven other men, he’s not easy. Just kiss his frozen, dead lips and find out what a live wire he is. Give it up for Judge Kozinski!

jaime on June 12, 2008 at 9:33 PM

perv

EJDolbow on June 12, 2008 at 9:49 PM

OT
Yahoo mail and google are both down. Anyone else have a
problem getting in.

This was on drudge.

Yahoo Strikes Deal With Google as Microsoft Talks End

Texyank on June 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM

OT
Yahoo mail and google are both down. Anyone else have a
problem getting in.

This was on drudge.

Yahoo Strikes Deal With Google as Microsoft Talks End

Texyank on June 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM

Nevermind. . . it’s back . Sorry AP

Texyank on June 12, 2008 at 9:52 PM

When someone digs up a video of Allah on the Dating Game, that will actually be something.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on June 12, 2008 at 9:56 PM

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on June 12, 2008 at 9:56 PM

because of that the search feature on YouTube just got a gazillion hits.

Limerick on June 12, 2008 at 9:59 PM

When someone digs up a video of Allah on the Dating Game, that will actually be something.

jgapinoy on June 12, 2008 at 10:01 PM

Damned Romanians, always have romance on their mind. They’re descendents of the Romans, after all.

On a serious note he’s the child of two Holocaust survivors, born in Bucharest, Romania. He looks very young for being born in 1950.

He was nominated by Ronald Reagan.

Entelechy on June 12, 2008 at 10:06 PM

Yes it is Squiggy!

I would of been commenting,however the H/A site
was diskabobulated,couldn’t get video or pictures,
for 2 effen stinkin days!!!

canopfor on June 12, 2008 at 10:13 PM

Geez, who dug that out of the archives?!

CP on June 12, 2008 at 10:31 PM

I plead the 9th!!

OMG!!! Schadenf….

Oh…is that now a banned word??

BigWyo on June 12, 2008 at 10:33 PM

Ok…obligatory is an understatement here…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9SaKYFR6ms

BigWyo on June 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM

I must admit, I thought it was the young Ed Morrissey.

radjah shelduck on June 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM

Here’s how he looks now.

Entelechy on June 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM

This surpasses bizarre.

SlimyBill on June 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM

Freaky, deaky. Flower of my heart? Creepy….

AprilOrit on June 12, 2008 at 11:30 PM

Update: Um … is bachelor number one Squiggy?

heh…”Hellooooo…”

It is, isn’t it?

As for our circuit court judge, damn…who knew? Just goes to show that you CAN overcome those moments captured by the camera…

JetBoy on June 12, 2008 at 11:39 PM

Here’s how he looks now.
Entelechy on June 12,2008 at 11:05 PM.

Entelechy: In that article,sexually aroused animal,
like accept for a male,how the h!ll do
they really know,was Dr.Doolittle there,
oh and not the new Dr.Doolittle,but the
older push-me-pull-me animal-Dr.Doolittle!
Haha. :) :)

canopfor on June 12, 2008 at 11:40 PM

He’s probably into FurCon Conventions and weird animal people.

AprilOrit on June 13, 2008 at 12:21 AM

I posted this on http://abovethelaw.com/2008/06/chief_judge_kozinski_and_the_i.php already, as “guest” but thought I’d get it out there under my regular identity.

I’m afraid that I’m going to have to digress into family history for a bit. I’m a CPA. My dad’s retired, but was a Civil Engineer. I’ve got an uncle, who I grew up spending a lot of time with, who was a plumber. He’s a bit rough around the edges, and has a badly-set broken nose from his time in the Marines, but I love him dearly.

My uncle keeps up a steady stream of forwarded emails. Some are funny, some aren’t. Some are a bit edgy, some feature nudity. Some I would show my girlfriend, some I wouldn’t forward to anyone. Some I’ve read, many I’ve just downloaded and archived. Most have just a word or two from my uncle, and a bunch of text or pictures from the great internet cloud.

This same uncle was recently diagnosed with a particularly virulent form of leukemia. Although things seem to be heading in the right direction for the moment, there were significant indications a few months back that I might never see him again alive.

It wouldn’t surprise me a lot to discover the cow-girl pictures in an saved email that I had not even read. There might be a note attached, saying something flippant about the cowgirls that he and my dad knew before they moved away from Colorado — or there might not. Either way, if someone suggested that I should censor anything from my email archives that could be embarassing — including anything tasteless or risque from my uncle — I would have to reply that it would be over my dead body that this would happen.

Some day, if and when they were ready for it, I could tell my cousins’ kids, “your grandad had a peculiar sense of humor” and have an example at hand. Some day, I might remember the man who taught me about snakes, and deer hunting, and living large, and page through these mementos myself. Only an idiot would say that was because I’m aroused by women painted as cows, or that I would have created such images myself.

I have neither seen, nor heard, of anything that would make this other than a purely political hit job — waving the bloody shirt. The individual who publicized this has an obvious axe to grind, and the LAT would say or do anything to smear anyone more conservative than Castro, Mao, or Lenin.

And for anyone who wants to purge my life of rougher elements, and try to ensure that my uncle is remembered only as a simpering prissy git, please kindly f*** yourselves.

cthulhu on June 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM

cthulhu on June 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM

I understand where you’re coming from, and there is freedom of speech to think of… however just like the current Puppy Marine Thread is going, there are certain members of our society that we hold to higher standards than ourselves and our brothers and cousins… Positions with Power of Example… Police, Doctors, Clergy, Politicians, Soldiers, Daycare Workers, Teachers, Coaches… Judges. the list goes on. these people choose a position of leadership, with it comes expectations of extraordinary will power and fortitude.
-
that being said I haven’t looked at all his stuff, I see it offered but I don’t see the need when so many of you and the media have described it. I believe, I have a pretty good picture of the content. as long as nothing is illegal in the content I see no issue. these Judges are not elected, they’re appointed for life… the qualification process is over. until he breaks the law or the regulations of the process he represents, this is a moot point. he was chosen for what ever reason he was and the person he is will be making the decisions.

Kaptain Amerika on June 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM

cthulhu

Your uncle is a plumber, not a judge.

AprilOrit on June 13, 2008 at 12:48 AM

Click the image to watch.

Nah. I already saw 40 year old virgin, didn’t care for it.

labrat on June 13, 2008 at 12:52 AM

When someone digs up a video of Allah, that will actually be something.

jgapinoy on June 12, 2008 at 10:01 PM

Images of the prophet are forbidden!!!

labrat on June 13, 2008 at 12:55 AM

Squiggy and Piggy

D2Boston on June 13, 2008 at 1:07 AM

AprilOrit on June 13, 2008 at 12:48 AM

It’s archived on my harddrive. I’m a CPA.

cthulhu on June 13, 2008 at 1:36 AM

AprilOrit got my dander up — probably inadvertently — and I snapped off a terse response and have been seething.

So let’s take this from a different angle.

We all wear different hats at different times. We have varied roles depending on context and who we’re talking to and when. I might be one kind of nephew to my uncle at a cousin’s wedding, and a completely different kind of nephew joking around the fireplace — or over the internet. I can be one type of CPA as a counselor for contemplated transactions, and a completely different one as an auditor of completed ones.

There are firewalls between these roles — in my professional capacity, it would be unthinkable to treat my coworkers sexually….but if I missed the chance to do a pat on the fanny in our hallway at home, my girlfriend would suspect that I’d been taken over by alien pods.

If Kozinski had distributed these images in his role as judge, there’d be no question that his sanity was impaired. But there’s no indication that such was the case. Rather, his communications in some unknown role or roles have been intercepted and broadcast in the context of his role as justice. At first, I was thinking of “crosstalk” as the proper metaphor, in that the images were transmitted over a common medium as his judicial communications….but “espionage” may be more apt.

Kozinski received these files in some capacity, and retained them. As such, they relate only to his behavior within that role. As an extreme example, if my uncle had been an SS grupenfuhrer in Nazi Germany and given me items from that period in his life, I could treasure such paraphernalia as a nephew….even as I deplored the regime and the creation of such items.

I suspect that the files were retained as part of being sociable to his correspondents. As such, it’s somewhat sloppy to have them publicly accessible — but nowhere near worthy of the level of invective that’s been floating around. Had he indicated that a petitioner should paint themselves as cattle before a hearing, I’d be in front of the mob with a torch and pitchfork — but this stuff on a random server hard drive?????

To sum up, then, Kozinski’s critics should seek to demonstrate: (1) the files belong to an identifiable role; (2) that role is a public role; and (3) the files show inappropriate behavior within that public role. (Nobody, so far as I know, has asserted that the files belong to the role of justice.) Everything I’ve seen so far fails steps one and two — and do we seriously want one-dimensional judges that occupy only one role in our society?

Put his court reporter in the cow makeup, and have it emailed to DAs appearing before the court, and we’ll talk. Have a bunch of goofy emailed stuff archived on a not-so-secure server, and this is a complete waste of time.

cthulhu on June 13, 2008 at 2:27 AM

Kaptain Amerika on June 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM

And the self-selected role of the Marine in question at the time of the puppy incident was public ambassador of Civilization to the land between the rivers. Public ambassador because it ended up on YouTube, Civ to Iraq, because that’s his force’s Mission.

(1) The actions belong to an identifiable role (the Mission that brought him to Iraq); (2) It’s a public role (per YouTube); and the behavior was inappropriate (because it shamed the Marines).

Since the cases are widely distinct, I have no problem with the dichotomy of outcomes.

cthulhu on June 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM

Not one post yet about how cute the girl was who “won” this date? She had that fresh, wholesome look like someone who could have been in a Burt Bacharach music video (if, indeed, there had been music videos back in those mod, swinging days days).

Captain Scarlet on June 13, 2008 at 4:45 AM

I’ve seen similar or worse photos posted or linked to by Allahpundit and at AoSHQ.

Blake on June 13, 2008 at 5:11 AM

that being said I haven’t looked at all his stuff, I see it offered but I don’t see the need when so many of you and the media have described it. I believe, I have a pretty good picture of the content. as long as nothing is illegal in the content I see no issue.

I suggest you do take a look at it or go read Patterico. Almost all found the descriptions over blown and the photos humerous.

Blake on June 13, 2008 at 5:13 AM

The judge sounds like “Klaus” from “American Dad”.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2008 at 8:23 AM

Hey, anybody know how things worked out with his “flower” girl?

manwithblackhat on June 13, 2008 at 12:31 PM