Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


DeMint launches conservatives-only PAC

posted at 11:05 am on June 11, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Hot Air commenters have made clear their intent to avoid contributing to Republican PACs in favor of individual contributions to conservative candidates. Senator Jim DeMint has another solution: The Senate Conservatives Fund. He will launch this new PAC today, which will focus on candidates that support conservative policies, especially on spending and federalism. DeMint wants to promote candidates that will represent all three legs of the conservative platform — strong defense, limited spending, and traditional values:

When he calls donors to raise money for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint hears the same basic message that has vexed party fundraisers since the start of this election cycle: The Republican Party isn’t much to write home about, particularly not with a check enclosed.

The NRSC, which gives money to help GOP candidates for the Senate, badly trails its counterpart, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. The DSCC had raised $76.6 million and had $37.6 million on hand as of the last federal filing on April 30, while the NRSC had raised $47.9 million and had $19.4 million on hand.

But DeMint says that donors who might be reluctant to give their money to a party that has strayed from conservative principles may be willing to give to individual conservative candidates. He’s hoping those candidates can polish the tarnished brand and provide an alternative to the Democratic Party.

“It’s important that Republicans provide a clear, attractive contrast,” DeMint said in an interview at the NRSC headquarters on Capitol Hill.

So, DeMint is creating a new ‘leadership’ political action committee (PAC), the Senate Conservatives Fund, dedicated to nominating and electing conservative Republicans.

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? We’ve seen grassroots calls for withholding funds to the GOP PACs in protest over their inability to elect people who will stick to conservative principles. While individual contributions can boost specific candidates, the power of organized effort gets lost, and the protests are more difficult to discern.

This new PAC allows conservatives to be heard in the aggregate. Rather than hope that silence speaks louder than words, a significant fundraising effort by the SCF would demonstrate the desire of conservatives to financially support candidates who do not stray from limited government and who do not want to spend tax money in a manner which embarrasses drunken sailors. The SCF, if successful, could help find a stalwart class of conservative Senators like DeMint and Tom Coburn.

This could have a negative effect, as CQ Politics points out. The SCF might wind up weakening some Republican incumbents, or forcing primary contests in seats that the GOP would be hard pressed to hold. That only seems like a risk in this cycle, when Republicans will be the most vulnerable in the next three cycles. DeMint also says that he wants to avoid intraparty conflict with SCF, preferring it to be a positive channel for conservatives without necessarily damaging the party — at least in the short run.

Senator DeMint will join us tomorrow to talk about the Senate Conservative Fund on The Ed Morrissey Show at 3 pm ET.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Sounds like a good idea to me. I’ll gladly contribute.

AZCoyote on June 11, 2008 at 11:11 AM

Excellent.

amerpundit on June 11, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Count me in!

Theworldisnotenough on June 11, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Might consider the Club for Growth as well…it’s well established.

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/

Asher on June 11, 2008 at 11:18 AM

(mad scientist voice) Interesting. Very interesting. (/voice)

We’re overdue for a re-shuffle of the political deck, this could help.

Wonder if this PAC could support a conservative Dem against a RINO….

Mew

acat on June 11, 2008 at 11:19 AM

A few primary challenges is what the Republican Party needs.

Cicero43 on June 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Give me a list of names and positions. That might pry my frozen wallet open.

Limerick on June 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Taking back the party from the McCain moonbats one checkbook at a time!

highhopes on June 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM

GOP is the New Coke of politics.

ronsfi on June 11, 2008 at 11:22 AM

Outstanding. I will support this.

RushBaby on June 11, 2008 at 11:25 AM

I don’t buy it. Unless he’s willing to fund primary opponents to many of his collegues, this sounds like just another scam.

Sydney Carton on June 11, 2008 at 11:25 AM

I’m just gun-shy. One hand on the Bible, one eye on the preacher, one hand on my wallet.

Some would say bitter. I consider it prudent. Without details of who gets my money and for what they are getting it for then my wallet stays right where it is.

Limerick on June 11, 2008 at 11:29 AM

This could have a negative effect, as CQ Politics points out. The SCF might wind up weakening some Republican incumbents, or forcing primary contests in seats that the GOP would be hard pressed to hold.

I would suggest that any Republican senators who would be weakened by this are already weak.

This may be a stretch, but this situation strikes me as similar to something that happened to the United Way over the past 15 years or so in their corporate fundraising campaigns. Off the heels of a financial scandal, once they gave people a choice of whether they wanted their contribution to go to the United Way general fund or to be specifically targeted to a specific non-profit agency, people chose in droves to specifically target their money. They are still doing that, and as a result the United Way became much more transparent and accountable.

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM

I’ve refused the RNC for two years. I will support this with enthusiasm if it can move forward.

geminicontender on June 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM

Limerick on June 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Bingo… what would really happen?

The standard fund would still be used to elect RINOs, and would stop supporting Conservatives, because they would be getting support for this fund.

End result? Status Quo. Would just be a question of what account they wrote the check out of.

Romeo13 on June 11, 2008 at 11:34 AM

strong defense, limited spending, traditional values

..three principles McCain has consistently stood for his entire career.
But we’ve still got a bunch of all-or-nothing hyper-purists calling McCain a RINO & a liberal.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 11:43 AM

“When he calls donors to raise money for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint hears the same basic message that has vexed party fundraisers since the start of this election cycle: The Republican Party isn’t much to write home about, particularly not with a check enclosed.”

So they’re angry in South Carolina, but they still voted for Lindsey Grahamnesty. They may as well contribute money if they’re going to re-elect the second biggest RINO in the Senate. Idiots!

orlandocajun on June 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM

Finally. Where do I sign up?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 11, 2008 at 11:47 AM

strong defense, limited spending, traditional values

..three principles McCain has consistently stood for his entire career.
But we’ve still got a bunch of all-or-nothing hyper-purists calling McCain a RINO & a liberal.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 11:43 AM

I wouldn’t say that being critical of McCain’s position on free speech (that would campaign finance reform) and the rule of law (that would be amnesty for illegals) makes me an all or nothing hyper purist. And your name calling is kind of like the proverbial kettle and pot.

McCain called himself a liberal Republican (that would be the “easy there” speech)and by several Democrat accounts has flirted with switching parties, so why shouldn’t people call him a RINO and a liberal?

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 11:50 AM

I don’t buy it. Unless he’s willing to fund primary opponents to many of his collegues, this sounds like just another scam.

Sydney Carton on June 11, 2008 at 11:25 AM

He said he wouldn’t rule that out because we need to take back our party. I’ll wait until he actually calls out a target first though.

Buddahpundit on June 11, 2008 at 11:54 AM

I’m just gun-shy. One hand on the Bible, one eye on the preacher, one hand on my wallet.

Some would say bitter. I consider it prudent. Without details of who gets my money and for what they are getting it for then my wallet stays right where it is.

Limerick on June 11, 2008 at 11:29 AM

My position exactly.

a capella on June 11, 2008 at 11:58 AM

Is this Real Change We Can Believe In, conservative style? If we’re headed to the wilderness already might as well get the shake up of the party out of the way, sooner rather than later. I can support this.

pistolero on June 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM

McCain called himself a liberal

He said, “conservative, liberal Republican” & immediately caught himself & said, “Hello! Conservative.” It was like Obama saying “all 57 states”, but Obama didn’t catch himself.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM

McCain called himself a liberal Republican (that would be the “easy there” speech)and by several Democrat accounts has flirted with switching parties, so why shouldn’t people call him a RINO and a liberal?

He also said Putin was president of Germany, it is called a gaffe. And the key word in the accounts of his “switches” is Democat accounts.

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:04 PM

This could have a negative effect, as CQ Politics points out. The SCF might wind up weakening some Republican incumbents, or forcing primary contests in seats that the GOP would be hard pressed to hold.

I like the idea, but I think the money would be better put targeting weak or marginal Democratic seats.

irishspy on June 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM

I’m in.

p0s3r on June 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM

McCain called himself a liberal Republican (that would be the “easy there” speech)and by several Democrat accounts has flirted with switching parties, so why shouldn’t people call him a RINO and a liberal?

He also said Putin was president of Germany, it is called a gaffe. And the key word in the accounts of his “switches” is Democat accounts.

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:04 PM

Oh, silly me. You’re right, McCain is perfect.

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM

Never said that, was that a Freudian Slip? Are you a closet McCain Admirier? Let it go, your among friends here :)

The MDS is strong with you.

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:19 PM

BigD

Of course McCain is far from perfect. But he’s voted conservatively most of the time throughout his career, & he’s the only one who can beat Obamarxist.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Why bother with this stunt. Haven’t we been told repeatedly, even by Republican pundits, that conservatives have lost it already?

Esthier on June 11, 2008 at 12:27 PM

Looks like Ed added a link to the PAC site: http://www.senateconservatives.com

thankful on June 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM

The MDS is strong with you.

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:19 PM

Yes, I have admitted that.

Following is a quote from a George Will (who I think is a fellow MDS-er) column from last February. If you want to know what about McCain bugs MDS-er’s, in my opinion it is probably this:

“Such is his towering moral vanity, he seems sincerely to consider it theoretically impossible for him to commit the offenses of appearances that he incessantly ascribes to others.

Such certitude is, however, not merely an unattractive trait. It is disturbing righteousness in someone grasping for presidential powers.”

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 12:30 PM

Might consider the Club for Growth as well…it’s well established.

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/

Asher on June 11, 2008 at 11:18 AM

Club for Growth is open borders. Not for true Conservatives

bill30097 on June 11, 2008 at 12:31 PM

bill30097 on June 11, 2008 at 12:31 PM

Ahh the TC’s have returned.

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 12:30 PM

Yep. I agree with you. His greatest strength, which allowed him to survive captivity, is also his greatest weakness. Ironic.

JiangxiDad on June 11, 2008 at 12:35 PM

I’m planning on a “Great GOP Walkout” the day after the Republican convention officially nominates McCain. I would love to have hundreds (thousdands?) of GOP members leave the party, all on the same day. But that’s all the self-promotion I feel comfortable doing here …

Ludwig on June 11, 2008 at 12:42 PM

This oould be the first step in bringing conservative thought back to the public arena. My check is in the mail.

volsense on June 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Ludwig on June 11, 2008 at 12:42 PM

Lovely

Squid Shark on June 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Unless DeMint names names on who is certainly not qualified for the money, e.g. McCain, look for limited success.

Better to just give the money directly to Inhoffe.

Valiant on June 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM

One hand on the Bible, one eye on the preacher, one hand on my wallet.

Some would call you a “clinger.” ;-0

Seriously, I like the concept but I agree with you. Republicans have been duped far too many times to take anybody on face value alone.

highhopes on June 11, 2008 at 12:45 PM

Cap’n,
Do we have a website for donations yet? I’ll gladly contribute

E9RET on June 11, 2008 at 12:47 PM

As much as I do not like McCain, he is the only one of the two to ever vote for a conservative issue. Obama is the most liberal candidate to ever run for the presidency. How does the leadership of this nation sink to these depths?

volsense on June 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM

E9RET: http://www.senateconservatives.com

thankful on June 11, 2008 at 12:53 PM

..three principles McCain has consistently stood for his entire career.
But we’ve still got a bunch of all-or-nothing hyper-purists calling McCain a RINO & a liberal.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 11:43 AM

And there it is! What do you call the opposite of those willing to critique John McCain (aka the MDS crowd by the lesser enlightened)?

A Stepford Supporter? A McCain Moonbat? RINOs for Change? Intolerant prig?

Jgapinoy, you are the one being intellectually dishonest here. John McCain is not a conservative, has not held true to traditional Republican values, has been a political Judas on countless occassions. Why do people like you get so hot and bothered when it is pointed out that John McCain is a liberal RINO who is not representive of the majority of the GOP?

Hell! John McCain doesn’t even want conservatives in the party and he really doesn’t want those “Jesus freak” evangelicals hanging around! McCain has made it very clear that he intends to win the election by appealing to right-of-Obama Democrats and could care less about traditional GOP values and principles. There is no reason for you to get all upset when others only point out the truth about McCain’s positions vis-a-vis the Republican party.

highhopes on June 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM

Oh, silly me. You’re right, McCain is perfect.

BigD on June 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM

Kool-aid kicking in?

highhopes on June 11, 2008 at 12:58 PM

SCF Sounds like a great Idea to me!

while I can’t afford much, I just donated 25 bucks via paypal. Go Get ‘em DeMint!

wearyman on June 11, 2008 at 12:59 PM

If that DeMint fellow keeps on, we might get our first president from South Carolina. Andrew Jackson was born in SC, and had a South Carolinian for Vice-President (Calhoun), but was elected from Tennessee.

DeMint in 2012!

backwoods conservative on June 11, 2008 at 1:02 PM

’bout time.

moxie_neanderthal on June 11, 2008 at 1:02 PM

McCain is not a conservative. He is trying to take the Republican party in a different direction that he believes will lead to winning more elections. The problem is he tried this in 2000 and lost to George Bush, who promptly won two elections in years that Democrats probably should have won. Bush won by expanding the base and appealing to it for the most part. McCain thinks he can win by abandoning much of the base and winning over more previously Democratic votes than he loses from the base.

It’s a nice theory, but a total crapshoot. He’s very lucky the Democrats nominated Barack Obama.

rockmom on June 11, 2008 at 1:05 PM

volsense on June 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM

John McCain hangs out with the Susan Collins, Olympia Snow, Chuck Grassley, Lincoln Chafee kind of “Republican.” I honestly don’t know that I agree with you that he is any better than Obama just because once upon a time he might have voted the same way the conservatives (i.e. his party) was voting.

It bothers me greatly that his apologists on this site will go on and on about what a wonderful human being McCain is without once broaching the subjects of McCain’s theft of Constitutional rights, his no-questions-asked amnesty scheme, his open borders position on national security, his repeated undermining of the GOP administration, his out-of-control temper tantrums against Rumsfeld over procurement contracts, etc….

If they are going to defend John McCain they need to be at least honest about what the GOP is selling this election year. John McCain is not a conservative and he appears to be downright hostile toward traditional GOP values. He is a liberal RINO who wants to win the election by getting Hillary Clinton’s supporters and he is willing to throw the GOP under the bus to do so. That’s who John McCain is. Shame on us for letting the fraud get the nomination. Shame on McCain supporters for continuing to lie about the credentials of their candidate!

highhopes on June 11, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Nice timing considering I made the same statement yesterday about forming a conservatives only group.

Just like the Republican party to take credit for others ideas.

But will at least hear this plan before I dismiss it as the same old empty promises as before.

William Amos on June 11, 2008 at 1:06 PM

Good idea, but I trust nobody in the “Republican party” anymore. I need to see actual results and specific plans for action.

Meanwhile, absolutely no money or support of any kind for RNC (RINOS, Not Conservatives)!!! And I’ll send my checks directly to candidates with explicit instructions that they NOT be shared with others.

landlines on June 11, 2008 at 1:32 PM

It would have to show it’s veracity, show that it won’t become the refuge of scoundrels. Meaning: this is still the Senate we are talking about, and Senators. If it shows any viability, any worth as a PAC, every no-account lime-liberal Republican will want to have his name attached. As cover so they can go about business as usual.
“Sure, I’ll wear the flagpin!”

Doug on June 11, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Hey, I contributed to the cause via Fred Thompson, so would be willing to do so again, particularly if the conservative legislators named by the PAC determine to vote as a block. That’s worth a donation or two.

I’m still touting my HOPE that the GOP will only pay for their POTUS candidate McCain to run on Thompson’s platform. The conservative platform is already spelled out and already reached a lot of attentive listeners whether or not they felt the author had enough fire in the belly. Finishing touches via Thompson’s platform would save a lot of time, arguments, dissent and taxes. Should he become the VP, it would also curb Romney’s socialist government sponsored projects from further eroding the conservative’s trademark of the smaller, leaner fighting machine used to incisively make government function according to Constitutional standards instead of Progressive wish lists, INCLUDING the wrong stuff from RINO “compassionate” federal thievery forcing tax payers to pay for corrupt business failures through bail-outs. At least shell out a widows mite or furrow a mustard seed for the PAC.

maverick muse on June 11, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Powerful people no longer see things straight because their lives have become too insulated. Such is McCain’s bain. In all the years he has been plotting towards his presidential run, I wonder if he has noted himself, perhaps in a journal, his reasons for decisions–beyond the public hype. I remember when Carl Hayden and Barry Goldwater retired noting that what had been Arizona’s own rooted sons were wiped aside for a transplant, a very particular POW. McCain had so much to prove then. So which McCain is the real mccoy? Has he been toying with democrats just to foil them in the end? Nah. wishful thinking

maverick muse on June 11, 2008 at 1:53 PM

I love Jim DeMint. He is a rare specimen, a man of integrity who is also a politician. I am in NC, and he is in SC, but he is quite visible. I think this is a fine plan, though my preference would be to start a third party called something like the “small government” party, in which conservatives and libertarians, and others, come together to begin the process of dismantling the horrid bloated machine that our goverment has become, before we take any steps to pass new laws that we think will make society better. Time to stop enabling all the crap they do by allowing our money to be taken and used badly. Time to remember it is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, not people wishing the GOVERNMENT would treat them fairly. Jim DeMint is just the kinda guy who could do it, too. Go Jim!

Peggy Snow Cahill on June 11, 2008 at 1:57 PM

It bothers me greatly that his apologists on this site will go on and on about what a wonderful human being McCain is without once broaching the subjects of McCain’s theft of Constitutional rights, his no-questions-asked amnesty scheme, his open borders position on national security, his repeated undermining of the GOP administration, his out-of-control temper tantrums against Rumsfeld over procurement contracts, etc…. highhopes 1:05 pm

Evidently you are a late comer. We have been through the McCain vetting already during the preseason and primaries. Vomit is no good to anything but a dog. More often than not, it’s a matter of anger management in not desiring to kick the dead horse just to make a newby happy. Go on if you must. But the chorus is busy thinking how to get what we need, not wasting too much effort whining the same ol’ same ol’ on cue. That’s a given.

maverick muse on June 11, 2008 at 2:00 PM

It could be a first step in the right direction.

Although I’m very skeptical about anything that comes from D.C., I will look at it.

Indy Conservative on June 11, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Why bother with this stunt. Haven’t we been told repeatedly, even by Republican pundits, that conservatives have lost it already?

Esthier on June 11, 2008 at 12:27 PM

Maybe DeMint wants to fight to move forward rather than sit back and whine and suck his thumb?

funky chicken on June 11, 2008 at 2:06 PM

Just sent them this e-pistle:

Greetings:

I didn’t see “Climate Realism” on your issues list.

But it is critical to stop the stampede toward taxation and regulation of ‘carbon’ because of the ‘global warming’ hoax. Otherwise we’ll see American growth and prosperity stopped in its tracks.

Sen. Jim Inhofe should be high on your list of candidates for funding.

I’m interested. Show me you’re serious.

MrLynn on June 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM

I hope they consider supporting Steve Pearce in NM and Bob Schaffer in CO. Both are running against Udalls. The Udall family is a bunch of revolting wankers…shudder.

It would just be lovely to see the whole Udall family crying in their beers this November.

funky chicken on June 11, 2008 at 2:22 PM

Senator DeMint has enough chips built up that I am more than willing to listen to what he has to say. This is one Texan who believes the Senator has great potential.

8straight on June 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM

DeMint for president.
his principal stand on immigration alone will be enough to get my vote and my money.

unseen on June 11, 2008 at 2:53 PM

This I will contribute to. I’ve been hanging onto my checkbook for months because I didn’t want to contribute to some of the losers that populate the Republican party. I’ve sent contributions to individual Representatives and Senators, but it’s a little hard to sort out who is who.

Fortunately, I trust Jim DeMint, and will continue to do so until and unless he proves that I can’t.

hachiban on June 11, 2008 at 2:54 PM

HATCH ASKS ENERGY COMMITTEE TO LIFT MORATORIUM ON OIL SHALE DEVELOPMENT

Washington – Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) today called on the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources to lift a moratorium that essentially bars the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from leasing land for commercial oil shale development.

During his testimony, Hatch also presented a letter from Utah Gov. Jon M. Huntsman Jr., who asked committee members in the letter to lift the oil shale-lease moratorium, calling it a “matter of great importance for Utah and the nation.”

Hatch also submitted a written statement to the committee in which he stated his stand on oil shale and asked committee members about their stand.

“The question . . . for the members of this committee, and I should add, for the Democratic leadership of Congress, is whether you will adopt the anti-oil agenda of the environmental movement as an element of your own energy policy.” Hatch said in the statement. “So far, I have heard of proposals to tax successful energy production, to investigate the oil futures markets, to ban Canadian oil imports in favor of oil from Venezuela, Russia, and the Middle East, and to call for delay after delay in the commercial production of oil shale. … These policies would not produce one drop of oil.”

The moratorium was imposed as part of the Consolidated Appropriation Act of 2008 and it inconsistent with the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT), which directed the BLM to lease several tracts of federal oil-shale land for research and to issue commercial-leasing regulations.

Hatch said oil shale and tar sand development are more economical, environmentally responsible and require less water than ethanol production. What’s more, he told committee members, Utah and Colorado have between 800 billion and two trillion barrels of recoverable oil.

Because the U.S. is so dependent on foreign oil, the senator added, the nation is sending “$600 billion overseas, often to countries that are our enemies. We need to use that money for development” of domestic oil to meet our energy needs.

“We need to wake up and stop sending money to our enemies throughout the world,” Hatch said.

funky chicken on June 11, 2008 at 3:05 PM

At first blush, I thought, yeah, sign me up… But then I thought, NO;. No more groups of Senators, (even if they are pretty good guys like DeMint) getting my money and passing it out according to what THEY decide, and actually filtering OUT my message.

Nope, I’m just going to continue to to give directly to the guys I support, and continue to tell them directly what I expect from them.

Why add another bureaucratic layer that can pass out your money to someone that you may not want to support…. After raking off their operating expenses and rather than delivering YOUR message, delivering the groupthink message of the committee bosses.

Washington Committees are one of the things that are killing this country.

LegendHasIt on June 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM

funky chicken on June 11, 2008 at 3:05 PM

GOOD FOR HATCH!!!

Too bad the guy running for President can’t come up with any concrete solutions… or at least steps in the right direction… like this.

Of course when the guy’s agenda is 179 degrees opposite of ACTUALLY achieving reasonably priced energy, offering platitudes about weaning off foreign oil while throwing roadblocks into achieving it are about the best you could expect.

LegendHasIt on June 11, 2008 at 4:35 PM

I hope they consider supporting Steve Pearce in NM and Bob Schaffer in CO. Both are running against Udalls. The Udall family is a bunch of revolting wankers…shudder.
It would just be lovely to see the whole Udall family crying in their beers this November.
funky chicken on June 11, 2008 at 2:22 PM

WORD!!!!
(in the vernacular)

Steve Pearce is the one bright spot in my political horizon. Even though he would make a superb Senator,I almost hated to see him risk his Congressional seat for the senate run, because he could keep that seat for as long as he wanted it without breaking a sweat. Winning the entire state however will be a hard row to hoe since all of the liberals from the north half of the state and all of the illegal aliens that Gov. Richardson (essentially) gave voting rights to will be voting for Udall….Twice..

I’ll have to look into Schaffer. Don’t know anything about him, but he might be a good way to invest a few bucks.

LegendHasIt on June 11, 2008 at 4:55 PM

GOP is the New Coke of politics.

The Grand New Party?

aengus on June 11, 2008 at 5:41 PM

Limited government, strong defense, traditional values, while corner stones, are not all that is needed.

Increased domestic energy, (I don’t like the phrase energy independence… not possible), and border security, and immigration reform… meaning making it easier to immigrate legally and harder to immigrate illegally. So unless McCain and other squishes can come around on ANWR, and offshore dilling, and securing the borders then it makes supporting them financially very difficult.

My own senator Norm Coleman has shrunk from a ACU rating of 68 in 06 to a 64 in 08, is one of them. He votes correctly fairly often, but messes up on big votes. Just this week he voted with the Dems on “punishing the oil companies” for doing what they are supposed to be doing. Can’t vote for Franken, and will likely vote for him, I don’t have to send him any money.

Dasher on June 11, 2008 at 7:34 PM

Of course McCain is far from perfect. But he’s voted conservatively most of the time throughout his career except for the really big, important issues, & he’s the only one who can beat Obamarxist left to vote for.

jgapinoy on June 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Fixed it for you.

fossten on June 11, 2008 at 9:50 PM

Color me skeptical.

I like the idea of being able to support only conservative politicians, yet I distrust anything coming from any Washington insider. Recent history shows us that our current crop of craptastic politicians can screw up a free meal, and that is why my money will stay in my wallet … for now.

Never forget this. Give Washington the job of building a simple mouse, then after being subject to Washington intrusiveness which gets you several plan revisions, the lowest bidding contractor, cost over-runs, more plan revisions, and then when everything is finally said and done [a decade later] they deliver to you … A Donkeyphant.

DannoJyd on June 11, 2008 at 11:47 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.