Hillary’s free-market enthusiasm?
posted at 11:40 am on June 6, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Not enthusiasm for free markets, mind you, but her likely insistence on a free-market value for her enthusiasm. Hillary Clinton will concede the nomination to Barack Obama tomorrow, but the question of how much energy she puts into his campaign may depend on how much cash Obama puts into her bank accounts. And even if she gets her millions, she may be angling for another run in four years:
In politics, money talks. And money is likely to be an important factor in discussions between Barack Obama’s advisers and the debt-saddled Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign.
Clinton will likely seek help from Obama in retiring her massive campaign debt, which has swollen to more than $30 million, including $11 million she lent the effort, advisers said Thursday.
The former first lady, who plans to bow out of the race and endorse Obama on Saturday, told donors she will raise money for Obama’s campaign, both to help the Democratic Party’s cash position and to expand the Illinois senator’s prodigious fundraising base. Her advisers estimate the former first lady could bring in $50 million to $100 million for the general election campaign — and much more if she were named Obama’s running mate.
When the last figures were announced, Barack Obama had $40 million in the bank, as compared to McCain’s $21 million. If Obama attempts to retire all of Hillary’s debt, he will find himself shorthanded at a time when his own campaign fundraising has tailed off. Since his peak in February of $50 million, he took $40 million and $32 million in each successive month. Unless he reversed that trend in May, he can hardly afford to give away three-quarters of his cash on hand.
Undoubtedly, this was one of the subjects discussed in their one-on-one meeting last night at Hillary Clinton’s DC house:
One way to retire the debt would be to combine the campaigns by adding Hillary to the ticket. Unfortunately for Hillary, there is no way Obama will want to have her and Bill on his back for the next few months, let alone the next few years. Jazz Shaw gives this a humorous slap:
More and more reports are accumulating which indicate that Hillary may have known exactly what pound of flesh she expects in return for her gracious party loyalty and sincere efforts to bring her army of voters into the Obama camp. It would seem that she wants Obama to name her as the vice president and to pay off all the bills she ran up in her own run.
I wonder if perhaps she would like Obama Girl to stop by every week to give her a pedicure as well?
She will have to horsetrade for the debt relief some other way. Obama has a lot of healing to do with Hillary’s supporters, and if he leaves her twisting in the wind, they’re unlikely to forgive his “sexist” campaigning style any time soon. And they may not be inclined to forgive anyway, as they may see a Hillary run in 2012 after a single McCain term the best of all possible worlds. As Andrew Malcolm notes at the LA Times blog Top of the Ticket, that appears to be one interpretation of her e-mail valediction:
She’s going to run again. Put that in the bank.
One, political operations don’t make this kind of investment and rapid response without another motive; manners by themselves are too expensive and time-consuming. And, two, re-read the seventh paragraph: “I know as I continue my lifelong work for a stronger America and a better world, I will turn to you for the support,” etc. You’re in her data bank right now for future reference and use. Count on it.
In 2004, many people wondered if the Clintons didn’t secretly hold back support for John Kerry in order to position Hillary for this 2008 run. They may try the same strategy again and run on the “I told you so” theme in 2012.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I saved an aricle that ran last summer in the New York Daily News with this headline: Hil Keeps Foot on GOP Neck. Sadly, the restaurant where I read that story is gone. As far as I’m concerned, so is the Daily News.
mymanpotsandpans on June 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM
He may not understand that she can do all kinds of things to Obama if he doesn’t play ball. Doe’s Anita Hill have a younger cousin?
RBMN on June 6, 2008 at 11:53 AM
All anyone might need to do is publicly ask him how much he REALLY believes in ’shared prosperity’. He should put his money where his mouth is and since he has raised so much money, he should give half of it to Hillary.
For that matter, he should give half of his money to McCain due to his ‘radical’ (communist) stance on ’shared prosperity’. I really should be getting paid for my advice here. Not that I think that McCain would take it because he’s arrogant enough to believe that he knows more than anyone else.
But his argument shouldn’t be for Obama to become more liberal and raid tax dollars for his campaign. His argument should be that if Obama really believes in ’shared prosperity’, then he should split campaign contributions evenly among the candidates – including the Republicans.
I should be debating Obama instead of McCain. McCain isn’t quite sure what decade it is.
ThackerAgency on June 6, 2008 at 11:57 AM
If Hillary wants to run in 2012 then she sure as hell better make sure that Obama doesn’t win in 2008; no way she would stand a chance against the incumbent Messiah.
Even if Obama were to win this November and have a horrible first term, the nation will swing to the GOP next time around.
She HAS to sabotage the guy.
Bishop on June 6, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Palin/Jindal ‘12
Connie on June 6, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Is it LEGAL for Obama to use the campaign funds that people donated to HIM, for Hillary?
Let her PAY HER OWN DEBTS, she ran them up, she owes them.
Barack, find another girl.
OR, will Barack choose Hillary and trumpet: THREE FOR THE PRICE OF ONE…er two
originalpechanga on June 6, 2008 at 12:00 PM
If her motives are soooo obvious he should let her hang. Why pay off her debts if she’s still going to f’k you. If behind closed doors she wants her debts paid for intended support he should go public and finally drive that stake all the way through. The key however is to do it at sunrise.
I don’t think he has the huevos.
patrick neid on June 6, 2008 at 12:10 PM
In response to some e-mails already received since Ed linked to my post on this, the Obama Girl reference had NOTHING to do with lesbians. If there is some secret gay/lesbian code out there about “pedicures” I apologize, but I was unaware of it. My GLBT codespeak is woefully out of date.
Jazz Shaw on June 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM
To those who are most fortunate come the greatest responsibilities. It is only fair for both Obama and Clinton to contribute their fair share to those most in need, the least represented and most vulnerable among us, John McCain.
moxie_neanderthal on June 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Hillary wants her bills paid. Whether Barry will cover her personal part of the bill is probably a big bone of contention. He’ll pay off the rest of the debt in exchange for her ’support’. As for her wanting to be VP? No way. IF he were elected president, she knows his administration will be a disaster. She won’t want to be part of that. The hanging chad is that if Barry’s administration goes down in flames, would the Dimocrats throw him under the bus and push Hillary in 2012? An even bigger question would be that if Barry’s administration tanked, would the American public be inclined to give the Dim’s a ’second chance’?
GarandFan on June 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM
Sucking the cash out of the Obama campaign is a key tactic for the Hillary’12 campaign.
pedestrian on June 6, 2008 at 1:45 PM
Comment pages: