The Free Trade Express
posted at 3:25 pm on June 12, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Jim Geraghty notices that John McCain has decided to engage in what could be called the Free Trade Express, or perhaps the America Will Keep Its Word Express. With Barack Obama criticizing NAFTA and demanding a renegotiation with Canada, and rejecting the Colombian free-trade agreement out of hand, McCain will attempt to reassure those American partners that he will strengthen ties rather than unravel them. McCain travels to both nations this summer to directly engage their citizens on America’s behalf:
Republican presidential nominee John McCain has sought and received an invitation to Ottawa to give a speech next week on free trade.
The Vietnam war hero’s presence in Canada’s national capital and his choice of subject matter is bound to revive controversy over the so-called NAFTA-gate affair, which embarrassed his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, earlier this year. …
Republican candidate John McCain will visit Colombia in July, according to a report in the country’s largest daily newspaper, El Tiempo, that was confirmed by Fox News.
The report says the Arizona senator’s one-day trip will include stops in Bogota, Medellin and Cartagena; he has plans to meet with President Alvaro Uribe to talk about trade and other issues of importance to Latin America. Colombia’s trade minister, Luis Guillermo Plata, was in Washington this week pushing for the stalled trade deal with the U.S., but Democratic lawmakers have made it clear they want to see a drop in violence in the country before approving the agreement.
This is a smart move. It makes McCain look presidential, gets him out of the country, and supporting free-trade initiatives in a high-profile manner. Especially in Colombia, this could help advance the interests of both nations. The agreement with the Uribe government may not be dead yet, and McCain could raise the profile of the treaty and put pressure on Congress to open the market to American businesses, especially with the economy struggling at the moment.
Canada gives the McCain campaign an opportunity to re-open the NAFTA Dance. He doesn’t even have to explicitly mention it; the press will provide the context of the Obama campaign’s attempt to play both ends of the protectionist street. McCain can present himself as a stalwart on free trade and gain considerable air time as the first presidential nominee to give a speech in Canada during an election campaign.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
BBC Reporter(!) gets right about Barack Obama..
Anita on June 12, 2008 at 3:31 PM
Will they though?
nailinmyeye on June 12, 2008 at 3:33 PM
“Democratic lawmakers have made it clear they want to see a drop in violence in the country before approving the agreement.”
Violence HAS dropped in almost every category since Uribe took over and the Democrats know it. Put that aside, wouldn’t an economically stimulative trade deal help Colombia create further gains against the violence situation? We hand out free foreign aid to ingrates across the planet, but we can’t help our closest Latin American ally strengthen its own economy?
Uribe doesn’t deserve this curb kick from Obama and other AFL-CIO controlled Democrats.
Golden Boy on June 12, 2008 at 3:34 PM
NAFTA?
Maybe your neck of the woods is living happily ever after with Canada. But I35 has a straight shot from Mexico through the US into Canada. Those of us sharing a border with Mexico aren’t so pleased with NAFTA.
Secure the borders.
Stop and inspect trucks.
Produce from Mexico needs certification before entering.
So do all the folks. Geez.
Of course Colombia deserves credit for improving their situation so dramatically, supporting the USA. Individual recognition per country status makes more sense than a blanket “we love you one america” deal.
maverick muse on June 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM
That was really interesting. Thanks for pointing it out.
nailinmyeye on June 12, 2008 at 3:38 PM
It’s a Grand Old Party.
He’ll be a Grand Old President.
jgapinoy on June 12, 2008 at 3:40 PM
I don’t mind free trade. I just want it to be FAIR and as written, NAFTA is not fair to the USA.
Sorry if it might miff some people/allies, but I want a FAIR playing field. Seems as simple as “what part of ILLEGAL don’t you understand?”
Oink on June 12, 2008 at 3:44 PM
Too bad that he seems to be mostly interested in trading “carbon credits”.
Hollowpoint on June 12, 2008 at 3:49 PM
That BBC guy seems to think that the purpose of the USA is to make the world at large feel good, hopeful even.
Well, maybe it does, sometimes. But that is NOT it’s purpose.
“…establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” covers it rather better.
(aside)
John: “…more perfect?…”
Ben: “Forget it, he’s on a roll…”
mojo on June 12, 2008 at 3:49 PM
Is he taking a handful of work visas with him?
BigD on June 12, 2008 at 3:50 PM
This just in: Columbian officials say the murder rate in D.C. must fall to 1965 levels before they will ink any deal.
Akzed on June 12, 2008 at 4:07 PM
I’m not worried about McCain leaving the country, it’s when he comes back that makes me nervous. I personally think that the Boarder Patrol should inspect his plane for the new lawn care staff that McCain is probably going down to get.
Snake307 on June 12, 2008 at 4:10 PM
What’s fair about forcing consumers to pay more for goods, just because they came from somewhere else?
Does California put tarrif’s on goods from other states because other states have lower cost of living and lower taxes?
MarkTheGreat on June 12, 2008 at 4:23 PM
Yeah, he’s all about free trade and free markets until he finds some industry he doesn’t like, you know, like petroleum. C’mon Ed, Free Trade Express? Really? Yeah, he’s leagues better than the Marxist Messiah, but to tout him as some stalwart on the market is just laughable. I get wanting to create a cute title for a post, but you’re making one hell of a stretch to do it.
doubleplusundead on June 12, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Mexico might be a problem, but there are benefits in staying on good trading terms with Canada. Since McCain doesn’t want to drill for oil in ANWR or the Grand Canyon, we might be able to trade for Canadian oil–at least the Canadians are not afraid to drill for it. With the Canadian climate, they’re forced to choose between A) Drill or B)Freeze, and they like Plan A better.
Steve Z on June 12, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Unions going to be ticked off… How do you reconcile the unions needs with America’s need? Simple unions come first.
tarpon on June 12, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Awesome!
Golden Boy on June 12, 2008 at 7:15 PM