So is the new Democrat Presidential nominee qualified to become the President of the United States?
Just ask the Democrats…
Clinton spokesman, Howard Wolfson
“Senator Obama is a fabulous orator, but we need more than words. We don’t n…

Just because someone is articulate doesn’t mean they are smart or correct; and in the same fashion, someone who isn’t articulate is not necessarily ignorant or stupid. Any adult who has spent significant time outside of the shadows of the Ivory Tower knows this.

In academia, from which Obama heralds, the ability to make a persuasive argument is equivalent, or even superior, to making a logical or correct argument. Being correct doesn’t matter when truth or reality is relative.

Watch Obama when he’s speaking to the Jewish audience – he can barely look them in the eye.

How can so many people be fooled by such a poseur?

D2Boston on June 7, 2008 at 12:09 PM

Reference the Reichstag elections of 1933.

That’s how.

(Nice piece Sean H.)

If other media outlets are ignoring such information or not examining its relevance, then they have ceased to serve a function in informing the electorate.

onlineanalyst on June 7, 2008 at 8:10 PM

When did they ever do that?
Their purpose has always been to seek power and influence over the masses, whilst making a profit. Any stance taken by an individual outlet has always been designed to control a particular demographic, taking into account what stance would “sell” well with said group.

TODAY’S HOT POTATO:

Taken from article: Obama: J’lem must remain an undivided capital

Talkback #: 37

Talkbacker: Rudy – Mtz. calif

Text: Send Obama a map of Jerusalem. Outline the boundary line, and place an X where the US embassy will be. Have him sign and date it with witnesses from the Israeli govt. Then you have some credibility to his statement

(This is a warning, disavowing me of inducing any outlandish side-effects from bringing up the following point:)

The intro and outro music of that Hannity segment was a little too reminiscent of “Chocolate Rain.”

(You were warned..)

aikidoka on June 7, 2008 at 9:00 PM

You are correct, and most of them seem to be in the freak-show parades and demonstrations in San Francisco, as captured by zombie’s photgraphic genius. Like Nancy Pelosi, they are just another “treat”. (Speaking of whom: Canada has reached a trade agreement with Colombia while our own Pelosi-led Congress sets back international relationships with Queenie’s refusal to back the administration’s efforts to engage our nation with a similar agreement. Check out the powerline thread.)

If other media outlets are ignoring such information or not examining its relevance, then they have ceased to serve a function in informing the electorate.
onlineanalyst on June 7, 2008 at 8:10 PM

Spot on as usual onlineanalyst… All of these relationships with “really bad people that really don’t like America” have been vetted by the NEW MEDIA; I can’t think of one single revelation regarding Obama that was brought forward by the MSM. The MSM (with all of it’s components) have ceased to serve a function in informing the electorate; in fact, the MSM actually manufactured phony evidence regarding a Republican candidate in an all out attempt to control the outcome of a presidential election in 2004. Not only have the MSM failed to perform the designed duties, the MSM has been busted committing acts of treason by leaking classified top-secret operations while our country is at war.

What the f***… What are we going to do about this? Talk about getting your eyes poked out while handcuffed! The MSM has been allowed to operate “above the law” for so many years now, we have created an absolute freak-n monster. This is pure bullshit. Our sons & daughters are fighting and dying to protect our freedom and liberty, and we allow this crap to go on unfettered.

Red State
(via Soren Dayton)
Hot Air
by Ed Morrissey
We have written on the network of radicals attached to Barack Obama’s political and public career, and perhaps none carry the impact of Rashid Khalidi. Barack Obama tried to shrug off Khalidi as a …

Because for the last 7 years, day in and day out, they have been fed a steady stream of disinformation and propaganda about how hellishly bad everything is.

drunyan8315 on June 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM

I hope that your point is a criticism of the brain-dead media, who can’t distinguish fact from opinion.

Did anyone else pick up on the information that the Ayers-Khalidi Woods Foundation support was occuring in 2001 and 2002, the very time when America was coming out of its snooze that Islamic terrorism is a deadly threat.

Ayers and Khalidi “enjoy” special privilege in academia, and their propaganda is infecting students with deceptive propaganda and disinformation. They are symptomatic of the rot that threatens critical thinking because they champion anti-American philosophy while not permitting or offering a counterweight of ideas. Like Ward Churchill, they use their positions and (in some cases supposed) credentials to indoctrinate the naive.

It’s too bad that Hannity is viewed with such skepticism by the Left. He is being treated as a Cassandra, whose warnings are ignored though they should be heeded. If other media outlets are ignoring such information or not examining its relevance, then they have ceased to serve a function in informing the electorate.

An Obamanation will be an abomination.

This is who Obama is, but the sheeple don’t care. They just want change.

Because for the last 7 years, day in and day out, they have been fed a steady stream of disinformation and propaganda about how hellishly bad everything is.